aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl')
-rw-r--r--lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl378
1 files changed, 143 insertions, 235 deletions
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl b/lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl
index d946469625..29a389d4b8 100644
--- a/lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl
+++ b/lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
%%
-module(erl_lint_SUITE).
-%-define(debug, true).
+%%-define(debug, true).
-ifdef(debug).
-define(line, put(line, ?LINE), ).
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@
-define(t, test_server).
-else.
-include_lib("common_test/include/ct.hrl").
--define(datadir, ?config(data_dir, Conf)).
--define(privdir, ?config(priv_dir, Conf)).
+-define(datadir, proplists:get_value(data_dir, Conf)).
+-define(privdir, proplists:get_value(priv_dir, Conf)).
-endif.
-export([all/0, suite/0,groups/0,init_per_suite/1, end_per_suite/1,
@@ -69,19 +69,15 @@
record_errors/1
]).
-% Default timetrap timeout (set in init_per_testcase).
--define(default_timeout, ?t:minutes(1)).
-
init_per_testcase(_Case, Config) ->
- ?line Dog = ?t:timetrap(?default_timeout),
- [{watchdog, Dog} | Config].
+ Config.
end_per_testcase(_Case, _Config) ->
- Dog = ?config(watchdog, _Config),
- test_server:timetrap_cancel(Dog),
ok.
-suite() -> [{ct_hooks,[ts_install_cth]}].
+suite() ->
+ [{ct_hooks,[ts_install_cth]},
+ {timetrap,{minutes,1}}].
all() ->
[{group, unused_vars_warn}, export_vars_warn,
@@ -119,50 +115,48 @@ end_per_group(_GroupName, Config) ->
-unused_vars_warn_basic(doc) ->
- "Warnings for unused variables in some simple cases.";
-unused_vars_warn_basic(suite) -> [];
+%% Warnings for unused variables in some simple cases.
unused_vars_warn_basic(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{basic1,
<<"f(F) -> % F unused.
ok.
- f(F, F) ->
- ok.
+f(F, F) ->
+ ok.
- g(_X) ->
- y.
+g(_X) ->
+ y.
- h(P) ->
- P.
+h(P) ->
+ P.
- x(N) ->
- case a:b() of
- [N|Y] -> % Y unused.
- ok
- end.
+x(N) ->
+ case a:b() of
+ [N|Y] -> % Y unused.
+ ok
+ end.
- y(N, L) ->
- lists:map(fun(T) -> T*N end, L).
+y(N, L) ->
+ lists:map(fun(T) -> T*N end, L).
- z(N, L) -> % N unused
- lists:map(fun(N, T) -> T*N end, L). % N shadowed.
+z(N, L) -> % N unused
+ lists:map(fun(N, T) -> T*N end, L). % N shadowed.
- c(A) ->
- case A of
- 1 -> B = []; % B unused.
- 2 -> B = []; % B unused.
- 3 -> B = f, B
- end.
- ">>,
+c(A) ->
+ case A of
+ 1 -> B = []; % B unused.
+ 2 -> B = []; % B unused.
+ 3 -> B = f, B
+ end.
+">>,
[warn_unused_vars],
- {warnings,[{1,erl_lint,{unused_var,'F'}},
- {15,erl_lint,{unused_var,'Y'}},
- {22,erl_lint,{unused_var,'N'}},
- {23,erl_lint,{shadowed_var,'N','fun'}},
- {28,erl_lint,{unused_var,'B'}},
- {29,erl_lint,{unused_var,'B'}}]}},
+{warnings,[{1,erl_lint,{unused_var,'F'}},
+ {15,erl_lint,{unused_var,'Y'}},
+ {22,erl_lint,{unused_var,'N'}},
+ {23,erl_lint,{shadowed_var,'N','fun'}},
+ {28,erl_lint,{unused_var,'B'}},
+ {29,erl_lint,{unused_var,'B'}}]}},
{basic2,
<<"-record(r, {x,y}).
f({X,Y}) -> {Z=X,Z=Y};
@@ -172,12 +166,10 @@ unused_vars_warn_basic(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
g({M, F, Arg}) -> (Z=M):F(Z=Arg).
h(X, Y) -> (Z=X) + (Z=Y).">>,
[warn_unused_vars], []}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unused_vars_warn_lc(doc) ->
- "Warnings for unused variables in list comprehensions.";
-unused_vars_warn_lc(suite) -> [];
+%% Warnings for unused variables in list comprehensions.
