diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'system/doc/reference_manual')
-rw-r--r-- | system/doc/reference_manual/expressions.xml | 106 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | system/doc/reference_manual/records.xml | 29 | ||||
-rwxr-xr-x | system/doc/reference_manual/typespec.xml | 659 |
3 files changed, 448 insertions, 346 deletions
diff --git a/system/doc/reference_manual/expressions.xml b/system/doc/reference_manual/expressions.xml index fa7870d96c..714ecccaf6 100644 --- a/system/doc/reference_manual/expressions.xml +++ b/system/doc/reference_manual/expressions.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ <chapter> <header> <copyright> - <year>2003</year><year>2009</year> + <year>2003</year><year>2010</year> <holder>Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.</holder> </copyright> <legalnotice> @@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ compliance with the License. You should have received a copy of the Erlang Public License along with this software. If not, it can be retrieved online at http://www.erlang.org/. - + Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the License. - + </legalnotice> <title>Expressions</title> @@ -217,12 +217,16 @@ lists:keysearch(Name, 1, List)</code> <p>In the second form of function calls, <c>ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)</c>, <c>ExprF</c> must be an atom or evaluate to a fun.</p> + <p>If <c>ExprF</c> is an atom the function is said to be called by - using the <em>implicitly qualified function name</em>. If - <c>ExprF/N</c> is the name of a function explicitly or - automatically imported from module <c>M</c>, then the call is - short for <c>M:ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)</c>. Otherwise, - <c>ExprF/N</c> must be a locally defined function. Examples:</p> + using the <em>implicitly qualified function name</em>. If the + function <c>ExprF</c> is locally defined, it is called. + Alternatively if <c>ExprF</c> is explicitly imported from module + <c>M</c>, <c>M:ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)</c> is called. If + <c>ExprF</c> is neither declared locally nor explicitly + imported, <c>ExprF</c> must be the name of an automatically + imported BIF. Examples:</p> + <code type="none"> handle(Msg, State) spawn(m, init, [])</code> @@ -238,16 +242,85 @@ Fun2([1,2], [3,4]) fun lists:append/2([1,2], [3,4]) => [1,2,3,4]</code> - <p>To avoid possible ambiguities, the fully qualified function - name must be used when calling a function with the same name as - a BIF, and the compiler does not allow defining a function with - the same name as an explicitly imported function.</p> + <p>Note that when calling a local function, there is a difference - between using the implicitly or fully qualified function name, as - the latter always refers to the latest version of the module. See - <seealso marker="code_loading">Compilation and Code Loading</seealso>.</p> + between using the implicitly or fully qualified function name, as + the latter always refers to the latest version of the module. See + <seealso marker="code_loading">Compilation and Code Loading</seealso>.</p> + <p>See also the chapter about <seealso marker="functions#eval">Function Evaluation</seealso>.</p> + + <section> + <title>Local Function Names Clashing With Auto-imported BIFs</title> + <p>If a local function has the same name as an auto-imported BIF, + the semantics is that implicitly qualified function calls are + directed to the locally defined function, not to the BIF. To avoid + confusion, there is a compiler directive available, + <c>-compile({no_auto_import,[F/A]})</c>, that makes a BIF not + being auto-imported. In certain situations, such a compile-directive + is mandatory.</p> + + <warning><p>Before OTP R14A (ERTS version 5.8), an implicitly + qualified function call to a function having the same name as an + auto-imported BIF always resulted in the BIF being called. In + newer versions of the compiler the local function is instead + called. The change is there to avoid that future additions to the + set of auto-imported BIFs does not silently change the behavior + of old code.</p> + + <p>However, to avoid that old (pre R14) code changed it's + behavior when compiled with OTP version R14A or later, the + following restriction applies: If you override the name of a BIF + that was auto-imported in OTP versions prior to R14A (ERTS version + 5.8) and have an implicitly qualified call to that function in + your code, you either need to explicitly remove the auto-import + using a compiler directive, or replace the call with a fully + qualified function call, otherwise you will get a compilation + error. See example below:</p> </warning> + + <code type="none"> +-export([length/1,f/1]). + +-compile({no_auto_import,[length/1]}). % erlang:length/1 no longer autoimported + +length([]) -> + 0; +length([H|T]) -> + 1 + length(T). %% Calls the local funtion length/1 + +f(X) when erlang:length(X) > 3 -> %% Calls erlang:length/1, + %% which is allowed in guards + long.