aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml')
-rw-r--r--system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml1504
1 files changed, 990 insertions, 514 deletions
diff --git a/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml b/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml
index 1006485e30..80ee9c992f 100644
--- a/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml
+++ b/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<chapter>
<header>
<copyright>
- <year>2016</year><year>2017</year>
+ <year>2016</year><year>2018</year>
<holder>Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.</holder>
</copyright>
<legalnotice>
@@ -36,16 +36,6 @@
manual page in STDLIB, where all interface functions and callback
functions are described in detail.
</p>
- <note>
- <p>
- This is a new behavior in Erlang/OTP 19.0.
- It has been thoroughly reviewed, is stable enough
- to be used by at least two heavy OTP applications, and is here to stay.
- Depending on user feedback, we do not expect
- but can find it necessary to make minor
- not backward compatible changes into Erlang/OTP 20.0.
- </p>
- </note>
<!-- =================================================================== -->
@@ -72,13 +62,14 @@ State(S) x Event(E) -> Actions(A), State(S')</pre>
<p>These relations are interpreted as follows:
if we are in state <c>S</c> and event <c>E</c> occurs, we
are to perform actions <c>A</c> and make a transition to
- state <c>S'</c>. Notice that <c>S'</c> can be equal to <c>S</c>.
+ state <c>S'</c>. Notice that <c>S'</c> can be equal to <c>S</c>
+ and that <c>A</c> can be empty.
</p>
<p>
As <c>A</c> and <c>S'</c> depend only on
<c>S</c> and <c>E</c>, the kind of state machine described
- here is a Mealy Machine
- (see, for example, the corresponding Wikipedia article).
+ here is a Mealy machine
+ (see, for example, the Wikipedia article "Mealy machine").
</p>
<p>
Like most <c>gen_</c> behaviors, <c>gen_statem</c> keeps
@@ -88,7 +79,95 @@ State(S) x Event(E) -> Actions(A), State(S')</pre>
or on the number of distinct input events,
a state machine implemented with this behavior
is in fact Turing complete.
- But it feels mostly like an Event-Driven Mealy Machine.
+ But it feels mostly like an Event-Driven Mealy machine.
+ </p>
+ </section>
+
+<!-- =================================================================== -->
+
+ <section>
+ <marker id="When to use gen_statem" />
+ <title>When to use gen_statem</title>
+ <p>
+ If your process logic is convenient to describe as a state machine,
+ and you want any of these <c>gen_statem</c> key features:
+ </p>
+ <list type="bulleted">
+ <item>
+ Co-located callback code for each state,
+ regardless of
+ <seealso marker="#Event Types">Event Type</seealso>
+ (such as <em>call</em>, <em>cast</em> and <em>info</em>)
+ </item>
+ <item>
+ <seealso marker="#Postponing Events">
+ Postponing Events
+ </seealso>
+ (a substitute for selective receive)
+ </item>
+ <item>
+ <seealso marker="#Inserted Events">
+ Inserted Events
+ </seealso>
+ that is: events from the state machine to itself
+ (in particular purely internal events)
+ </item>
+ <item>
+ <seealso marker="#State Enter Calls">
+ State Enter Calls
+ </seealso>
+ (callback on state entry co-located with the rest
+ of each state's callback code)
+ </item>
+ <item>
+ Easy-to-use timeouts
+ (<seealso marker="#State Time-Outs">State Time-Outs</seealso>,
+ <seealso marker="#Event Time-Outs">Event Time-Outs</seealso>
+ and
+ <seealso marker="#Generic Time-Outs">Generic Time-outs</seealso>
+ (named time-outs))
+ </item>
+ </list>
+ <p>
+ If so, or if possibly needed in future versions,
+ then you should consider using <c>gen_statem</c> over
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_server"><c>gen_server</c></seealso>.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ For simple state machines not needing these features
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_server"><c>gen_server</c></seealso>
+ works just fine.
+ It also has got smaller call overhead,
+ but we are talking about something like 2 vs 3.3 microseconds
+ call roundtrip time here, so if the server callback
+ does just a little bit more than just replying,
+ or if the call is not extremely frequent,
+ that difference will be hard to notice.
+ </p>
+ </section>
+
+<!-- =================================================================== -->
+
+ <section>
+ <marker id="Callback Module" />
+ <title>Callback Module</title>
+ <p>
+ The callback module contains functions that implement
+ the state machine.
+ When an event occurs,
+ the <c>gen_statem</c> behaviour engine
+ calls a function in the callback module with the event,
+ current state and server data.
+ This function performs the actions for this event,
+ and returns the new state and server data
+ and also actions to be performed by the behaviour engine.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ The behaviour engine holds the state machine state,
+ server data, timer references, a queue of posponed messages
+ and other metadata. It receives all process messages,
+ handles the system messages, and calls the callback module
+ with machine specific events.
</p>
</section>
@@ -100,61 +179,72 @@ State(S) x Event(E) -> Actions(A), State(S')</pre>
<p>
The <c>gen_statem</c> behavior supports two callback modes:
</p>
- <list type="bulleted">
+ <taglist>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode">
+ <c>state_functions</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
<p>
- In mode
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"><c>state_functions</c></seealso>,
- the state transition rules are written as some Erlang
- functions, which conform to the following convention:
- </p>
- <pre>
-StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
- ... code for actions here ...
- {next_state, NewStateName, NewData}.
- </pre>
- <p>
- This form is used in most examples here for example in section
- <seealso marker="#Example">Example</seealso>.
+ Events are handled by one callback function per state.
</p>
</item>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode">
+ <c>handle_event_function</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
<p>
- In mode
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"><c>handle_event_function</c></seealso>,
- only one Erlang function provides all state transition rules:
- </p>
- <pre>
-handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data) ->
- ... code for actions here ...
- {next_state, NewState, NewData}
- </pre>
- <p>
- See section
- <seealso marker="#One Event Handler">One Event Handler</seealso>
- for an example.
+ Events are handled by one single callback function.
</p>
</item>
- </list>
+ </taglist>
<p>
- Both these modes allow other return tuples; see
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:StateName/3"><c>Module:StateName/3</c></seealso>
- in the <c>gen_statem</c> manual page.
- These other return tuples can, for example, stop the machine,
- execute state transition actions on the machine engine itself,
- and send replies.
+ The callback mode is selected at server start
+ and may be changed with a code upgrade/downgrade.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ See the section
+ <seealso marker="#Event Handler">Event Handler</seealso>
+ that describes the event handling callback function(s).
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ The callback mode is selected by implementing
+ a mandatory callback function
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:callback_mode/0">
+ <c>Module:callback_mode()</c>
+ </seealso>
+ that returns one of the callback modes.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ The
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:callback_mode/0">
+ <c>Module:callback_mode()</c>
+ </seealso>
+ function may also return a list containing the callback mode
+ and the atom <c>state_enter</c> in which case
+ <seealso marker="#State Enter Calls">State Enter Calls</seealso>
+ are activated for the callback mode.
</p>
<section>
<marker id="Choosing the Callback Mode" />
<title>Choosing the Callback Mode</title>
<p>
+ The short version: choose <c>state_functions</c> -
+ it is the one most like <c>gen_fsm</c>.
+ But if you do not want the restriction that the state
+ must be an atom, or if you do not want to write
+ one event handler function per state; please read on...
+ </p>
+ <p>
The two
- <seealso marker="#Callback Modes">callback modes</seealso>
- give different possibilities
- and restrictions, but one goal remains:
- you want to handle all possible combinations of
- events and states.
+ <seealso marker="#Callback Modes">Callback Modes</seealso>
+ give different possibilities and restrictions,
+ with one common goal:
+ to handle all possible combinations of events and states.
</p>
<p>
This can be done, for example, by focusing on one state at the time
@@ -167,7 +257,7 @@ handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data) ->
With <c>state_functions</c>, you are restricted to use
atom-only states, and the <c>gen_statem</c> engine
branches depending on state name for you.