unused_vars_warn_lc(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{lc1,
<<"bin([X]) ->
@@ -404,9 +396,7 @@ unused_vars_warn_lc(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{error,[{22,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'U',{'case',2}}},
{27,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'U',{'case',2}}}],
[{16,erl_lint,{unused_var,'Y'}},
- % {24,erl_lint,{exported_var,'X',{'case',8}}},
{24,erl_lint,{unused_var,'U'}},
- % {26,erl_lint,{exported_var,'X',{'case',8}}},
{26,erl_lint,{unused_var,'U'}}]}},
{lc17,
@@ -436,7 +426,6 @@ unused_vars_warn_lc(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[warn_unused_vars],
{error,[{22,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'U',{'case',3}}}],
[{17,erl_lint,{unused_var,'Y'}},
- % {21,erl_lint,{exported_var,'X',{'case',9}}},
{21,erl_lint,{unused_var,'U'}}]}},
{lc18,
@@ -461,14 +450,12 @@ unused_vars_warn_lc(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
end,
[B || <<U: % U unused
U>> <- X, <<B:Y>> <- Z]. % U unsafe. Y unsafe.
- % U shadowed. (X exported.)
+ % U shadowed. (X exported.)
">>,
[warn_unused_vars],
{error,[{21,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'U',{'case',2}}},
{21,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'Y',{'case',14}}}],
[{20,erl_lint,{unused_var,'U'}}
- % ,{21,erl_lint,{exported_var,'X',{'case',8}}}
- % ,{21,erl_lint,{shadowed_var,'U',generate}}
]}},
{lc19,
@@ -522,13 +509,11 @@ unused_vars_warn_lc(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[{14,erl_lint,{unused_var,'Q'}}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unused_vars_warn_rec(doc) ->
- "Warnings for unused variables in records.";
-unused_vars_warn_rec(suite) -> [];
+%% Warnings for unused variables in records.
unused_vars_warn_rec(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{rec1, % An example provided by Bjorn.
<<"-record(edge,
@@ -580,12 +565,10 @@ unused_vars_warn_rec(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{error,[{2,erl_lint,{redefine_field,r,a}},
{2,erl_lint,{redefine_field,r,a}}],
[{2,erl_lint,{unused_var,'X'}}]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unused_vars_warn_fun(doc) ->
- "Warnings for unused variables in funs.";
-unused_vars_warn_fun(suite) -> [];
+%% Warnings for unused variables in funs.
unused_vars_warn_fun(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{fun1,
<<"a({A,B}) -> % A unused.
@@ -707,12 +690,10 @@ unused_vars_warn_fun(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{33,erl_lint,{unused_var,'U'}},
{33,erl_lint,{shadowed_var,'U','fun'}}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unused_vars_OTP_4858(doc) ->
- "Bit syntax, binsize variable used in the same matching.";
-unused_vars_OTP_4858(suite) -> [];
+%% Bit syntax, binsize variable used in the same matching.
unused_vars_OTP_4858(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_4858,
<<"objs(<<Size:4/unit:8, B:Size/binary>>) ->
@@ -731,7 +712,7 @@ unused_vars_OTP_4858(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{8,erl_lint,{unused_var,'B'}},
{8,erl_lint,{unused_var,'Rest'}}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
unused_unsafe_vars_warn(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
@@ -776,9 +757,7 @@ unused_unsafe_vars_warn(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-export_vars_warn(doc) ->
- "Warnings for exported variables";
-export_vars_warn(suite) -> [];
+%% Warnings for exported variables.
export_vars_warn(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{exp1,
<<"u() ->
@@ -868,13 +847,11 @@ export_vars_warn(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[],
{warnings,[{7,erl_lint,{exported_var,'Z',{'if',2}}}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-shadow_vars(doc) ->
- "Shadowed variables are tested in other places, but here we test "
- "that the warning can be turned off.";
-shadow_vars(suite) -> [];
+%% Shadowed variables are tested in other places, but here we test
+%% that the warning can be turned off.
shadow_vars(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{shadow1,
<<"bin(A) ->
@@ -899,12 +876,10 @@ shadow_vars(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
[],
[]}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unused_import(doc) ->
- "Test that the 'warn_unused_import' option works.";
-unused_import(suite) -> [];
+%% Test that the 'warn_unused_import' option works.
unused_import(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{imp1,
<<"-import(lists, [map/2,foldl/3]).
