diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'system/doc')
-rw-r--r-- | system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml | 87 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml b/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml index 72aaafd780..27b9b7c761 100644 --- a/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml +++ b/system/doc/design_principles/statem.xml @@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ State(S) x Event(E) -> Actions(A), State(S')</pre> <marker id="callback_modes" /> <title>Callback Modes</title> <p> - The <c>gen_statem</c> behaviour supports two different - <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action"> - callback modes. + The <c>gen_statem</c> behaviour supports two different callback modes. + In the mode + <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"> + <c>state_functions</c>, </seealso> - In the mode <c>state_functions</c>, the state transition rules are written as a number of Erlang functions, which conform to the following convention: </p> @@ -103,7 +103,11 @@ StateName(EventType, EventContent, Data) -> .. code for actions here ... {next_state, NewStateName, NewData}.</pre> <p> - In the mode <c>handle_event_function</c> there is only one + In the mode + <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"> + <c>handle_event_function</c> + </seealso> + there is only one Erlang function that implements all state transition rules: </p> <pre> @@ -125,9 +129,7 @@ handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data) -> <title>Choosing Callback Mode</title> <p> The two - <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action"> - callback modes - </seealso> + <seealso marker="#callback_modes">callback modes</seealso> gives different possibilities and restrictions, but one goal remains: you want to handle all possible combinations of @@ -186,7 +188,7 @@ handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data) -> <title>Example</title> <p> This is an example starting off as equivalent to the the example in the - <seealso marker="fsm"><c>gen_fsm</c> behaviour </seealso> + <seealso marker="fsm"><c>gen_fsm</c> behaviour</seealso> description. In later chapters additions and tweaks are made using features in <c>gen_statem</c> that <c>gen_fsm</c> does not have. At the end of this section you can find the example again @@ -217,6 +219,7 @@ handle_event(EventType, EventContent, State, Data) -> -module(code_lock). -behaviour(gen_statem). -define(NAME, code_lock). +-define(CALLBACK_MODE, state_functions). -export([start_link/1]). -export([button/1]). @@ -233,7 +236,7 @@ button(Digit) -> init(Code) -> do_lock(), Data = #{code => Code, remaining => Code}, - {state_functions,locked,Data}. + {?CALLBACK_MODE,locked,Data}. locked( cast, {button,Digit}, @@ -264,7 +267,7 @@ terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) -> State =/= locked andalso do_lock(), ok. code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) -> - {ok,State,Data}. + {?CALLBACK_MODE,State,Data}. ]]></code> <p>The code is explained in the next sections.</p> </section> @@ -340,16 +343,20 @@ start_link(Code) -> If name registration succeeds, the new <c>gen_statem</c> process calls the callback function <c>code_lock:init(Code)</c>. This function is expected to return <c>{CallbackMode,State,Data}</c>, - where <c>CallbackMode</c> selects callback module state function - mode, in this case <c>state_functions</c> that is each state + where + <seealso marker="#callback_modes"> + <c>CallbackMode</c> + </seealso> + selects callback module state function mode, in this case + <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"> + <c>state_functions</c> + </seealso> + through the macro <c>?CALLBACK_MODE</c> that is; each state has got its own handler function. <c>State</c> is the initial state of the <c>gen_statem</c>, in this case <c>locked</c>; assuming the door is locked to begin with. <c>Data</c> is the internal server data of the <c>gen_statem</c>. - Here the server data is a - <seealso marker="stdlib:maps"> - map - </seealso> + Here the server data is a <seealso marker="stdlib:maps">map</seealso> with the key <c>code</c> that stores the correct button sequence and the key <c>remaining</c> that stores the remaining correct button sequence @@ -359,7 +366,7 @@ start_link(Code) -> init(Code) -> do_lock(), Data = #{code => Code, remaining => Code}, - {state_functions,locked,Data}. + {?CALLBACK_MODE,locked,Data}. ]]></code> <p> <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#start_link/3"> @@ -536,13 +543,12 @@ handle_event({call,From}, code_length, #{code := Code} = Data) -> </p> <code type="erl"><![CDATA[ ... --export([handle_event/4]). +-define(CALLBACK_MODE, state_functions). ... +-export([handle_event/4]). -init(Code) -> - Data = #{code => Code, remaining => Code}, - {handle_event_function,locked,Data}. +... handle_event(cast, {button,Digit}, State, #{code := Code} = Data) -> case State of @@ -598,8 +604,8 @@ handle_event(timeout, _, open, Data) -> <code type="erl"><![CDATA[ init(Args) -> process_flag(trap_exit, true), + do_lock(), ... - {CallbackMode,State,Data}. ]]></code> <p> In this example we let the <c>terminate/3</c> function @@ -994,11 +1000,18 @@ do_unlock() -> utilizing a helper function <c>enter/3</c> for state entry: </p> <code type="erl"><![CDATA[ +... +-define(CALLBACK_MODE, state_functions). + +... + init(Code) -> + process_flag(trap_exit, true), Data = #{code => Code}, - enter(state_functions, locked, Data). + enter(?CALLBACK_MODE, locked, Data). ... + locked(internal, enter, _Data) -> do_lock(), {keep_state,Data#{remaining => Code}}; @@ -1053,6 +1066,7 @@ enter(Tag, State, Data) -> -module(code_lock). -behaviour(gen_statem). -define(NAME, code_lock_2). +-define(CALLBACK_MODE, state_functions). -export([start_link/1,stop/0]). -export([button/1,code_length/0]). @@ -1070,8 +1084,9 @@ code_length() -> gen_statem:call(?NAME, code_length). init(Code) -> + process_flag(trap_exit, true), Data = #{code => Code}, - enter(state_functions, locked, Data). + enter(?CALLBACK_MODE, locked, Data). locked(internal, enter, #{code := Code} = Data) -> do_lock(), @@ -1115,7 +1130,7 @@ terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) -> State =/= locked andalso do_lock(), ok. code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) -> - {ok,State,Data}. + {?CALLBACK_MODE,State,Data}. ]]></code> </section> @@ -1129,14 +1144,10 @@ code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) -> </p> <code type="erl"><![CDATA[ ... --export([handle_event/4]). +-define(CALLBACK_MODE, handle_event_function). ... - -init(Code) -> - process_flag(trap_exit, true), - Data = #{code => Code}, - enter(handle_event_function, locked, Data). +-export([handle_event/4]). ... @@ -1185,11 +1196,10 @@ handle_event({call,From}, code_length, _State, #{code := Code}) -> <section> <title>Complex State</title> <p> - The - <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-action"> - callback mode + The callback mode + <seealso marker="stdlib:gen_statem#type-callback_mode"> + <c>handle_event_function</c> </seealso> - <c>handle_event_function</c> enables using a non-atom state as described in <seealso marker="#callback_modes"> Callback Modes, @@ -1245,6 +1255,7 @@ handle_event({call,From}, code_length, _State, #{code := Code}) -> -module(code_lock). -behaviour(gen_statem). -define(NAME, code_lock_3). +-define(CALLBACK_MODE, handle_event_function). -export([start_link/2,stop/0]). -export([button/1,code_length/0,set_lock_button/1]). @@ -1267,7 +1278,7 @@ set_lock_button(LockButton) -> init({Code,LockButton}) -> process_flag(trap_exit, true), Data = #{code => Code}, - enter(handle_event_function, {locked,LockButton}, Data, []). + enter(?CALLBACK_MODE, {locked,LockButton}, Data, []). %% State: locked handle_event(internal, enter, {locked,_}, #{code := Code} = Data) -> @@ -1323,7 +1334,7 @@ terminate(_Reason, State, _Data) -> State =/= locked andalso do_lock(), ok. code_change(_Vsn, State, Data, _Extra) -> - {ok,State,Data}. + {?CALLBACK_MODE,State,Data}. ]]></code> <p> It may be an ill-fitting model for a physical code lock |