- This encourages the callback module to gather
+ This encourages the callback module to co-locate
the implementation of all event actions particular
to one state in the same place in the code,
hence to focus on one state at the time.
@@ -186,13 +276,17 @@ handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data) ->
This mode works equally well when you want to focus on
one event at the time or on
one state at the time, but function
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:handle_event/4"><c>Module:handle_event/4</c></seealso>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:handle_event/4">
+ <c>Module:handle_event/4</c>
+ </seealso>
quickly grows too large to handle without branching to
helper functions.
</p>
<p>
The mode enables the use of non-atom states, for example,
complex states or even hierarchical states.
+ See section
+ <seealso marker="#Complex State">Complex State</seealso>.
If, for example, a state diagram is largely alike
for the client side and the server side of a protocol,
you can have a state <c>{StateName,server}</c> or
@@ -208,43 +302,180 @@ handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data) ->
<!-- =================================================================== -->
<section>
- <marker id="State Enter Calls" />
- <title>State Enter Calls</title>
+ <marker id="Event Handler" />
+ <title>Event Handler</title>
<p>
- The <c>gen_statem</c> behavior can regardless of callback mode
- automatically
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-state_enter">
- call the state callback
- </seealso>
- with special arguments whenever the state changes
- so you can write state entry actions
- near the rest of the state transition rules.
- It typically looks like this:
+ Which callback function that handles an event
+ depends on the callback mode:
</p>
- <pre>
-StateName(enter, _OldState, Data) ->
- ... code for state entry actions here ...
- {keep_state, NewData};
-StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
- ... code for actions here ...
- {next_state, NewStateName, NewData}.</pre>
+ <taglist>
+ <tag><c>state_functions</c></tag>
+ <item>
+ The event is handled by:<br />
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:StateName/3">
+ <c>Module:StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data)</c>
+ </seealso>
+ <p>
+ This form is the one mostly used in the
+ <seealso marker="#Example">Example</seealso>
+ section.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ <tag><c>handle_event_function</c></tag>
+ <item>
+ The event is handled by:<br />
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:handle_event/4">
+ <c>Module:handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data)</c>
+ </seealso>
+ <p>
+ See section
+ <seealso marker="#One Event Handler">One Event Handler</seealso>
+ for an example.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ </taglist>
<p>
- Depending on how your state machine is specified,
- this can be a very useful feature,
- but it forces you to handle the state enter calls in all states.
- See also the
- <seealso marker="#State Entry Actions">
- State Entry Actions
+ The state is either the name of the function itself or an argument to it.
+ The other arguments are the <c>EventType</c> described in section
+ <seealso marker="#Event Types">Event Types</seealso>,
+ the event dependent <c>EventContent</c>, and the current server <c>Data</c>.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ State enter calls are also handled by the event handler and have
+ slightly different arguments. See the section
+ <seealso marker="#State Enter Calls">State Enter Calls</seealso>.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ The event handler return values are defined in the description of
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:StateName/3">
+ <c>Module:StateName/3</c>
</seealso>
- chapter.
+ in the <c>gen_statem</c> manual page, but here is
+ a more readable list:
</p>
+ <taglist>
+ <tag>
+ <c>{next_state, NextState, NewData, Actions}</c><br />
+ <c>{next_state, NextState, NewData}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+ Set next state and update the server data.
+ If the <c>Actions</c> field is used, execute state transition actions.
+ An empty <c>Actions</c> list is equivalent to not returning the field.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ See section
+ <seealso marker="#State Transition Actions">
+ State Transition Actions
+ </seealso>
+ for a list of possible
+ state transition actions.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ If <c>NextState =/= State</c> the state machine changes
+ to a new state. A
+ <seealso marker="#State Enter Calls">state enter call</seealso>
+ is performed if enabled and all
+ <seealso marker="#Postponing Events">postponed events</seealso>
+ are retried.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ <tag>
+ <c>{keep_state, NewData, Actions}</c><br />
+ <c>{keep_state, NewData}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+ Same as the <c>next_state</c> values with
+ <c>NextState =:= State</c>, that is, no state change.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ <tag>
+ <c>{keep_state_and_data, Actions}</c><br />
+ <c>keep_state_and_data</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+ Same as the <c>keep_state</c> values with
+ <c>NextData =:= Data</c>, that is, no change in server data.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ <tag>
+ <c>{repeat_state, NewData, Actions}</c><br />
+ <c>{repeat_state, NewData}</c><br />
+ <c>{repeat_state_and_data, Actions}</c><br />
+ <c>repeat_state_and_data</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+ Same as the <c>keep_state</c> or <c>keep_state_and_data</c> values,
+ and if
+ <seealso marker="#State Enter Calls">
+ State Enter Calls
+ </seealso>
+ are enabled, repeat the state enter call
+ as if this state was entered again.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ <tag>
+ <c>{stop, Reason, NewData}</c><br />
+ <c>{stop, Reason}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+ Stop the server with reason <c>Reason</c>.
+ If the <c>NewData</c> field is used, first update the server data.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ <tag>
+ <c>{stop_and_reply, Reason, NewData, ReplyActions}</c><br />
+ <c>{stop_and_reply, Reason, ReplyActions}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>
+ Same as the <c>stop</c> values, but first execute the given
+ state transition actions that may only be reply actions.
+ </p>
+ </item>
+ </taglist>
+
+ <section>
+ <marker id="The First State" />
+ <title>The First State</title>
+ <p>
+ To decide the first state the
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:init/1">
+ <c>Module:init(Args)</c>
+ </seealso>
+ callback function is called before any
+ <seealso marker="#Event Handler">Event Handler</seealso>
+ is called. This function behaves like an event handler
+ function, but gets its only argument <c>Args</c> from
+ the <c>gen_statem</c>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#start/3">
+ <c>start/3,4</c>
+ </seealso>
+ or
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#start_link/3">
+ <c>start_link/3,4</c>
+ </seealso>
+ function, and returns <c>{ok, State, Data}</c>
+ or <c>{ok, State, Data, Actions}</c>.
+ If you use the
+ <seealso marker="#Postponing Events"><c>postpone</c></seealso>
+ action from this function, that action is ignored,
+ since there is no event to postpone.
+ </p>
+ </section>
+
</section>
<!-- =================================================================== -->
<section>
- <marker id="Actions" />
- <title>Actions</title>
+ <marker id="State Transition Actions" />
+ <title>State Transition Actions</title>
<p>
In the first section
<seealso marker="#Event-Driven State Machines">
@@ -259,77 +490,102 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
</p>
<p>
There are more specific state-transition actions
- that a callback function can order the <c>gen_statem</c>
+ that a callback function can command the <c>gen_statem</c>
engine to do after the callback function return.
- These are ordered by returning a list of
+ These are commanded by returning a list of
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action">actions</seealso>
in the
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-state_callback_result">return tuple</seealso>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-state_callback_result">
+ return value
+ </seealso>
from the
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:StateName/3">callback function</seealso>.
