aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/stdlib/doc/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/stdlib/doc/src')
-rw-r--r--lib/stdlib/doc/src/filename.xml6
-rw-r--r--lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_event.xml17
-rw-r--r--lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_server.xml10
-rw-r--r--lib/stdlib/doc/src/io_protocol.xml22
-rw-r--r--lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml2
5 files changed, 35 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/filename.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/filename.xml
index bc3a616d39..9296319b83 100644
--- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/filename.xml
+++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/filename.xml
@@ -295,6 +295,12 @@
<p>Finds the source filename and compiler options for a module.
The result can be fed to <c>compile:file/2</c> in order to
compile the file again.</p>
+
+ <warning><p>We don't recommend using this function. If possible,
+ use <seealso marker="beam_lib">beam_lib(3)</seealso> to extract
+ the abstract code format from the BEAM file and compile that
+ instead.</p></warning>
+
<p>The <c><anno>Beam</anno></c> argument, which can be a string or an atom,
specifies either the module name or the path to the source
code, with or without the <c>".erl"</c> extension. In either
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_event.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_event.xml
index 24bcb419fe..79a0c8ad89 100644
--- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_event.xml
+++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_event.xml
@@ -195,12 +195,13 @@ gen_event:stop -----> Module:terminate/2
handlers using the same callback module.</p>
<p><c>Args</c> is an arbitrary term which is passed as the argument
to <c>Module:init/1</c>.</p>
- <p>If <c>Module:init/1</c> returns a correct value, the event
- manager adds the event handler and this function returns
+ <p>If <c>Module:init/1</c> returns a correct value indicating
+ successful completion, the event manager adds the event
+ handler and this function returns
<c>ok</c>. If <c>Module:init/1</c> fails with <c>Reason</c> or
- returns an unexpected value <c>Term</c>, the event handler is
+ returns <c>{error,Reason}</c>, the event handler is
ignored and this function returns <c>{'EXIT',Reason}</c> or
- <c>Term</c>, respectively.</p>
+ <c>{error,Reason}</c>, respectively.</p>
</desc>
</func>
<func>
@@ -448,12 +449,13 @@ gen_event:stop -----> Module:terminate/2
</section>
<funcs>
<func>
- <name>Module:init(InitArgs) -> {ok,State} | {ok,State,hibernate}</name>
+ <name>Module:init(InitArgs) -> {ok,State} | {ok,State,hibernate} | {error,Reason}</name>
<fsummary>Initialize an event handler.</fsummary>
<type>
<v>InitArgs = Args | {Args,Term}</v>
<v>&nbsp;Args = Term = term()</v>
<v>State = term()</v>
+ <v>Reason = term()</v>
</type>
<desc>
<p>Whenever a new event handler is added to an event manager,
@@ -470,8 +472,9 @@ gen_event:stop -----> Module:terminate/2
the argument provided in the function call/return tuple and
<c>Term</c> is the result of terminating the old event handler,
see <c>gen_event:swap_handler/3</c>.</p>
- <p>The function should return <c>{ok,State}</c> or <c>{ok,State, hibernate}</c>
- where <c>State</c> is the initial internal state of the event handler.</p>
+ <p>If successful, the function should return <c>{ok,State}</c>
+ or <c>{ok,State,hibernate}</c> where <c>State</c> is the
+ initial internal state of the event handler.</p>
<p>If <c>{ok,State,hibernate}</c> is returned, the event
manager will go into hibernation (by calling <seealso
marker="proc_lib#hibernate/3">proc_lib:hibernate/3</seealso>),
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_server.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_server.xml
index 1045766e01..edeb7dff91 100644
--- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_server.xml
+++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_server.xml
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<erlref>
<header>
<copyright>
- <year>1996</year><year>2010</year>
+ <year>1996</year><year>2011</year>
<holder>Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.</holder>
</copyright>
<legalnotice>
@@ -570,13 +570,14 @@ gen_server:abcast -----> Module:handle_cast/2
</desc>
</func>
<func>
- <name>Module:code_change(OldVsn, State, Extra) -> {ok, NewState}</name>
+ <name>Module:code_change(OldVsn, State, Extra) -> {ok, NewState} | {error, Reason}</name>
<fsummary>Update the internal state during upgrade/downgrade.</fsummary>
<type>
<v>OldVsn = Vsn | {down, Vsn}</v>
<v>&nbsp;&nbsp;Vsn = term()</v>
<v>State = NewState = term()</v>
<v>Extra = term()</v>
+ <v>Reason = term()</v>
</type>
<desc>
<p>This function is called by a gen_server when it should
@@ -595,7 +596,10 @@ gen_server:abcast -----> Module:handle_cast/2
<p><c>State</c> is the internal state of the gen_server.</p>
<p><c>Extra</c> is passed as-is from the <c>{advanced,Extra}</c>
part of the update instruction.</p>
- <p>The function should return the updated internal state.</p>
+ <p>If successful, the function shall return the updated
+ internal state.</p>
+ <p>If the function returns <c>{error,Reason}</c>, the ongoing
+ upgrade will fail and roll back to the old release.</p>
</desc>
</func>
<func>
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/io_protocol.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/io_protocol.xml
index 3e8ab1affc..0ff3d5c1ee 100644
--- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/io_protocol.xml
+++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/io_protocol.xml
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ current I/O-protocol.</p>
and execution time efficiency has triggered extensions to the protocol
over the years, making the protocol larger and somewhat less easy to
implement than the original. It can certainly be argumented that the
-current protocol is to complex, but this text describes how it looks