@@ -913,12 +888,10 @@ unused_import(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
[warn_unused_import],
{warnings,[{1,erl_lint,{unused_import,{{foldl,3},lists}}}]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unused_function(doc) ->
- "Test warnings for unused functions.";
-unused_function(suite) -> [];
+%% Test warnings for unused functions.
unused_function(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{func1,
<<"-export([t/1]).
@@ -961,12 +934,10 @@ unused_function(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{[]}, %Tuple indicates no 'export_all'.
[]}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unsafe_vars(doc) ->
- "OTP-4671. Errors for unsafe variables";
-unsafe_vars(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-4671. Errors for unsafe variables.
unsafe_vars(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{unsafe1,
<<"t() ->
@@ -1042,7 +1013,7 @@ unsafe_vars(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
D = 1;
2 ->
A = 2,
- % B not bound here
+ %% B not bound here
C = 2,
catch D = 2; % unsafe in two clauses
3 ->
@@ -1064,12 +1035,10 @@ unsafe_vars(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{24,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'D',{'case',2}}}],
[]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unsafe_vars2(doc) ->
- "OTP-4831, seq8202. No warn_unused_vars and unsafe variables";
-unsafe_vars2(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-4831, seq8202. No warn_unused_vars and unsafe variables.
unsafe_vars2(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{unsafe2_1,
<<"foo(State) ->
@@ -1098,12 +1067,10 @@ unsafe_vars2(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[],
{errors,[{9,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'State1',{'if',4}}}],[]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unsafe_vars_try(doc) ->
- "Errors for unsafe variables in try/catch constructs.";
-unsafe_vars_try(suite) -> [];
+%% Errors for unsafe variables in try/catch constructs.
unsafe_vars_try(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{unsafe_try1,
<<"foo2() ->
@@ -1288,12 +1255,10 @@ unsafe_vars_try(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
[],
{errors,[{13,erl_lint,{unsafe_var,'Acc',{'try',6}}}],[]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-unsized_binary_in_bin_gen_pattern(doc) ->
- "Unsized binary fields are forbidden in patterns of bit string generators";
-unsized_binary_in_bin_gen_pattern(suite) -> [];
+%% Unsized binary fields are forbidden in patterns of bit string generators.
unsized_binary_in_bin_gen_pattern(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{unsized_binary_in_bin_gen_pattern,
<<"t({bc,binary,Bin}) ->
@@ -1326,9 +1291,7 @@ unsized_binary_in_bin_gen_pattern(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-guard(doc) ->
- "OTP-4670. Guards, is_record in particular.";
-guard(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-4670. Guards, is_record in particular.
guard(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
%% Well, these could be plain code...
Ts = [{guard1,
@@ -1543,7 +1506,7 @@ guard(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
[nowarn_obsolete_guard],
[]}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
Ts1 = [{guard5,
<<"-record(apa, {}).
t3(A) when record(A, {apa}) ->
@@ -1614,12 +1577,10 @@ guard(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{2,erl_lint,illegal_guard_expr}],
[]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts1),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts1),
ok.
-otp_4886(doc) ->
- "OTP-4886. Calling is_record with given record name.";
-otp_4886(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-4886. Calling is_record with given record name.
otp_4886(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_4886,
<<"t() ->
@@ -1638,12 +1599,10 @@ otp_4886(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{4,erl_lint,{undefined_record,foo}},
{5,erl_lint,{undefined_record,foo}}],
[]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_4988(doc) ->
- "OTP-4988. Error when in-lining non-existent functions.";
-otp_4988(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-4988. Error when in-lining non-existent functions.
otp_4988(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_4988,
<<"-compile({inline, [{f,3},{f,4},{f,2},{f,a},{1,foo}]}).
@@ -1665,12 +1624,10 @@ otp_4988(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{1,erl_lint,{bad_inline,{f,a}}},
{3,erl_lint,{bad_inline,{g,12}}}],
[]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5091(doc) ->
- "OTP-5091. Patterns and the bit syntax: invalid warnings.";
-otp_5091(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5091. Patterns and the bit syntax: invalid warnings.
otp_5091(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_5091_1,
<<"t() ->
@@ -1883,12 +1840,10 @@ otp_5091(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
<<"-record(r, {f1,f2}).
t(#r{f1 = A, f2 = A}) -> a.">>, [], []}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5276(doc) ->
- "OTP-5276. Check the 'deprecated' attributed.";
-otp_5276(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5276. Check the 'deprecated' attributed.
otp_5276(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_5276_1,
<<"-deprecated([{frutt,0,next_version}]).