- These state transition actions affect the <c>gen_statem</c>
- engine itself and can do the following:
+ These are the possible state transition actions:
</p>
- <list type="bulleted">
- <item>
+ <taglist>
+ <tag>
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-postpone">
- Postpone
+ <c>postpone</c>
</seealso>
- the current event, see section
+ <br />
+ <c>{postpone, Boolean}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ If set postpone the current event, see section
<seealso marker="#Postponing Events">Postponing Events</seealso>
</item>
- <item>
+ <tag>
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-hibernate">
- Hibernate
+ <c>hibernate</c>
</seealso>
- the <c>gen_statem</c>, treated in
+ <br />
+ <c>{hibernate, Boolean}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ If set hibernate the <c>gen_statem</c>, treated in section
<seealso marker="#Hibernation">Hibernation</seealso>
</item>
- <item>
- Start a
+ <tag>
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-state_timeout">
- state time-out</seealso>,
- read more in section
+ <c>{state_timeout, Time}</c>
+ </seealso>
+ <br />
+ <c>{state_timeout, Time, Opts}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ Start a state time-out, read more in section
<seealso marker="#State Time-Outs">State Time-Outs</seealso>
</item>
- <item>
- Start a
+ <tag>
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-generic_timeout">
- generic time-out</seealso>,
- read more in section
+ <c>{{timeout, Name}, Time}</c>
+ </seealso>
+ <br />
+ <c>{{timeout, Name}, Time, Opts}</c>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ Start a generic time-out, read more in section
<seealso marker="#Generic Time-Outs">Generic Time-Outs</seealso>
</item>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-event_timeout">
+ <c>{timeout, Time}</c>
+ </seealso>
+ <br />
+ <c>{timeout, Time, Opts}</c><br />
+ <c>Time</c>
+ </tag>
<item>
- Start an
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-event_timeout">event time-out</seealso>,
- see more in section
+ Start an event time-out, see more in section
<seealso marker="#Event Time-Outs">Event Time-Outs</seealso>
</item>
- <item>
+ <tag>
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-reply_action">
- Reply
+ <c>{reply, From, Reply}</c>
</seealso>
- to a caller, mentioned at the end of section
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ Reply to a caller, mentioned at the end of section
<seealso marker="#All State Events">All State Events</seealso>
</item>
- <item>
- Generate the
+ <tag>
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action">
- next event
+ <c>{next_event, EventType, EventContent}</c>
</seealso>
- to handle, see section
- <seealso marker="#Self-Generated Events">Self-Generated Events</seealso>
+ </tag>
+ <item>
+ Generate the next event to handle, see section
+ <seealso marker="#Inserted Events">Inserted Events</seealso>
</item>
- </list>
+ </taglist>
<p>
- For details, see the
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action">
- <c>gen_statem(3)</c>
- </seealso>
- manual page.
+ For details, see the <c>gen_statem(3)</c>
+ manual page for type
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action"><c>action()</c></seealso>.
You can, for example, reply to many callers,
generate multiple next events,
- and set time-outs to relative or absolute times.
+ and set a time-out to use absolute instead of relative time
+ (using the <c>Opts</c> field).
</p>
</section>
@@ -341,8 +597,8 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
<p>
Events are categorized in different
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-event_type">event types</seealso>.
- Events of all types are handled in the same callback function,
- for a given state, and the function gets
+ Events of all types are for a given state
+ handled in the same callback function, and that function gets
<c>EventType</c> and <c>EventContent</c> as arguments.
</p>
<p>
@@ -350,12 +606,20 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
they come from:
</p>
<taglist>
- <tag><c>cast</c></tag>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-external_event_type">
+ <c>cast</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
Generated by
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#cast/2"><c>gen_statem:cast</c></seealso>.
</item>
- <tag><c>{call,From}</c></tag>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-external_event_type">
+ <c>{call,From}</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
Generated by
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#call/2"><c>gen_statem:call</c></seealso>,
@@ -364,12 +628,20 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
<c>{reply,From,Msg}</c> or by calling
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#reply/1"><c>gen_statem:reply</c></seealso>.
</item>
- <tag><c>info</c></tag>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-external_event_type">
+ <c>info</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
Generated by any regular process message sent to
the <c>gen_statem</c> process.
</item>
- <tag><c>state_timeout</c></tag>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-timeout_event_type">
+ <c>state_timeout</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
Generated by state transition action
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-state_timeout">
@@ -377,7 +649,11 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
</seealso>
state timer timing out.
</item>
- <tag><c>{timeout,Name}</c></tag>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-timeout_event_type">
+ <c>{timeout,Name}</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
Generated by state transition action
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-generic_timeout">
@@ -385,7 +661,11 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
</seealso>
generic timer timing out.
</item>
- <tag><c>timeout</c></tag>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-timeout_event_type">
+ <c>timeout</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
Generated by state transition action
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-event_timeout">
@@ -394,7 +674,11 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
(or its short form <c>Time</c>)
event timer timing out.
</item>
- <tag><c>internal</c></tag>
+ <tag>
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-event_type">
+ <c>internal</c>
+ </seealso>
+ </tag>
<item>
Generated by state transition
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action">action</seealso>
@@ -408,19 +692,75 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
<!-- =================================================================== -->
<section>
+ <marker id="State Enter Calls" />
+ <title>State Enter Calls</title>
+ <p>
+ The <c>gen_statem</c> behavior can if this is enabled,
+ regardless of callback mode,
+ automatically
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-state_enter">
+ call the state callback
+ </seealso>
+ with special arguments whenever the state changes
+ so you can write state enter actions
+ near the rest of the state transition rules.
+ It typically looks like this:
+ </p>
+ <pre>
+StateName(enter, OldState, Data) ->
+ ... code for state enter actions here ...
+ {keep_state, NewData};
+StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
+ ... code for actions here ...
+ {next_state, NewStateName, NewData}.</pre>
+ <p>
+ Since the state enter call is not an event there are restrictions
+ on the allowed return value and
+ <seealso marker="#State Transition Actions">State Transition Actions</seealso>.
+ You may not change the state,
+ <seealso marker="#Postponing Events">postpone</seealso>
+ this non-event, or
+ <seealso marker="#Inserted Events">insert events</seealso>.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ The first state that is entered will get a state enter call
+ with <c>OldState</c> equal to the current state.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ You may repeat the state enter call using the <c>{repeat_state,...}</c>
+ return value from the
+ <seealso marker="#Event Handler">Event Handler</seealso>.
+ In this case <c>OldState</c> will also be equal to the current state.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ Depending on how your state machine is specified,
+ this can be a very useful feature,
+ but it forces you to handle the state enter calls in all states.
+ See also the
+ <seealso marker="#State Enter Actions">
+ State Enter Actions
+ </seealso>
+ chapter.
+ </p>
+ </section>
+
+<!-- =================================================================== -->
+
+ <section>
<marker id="Example" />
<title>Example</title>
<p>
A door with a code lock can be seen as a state machine.
Initially, the door is locked. When someone presses a button,
an event is generated.
- Depending on what buttons have been pressed before,
- the sequence so far can be correct, incomplete, or wrong.
- If correct, the door is unlocked for 10 seconds (10,000 milliseconds).
- If incomplete, we wait for another button to be pressed. If
- wrong, we start all over, waiting for a new button sequence.
- </p>
- <image file="../design_principles/code_lock.png">
+ The pressed buttons are collected, up to the number of buttons
+ in the correct code.
+ If correct, the door is unlocked for 10 seconds.
+ If not correct, we wait for a new button to be pressed.
+ </p>
+ <!-- The image is edited with dia in a .dia file,
+ then exported to Scalable Vector Graphics. -->
+ <image file="../design_principles/code_lock.svg" width="80%">
<icaption>Code Lock State Diagram</icaption>
</image>
<p>
@@ -434,43 +774,51 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
-export([start_link/1]).
-export([button/1]).
--export([init/1,callback_mode/0,terminate/3,code_change/4]).
+-export([init/1,callback_mode/0,terminate/3]).
-export([locked/3,open/3]).
start_link(Code) ->
gen_statem:start_link({local,?NAME}, ?MODULE, Code, []).
-button(Digit) ->
- gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {button,Digit}).
+button(Button) ->
+ gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {button,Button}).
init(Code) ->
do_lock(),
- Data = #{code => Code, remaining => Code},
+ Data = #{code => Code, length => length(Code), buttons => []},
{ok, locked, Data}.
callback_mode() ->
state_functions.
-
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
locked(
- cast, {button,Digit},
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] ->
+ cast, {button,Button},
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+ NewButtons =
+ if
+ length(Buttons) < Length ->
+ Buttons;
+ true ->
+ tl(Buttons)
+ end ++ [Button],
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
do_unlock(),
- {next_state, open, Data#{remaining := Code},
- [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
- [Digit|Rest] -> % Incomplete
- {next_state, locked, Data#{remaining := Rest}};
- _Wrong ->
- {next_state, locked, Data#{remaining := Code}}
+ {next_state, open, Data#{buttons := []},
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ {next_state, locked, Data#{buttons := NewButtons}}
end.