+current protocol is too complex, but this text describes how it looks
today, not how it should have looked.</p>
-<p>The basic ideas from the original protocol still holds. The io_server
+<p>The basic ideas from the original protocol still hold. The io_server
and client communicate with one single, rather simplistic protocol and
no server state is ever present in the client. Any io_server can be
used together with any client code and client code need not be aware
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ of the actual device the io_server communicates with.</p>
<section>
<title>Protocol basics</title>
-<p>As described in Roberts paper, servers and clients communicate using
+<p>As described in Robert's paper, servers and clients communicate using
io_request/io_reply tuples as follows:</p>
<p><em>{io_request, From, ReplyAs, Request}</em><br/>
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Reply part.</p>
<em>{put_chars, Encoding, Module, Function, Args}</em>
</p>
<list type="bulleted">
-<item>Encoding is either 'latin1' or 'unicode', meaning that the
+<item>Encoding is either 'unicode' or 'latin1', meaning that the
characters are (in case of binaries) encoded as either UTF-8 or
iso-latin-1 (pure bytes). A well behaved io_server should also
return error if list elements contain integers > 255 when the
@@ -116,13 +116,13 @@ Reply part.</p>
produces. Note that byte-oriented data is simplest sent using latin1
Encoding</item>
-<item>Characters are the data to be put on the device. If encoding is
- latin1, this is an iolist(). If encoding is unicode, this is an
+<item>Characters are the data to be put on the device. If Encoding is
+ latin1, this is an iolist(). If Encoding is unicode, this is an
Erlang standard mixed unicode list (one integer in a list per
character, characters in binaries represented as UTF-8).</item>
<item>Module, Function, Args denotes a function which will be called to
- produce the data (like io_lib:format), Args is a list of arguments
+ produce the data (like io_lib:format). Args is a list of arguments
to the function. The function should produce data in the given
Encoding. The io_server should call the function as apply(Mod, Func,
Args) and will put the returned data on the device as if it was sent
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ latin1, Module, Function, Args} respectively. </p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>Encoding denotes how data is to be sent back to the client and
what data is sent to the function denoted by
- Module/Function/Arity. If the function supplied returns data as a
+ Module/Function/ExtraArgs. If the function supplied returns data as a
list, the data is converted to this encoding. If however the
function supplied returns data in some other format, no conversion
can be done and it's up to the client supplied function to return
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ latin1, Module, Function, Args} respectively. </p>
<item>Prompt is a list of characters (not mixed, no binaries) or an atom()
to be output as a prompt for input on the device. The Prompt is
often ignored by the io_server and a Prompt set to '' should always
- be ignored (and result in nothing being written to the device). </item>
+ be ignored (and result in nothing being written to the device).</item>
<item><p>Module, Function, ExtraArgs denotes a function and arguments to
determine when enough data is written. The function should take two
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ request({get_line, Encoding, _Prompt}, State) -&gt;
</code>
<p>Here we have cheated a little by more or less only implementing
-get_until and using internal helpers to implement get__chars and
+get_until and using internal helpers to implement get_chars and
get_line. In production code, this might be to inefficient, but that
of course depends on the frequency of the different requests. Before
we start actually implementing the functions put_chars/2 and
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ encounter an error or the list is exhausted. The last return value is
sent back to the client (it's first returned to the main loop and then
sent back by the function io_reply).</p>
-<p>The getopt and setopt requests is also simple to handle, we just
+<p>The getopt and setopt requests are also simple to handle, we just
change or read our state record:</p>
<code>
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml
index 0fa7de0a5c..a7e010a05f 100644
--- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml
+++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
<title>Standard Unicode representation in Erlang</title>
<p>In Erlang, strings are actually lists of integers. A string is defined to be encoded in the ISO-latin-1 (ISO8859-1) character set, which is, codepoint by codepoint, a sub-range of the Unicode character set.</p>
<p>The standard list encoding for strings is therefore easily extendible to cope with the whole Unicode range: A Unicode string in Erlang is simply a list containing integers, each integer being a valid Unicode codepoint and representing one character in the Unicode character set.</p>
-<p>Regular Erlang strings in ISO-latin-1 are a subset of there Unicode strings.</p>
+<p>Regular Erlang strings in ISO-latin-1 are a subset of their Unicode strings.</p>
<p>Binaries on the other hand are more troublesome. For performance reasons, programs often store textual data in binaries instead of lists, mainly because they are more compact (one byte per character instead of two words per character, as is the case with lists). Using erlang:list_to_binary/1, an regular Erlang string can be converted into a binary, effectively using the ISO-latin-1 encoding in the binary - one byte per character. This is very convenient for those regular Erlang strings, but cannot be done for Unicode lists.</p>
<p>As the UTF-8 encoding is widely spread and provides the most compact storage, it is selected as the standard encoding of Unicode characters in binaries for Erlang.</p>