@@ -1915,12 +1870,10 @@ otp_5276(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{9,erl_lint,{invalid_deprecated,{{badly,formed},1}}},
{11,erl_lint,{bad_deprecated,{atom_to_list,1}}}],
[{13,erl_lint,{unused_function,{frutt,0}}}]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5917(doc) ->
- "OTP-5917. Check the 'deprecated' attributed.";
-otp_5917(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5917. Check the 'deprecated' attributed.
otp_5917(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_5917_1,
<<"-compile(export_all).
@@ -1932,12 +1885,10 @@ otp_5917(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
{[]},
[]}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_6585(doc) ->
- "OTP-6585. Check the deprecated guards list/1, pid/1, ....";
-otp_6585(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-6585. Check the deprecated guards list/1, pid/1, ....
otp_6585(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_6585_1,
<<"-compile(export_all).
@@ -1955,12 +1906,10 @@ otp_6585(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{warnings,[{5,erl_lint,{obsolete_guard,{list,1}}},
{6,erl_lint,{obsolete_guard,{record,2}}},
{7,erl_lint,{obsolete_guard,{pid,1}}}]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5338(doc) ->
- "OTP-5338. Bad warning in record initialization.";
-otp_5338(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5338. Bad warning in record initialization.
otp_5338(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
%% OTP-5878: variables like X are no longer allowed in initialisations
Ts = [{otp_5338,
@@ -1972,13 +1921,11 @@ otp_5338(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[],
{error,[{1,erl_lint,{unbound_var,'X'}}],
[{3,erl_lint,{unused_var,'X'}}]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5362(doc) ->
- "OTP-5362. deprecated_function, "
- "{nowarn_unused_funtion,FAs}, 'better' line numbers.";
-otp_5362(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5362. deprecated_function,
+%% {nowarn_unused_funtion,FAs}, 'better' line numbers.
otp_5362(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_5362_1,
<<"-include_lib(\"stdlib/include/qlc.hrl\").
@@ -2178,12 +2125,10 @@ otp_5362(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5371(doc) ->
- "OTP-5371. Aliases for bit syntax expressions are no longer allowed.";
-otp_5371(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5371. Aliases for bit syntax expressions are no longer allowed.
otp_5371(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_5371_1,
<<"t(<<A:8>> = <<B:8>>) ->
@@ -2237,10 +2182,10 @@ otp_5371(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{6,v3_core,nomatch},
{8,v3_core,nomatch}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_7227(doc) -> "OTP_7227. Some aliases for bit syntax expressions were still allowed.";
+%% OTP_7227. Some aliases for bit syntax expressions were still allowed.
otp_7227(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_7227_1,
<<"t([<<A:8>> = {C,D} = <<B:8>>]) ->
@@ -2307,12 +2252,10 @@ otp_7227(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[],
{errors,[{2,erl_lint,illegal_bin_pattern}],[]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5494(doc) ->
- "OTP-5494. Warnings for functions exported more than once.";
-otp_5494(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5494. Warnings for functions exported more than once.
otp_5494(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_5494_1,
<<"-export([t/0]).
@@ -2321,12 +2264,10 @@ otp_5494(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
[],
{warnings,[{2,erl_lint,{duplicated_export,{t,0}}}]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5644(doc) ->
- "OTP-5644. M:F/A in record initialization.";
-otp_5644(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5644. M:F/A in record initialization.
otp_5644(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
%% This test is a no-op. Although {function,mfa,i,1} was
%% transformed into {function,Line,i,1} by copy_expr, the module
@@ -2342,12 +2283,10 @@ otp_5644(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
[],
[]}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_5878(doc) ->
- "OTP-5878. Record declaration: forward references, introduced variables.";
-otp_5878(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-5878. Record declaration: forward references, introduced variables.
otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_5878_10,
<<"-record(rec1, {a = #rec2{}}).
@@ -2463,7 +2402,7 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[{1,erl_lint,{unused_record,r}}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
Abstr = <<"-module(lint_test, [A, B]).