-
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
open(state_timeout, lock, Data) ->
do_lock(),
{next_state, locked, Data};
open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
{next_state, open, Data}.
-
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
do_lock() ->
io:format("Lock~n", []).
do_unlock() ->
@@ -479,8 +827,6 @@ do_unlock() ->
terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) ->
State =/= locked andalso do_lock(),
ok.
-code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) ->
- {ok, State, Data}.
]]></code>
<p>The code is explained in the next sections.</p>
</section>
@@ -556,17 +902,17 @@ start_link(Code) ->
in this case <c>locked</c>; assuming that the door is locked to begin
with. <c>Data</c> is the internal server data of the <c>gen_statem</c>.
Here the server data is a <seealso marker="stdlib:maps">map</seealso>
- with key <c>code</c> that stores
- the correct button sequence, and key <c>remaining</c>
- that stores the remaining correct button sequence
- (the same as the <c>code</c> to begin with).
+ with key <c>code</c> that stores the correct button sequence,
+ key <c>length</c> store its length,
+ and key <c>buttons</c> that stores the collected buttons
+ up to the same length.
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
init(Code) ->
do_lock(),
- Data = #{code => Code, remaining => Code},
- {ok,locked,Data}.
+ Data = #{code => Code, length => length(Code), buttons => []},
+ {ok, locked, Data}.
]]></code>
<p>Function
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#start_link/3"><c>gen_statem:start_link</c></seealso>
@@ -584,10 +930,6 @@ init(Code) ->
a <c>gen_statem</c> that is not part of a supervision tree.
</p>
- <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
-callback_mode() ->
- state_functions.
- ]]></code>
<p>
Function
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:callback_mode/0"><c>Module:callback_mode/0</c></seealso>
@@ -595,8 +937,12 @@ callback_mode() ->
<seealso marker="#Callback Modes"><c>CallbackMode</c></seealso>
for the callback module, in this case
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"><c>state_functions</c></seealso>.
- That is, each state has got its own handler function.
+ That is, each state has got its own handler function:
</p>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+callback_mode() ->
+ state_functions.
+ ]]></code>
</section>
@@ -620,7 +966,7 @@ button(Digit) ->
<c>{button,Digit}</c> is the event content.
</p>
<p>
- The event is made into a message and sent to the <c>gen_statem</c>.
+ The event is sent to the <c>gen_statem</c>.
When the event is received, the <c>gen_statem</c> calls
<c>StateName(cast, Event, Data)</c>, which is expected to
return a tuple <c>{next_state, NewStateName, NewData}</c>,
@@ -629,44 +975,48 @@ button(Digit) ->
<c>NewStateName</c> is the name of the next state to go to.
<c>NewData</c> is a new value for the server data of
the <c>gen_statem</c>, and <c>Actions</c> is a list of
- actions on the <c>gen_statem</c> engine.
+ actions to be performed by the <c>gen_statem</c> engine.
</p>
+
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
locked(
- cast, {button,Digit},
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] -> % Complete
+ cast, {button,Button},
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+ NewButtons =
+ if
+ length(Buttons) < Length ->
+ Buttons;
+ true ->
+ tl(Buttons)
+ end ++ [Button],
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
do_unlock(),
- {next_state, open, Data#{remaining := Code},
- [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
- [Digit|Rest] -> % Incomplete
- {next_state, locked, Data#{remaining := Rest}};
- [_|_] -> % Wrong
- {next_state, locked, Data#{remaining := Code}}
+ {next_state, open, Data#{buttons := []},
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ {next_state, locked, Data#{buttons := NewButtons}}
end.
-
-open(state_timeout, lock, Data) ->
- do_lock(),
- {next_state, locked, Data};
-open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
- {next_state, open, Data}.
]]></code>
<p>
- If the door is locked and a button is pressed, the pressed
- button is compared with the next correct button.
+ In state <c>locked</c>, when a button is pressed,
+ it is collected with the last pressed buttons
+ up to the length of the correct code,
+ and compared with the correct code.
Depending on the result, the door is either unlocked
and the <c>gen_statem</c> goes to state <c>open</c>,
or the door remains in state <c>locked</c>.
</p>
<p>
- If the pressed button is incorrect, the server data
- restarts from the start of the code sequence.
- </p>
- <p>
- If the whole code is correct, the server changes states
- to <c>open</c>.
+ When changing to state <c>open</c>, the collected
+ buttons are reset, the lock unlocked, and a state timer
+ for 10 s is started.
</p>
+
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
+ {next_state, open, Data}.
+ ]]></code>
<p>
In state <c>open</c>, a button event is ignored
by staying in the same state. This can also be done
@@ -684,9 +1034,9 @@ open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
the following tuple is returned from <c>locked/2</c>:
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
-{next_state, open, Data#{remaining := Code},
- [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
- ]]></code>
+{next_state, open, Data#{buttons := []},
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
+ ]]></code>
<p>
10,000 is a time-out value in milliseconds.
After this time (10 seconds), a time-out occurs.
@@ -721,10 +1071,9 @@ open(state_timeout, lock, Data) ->
</p>
<p>
Consider a <c>code_length/0</c> function that returns
- the length of the correct code
- (that should not be sensitive to reveal).
+ the length of the correct code.
We dispatch all events that are not state-specific
- to the common function <c>handle_event/3</c>:
+ to the common function <c>handle_common/3</c>:
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
...
@@ -737,16 +1086,46 @@ code_length() ->
...
locked(...) -> ... ;
locked(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
- handle_event(EventType, EventContent, Data).
+ handle_common(EventType, EventContent, Data).
...
open(...) -> ... ;
open(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
- handle_event(EventType, EventContent, Data).
+ handle_common(EventType, EventContent, Data).
-handle_event({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
- {keep_state, Data, [{reply,From,length(Code)}]}.
+handle_common({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data,
+ [{reply,From,length(Code)}]}.
]]></code>
+
+ <p>
+ Another way to do it is through a convenience macro
+ <c>?HANDLE_COMMON/0</c>:
+ </p>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+...
+-export([button/1,code_length/0]).
+...
+
+code_length() ->
+ gen_statem:call(?NAME, code_length).
+
+-define(HANDLE_COMMON,
+ ?FUNCTION_NAME(T, C, D) -> handle_common(T, C, D)).
+%%
+handle_common({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data,
+ [{reply,From,length(Code)}]}.
+
+...
+locked(...) -> ... ;
+?HANDLE_COMMON.
+
+...
+open(...) -> ... ;
+?HANDLE_COMMON.
+]]></code>
+
<p>
This example uses
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#call/2"><c>gen_statem:call/2</c></seealso>,
@@ -757,6 +1136,14 @@ handle_event({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
when you want to stay in the current state but do not know or
care about what it is.
</p>
+ <p>
+ If the common event handler needs to know the current state
+ a function <c>handle_common/4</c> can be used instead:
+ </p>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+-define(HANDLE_COMMON,
+ ?FUNCTION_NAME(T, C, D) -> handle_common(T, C, ?FUNCTION_NAME, D)).
+ ]]></code>
</section>
<!-- =================================================================== -->
@@ -765,7 +1152,11 @@ handle_event({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
<marker id="One Event Handler" />
<title>One Event Handler</title>
<p>
- If mode <c>handle_event_function</c> is used,
+ If
+ <seealso marker="#Callback Modes">
+ Callback Mode
+ </seealso>
+ <c>handle_event_function</c> is used,
all events are handled in
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#Module:handle_event/4"><c>Module:handle_event/4</c></seealso>
and we can (but do not have to) use an event-centered approach
@@ -783,25 +1174,35 @@ callback_mode() ->
handle_event(cast, {button,Digit}, State, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
case State of
locked ->
- case maps:get(remaining, Data) of
- [Digit] -> % Complete
- do_unlock(),
- {next_state, open, Data#{remaining := Code},
- [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
- [Digit|Rest] -> % Incomplete
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Rest}};
- [_|_] -> % Wrong
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code}}
- end;
+ #{length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data,
+ NewButtons =
+ if
+ length(Buttons) < Length ->
+ Buttons;
+ true ->
+ tl(Buttons)
+ end ++ [Button],
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
+ do_unlock(),
+ {next_state, open, Data#{buttons := []},
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := NewButtons}}
+ end;
open ->
keep_state_and_data
end;
handle_event(state_timeout, lock, open, Data) ->
do_lock(),
- {next_state, locked, Data}.
