diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/asn1/doc/src/asn1_ug.xml | 164 |
1 files changed, 57 insertions, 107 deletions
diff --git a/lib/asn1/doc/src/asn1_ug.xml b/lib/asn1/doc/src/asn1_ug.xml index dd08eb1817..ce8da39e6d 100644 --- a/lib/asn1/doc/src/asn1_ug.xml +++ b/lib/asn1/doc/src/asn1_ug.xml @@ -392,6 +392,40 @@ File3.asn </pre> </section> <section> + <title>A quick note about tags</title> + + <p>Tags used to be important for all users of ASN.1, because it + was necessary to manually add tags to certain constructs in order + for the ASN.1 specification to be valid. Here is an example of + an old-style specification:</p> + + <pre> +Tags DEFINITIONS ::= +BEGIN + Afters ::= CHOICE { cheese [0] IA5String, + dessert [1] IA5String } +END </pre> + + <p>Without the tags (the numbers in square brackets) the ASN.1 + compiler would refuse to compile the file.</p> + + <p>In 1994 the global tagging mode AUTOMATIC TAGS was introduced. + By putting AUTOMATIC TAGS in the module header, the ASN.1 compiler + will automatically add tags when needed. Here is the same + specification in AUTOMATIC TAGS mode:</p> + + <pre> +Tags DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::= +BEGIN + Afters ::= CHOICE { cheese IA5String, + dessert IA5String } +END +</pre> + + <p>Tags will not be mentioned any more in this manual.</p> + </section> + + <section> <marker id="ASN1Types"></marker> <title>The ASN.1 Types</title> <p>This section describes the ASN.1 types including their @@ -983,47 +1017,24 @@ SExt ::= SEQUENCE { <marker id="CHOICE"></marker> <title>CHOICE</title> <p>The CHOICE type is a space saver and is similar to the concept of a - 'union' in the C-language. As with the previous SET-type, the - tags of all components of a CHOICE need to be distinct. If - AUTOMATIC TAGS are defined for the module (which is - preferable) the tags can be omitted completely in the ASN.1 - specification of a CHOICE. - </p> + 'union' in the C language.</p> <p>Assume:</p> <pre> +SomeModuleName DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::= +BEGIN T ::= CHOICE { - x [0] REAL, - y [1] INTEGER, - z [2] OBJECT IDENTIFIER } - </pre> + x REAL, + y INTEGER, + z OBJECT IDENTIFIER } +END </pre> <p>It is then possible to assign values:</p> <pre> TVal1 = {y,17}, TVal2 = {z,{0,1,2}}, </pre> - <p>A CHOICE value is always represented as the tuple + <p>A CHOICE value is always represented as the tuple <c>{ChoiceAlternative, Val}</c> where <c>ChoiceAlternative</c> - is an atom denoting the selected choice - alternative. - </p> - <p>It is also allowed to have a CHOICE type tagged as follow:</p> - <p></p> - <pre> -C ::= [PRIVATE 111] CHOICE { - C1, - C2 } - -C1 ::= CHOICE { - a [0] INTEGER, - b [1] BOOLEAN } - -C2 ::= CHOICE { - c [2] INTEGER, - d [3] OCTET STRING } </pre> - <p>In this case, the top type C appears to have no tags at all in - its components, however, both C1 and C2 are also defined as - CHOICE types and they have distinct tags among themselves. - Hence, the above type C is both legal and allowed. + is an atom denoting the selected choice alternative. </p> <section> @@ -1104,20 +1115,23 @@ Arr2Val = ["abc",[14,34,54],"Octets"], </pre> Where <c>Value</c> may be a value of yet another type T2.