</code> + + <p>The same logic applies to explicitly imported functions from + other modules as to locally defined functions. To both import a + function from another module and have the function declared in the + module at the same time is not allowed.</p> + + <code type="none"> +-export([f/1]). + +-compile({no_auto_import,[length/1]}). % erlang:length/1 no longer autoimported + +-import(mod,[length/1]). + +f(X) when erlang:length(X) > 33 -> %% Calls erlang:lenght/1, + %% which is allowed in guards + + erlang:length(X); %% Explicit call to erlang:length in body + +f(X) -> + length(X). %% mod:length/1 is called</code> + + + <p>For auto-imported BIFs added to Erlang in release R14A and thereafter, + overriding the name with a local function or explicit import is always + allowed. However, if the <c>-compile({no_auto_import,[F/A])</c> + directive is not used, the compiler will issue a warning whenever + the function is called in the module using the implicitly qualified + function name.</p> + </section> </section> <section> @@ -1257,6 +1330,9 @@ end</pre> <cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_bitstring/1</c></cell> </row> <row> + <cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_boolean/1</c></cell> + </row> + <row> <cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_float/1</c></cell> </row> <row> diff --git a/system/doc/reference_manual/records.xml b/system/doc/reference_manual/records.xml index e2fe5fe8de..d01d883ef3 100644 --- a/system/doc/reference_manual/records.xml +++ b/system/doc/reference_manual/records.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ <chapter> <header> <copyright> - <year>2003</year><year>2009</year> + <year>2003</year><year>2010</year> <holder>Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.</holder> </copyright> <legalnotice> @@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ compliance with the License. You should have received a copy of the Erlang Public License along with this software. If not, it can be retrieved online at http://www.erlang.org/. - + Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the License. - + </legalnotice> <title>Records</title> @@ -145,6 +145,29 @@ is_person(_P) -> </section> <section> + <title>Nested records</title> + <p>Beginning with R14 parentheses when accessing or updating nested + records can be omitted. Assuming we have the following record + definitions:</p> + <pre> +-record(nrec0, {name = "nested0"}). +-record(nrec1, {name = "nested1", nrec0=#nrec0{}}). +-record(nrec2, {name = "nested2", nrec1=#nrec1{}}). + +N2 = #nrec2{}, + </pre> + <p>Before R14 you would have needed to use parentheses as following:</p> + <pre> +"nested0" = ((N2#nrec2.nrec1)#nrec1.nrec0)#nrec0.name, +N0n = ((N2#nrec2.nrec1)#nrec1.nrec0)#nrec0{name = "nested0a"}, + </pre> + <p>Since R14 you can also write:</p> + <pre> +"nested0" = N2#nrec2.nrec1#nrec1.nrec0#nrec0.name, +N0n = N2#nrec2.nrec1#nrec1.nrec0#nrec0{name = "nested0a"},</pre> + </section> + + <section> <title>Internal Representation of Records</title> <p>Record expressions are translated to tuple expressions during compilation. A record defined as</p> diff --git a/system/doc/reference_manual/typespec.xml b/system/doc/reference_manual/typespec.xml index a3660713e4..f08639f9a1 100755 --- a/system/doc/reference_manual/typespec.xml +++ b/system/doc/reference_manual/typespec.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ <chapter> <header> <copyright> - <year>2003</year><year>2009</year> + <year>2003</year><year>2010</year> <holder>Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.