+ {next_state, locked, Data};
+handle_event(
+ {call,From}, code_length, _State, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data,
+ [{reply,From,length(Code)}]}.
...
- ]]></code>
+]]></code>
</section>
<!-- =================================================================== -->
@@ -833,7 +1234,7 @@ init(Args) ->
process_flag(trap_exit, true),
do_lock(),
...
- ]]></code>
+ ]]></code>
<p>
When ordered to shut down, the <c>gen_statem</c> then calls
callback function <c>terminate(shutdown, State, Data)</c>.
@@ -847,7 +1248,7 @@ init(Args) ->
terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) ->
State =/= locked andalso do_lock(),
ok.
- ]]></code>
+ ]]></code>
</section>
<section>
@@ -866,7 +1267,7 @@ terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) ->
...
stop() ->
gen_statem:stop(?NAME).
- ]]></code>
+ ]]></code>
<p>
This makes the <c>gen_statem</c> call callback function
<c>terminate/3</c> just like for a supervised server
@@ -889,30 +1290,29 @@ stop() ->
</p>
<p>
It is ordered by the state transition action
- <c>{timeout,Time,EventContent}</c>, or just <c>Time</c>,
- or even just <c>Time</c> instead of an action list
+ <c>{timeout,Time,EventContent}</c>, or just an integer <c>Time</c>,
+ even without the enclosing actions list
(the latter is a form inherited from <c>gen_fsm</c>.
</p>
<p>
- This type of time-out is useful to for example act on inactivity.
+ This type of time-out is useful for example to act on inactivity.
Let us restart the code sequence
if no button is pressed for say 30 seconds:
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
...
-locked(
- timeout, _,
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- {next_state, locked, Data#{remaining := Code}};
+locked(timeout, _, Data) ->
+ {next_state, locked, Data#{buttons := []}};
locked(
cast, {button,Digit},
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
...
- [Digit|Rest] -> % Incomplete
- {next_state, locked, Data#{remaining := Rest}, 30000};
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ {next_state, locked, Data#{buttons := NewButtons},
+ 30000} % Time in milliseconds
...
- ]]></code>
+]]></code>
<p>
Whenever we receive a button event we start an event time-out
of 30 seconds, and if we get an event type <c>timeout</c>
@@ -925,6 +1325,13 @@ locked(
Whatever event you act on has already cancelled
the event time-out...
</p>
+ <p>
+ Note that an event time-out does not work well with
+ when you have for example a status call as in
+ <seealso marker="#All State Events">All State Events</seealso>,
+ or handle unknown events, since all kinds of events
+ will cancel the event time-out.
+ </p>
</section>
<!-- =================================================================== -->
@@ -952,37 +1359,43 @@ locked(
<p>
Here is how to accomplish the state time-out
in the previous example by instead using a generic time-out
- named <c>open_tm</c>:
+ named for example <c>open</c>:
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
...
locked(
cast, {button,Digit},
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] ->
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+...
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
do_unlock(),
- {next_state, open, Data#{remaining := Code},
- [{{timeout,open_tm},10000,lock}]};
+ {next_state, open, Data#{buttons := []},
+ [{{timeout,open},10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
...
-open({timeout,open_tm}, lock, Data) ->
+open({timeout,open}, lock, Data) ->
do_lock(),
{next_state,locked,Data};
open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
{keep_state,Data};
...
- ]]></code>
+]]></code>
<p>
- Just as
- <seealso marker="#State Time-Outs">state time-outs</seealso>
- you can restart or cancel a specific generic time-out
+ Specific generic time-outs can just as
+ <seealso marker="#State Time-Outs">State Time-Outs</seealso>
+ be restarted or cancelled
by setting it to a new time or <c>infinity</c>.
</p>
<p>
- Another way to handle a late time-out can be to not cancel it,
- but to ignore it if it arrives in a state
- where it is known to be late.
+ In this particular case we do not need to cancel the timeout
+ since the timeout event is the only possible reason to
+ change the state from <c>open</c> to <c>locked</c>.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ Instead of bothering with when to cancel a time-out,
+ a late time-out event can be handled by ignoring it
+ if it arrives in a state where it is known to be late.
</p>
</section>
@@ -994,7 +1407,7 @@ open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
<p>
The most versatile way to handle time-outs is to use
Erlang Timers; see
- <seealso marker="erts:erlang#start_timer/4"><c>erlang:start_timer3,4</c></seealso>.
+ <seealso marker="erts:erlang#start_timer/4"><c>erlang:start_timer/3,4</c></seealso>.
Most time-out tasks can be performed with the
time-out features in <c>gen_statem</c>,
but an example of one that can not is if you should need
@@ -1009,12 +1422,15 @@ open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
...
locked(
cast, {button,Digit},
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] ->
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+...
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
do_unlock(),
- Tref = erlang:start_timer(10000, self(), lock),
- {next_state, open, Data#{remaining := Code, timer => Tref}};
+ Tref =
+ erlang:start_timer(
+ 10000, self(), lock), % Time in milliseconds
+ {next_state, open, Data#{buttons := [], timer => Tref}};
...
open(info, {timeout,Tref,lock}, #{timer := Tref} = Data) ->
@@ -1023,7 +1439,7 @@ open(info, {timeout,Tref,lock}, #{timer := Tref} = Data) ->
open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
{keep_state,Data};
...
- ]]></code>
+]]></code>
<p>
Removing the <c>timer</c> key from the map when we
change to state <c>locked</c> is not strictly
@@ -1063,7 +1479,9 @@ open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
</p>
<p>
Postponing is ordered by the state transition
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action">action</seealso>
+ <seealso marker="#State Transition Actions">
+ State Transition Action
+ </seealso>
<c>postpone</c>.
</p>
<p>
@@ -1076,15 +1494,18 @@ open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
open(cast, {button,_}, Data) ->
{keep_state,Data,[postpone]};
...
- ]]></code>
+]]></code>
<p>
Since a postponed event is only retried after a state change,
you have to think about where to keep a state data item.
You can keep it in the server <c>Data</c>
or in the <c>State</c> itself,
for example by having two more or less identical states
- to keep a boolean value, or by using a complex state with
- <seealso marker="#Callback Modes">callback mode</seealso>
+ to keep a boolean value, or by using a complex state
+ (see section
+ <seealso marker="#Complex State">Complex State</seealso>)
+ with
+ <seealso marker="#Callback Modes">Callback Mode</seealso>
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"><c>handle_event_function</c></seealso>.
If a change in the value changes the set of events that is handled,
then the value should be kept in the State.
@@ -1134,28 +1555,38 @@ start_link(Code) ->
fun () ->
true = register(?NAME, self()),
do_lock(),
- locked(Code, Code)
+ locked(Code, length(Code), [])
end).
-button(Digit) ->
- ?NAME ! {button,Digit}.
-
-locked(Code, [Digit|Remaining]) ->
+button(Button) ->
+ ?NAME ! {button,Button}.
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+locked(Code, Length, Buttons) ->
receive
- {button,Digit} when Remaining =:= [] ->
- do_unlock(),
- open(Code);
- {button,Digit} ->
- locked(Code, Remaining);
- {button,_} ->
- locked(Code, Code)
+ {button,Button} ->
+ NewButtons =
+ if
+ length(Buttons) < Length ->
+ Buttons;
+ true ->
+ tl(Buttons)
+ end ++ [Button],
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
+ do_unlock(),
+ open(Code, Length);
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ locked(Code, Length, NewButtons)
+ end
end.
