aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/system/doc/efficiency_guide/retired_myths.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'system/doc/efficiency_guide/retired_myths.xml')
-rw-r--r--system/doc/efficiency_guide/retired_myths.xml14
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/system/doc/efficiency_guide/retired_myths.xml b/system/doc/efficiency_guide/retired_myths.xml
index 9b914a3b6e..144c942c2b 100644
--- a/system/doc/efficiency_guide/retired_myths.xml
+++ b/system/doc/efficiency_guide/retired_myths.xml
@@ -60,4 +60,18 @@
That leads us to the myth that tail-recursive functions are faster
than body-recursive functions.</p>
</section>
+
+ <section>
+ <title>Myth: List subtraction ("--" operator) is slow</title>
+
+ <p>List subtraction used to have a run-time complexity proportional to the
+ product of the length of its operands, so it was extremely slow when both
+ lists were long.</p>
+
+ <p>As of OTP 22 the run-time complexity is "n log n" and the operation will
+ complete quickly even when both lists are very long. In fact, it is
+ faster and uses less memory than the commonly used workaround to convert
+ both lists to ordered sets before subtracting them with
+ <c>ordsets:subtract/2</c>.</p>
+ </section>
</chapter>