</holder> </copyright> <legalnotice> @@ -32,29 +32,24 @@ <section> <title>Introduction of Types</title> <p> - Although Erlang is a dynamically typed language this section describes - an extension to the Erlang language for declaring sets of Erlang terms - to form a particular type, effectively forming a specific sub-type of the - set of all Erlang terms. + Erlang is a dynamically typed language. Still, it comes with a + language extension for declaring sets of Erlang terms to form a + particular type, effectively forming a specific sub-type of the set + of all Erlang terms. </p> <p> - Subsequently, these types can be used to specify types of record fields - and the argument and return types of functions. + Subsequently, these types can be used to specify types of record fields + and the argument and return types of functions. </p> <p> - Type information can be used to document function interfaces, - provide more information for bug detection tools such as <c>Dialyzer</c>, - and can be exploited by documentation tools such as <c>Edoc</c> for - generating program documentation of various forms. - It is expected that the type language described in this document will - supersede and replace the purely comment-based <c>@type</c> and + Type information can be used to document function interfaces, + provide more information for bug detection tools such as <c>Dialyzer</c>, + and can be exploited by documentation tools such as <c>Edoc</c> for + generating program documentation of various forms. + It is expected that the type language described in this document will + supersede and replace the purely comment-based <c>@type</c> and <c>@spec</c> declarations used by <c>Edoc</c>. </p> - <warning> - The syntax and semantics described here is still preliminary and might be - slightly changed and extended before it becomes officially supported. - The plan is that this will happen in R14B. - </warning> </section> <section> <marker id="syntax"></marker> @@ -96,7 +91,7 @@ Type :: any() %% The top type, the set of all Erlang terms. | none() %% The bottom type, contains no terms. | pid() | port() - | ref() + | reference() | [] %% nil | Atom | Binary @@ -139,326 +134,334 @@ Tuple :: tuple() %% stands for a tuple of any size TList :: Type | Type, TList ]]></pre> - <p> - Because lists are commonly used, they have shorthand type notations. - The type <c>list(T)</c> has the shorthand <c>[T]</c>. The shorthand <c>[T,...]</c> stands for - the set of non-empty proper lists whose elements are of type <c>T</c>. - The only difference between the two shorthands is that <c>[T]</c> may be an - empty list but <c>[T,...]</c> may not. - </p> - <p> - Notice that the shorthand for <c>list()</c>, i.e. the list of elements of unknown type, - is <c>[_]</c> (or <c>[any()]</c>), not <c>[]</c>. - The notation <c>[]</c> specifies the singleton type for the empty list. - </p> - <p> - For convenience, the following types are also built-in. - They can be thought as predefined aliases for the type unions also shown in - the table. (Some type unions below slightly abuse the syntax of types.) - </p> - <table> - <row> - <cell><b>Built-in type</b></cell><cell><b>Stands for</b></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>term()</c></cell><cell><c>any()</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>bool()</c></cell><cell><c>'false' | 'true'</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>byte()</c></cell><cell><c>0..255</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>char()</c></cell><cell><c>0..16#10ffff</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>non_neg_integer()</c></cell><cell><c>0..</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>pos_integer()</c></cell><cell><c>1..</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>neg_integer()</c></cell><cell><c>..-1</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>number()</c></cell><cell><c>integer() | float()</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>list()</c></cell><cell><c>[any()]</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>maybe_improper_list()</c></cell><cell><c>maybe_improper_list(any(), any())</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>maybe_improper_list(T)</c></cell><cell><c>maybe_improper_list(T, any())</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>string()</c></cell><cell><c>[char()]</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>nonempty_string()</c></cell><cell><c>[char(),...]</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>iolist()</c></cell><cell><c>maybe_improper_list( -char() | binary() | iolist(), binary() | [])</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>module()</c></cell><cell><c>atom()</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>mfa()</c></cell><cell><c>{atom(),atom(),byte()}</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>node()</c></cell><cell><c>atom()</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>timeout()</c></cell><cell><c>'infinity' | non_neg_integer()</c></cell> - </row> - <row> - <cell><c>no_return()</c></cell><cell><c>none()</c></cell> - </row> - </table> - - <p> - Users are not allowed to define types with the same names as the predefined or - built-in ones. - This is checked by the compiler and its violation results in a compilation - error. - (For bootstrapping purposes, it can also result to just a warning if this - involves a built-in type which has just been introduced.) - </p> - <note> - The following built-in list types also exist, - but they are expected to be rarely used. Hence, they have long names: - </note> - <pre> + <p> + Because lists are commonly used, they have shorthand type notations. + The type <c>list(T)</c> has the shorthand <c>[T]</c>. + The shorthand <c>[T,...]