-
-open(Code) ->
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+open(Code, Length) ->
receive
- after 10000 ->
+ after 10000 -> % Time in milliseconds
do_lock(),
- locked(Code, Code)
+ locked(Code, Length, [])
end.
do_lock() ->
@@ -1178,8 +1609,10 @@ do_unlock() ->
passing non-system messages to the callback module.
</p>
<p>
- The state transition
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action">action</seealso>
+ The
+ <seealso marker="#State Transition Actions">
+ State Transition Action
+ </seealso>
<c>postpone</c> is designed to model
selective receives. A selective receive implicitly postpones
any not received events, but the <c>postpone</c>
@@ -1196,16 +1629,16 @@ do_unlock() ->
<!-- =================================================================== -->
<section>
- <marker id="State Entry Actions" />
- <title>State Entry Actions</title>
+ <marker id="State Enter Actions" />
+ <title>State Enter Actions</title>
<p>
Say you have a state machine specification
- that uses state entry actions.
- Allthough you can code this using self-generated events
+ that uses state enter actions.
+ Allthough you can code this using inserted events
(described in the next section), especially if just
- one or a few states has got state entry actions,
+ one or a few states has got state enter actions,
this is a perfect use case for the built in
- <seealso marker="#State Enter Calls">state enter calls</seealso>.
+ <seealso marker="#State Enter Calls">State Enter Calls</seealso>.
</p>
<p>
You return a list containing <c>state_enter</c> from your
@@ -1219,7 +1652,7 @@ do_unlock() ->
...
init(Code) ->
process_flag(trap_exit, true),
- Data = #{code => Code},
+ Data = #{code => Code, length = length(Code)},
{ok, locked, Data}.
callback_mode() ->
@@ -1227,24 +1660,26 @@ callback_mode() ->
locked(enter, _OldState, Data) ->
do_lock(),
- {keep_state,Data#{remaining => Code}};
+ {keep_state,Data#{buttons => []}};
locked(
cast, {button,Digit},
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] ->
- {next_state, open, Data};
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+...
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
+ {next_state, open, Data};
...
open(enter, _OldState, _Data) ->
do_unlock(),
- {keep_state_and_data, [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
+ {keep_state_and_data,
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
open(state_timeout, lock, Data) ->
{next_state, locked, Data};
...
- ]]></code>
+]]></code>
<p>
- You can repeat the state entry code by returning one of
+ You can repeat the state enter code by returning one of
<c>{repeat_state, ...}</c>, <c>{repeat_state_and_data,_}</c>
or <c>repeat_state_and_data</c> that otherwise behaves
exactly like their <c>keep_state</c> siblings.
@@ -1259,13 +1694,15 @@ open(state_timeout, lock, Data) ->
<!-- =================================================================== -->
<section>
- <marker id="Self-Generated Events" />
- <title>Self-Generated Events</title>
+ <marker id="Inserted Events" />
+ <title>Inserted Events</title>
<p>
It can sometimes be beneficial to be able to generate events
to your own state machine.
- This can be done with the state transition
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action">action</seealso>
+ This can be done with the
+ <seealso marker="#State Transition Actions">
+ State Transition Action
+ </seealso>
<c>{next_event,EventType,EventContent}</c>.
</p>
<p>
@@ -1279,58 +1716,75 @@ open(state_timeout, lock, Data) ->
<p>
One example for this is to pre-process incoming data, for example
decrypting chunks or collecting characters up to a line break.
+ </p>
+ <p>
Purists may argue that this should be modelled with a separate
state machine that sends pre-processed events
- to the main state machine.
- But to decrease overhead the small pre-processing state machine
+ to the main state machine,
+ but to decrease overhead the small pre-processing state machine
can be implemented in the common state event handling
of the main state machine using a few state data variables
that then sends the pre-processed events as internal events
to the main state machine.
+ Using internal events also can make it easier
+ to synchronize the state machines.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ A variant of this is to use a
+ <seealso marker="#Complex State">
+ Complex State
+ </seealso>
+ with
+ <seealso marker="#One Event Handler">One Event Handler</seealso>.
+ The state is then modeled with for example a tuple
+ <c>{MainFSMState,SubFSMState}</c>.
</p>
<p>
- The following example uses an input model where you give the lock
- characters with <c>put_chars(Chars)</c> and then call
- <c>enter()</c> to finish the input.
+ To illustrate this we make up an example where the buttons
+ instead generate down and up (press and release) events,
+ and the lock responds to an up event only after
+ the corresponding down event.
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
...
--export(put_chars/1, enter/0).
+-export(down/1, up/1).
...
-put_chars(Chars) when is_binary(Chars) ->
- gen_statem:call(?NAME, {chars,Chars}).
+down(Button) ->
+ gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {down,Button}).
-enter() ->
- gen_statem:call(?NAME, enter).
+up(Button) ->
+ gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {up,Button}).
...
locked(enter, _OldState, Data) ->
do_lock(),
{keep_state,Data#{remaining => Code, buf => []}};
+locked(
+ internal, {button,Digit},
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
...
-
-handle_event({call,From}, {chars,Chars}, #{buf := Buf} = Data) ->
- {keep_state, Data#{buf := [Chars|Buf],
- [{reply,From,ok}]};
-handle_event({call,From}, enter, #{buf := Buf} = Data) ->
- Chars = unicode:characters_to_binary(lists:reverse(Buf)),
- try binary_to_integer(Chars) of
- Digit ->
- {keep_state, Data#{buf := []},
- [{reply,From,ok},
- {next_event,internal,{button,Chars}}]}
- catch
- error:badarg ->
- {keep_state, Data#{buf := []},
- [{reply,From,{error,not_an_integer}}]}
+]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+handle_common(cast, {down,Button}, Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data#{button := Button}};
+handle_common(cast, {up,Button}, Data) ->
+ case Data of
+ #{button := Button} ->
+ {keep_state,maps:remove(button, Data),
+ [{next_event,internal,{button,Button}}]};
+ #{} ->
+ keep_state_and_data
end;
...
- ]]></code>
+
+open(internal, {button,_}, Data) ->
+ {keep_state,Data,[postpone]};
+...
+]]></code>
<p>
If you start this program with <c>code_lock:start([17])</c>
- you can unlock with <c>code_lock:put_chars(&lt;&lt;"001">>),
- code_lock:put_chars(&lt;&lt;"7">>), code_lock:enter()</c>.
+ you can unlock with <c>code_lock:down(17), code_lock:up(17).</c>
</p>
</section>
@@ -1344,14 +1798,16 @@ handle_event({call,From}, enter, #{buf := Buf} = Data) ->
modifications and some more using state enter calls,
which deserves a new state diagram:
</p>
- <image file="../design_principles/code_lock_2.png">
+ <!-- The image is edited with dia in a .dia file,
+ then exported to Scalable Vector Graphics. -->
+ <image file="../design_principles/code_lock_2.svg" width="80%">
<icaption>Code Lock State Diagram Revisited</icaption>
</image>
<p>
Notice that this state diagram does not specify how to handle
a button event in the state <c>open</c>. So, you need to
- read somewhere else that unspecified events
- must be ignored as in not consumed but handled in some other state.
+ read in some side notes, that is, here: that unspecified events
+ shall be postponed (handled in some later state).
Also, the state diagram does not show that the <c>code_length/0</c>
call must be handled in every state.
</p>
@@ -1368,8 +1824,8 @@ handle_event({call,From}, enter, #{buf := Buf} = Data) ->
-define(NAME, code_lock_2).
-export([start_link/1,stop/0]).
--export([button/1,code_length/0]).
--export([init/1,callback_mode/0,terminate/3,code_change/4]).
+-export([down/1,up/1,code_length/0]).
+-export([init/1,callback_mode/0,terminate/3]).
-export([locked/3,open/3]).
start_link(Code) ->
@@ -1377,52 +1833,75 @@ start_link(Code) ->
stop() ->
gen_statem:stop(?NAME).
-button(Digit) ->
- gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {button,Digit}).
+down(Digit) ->
+ gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {down,Digit}).
+up(Digit) ->
+ gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {up,Digit}).
code_length() ->
gen_statem:call(?NAME, code_length).
