Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The BIFs prepare_loading/2 and finish_loading/1 have been
designed to allow fast loading in parallel of many modules.
Because of the complications with on_load functions,
the initial implementation of finish_loading/1 only allowed
a single element in the list of prepared modules.
finish_loading/1 does not suspend other processes, but it must wait
for all schedulers to pass a write barrier ("thread progress"). The
time for all schedulers to pass the write barrier is highly variable,
depending on what kind of code they are executing. Therefore, allowing
finish_loading/1 to finish the loading for more than one module before
passing the write barrier could potentially be much faster than
calling finish_loading/1 multiple times.
The test case many/1 run on my computer shows that with "heavy load",
finish loading of 100 modules in parallel is almost 50 times faster
than loading them sequentially. With "light load", the gain is still
almost 10 times.
Here follows an actual sample of the output from the test case on
my computer (an 2012 iMac):
Light load
==========
Sequential: 22361 µs
Parallel: 2586 µs
Ratio: 9
Heavy load
==========
Sequential: 254512 µs
Parallel: 5246 µs
Ratio: 49
|
|
We will need a way to check whether an prepared BEAM modules has
an on_load function.
|
|
* hb/stdlib/epp_typed_record_fields/OTP-13148:
stdlib: Let beam_lib restore typed record forms
|
|
Forms with record field types created before OTP 19.0 are replaced by
well-formed record forms holding the type information.
Tools reading the 'abstract_code' chunk can rely on the returned forms
being well-formed, that is, there are no badly formed 'type' attribute
forms.
|
|
OTP-13341
* sverk/erts-hipe_x86_signal-cleanups:
hipe_sigaltstack: correct initialization of ss.ss_flags
hipe_x86_signal: cleanups
hipe_x86_signal: cleanups
hipe_x86_signal: cleanups
hipe_x86_signal: cleanups
hipe_x86_signal: cleanups
hipe_x86_signal: cleanups
|
|
* sverk/fix-list-length-int/OTP-13288:
erts: Fix error cases in enif_get_list_length
erts: Use Sint instead of int for list lengths
|
|
|
|
* bjorn/stdlib/function-macro/OTP-13059:
Implement ?FUNCTION_NAME and ?FUNCTION_ARITY macros
epp: Refactor expand_macros()
|
|
* bjorn/remove-test_server/OTP-12705:
Remove test_server as a standalone application
Erlang mode for Emacs: Include ct.hrl instead test_server.hrl
Remove out-commented references to the test_server applications
Makefiles: Remove test_server from include path and code path
Eliminate use of test_server.hrl and test_server_line.hrl
|
|
* legoscia/prettier-default-error-logger/OTP-13325:
Prettify default error_logger output somewhat
|
|
|
|
* sverk/nif-test-cuddle:
erts: Fix wobbling test failure in nif_SUITE
|
|
|
|
* sverk/openssl-config-doc:
Add --with-ssl-incl and --with-ssl-rpath to docs
|
|
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/ssl-doc-typos:
Fix typos in ssl.xml
OTP-13339
|
|
* msantos/ms/typo-windows-build-script:
Fix typo in Windows build scripts
OTP-13337
|
|
|
|
* ia/pr/typo-fixes:
Fix public_key documentation typos
Fix typos in ssl.xml
|
|
|
|
|
|
* maint:
kernel: Correct contract for inet:getifaddrs/1
|
|
* hb/kernel/correct_contract/OTP-13335:
kernel: Correct contract for inet:getifaddrs/1
|
|
For a long time, users have asked for one or more macros that would
return the name and arity of the current function.
We could define a single ?FUNCTION macro that would return
a {Name,Arity} tuple. However, to access just the name or
just the arity for the function, element/2 must be used.
That would limit its usefulness, because element/2 is not
allowed in all contexts.
Therefore, it seems that we will need two macros.
?FUNCTION_NAME that expands to the name of the current function
and ?FUNCTION_ARITY that expands to arity of the current
function.
Converting the function name to a string can be done like this:
f() ->
atom_to_list(?FUNCTION_NAME) ++ "/" ++
integer_to_list(?FUNCTION_ARITY).
f/0 will return "f/0". The BEAM compiler will evaluate the
entire expression at compile-time, so there will not be
any run-time penalty for the function calls.
The implementation is non-trivial because the preprocessor is
run before the parser.