</c> stands for + the set of non-empty proper lists whose elements are of type <c>T</c>. + The only difference between the two shorthands is that <c>[T]</c> may be an + empty list but <c>[T,...]</c> may not. + </p> + <p> + Notice that the shorthand for <c>list()</c>, i.e. the list of + elements of unknown type, is <c>[_]</c> (or <c>[any()]</c>), not <c>[]</c>. + The notation <c>[]</c> specifies the singleton type for the empty list. + </p> + <p> + For convenience, the following types are also built-in. + They can be thought as predefined aliases for the type unions also shown in + the table. (Some type unions below slightly abuse the syntax of types.) + </p> + <table> + <row> + <cell><b>Built-in type</b></cell><cell><b>Stands for</b></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>term()</c></cell><cell><c>any()</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>boolean()</c></cell><cell><c>'false' | 'true'</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>byte()</c></cell><cell><c>0..255</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>char()</c></cell><cell><c>0..16#10ffff</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>non_neg_integer()</c></cell><cell><c>0..</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>pos_integer()</c></cell><cell><c>1..</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>neg_integer()</c></cell><cell><c>..-1</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>number()</c></cell><cell><c>integer() | float()</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>list()</c></cell><cell><c>[any()]</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>maybe_improper_list()</c></cell><cell><c>maybe_improper_list(any(), any())</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>maybe_improper_list(T)</c></cell><cell><c>maybe_improper_list(T, any())</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>string()</c></cell><cell><c>[char()]</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>nonempty_string()</c></cell><cell><c>[char(),...]</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>iolist()</c></cell><cell><c>maybe_improper_list(char() | binary() | iolist(), binary() | [])</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>module()</c></cell><cell><c>atom()</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>mfa()</c></cell><cell><c>{atom(),atom(),byte()}</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>node()</c></cell><cell><c>atom()</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>timeout()</c></cell><cell><c>'infinity' | non_neg_integer()</c></cell> + </row> + <row> + <cell><c>no_return()</c></cell><cell><c>none()</c></cell> + </row> + </table> + + <p> + Users are not allowed to define types with the same names as the + predefined or built-in ones. This is checked by the compiler and + its violation results in a compilation error. + (For bootstrapping purposes, it can also result to just a warning if this + involves a built-in type which has just been introduced.) + </p> + <note> + The following built-in list types also exist, + but they are expected to be rarely used. Hence, they have long names: + </note> + <pre> nonempty_maybe_improper_list(Type) :: nonempty_maybe_improper_list(Type, any()) -nonempty_maybe_improper_list() :: nonempty_maybe_improper_list(any()) - </pre> - <p> - where the following two types - define the set of Erlang terms one would expect: - </p> - <pre> +nonempty_maybe_improper_list() :: nonempty_maybe_improper_list(any())</pre> + <p> + where the following two types + define the set of Erlang terms one would expect: + </p> + <pre> nonempty_improper_list(Type1, Type2) -nonempty_maybe_improper_list(Type1, Type2) - </pre> - <p> - Also for convenience, we allow for record notation to be used. - Records are just shorthands for the corresponding tuples. - </p> - <pre> +nonempty_maybe_improper_list(Type1, Type2)</pre> + <p> + Also for convenience, we allow for record notation to be used. + Records are just shorthands for the corresponding tuples. + </p> + <pre> Record :: #Erlang_Atom{} - | #Erlang_Atom{Fields} - </pre> + | #Erlang_Atom{Fields}</pre> + <p> + Records have been extended to possibly contain