-
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
init(Code) ->
process_flag(trap_exit, true),
- Data = #{code => Code},
+ Data = #{code => Code, length => length(Code), buttons => []},
{ok, locked, Data}.
callback_mode() ->
[state_functions,state_enter].
-locked(enter, _OldState, #{code := Code} = Data) ->
+-define(HANDLE_COMMON,
+ ?FUNCTION_NAME(T, C, D) -> handle_common(T, C, D)).
+%%
+handle_common(cast, {down,Button}, Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data#{button => Button}};
+handle_common(cast, {up,Button}, Data) ->
+ case Data of
+ #{button := Button} ->
+ {keep_state, maps:remove(button, Data),
+ [{next_event,internal,{button,Button}}]};
+ #{} ->
+ keep_state_and_data
+ end;
+handle_common({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code}) ->
+ {keep_state_and_data,
+ [{reply,From,length(Code)}]}.
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+locked(enter, _OldState, Data) ->
do_lock(),
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining => Code}};
-locked(
- timeout, _,
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code}};
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := []}};
+locked(state_timeout, button, Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := []}};
locked(
- cast, {button,Digit},
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] -> % Complete
+ internal, {button,Digit},
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+ NewButtons =
+ if
+ length(Buttons) < Length ->
+ Buttons;
+ true ->
+ tl(Buttons)
+ end ++ [Button],
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
+ do_unlock(),
{next_state, open, Data};
- [Digit|Rest] -> % Incomplete
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Rest}, 30000};
- [_|_] -> % Wrong
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code}}
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := NewButtons},
+ [{state_timeout,30000,button}]} % Time in milliseconds
end;
-locked(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
- handle_event(EventType, EventContent, Data).
-
+?HANDLE_COMMON.
+]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
open(enter, _OldState, _Data) ->
do_unlock(),
- {keep_state_and_data, [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
+ {keep_state_and_data,
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
open(state_timeout, lock, Data) ->
{next_state, locked, Data};
-open(cast, {button,_}, _) ->
+open(internal, {button,_}, _) ->
{keep_state_and_data, [postpone]};
-open(EventType, EventContent, Data) ->
- handle_event(EventType, EventContent, Data).
-
-handle_event({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code}) ->
- {keep_state_and_data, [{reply,From,length(Code)}]}.
+?HANDLE_COMMON.
do_lock() ->
io:format("Locked~n", []).
@@ -1432,9 +1911,7 @@ do_unlock() ->
terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) ->
State =/= locked andalso do_lock(),
ok.
-code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) ->
- {ok,State,Data}.
- ]]></code>
+ ]]></code>
</section>
<section>
@@ -1448,54 +1925,72 @@ code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) ->
so this example first branches depending on state:
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
-...
-export([handle_event/4]).
-
-...
+]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
callback_mode() ->
[handle_event_function,state_enter].
-
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+%%
%% State: locked
-handle_event(
- enter, _OldState, locked,
- #{code := Code} = Data) ->
+handle_event(enter, _OldState, locked, Data) ->
do_lock(),
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining => Code}};
-handle_event(
- timeout, _, locked,
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code}};
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := []}};
+handle_event(state_timeout, button, locked, Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := []}};
handle_event(
- cast, {button,Digit}, locked,
- #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] -> % Complete
+ internal, {button,Digit}, locked,
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+ NewButtons =
+ if
+ length(Buttons) < Length ->
+ Buttons;
+ true ->
+ tl(Buttons)
+ end ++ [Button],
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
+ do_unlock(),
{next_state, open, Data};
- [Digit|Rest] -> % Incomplete
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Rest}, 30000};
- [_|_] -> % Wrong
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code}}
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := NewButtons},
+ [{state_timeout,30000,button}]} % Time in milliseconds
end;
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
%%
%% State: open
handle_event(enter, _OldState, open, _Data) ->
do_unlock(),
- {keep_state_and_data, [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
+ {keep_state_and_data,
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
handle_event(state_timeout, lock, open, Data) ->
{next_state, locked, Data};
-handle_event(cast, {button,_}, open, _) ->
+handle_event(internal, {button,_}, open, _) ->
{keep_state_and_data,[postpone]};
-%%
-%% Any state
-handle_event({call,From}, code_length, _State, #{code := Code}) ->
- {keep_state_and_data, [{reply,From,length(Code)}]}.
-
-...
- ]]></code>
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+%% Common events
+handle_event(cast, {down,Button}, _State, Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data#{button => Button}};
+handle_event(cast, {up,Button}, _State, Data) ->
+ case Data of
+ #{button := Button} ->
+ {keep_state, maps:remove(button, Data),
+ [{next_event,internal,{button,Button}},
+ {state_timeout,30000,button}]}; % Time in milliseconds
+ #{} ->
+ keep_state_and_data
+ end;
+handle_event({call,From}, code_length, _State, #{length := Length}) ->
+ {keep_state_and_data,
+ [{reply,From,Length}]}.
+ ]]></code>
</section>
<p>
- Notice that postponing buttons from the <c>locked</c> state
- to the <c>open</c> state feels like a strange thing to do
+ Notice that postponing buttons from the <c>open</c> state
+ to the <c>locked</c> state feels like a strange thing to do
for a code lock, but it at least illustrates event postponing.
</p>
</section>
@@ -1532,7 +2027,7 @@ handle_event({call,From}, code_length, _State, #{code := Code}) ->
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
...
--export([init/1,terminate/3,code_change/4,format_status/2]).
+-export([init/1,terminate/3,format_status/2]).
...
format_status(Opt, [_PDict,State,Data]) ->
@@ -1540,7 +2035,6 @@ format_status(Opt, [_PDict,State,Data]) ->
{State,
maps:filter(
fun (code, _) -> false;
- (remaining, _) -> false;
(_, _) -> true
end,
Data)},
@@ -1576,10 +2070,10 @@ format_status(Opt, [_PDict,State,Data]) ->
<p>
One reason to use this is when you have a state item
that when changed should cancel the
- <seealso marker="#State Time-Outs">state time-out</seealso>,
+ <seealso marker="#State Time-Outs">State Time-Out</seealso>,
or one that affects the event handling
in combination with postponing events.
- We will complicate the previous example
+ We will go for the latter and complicate the previous example
by introducing a configurable lock button
(this is the state item in question),
which in the <c>open</c> state immediately locks the door,
@@ -1588,33 +2082,33 @@ format_status(Opt, [_PDict,State,Data]) ->
<p>
Suppose now that we call <c>set_lock_button</c>
while the door is open,
- and have already postponed a button event
- that until now was not the lock button.
- The sensible thing can be to say that
- the button was pressed too early so it is
- not to be recognized as the lock button.
- However, then it can be surprising that a button event
- that now is the lock button event arrives (as retried postponed)
- immediately after the state transits to <c>locked</c>.
- </p>
- <p>
- So we make the <c>button/1</c> function synchronous
- by using
- <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#call/2"><c>gen_statem:call</c></seealso>
- and still postpone its events in the <c>open</c> state.
- Then a call to <c>button/1</c> during the <c>open</c>
- state does not return until the state transits to <c>locked</c>,
- as it is there the event is handled and the reply is sent.
- </p>
- <p>
- If a process now calls <c>set_lock_button/1</c>
- to change the lock button while another process
- hangs in <c>button/1</c> with the new lock button,
- it can be expected that the hanging lock button call
- immediately takes effect and locks the lock.
- Therefore, we make the current lock button a part of the state,
- so that when we change the lock button, the state changes
- and all postponed events are retried.
+ and we have already postponed a button event
+ that was the new lock button:
+ </p>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+1> code_lock:start_link([a,b,c], x).
+{ok,<0.666.0>}
+2> code_lock:button(a).
+ok
+3> code_lock:button(b).
+ok
+4> code_lock:button(c).
+ok
+Open
+5> code_lock:button(y).
+ok
+6> code_lock:set_lock_button(y).
+x
+% What should happen here? Immediate lock or nothing?