</p> <p>For example:</p> <pre> +EmbeddedExample DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::= +BEGIN B ::= SEQUENCE { a Arr1, - b [0] T } + b T } Arr1 ::= SET SIZE (5) OF INTEGER (4..9) T ::= CHOICE { - x [0] REAL, - y [1] INTEGER, - z [2] OBJECT IDENTIFIER } </pre> - <p>The above example can be assigned like this in Erlang:</p> + x REAL, + y INTEGER, + z OBJECT IDENTIFIER } + END </pre> + <p>The SEQUENCE b can be encoded like this in Erlang:</p> <pre> -V2 = #'B'{a=[4,5,6,7,8], b={x,7.77}}. - </pre> +1> 'EmbeddedExample':encode('B', {'B',[4,5,6,7,8],{x,"7.77"}}). +{ok,<<5,56,0,8,3,55,55,55,46,69,45,50>>} </pre> </section> </section> @@ -1139,8 +1153,8 @@ V2 = #'B'{a=[4,5,6,7,8], b={x,7.77}}. Emb ::= SEQUENCE { a SEQUENCE OF OCTET STRING, b SET { - a [0] INTEGER, - b [1] INTEGER DEFAULT 66}, + a INTEGER, + b INTEGER DEFAULT 66}, c CHOICE { a INTEGER, b FooType } } @@ -1211,7 +1225,7 @@ PType{T} ::= SEQUENCE{ <p>Types may refer to themselves. Suppose:</p> <pre> Rec ::= CHOICE { - nothing [0] NULL, + nothing NULL, something SEQUENCE { a INTEGER, b OCTET STRING, @@ -1243,7 +1257,7 @@ tt TT ::= {a 77,b {"kalle","kula"}} </pre> Firstly, it could be used as the value in some DEFAULT component:</p> <pre> SS ::= SET { - s [0] OBJECT IDENTIFIER, + s OBJECT IDENTIFIER, val TT DEFAULT tt } </pre> <p>It could also be used from inside an Erlang program. If the above ASN.1 code was defined in ASN.1 module <c>Values</c>, then the ASN.1 value @@ -1403,70 +1417,6 @@ T2 ::= General{BIT STRING} </section> <section> - <title>Tags</title> - <p>Every built-in ASN.1 type, except CHOICE and ANY have a universal tag. - This is a unique number that clearly identifies the type. <br></br> - - It is essential for all users of ASN.1 to - understand all the details about tags.</p> - <p>Tags are implicitly encoded in the BER encoding as shown below, but - are hardly not accounted for in the PER encoding. In PER tags are - used for instance to sort the components of a SET.</p> - <p>There are four different types of tags.</p> - <taglist> - <tag><em>universal</em></tag> - <item> - <p>For types whose meaning is the same in all - applications. Such as integers, sequences and so on; that is, all the built in - types.</p> - </item> - <tag><em>application</em></tag> - <item> - <p>For application specific types for example, the types in - X.400 Message handling service have this sort of tag.</p> - </item> - <tag><em>private</em></tag> - <item> - <p>For your own private types.</p> - </item> - <tag><em>context</em></tag> - <item> - <p>This is used to distinguish otherwise indistinguishable - types in a specific context. For example, if we have two - components of a - CHOICE type that are both <c>INTEGER</c> values, there is no - way for the decoder to - decipher which component was actually chosen, since both - components will be - tagged as <c>INTEGER</c>. When this or similar situations occur, - one or both of the components should be given a context specific - to resolve the ambiguity.</p> - </item> - </taglist> - <p>The tag in the case of the 'Apdu' type [PRIVATE 1] is encoded to a - sequence of bytes making it possible for a - decoder to look at the (initial) bytes that arrive and determine - whether the rest of the bytes must be of the type associated - with that particular sequence of bytes. This means that each - tag must be uniquely associated with <em>only</em> one ASN.1 - type. - </p> - <p>Immediately following the tag is a sequence of bytes - informing the decoder of the length of the instance. This is - sometimes referred to as TLV (Tag length value) encoding. - Hence, the structure of a BER encoded series of bytes is as shown in the table below.</p> - <p></p> - <table> - <row> - <cell align="left" valign="middle">Tag</cell> - <cell align="left" valign="middle">Len</cell> - <cell align="left" valign="middle">Value</cell> - </row> - <tcaption>Structure of a BER encoded series of bytes</tcaption> - </table> - </section> - - <section> <title>Encoding Rules</title> <p>When the first recommendation on ASN.1 was released 1988 it was accompanied with the Basic Encoding Rules, BER, as the only |