type information. + This is described in the sub-section <seealso marker="#typeinrecords">"Type information in record declarations"</seealso> below. + </p> + </section> + + <section> + <title>Type declarations of user-defined types</title> <p> - Records have been extended to possibly contain type information. - This is described in the sub-section <seealso marker="#typeinrecords">"Type information in record declarations"</seealso> below. - </p> - </section> - - <section> - <title>Type declarations of user-defined types</title> - <p> - As seen, the basic syntax of a type is an atom followed by closed - parentheses. New types are declared using '-type' compiler attributes - as in the following: - </p> - <pre> --type my_type() :: Type. - </pre> - <p> - where the type name is an atom (<c>'my_type'</c> in the above) followed by - parenthesis. Type is a type as defined in the previous section. - A current restriction is that Type can contain only predefined types - or user-defined types which have been previously defined. - This restriction is enforced by the compiler and results in a - compilation error. (A similar restriction currently exists for records). - </p> - <p> - This means that currently general recursive types cannot be defined. - Lifting this restriction is future work. - </p> - <p> - Type declarations can also be parameterized by including type variables - between the parentheses. The syntax of type variables is the same as - Erlang variables (starts with an upper case letter). - Naturally, these variables can - and should - appear on the RHS of the - definition. A concrete example appears below: - </p> - <pre> --type orddict(Key, Val) :: [{Key, Val}]. - </pre> - - </section> - - <marker id="typeinrecords"/> - <section> - <title> - Type information in record declarations - </title> - <p> - The types of record fields can be specified in the declaration of the - record. The syntax for this is: - </p> - <pre> --record(rec, {field1 :: Type1, field2, field3 :: Type3}). - </pre> - <p> - For fields without type annotations, their type defaults to any(). - I.e., the above is a shorthand for: - </p> - <pre> --record(rec, {field1 :: Type1, field2 :: any(), field3 :: Type3}). - </pre> - <p> - In the presence of initial values for fields, - the type must be declared after the initialization as in the following: - </p> - <pre> --record(rec, {field1 = [] :: Type1, field2, field3 = 42 :: Type3}). - </pre> - <p> - Naturally, the initial values for fields should be compatible - with (i.e. a member of) the corresponding types. - This is checked by the compiler and results in a compilation error - if a violation is detected. For fields without initial values, - the singleton type <c>'undefined'</c> is added to all declared types. - In other words, the following two record declarations have identical - effects: - </p> - <pre> + As seen, the basic syntax of a type is an atom followed by closed + parentheses. New types are declared using '-type' and '-opaque' + compiler attributes as in the following: + </p> + <pre> +-type my_struct_type() :: Type. +-opaque my_opaq_type() :: Type.</pre> + <p> + where the type name is an atom (<c>'my_struct_type'</c> in the above) + followed by parentheses. Type is a type as defined in the + previous section. + A current restriction is that Type can contain only predefined types, + or user-defined types which are either module-local (i.e., with a + definition that is present in the code of the module) or are remote + types (i.e., types defined in and exported by other modules; see below). + For module-local types, the restriction that their definition + exists in the module is enforced by the compiler and results in a + compilation error. (A similar restriction currently exists for records.) + </p> + <p> + Type declarations can also be parameterized by including type variables + between the parentheses. The syntax of type variables is the same as + Erlang variables (starts with an upper case letter). + Naturally, these variables can - and should - appear on the RHS of the + definition. A concrete example appears below: + </p> + <pre> +-type orddict(Key, Val) :: [{Key, Val}].</pre> + <p> + A module can export some types in order to declare that other modules + are allowed to refer to them as <em>remote types</em>. + This declaration has the following form: + <pre> +-export_type([T1/A1, ..., Tk/Ak]).</pre> + where the Ti's are atoms (the name of the type) and the Ai's are their + arguments. An example is given below: + <pre> +-export_type([my_struct_type/0, orddict/2]).