">>,
@@ -2480,7 +2419,7 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
X <- Z ++ [A,Y]])}).
t() -> {#r1{},#r2{},#r3{}}.
">>,
- ?line {error,[{8,qlc,{used_generator_variable,'A'}},
+ {error,[{8,qlc,{used_generator_variable,'A'}},
{8,qlc,{used_generator_variable,'Y'}},
{8,qlc,{used_generator_variable,'Z'}}],
[{6,erl_lint,{unused_var,'V'}}]} =
@@ -2521,7 +2460,7 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
bar.
">>,
- ?line {errors,[{6,erl_lint,{unbound_var,'A'}},
+ {errors,[{6,erl_lint,{unbound_var,'A'}},
{13,erl_lint,illegal_guard_expr},
{15,erl_lint,{undefined_field,r3,q}},
{17,erl_lint,{undefined_field,r,q}},
@@ -2540,14 +2479,14 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
foo
end.
">>,
- ?line {errors,[{4,erl_lint,{undefined_function,{x,0}}},
+ {errors,[{4,erl_lint,{undefined_function,{x,0}}},
{5,erl_lint,illegal_guard_expr},
{7,erl_lint,illegal_guard_expr}],
[]} =
run_test2(Config, Ill2, [warn_unused_record]),
Ill3 = <<"t() -> ok.">>,
- ?line {errors,[{1,erl_lint,undefined_module}],[]} =
+ {errors,[{1,erl_lint,undefined_module}],[]} =
run_test2(Config, Ill3, [warn_unused_record]),
Usage1 = <<"-module(lint_test).
@@ -2560,7 +2499,7 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
t() ->
{#u2{}}.
">>,
- ?line {warnings,[{5,erl_lint,{unused_record,u3}},
+ {warnings,[{5,erl_lint,{unused_record,u3}},
{6,erl_lint,{unused_record,u4}}]} =
run_test2(Config, Usage1, [warn_unused_record]),
@@ -2575,7 +2514,7 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
t() ->
{#u2{}}.
">>,
- ?line [] = run_test2(Config, Usage2, [warn_unused_record]),
+ [] = run_test2(Config, Usage2, [warn_unused_record]),
%% This a completely different story...
%% The linter checks if qlc.hrl hasn't been included
@@ -2589,7 +2528,7 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
H3 = q([X || X <- [1,2]], []),
{H1,H2,H3}.
">>,
- ?line {warnings,[{6,erl_lint,{missing_qlc_hrl,1}},
+ {warnings,[{6,erl_lint,{missing_qlc_hrl,1}},
{7,erl_lint,{missing_qlc_hrl,2}},
{8,erl_lint,{missing_qlc_hrl,2}}]} =
run_test2(Config, QLC2, [warn_unused_record]),
@@ -2605,7 +2544,7 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
foo(#request{}) -> ok.
">>,
- ?line [] = run_test2(Config, UsedByType, [warn_unused_record]),
+ [] = run_test2(Config, UsedByType, [warn_unused_record]),
%% Abstract code generated by OTP 18. Note that the type info for
%% record fields has been put in a separate form.
@@ -2626,9 +2565,8 @@ otp_5878(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
ok.
-otp_6885(doc) ->
- "OTP-6885. Binary fields in bit syntax matching is now only allowed at the end.";
-otp_6885(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-6885. Binary fields in bit syntax matching is now only
+%% allowed at the end.
otp_6885(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = <<"-module(otp_6885).
-export([t/1]).
@@ -2655,7 +2593,7 @@ otp_6885(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
ok.
">>,
- ?line {errors,[{3,erl_lint,unsized_binary_not_at_end},
+ {errors,[{3,erl_lint,unsized_binary_not_at_end},
{4,erl_lint,unsized_binary_not_at_end},
{5,erl_lint,unsized_binary_not_at_end},
{10,erl_lint,typed_literal_string},
@@ -2665,9 +2603,7 @@ otp_6885(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[]} = run_test2(Config, Ts, []),
ok.
-otp_10436(doc) ->
- "OTP-6885. Warnings for opaque types.";
-otp_10436(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-6885. Warnings for opaque types.
otp_10436(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = <<"-module(otp_10436).
-export_type([t1/0]).
@@ -2687,9 +2623,7 @@ otp_10436(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
run_test2(Config, Ts2, []),
ok.