+]]></code>
+ <p>
+ We could say that the button was pressed too early
+ so it is not to be recognized as the lock button.
+ Or we can make the lock button part of the state so
+ when we then change the lock button in the locked state,
+ the change becomes a state change
+ and all postponed events are retried,
+ therefore the lock is immediately locked!
</p>
<p>
We define the state as <c>{StateName,LockButton}</c>,
@@ -1627,8 +2121,8 @@ format_status(Opt, [_PDict,State,Data]) ->
-define(NAME, code_lock_3).
-export([start_link/2,stop/0]).
--export([button/1,code_length/0,set_lock_button/1]).
--export([init/1,callback_mode/0,terminate/3,code_change/4,format_status/2]).
+-export([button/1,set_lock_button/1]).
+-export([init/1,callback_mode/0,terminate/3]).
-export([handle_event/4]).
start_link(Code, LockButton) ->
@@ -1637,77 +2131,69 @@ start_link(Code, LockButton) ->
stop() ->
gen_statem:stop(?NAME).
-button(Digit) ->
- gen_statem:call(?NAME, {button,Digit}).
-code_length() ->
- gen_statem:call(?NAME, code_length).
+button(Button) ->
+ gen_statem:cast(?NAME, {button,Button}).
set_lock_button(LockButton) ->
gen_statem:call(?NAME, {set_lock_button,LockButton}).
-
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
init({Code,LockButton}) ->
process_flag(trap_exit, true),
- Data = #{code => Code, remaining => undefined},
+ Data = #{code => Code, length => length(Code), buttons => []},
{ok, {locked,LockButton}, Data}.
callback_mode() ->
[handle_event_function,state_enter].
-handle_event(
- {call,From}, {set_lock_button,NewLockButton},
- {StateName,OldLockButton}, Data) ->
- {next_state, {StateName,NewLockButton}, Data,
- [{reply,From,OldLockButton}]};
-handle_event(
- {call,From}, code_length,
- {_StateName,_LockButton}, #{code := Code}) ->
- {keep_state_and_data,
- [{reply,From,length(Code)}]};
-%%
%% State: locked
+handle_event(enter, _OldState, {locked,_}, Data) ->
+ do_lock(),
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := []}};
+handle_event(state_timeout, button, {locked,_}, Data) ->
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := []}};
handle_event(
- EventType, EventContent,
- {locked,LockButton}, #{code := Code, remaining := Remaining} = Data) ->
- case {EventType, EventContent} of
- {enter, _OldState} ->
- do_lock(),
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code}};
- {timeout, _} ->
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code}};
- {{call,From}, {button,Digit}} ->
- case Remaining of
- [Digit] -> % Complete
- {next_state, {open,LockButton}, Data,
- [{reply,From,ok}]};
- [Digit|Rest] -> % Incomplete
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Rest},
- [{reply,From,ok}, 30000]};
- [_|_] -> % Wrong
- {keep_state, Data#{remaining := Code},
- [{reply,From,ok}]}
- end
+ cast, {button,Digit}, {locked,LockButton},
+ #{code := Code, length := Length, buttons := Buttons} = Data) ->
+ NewButtons =
+ if
+ length(Buttons) < Length ->
+ Buttons;
+ true ->
+ tl(Buttons)
+ end ++ [Button],
+ if
+ NewButtons =:= Code -> % Correct
+ do_unlock(),
+ {next_state, {open,LockButton}, Data};
+ true -> % Incomplete | Incorrect
+ {keep_state, Data#{buttons := NewButtons},
+ [{state_timeout,30000,button}]} % Time in milliseconds
end;
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
%%
%% State: open
+handle_event(enter, _OldState, {open,_}, _Data) ->
+ do_unlock(),
+ {keep_state_and_data,
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]}; % Time in milliseconds
+handle_event(state_timeout, lock, {open,_}, Data) ->
+ {next_state, locked, Data};
+handle_event(cast, {button,LockButton}, {open,LockButton}, Data) ->
+ {next_state, {locked,LockButton}, Data};
+handle_event(cast, {button,_}, {open,_}, Data) ->
+ {keep_state_and_data,[postpone]};
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
+%%
+%% Common events
handle_event(
- EventType, EventContent,
- {open,LockButton}, Data) ->
- case {EventType, EventContent} of
- {enter, _OldState} ->
- do_unlock(),
- {keep_state_and_data, [{state_timeout,10000,lock}]};
- {state_timeout, lock} ->
- {next_state, {locked,LockButton}, Data};
- {{call,From}, {button,Digit}} ->
- if
- Digit =:= LockButton ->
- {next_state, {locked,LockButton}, Data,
- [{reply,From,locked}]};
- true ->
- {keep_state_and_data,
- [postpone]}
- end
- end.
-
+ {call,From}, {set_lock_button,NewLockButton},
+ {StateName,OldLockButton}, Data) ->
+ {next_state, {StateName,NewLockButton}, Data,
+ [{reply,From,OldLockButton}]}.
+ ]]></code>
+ <code type="erl"><![CDATA[
do_lock() ->
io:format("Locked~n", []).
do_unlock() ->
@@ -1716,29 +2202,7 @@ do_unlock() ->
terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) ->
State =/= locked andalso do_lock(),
ok.
-code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) ->
- {ok,State,Data}.
-format_status(Opt, [_PDict,State,Data]) ->
- StateData =
- {State,
- maps:filter(
- fun (code, _) -> false;
- (remaining, _) -> false;
- (_, _) -> true
- end,
- Data)},
- case Opt of
- terminate ->
- StateData;
- normal ->
- [{data,[{"State",StateData}]}]
- end.
]]></code>
- <p>
- It can be an ill-fitting model for a physical code lock
- that the <c>button/1</c> call can hang until the lock
- is locked. But for an API in general it is not that strange.
- </p>
</section>
<!-- =================================================================== -->
@@ -1770,17 +2234,15 @@ format_status(Opt, [_PDict,State,Data]) ->
</p>
<code type="erl"><![CDATA[
...
+%%
%% State: open
-handle_event(
- EventType, EventContent,
- {open,LockButton}, Data) ->
- case {EventType, EventContent} of
- {enter, _OldState} ->
- do_unlock(),
- {keep_state_and_data,
- [{state_timeout,10000,lock},hibernate]};
+handle_event(enter, _OldState, {open,_}, _Data) ->
+ do_unlock(),
+ {keep_state_and_data,
+ [{state_timeout,10000,lock}, % Time in milliseconds
+ hibernate]};
...
- ]]></code>
+]]></code>
<p>
The atom
<seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-hibernate"><c>hibernate</c></seealso>
@@ -1793,20 +2255,34 @@ handle_event(
<p>
To change that we would need to insert
action <c>hibernate</c> in more places.
- For example, for the state-independent <c>set_lock_button</c>
- and <c>code_length</c> operations that then would have to
- be aware of using <c>hibernate</c> while in the
+ For example, the state-independent <c>set_lock_button</c>
+ operation would have to use <c>hibernate</c> but only in the
<c>{open,_}</c> state, which would clutter the code.
</p>
<p>
- Another not uncommon scenario is to use the event time-out
- to triger hibernation after a certain time of inactivity.
+ Another not uncommon scenario is to use the
+ <seealso marker="#Event Time-Outs">Event Time-Out</seealso>
+ to trigger hibernation after a certain time of inactivity.
+ There is also a server start option
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-hibernate_after_opt">
+ <c>{hibernate_after, Timeout}</c>
+ </seealso>
+ for
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#start/3">
+ <c>start/3,4</c>
+ </seealso>
+ or
+ <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#start_link/3">
+ <c>start_link/3,4</c>
+ </seealso>
+ that may be used to automatically hibernate the server.
</p>
<p>
- This server probably does not use
+ This particular server probably does not use
heap memory worth hibernating for.
To gain anything from hibernation, your server would
- have to produce some garbage during callback execution,
+ have to produce non-insignificant garbage
+ during callback execution,
for which this example server can serve as a bad example.
</p>
</section>