</pre> + Assuming that these types are exported from module <c>'mod'</c> then + one can refer to them from other modules using remote type expressions + like those below: + <pre> +mod:my_struct_type() +mod:orddict(atom(), term())</pre> + One is not allowed to refer to types which are not declared as exported. + </p> + <p> + Types declared as <c>opaque</c> represent sets of terms whose + structure is not supposed to be visible in any way outside of + their defining module (i.e., only the module defining them is + allowed to depend on their term structure). Consequently, such + types do not make much sense as module local - module local + types are not accessible by other modules anyway - and should + always be exported. + </p> + </section> + + <marker id="typeinrecords"/> + <section> + <title>Type information in record declarations</title> + <p> + The types of record fields can be specified in the declaration of the + record. The syntax for this is: + </p> + <pre> +-record(rec, {field1 :: Type1, field2, field3 :: Type3}).</pre> + <p> + For fields without type annotations, their type defaults to any(). + I.e., the above is a shorthand for: + </p> + <pre> +-record(rec, {field1 :: Type1, field2 :: any(), field3 :: Type3}).</pre> + <p> + In the presence of initial values for fields, + the type must be declared after the initialization as in the following: + </p> + <pre> +-record(rec, {field1 = [] :: Type1, field2, field3 = 42 :: Type3}).</pre> + <p> + Naturally, the initial values for fields should be compatible + with (i.e. a member of) the corresponding types. + This is checked by the compiler and results in a compilation error + if a violation is detected. For fields without initial values, + the singleton type <c>'undefined'</c> is added to all declared types. + In other words, the following two record declarations have identical + effects: + </p> + <pre> -record(rec, {f1 = 42 :: integer(), f2 :: float(), - f3 :: 'a' | 'b'). + f3 :: 'a' | 'b'}). -record(rec, {f1 = 42 :: integer(), f2 :: 'undefined' | float(), - f3 :: 'undefined' | 'a' | 'b'). - </pre> - <p> - For this reason, it is recommended that records contain initializers, - whenever possible. - </p> - <p> - Any record, containing type information or not, once defined, - can be used as a type using the syntax: - </p> - <pre> -#rec{} - </pre> - <p> - In addition, the record fields can be further specified when using - a record type by adding type information about the field in the following - manner: - </p> - <pre> -#rec{some_field :: Type} - </pre> - <p> - Any unspecified fields are assumed to have the type in the original - record declaration. - </p> - </section> + f3 :: 'undefined' | 'a' | 'b'}).</pre> + <p> + For this reason, it is recommended that records contain initializers, + whenever possible. + </p> + <p> + Any record, containing type information or not, once defined, + can be used as a type using the syntax: + </p> + <pre> +#rec{}</pre> + <p> + In addition, the record fields can be further specified when using + a record type by adding type information about the field in + the following manner: + </p> + <pre> +#rec{some_field :: Type}</pre> + <p> + Any unspecified fields are assumed to have the type in the original + record declaration. + </p> + </section> - <section> - <title>Specifications (contracts) for functions</title> - <p> - A contract (or specification) for a function is given using the new - compiler attribute <c>'-spec'</c>. The basic format is as follows: - </p> - <pre> --spec Module:Function(ArgType1, ..., ArgTypeN) -> ReturnType. - </pre> - <p> - The arity of the function has to match the number of arguments, - or else a compilation error occurs. - </p> - <p> - This form can also be used in header files (.hrl) to declare type - information for exported functions. - Then these header files can be included in files that (implicitly or - explicitly) import these functions. - </p> - <p> - For most uses within a given module, the following shorthand is allowed: - </p> - <pre> --spec Function(ArgType1, ..., ArgTypeN) -> ReturnType. - </pre> - <p> - Also, for documentation purposes, argument names can be given: - </p> - <pre> --spec Function(ArgName1 :: Type1, ..., ArgNameN :: TypeN) -> RT. - </pre> - <p> - A function specification can be overloaded. - That is, it can have several types, separated by a semicolon (<c>;</c>): - </p> - <pre> + <section> + <title>Specifications for functions</title> + <p> + A specification (or contract) for a function is given using the new + compiler attribute <c>'-spec'</c>. The general format is as follows: + </p> + <pre> +-spec Module:Function(ArgType1, ..., ArgTypeN) -> ReturnType.