-otp_11254(doc) ->
- "OTP-11254. M:F/A could crash the linter.";
-otp_11254(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-11254. M:F/A could crash the linter.
otp_11254(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = <<"-module(p2).
-export([manifest/2]).
@@ -2701,9 +2635,7 @@ otp_11254(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
run_test2(Config, Ts, []),
ok.
-otp_11772(doc) ->
- "OTP-11772. Reintroduce errors for redefined builtin types.";
-otp_11772(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-11772. Reintroduce errors for redefined builtin types.
otp_11772(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = <<"
-module(newly).
@@ -2728,9 +2660,7 @@ otp_11772(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[]} = run_test2(Config, Ts, []),
ok.
-otp_11771(doc) ->
- "OTP-11771. Do not allow redefinition of the types arity(_) &c..";
-otp_11771(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-11771. Do not allow redefinition of the types arity(_) &c..
otp_11771(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = <<"
-module(newly).
@@ -2757,9 +2687,7 @@ otp_11771(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[]} = run_test2(Config, Ts, []),
ok.
-otp_11872(doc) ->
- "OTP-11872. The type map() undefined when exported.";
-otp_11872(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-11872. The type map() undefined when exported.
otp_11872(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = <<"
-module(map).
@@ -2781,22 +2709,19 @@ otp_11872(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
run_test2(Config, Ts, []),
ok.
-export_all(doc) ->
- "OTP-7392. Warning for export_all.";
+%% OTP-7392. Warning for export_all.
export_all(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = <<"-module(export_all_module).
-compile([export_all]).
id(I) -> I.
">>,
- ?line [] = run_test2(Config, Ts, []),
- ?line {warnings,[{2,erl_lint,export_all}]} =
+ [] = run_test2(Config, Ts, []),
+ {warnings,[{2,erl_lint,export_all}]} =
run_test2(Config, Ts, [warn_export_all]),
ok.
-bif_clash(doc) ->
- "Test warnings for functions that clash with BIFs.";
-bif_clash(suite) -> [];
+%% Test warnings for functions that clash with BIFs.
bif_clash(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{clash1,
<<"t(X) ->
@@ -3063,12 +2988,10 @@ bif_clash(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[]}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-behaviour_basic(doc) ->
- "Basic tests with one behaviour.";
-behaviour_basic(suite) -> [];
+%% Basic tests with one behaviour.
behaviour_basic(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{behaviour1,
<<"-behaviour(application).
@@ -3102,12 +3025,10 @@ behaviour_basic(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[],
{warnings,[{1,erl_lint,{undefined_behaviour_func,{start,2},application}}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-behaviour_multiple(doc) ->
- "Basic tests with multiple behaviours.";
-behaviour_multiple(suite) -> [];
+%% Basic tests with multiple behaviours.
behaviour_multiple(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{behaviour1,
<<"-behaviour(application).
@@ -3205,12 +3126,10 @@ behaviour_multiple(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
erl_lint,
{conflicting_behaviours,{init,1},supervisor,1,gen_server}}]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_11861(doc) ->
- "OTP-11861. behaviour_info() and -callback.";
-otp_11861(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-11861. behaviour_info() and -callback.
otp_11861(Conf) when is_list(Conf) ->
CallbackFiles = [callback1, callback2, callback3,
bad_behaviour1, bad_behaviour2],
@@ -3391,12 +3310,12 @@ otp_11861(Conf) when is_list(Conf) ->
[],
[]}
],
- ?line [] = run(Conf, Ts),
+ [] = run(Conf, Ts),
true = code:set_path(CodePath),
ok.
-otp_7550(doc) ->
- "Test that the new utf8/utf16/utf32 types do not allow size or unit specifiers.";
+%% Test that the new utf8/utf16/utf32 types do not allow size or
+%% unit specifiers.
otp_7550(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_7550,
<<"f8(A) ->
@@ -3432,12 +3351,11 @@ otp_7550(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{20,erl_lint,utf_bittype_size_or_unit}
],
[]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_8051(doc) ->
- "Bugfix: -opaque with invalid type.";
+%% Bugfix: -opaque with invalid type.
otp_8051(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{otp_8051,
<<"-opaque foo() :: bar().