</pre> + <p> + The arity of the function has to match the number of arguments, + or else a compilation error occurs. + </p> + <p> + This form can also be used in header files (.hrl) to declare type + information for exported functions. + Then these header files can be included in files that (implicitly or + explicitly) import these functions. + </p> + <p> + For most uses within a given module, the following shorthand suffices: + </p> + <pre> +-spec Function(ArgType1, ..., ArgTypeN) -> ReturnType.</pre> + <p> + Also, for documentation purposes, argument names can be given: + </p> + <pre> +-spec Function(ArgName1 :: Type1, ..., ArgNameN :: TypeN) -> RT.</pre> + <p> + A function specification can be overloaded. + That is, it can have several types, separated by a semicolon (<c>;</c>): + </p> + <pre> -spec foo(T1, T2) -> T3 - ; (T4, T5) -> T6. - </pre> - <p> - A current restriction, which currently results in a warning - (OBS: not an error) by the compiler, is that the domains of the argument - types cannot be overlapping. - For example, the following specification results in a warning: - </p> - <pre> + ; (T4, T5) -> T6.</pre> + <p> + A current restriction, which currently results in a warning + (OBS: not an error) by the compiler, is that the domains of + the argument types cannot be overlapping. + For example, the following specification results in a warning: + </p> + <pre> -spec foo(pos_integer()) -> pos_integer() - ; (integer()) -> integer(). - </pre> - <p> - Type variables can be used in specifications to specify relations for - the input and output arguments of a function. - For example, the following specification defines the type of a - polymorphic identity function: - </p> - <pre> --spec id(X) -> X. - </pre> - <p> - However, note that the above specification does not restrict the input - and output type in any way. - We can constrain these types by guard-like subtype constraints: - </p> - <pre> --spec id(X) -> X when is_subtype(X, tuple()). - </pre> - <p> - and provide bounded quantification. Currently, - the <c>is_subtype/2</c> guard is the only guard which can - be used in a <c>'-spec'</c> attribute. - </p> - <p> - The scope of an <c>is_subtype/2</c> constraint is the - <c>(...) -> RetType</c> - specification after which it appears. To avoid confusion, - we suggest that different variables are used in different constituents of - an overloaded contract as in the example below: - </p> - <pre> --spec foo({X, integer()}) -> X when is_subtype(X, atom()) - ; ([Y]) -> Y when is_subtype(Y, number()). - </pre> - <p> - Some functions in Erlang are not meant to return; - either because they define servers or because they are used to - throw exceptions as the function below: - </p> - <pre> -my_error(Err) -> erlang:throw({error, Err}). - </pre> - <p> - For such functions we recommend the use of the special no_return() - type for their "return", via a contract of the form: - </p> - <pre> --spec my_error(term()) -> no_return(). - </pre> - </section> + ; (integer()) -> integer().</pre> + <p> + Type variables can be used in specifications to specify relations for + the input and output arguments of a function. + For example, the following specification defines the type of a + polymorphic identity function: + </p> + <pre> +-spec id(X) -> X.</pre> + <p> + However, note that the above specification does not restrict the input + and output type in any way. + We can constrain these types by guard-like subtype constraints: + </p> + <pre> +-spec id(X) -> X when is_subtype(X, tuple()).</pre> + <p> + or equivalently by the more succinct and more modern form of the above: + </p> + <pre> +-spec id(X) -> X when X :: tuple().</pre> + <p> + and provide bounded quantification. Currently, the <c>::</c> constraint + (the <c>is_subtype/2</c> guard) is the only guard constraint which can + be used in the <c>'when'</c> part of a <c>'-spec'</c> attribute. + </p> + <p> + The scope of an <c>::</c> constraint is the + <c>(...) -> RetType</c> + specification after which it appears. To avoid confusion, + we suggest that different variables are used in different + constituents of an overloaded contract as in the example below: + </p> + <pre> +-spec foo({X, integer()}) -> X when X :: atom() + ; ([Y]) -> Y when Y :: number().</pre> + <p> + Some functions in Erlang are not meant to return; + either because they define servers or because they are used to + throw exceptions as the function below: + </p> + <pre> +my_error(Err) -> erlang:throw({error, Err}).</pre> + <p> + For such functions we recommend the use of the special no_return() + type for their "return", via a contract of the form: + </p> + <pre> +-spec my_error(term()) -> no_return().</pre> + </section> </chapter> |