@@ -3445,12 +3363,10 @@ otp_8051(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
">>,
[],
{errors,[{1,erl_lint,{undefined_type,{bar,0}}}],[]}}],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-format_warn(doc) ->
- "Check that format warnings are generated.";
-format_warn(suite) -> [];
+%% Check that format warnings are generated.
format_warn(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
L1 = 14,
L2 = 4,
@@ -3460,18 +3376,18 @@ format_warn(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
ok.
format_level(Level, Count, Config) ->
- ?line W = get_compilation_result(Config, "format",
+ W = get_compilation_result(Config, "format",
[{warn_format, Level}]),
%% Pick out the 'format' warnings.
- ?line FW = lists:filter(fun({_Line, erl_lint, {format_error, _}}) -> true;
+ FW = lists:filter(fun({_Line, erl_lint, {format_error, _}}) -> true;
(_) -> false
end,
W),
- ?line case length(FW) of
+ case length(FW) of
Count ->
ok;
Other ->
- ?t:format("Expected ~w warning(s); got ~w", [Count,Other]),
+ io:format("Expected ~w warning(s); got ~w", [Count,Other]),
fail()
end,
ok.
@@ -3507,7 +3423,7 @@ on_load_successful(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{[]}, %Tuple indicates no 'export_all'.
[]}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
on_load_failing(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
@@ -3555,12 +3471,10 @@ on_load_failing(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{errors,
[{1,erl_lint,{undefined_on_load,{non_existing,0}}}],[]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-too_many_arguments(doc) ->
- "Test that too many arguments is not accepted.";
-too_many_arguments(suite) -> [];
+%% Test that too many arguments is not accepted.
too_many_arguments(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [{too_many_1,
<<"f(_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_) -> ok.">>,
@@ -3569,7 +3483,7 @@ too_many_arguments(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[{1,erl_lint,{too_many_arguments,256}}],[]}}
],
- ?line [] = run(Config, Ts),
+ [] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
@@ -3652,9 +3566,7 @@ bin_syntax_errors(Config) ->
[] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-predef(doc) ->
- "OTP-10342: No longer predefined types: array(), digraph(), and so on";
-predef(suite) -> [];
+%% OTP-10342: No longer predefined types: array(), digraph(), and so on.
predef(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
W = get_compilation_result(Config, "predef", []),
[] = W,
@@ -3781,8 +3693,7 @@ maps_type(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_11851(doc) ->
- "OTP-11851: More atoms can be used as type names + bug fixes.";
+%% OTP-11851: More atoms can be used as type names + bug fixes.
otp_11851(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Ts = [
{otp_11851_1,
@@ -3868,9 +3779,8 @@ otp_11851(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
[] = run(Config, Ts),
ok.
-otp_11879(doc) ->
- "OTP-11879: The -spec f/a :: (As) -> B; syntax removed, "
- "and is_subtype/2 deprecated";
+%% OTP-11879: The -spec f/a :: (As) -> B; syntax removed,
+%% and is_subtype/2 deprecated.
otp_11879(_Config) ->
Fs = [{attribute,0,file,{"file.erl",0}},
{attribute,0,module,m},
@@ -3891,8 +3801,7 @@ otp_11879(_Config) ->
[]} = compile:forms(Fs, [return,report]),
ok.
-otp_13230(doc) ->
- "OTP-13230: -deprecated without -module";
+%% OTP-13230: -deprecated without -module.
otp_13230(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Abstr = <<"-deprecated([{frutt,0,next_version}]).">>,
{errors,[{1,erl_lint,undefined_module},
@@ -3917,7 +3826,7 @@ run(Config, Tests) ->
E ->
BadL;
Bad ->
- ?t:format("~nTest ~p failed. Expected~n ~p~n"
+ io:format("~nTest ~p failed. Expected~n ~p~n"
"but got~n ~p~n", [N, E, Bad]),
fail()
end
@@ -3927,8 +3836,8 @@ run(Config, Tests) ->
%% Compiles a test file and returns the list of warnings/errors.
get_compilation_result(Conf, Filename, Warnings) ->
- ?line DataDir = ?datadir,
- ?line File = filename:join(DataDir, Filename),
+ DataDir = ?datadir,
+ File = filename:join(DataDir, Filename),
{ok,Bin} = file:read_file(File++".erl"),
FileS = binary_to_list(Bin),
{match,[{Start,Length}|_]} = re:run(FileS, "-module.*\\n"),
@@ -3992,5 +3901,4 @@ call_format_error(L) ->
L.
fail() ->
- io:format("failed~n"),
- ?t:fail().
+ ct:fail(failed).