One way to implement the macros would be to replace them with some
placeholder and then let the parser or possibly a later pass replace
the placeholder with correct value. That could potentially slow
down the compiler and cause incompatibilities for parse transforms.
Another way is to let the preprocessor do the whole job. That means
that the preprocessor will have to scan the function head to find
out the name and arity. The scanning of the function head can be
delayed until the first occurrence of a ?FUNCTION_NAME or
?FUNCTION_ARITY.
I have chosen the second way because it seems less likely to cause
weird compatibility problems.
|
|
* jv/erts/optimize-cmp:
Unify comparison macros in erl_utils.h
Avoid erts_cmp jump in atom, int and float comparisons
|
|
See also http://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-95.
|
|
As a preparation for implementing a ?FUNCTION macro, pass the
entire state record to expand_macros/2 and its helpers. That will
allow us to have more information available when expanding
?FUNCTION.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* hb/stdlib/epp_typed_record_fields/OTP-13148:
stdlib: Update qlc_pt to handle typed record fields
stdlib: Let the linter detect old typed records
stdlib: Update the linter to handle typed record fields
stdlib: Update erl_expand_records to handle typed record fields
compiler: Update the compiler to handle typed record fields
stdlib: Update erl_id_trans to handle types and specs
stdlib: Add a Cover test with typed record field
stdlib: Update module shell to handle typed record fields
stdlib: Update ms_transform to handle typed record fields
stdlib: Modify the preprocessor as to expose typed record fields
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problem: The types of record fields have since R12B been put in a
separate form by epp:parse_file(), leaving the record declaration form
untyped. The separate form, however, does not follow the syntax of
type declarations, and parse transforms inspecting -type() attributes
need to know about the special syntax. Since the compiler stores the
return value of epp:parse_file() as debug information in the abstract
code chunk ("Abst" or 'abstract_code'), tools too need to know about
the special syntax, if they inspect -type() attributes in abstract
code.
Solution: As of this commit no separate form is created by
epp:parse_file(), but the type information kept in the record fields.
This means that all parse transforms and all tools inspecting
-record() declarations need to recognize {typed_record_field, Field,
Type}.
We recommend that all parse transforms and tools be updated as to
recognize typed record fields.
Discussion: As of OTP 19.0, the abstract form of type declarations and
function specifications is documented. An (unsatisfactory) alternative
to the above solution is to document two formats of the abstract form
of typed record fields: one if returned by epp:parse_file(); and one
if returned by, for example, epp:parse_erl_form(). Yet another (bad)
alternative is to not document the format returned by epp:erl_parse(),
but instead document the idempotent function
epp:restore_typed_record_fields/1, and urge authors of parse transform
and tools to always call this function.
|
|
The test_server application has previously been deprecated.
In OTP 19, we will move relevant parts of test_server into the
common_test application. Test suites that include test_server.hrl
must be updated to include ct.hrl instead. Test suites that include
test_server_line.hrl must removed that inclusion. Test suites that
call the test_server module directly will continue to work in OTP 19.
The test suites for Erlang/OTP are built and executed in exactly
the same way as previously.
Here are some more details.
The modules test_server*.erl and erl2html2.erl in lib/test_server/src
have been moved to common_test/src.
The test_server.hrl and test_server_line.hrl include files have
been deleted. The macros in test_server.hrl have been copied into
lib/common_test/include/ct.hrl.
The ts*.erl modules and their associated data files in
lib/test_server/src has been been moved to the new directory
lib/common_test/test_server. The ts* modules are no longer built
to lib/common_test/ebin. They will only built when 'make release_tests'
is executed.
The test suite for test_server has been moved to lib/common_test/test.
The rest of the files have been deleted.
|
|
|
|
Cleanliness.
|
|
Since no test suites includede test_server.hrl, there is no need
to have test_server in the include path or code path.
|
|
As a first step to removing the test_server application as
as its own separate application, change the inclusion of
test_server.hrl to an inclusion of ct.hrl and remove the
inclusion of test_server_line.hrl.
|
|
* maint:
xmerl: Remove 'no_return' Dialyzer warnings
xmerl: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
eunit: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
debugger: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
kernel: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
mnesia: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
observer: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
runtime_tools: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
stdlib: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
test_server: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
tools: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
Conflicts:
lib/stdlib/src/erl_lint.erl
lib/stdlib/src/otp_internal.erl
|
|
* hb/add_dialyzer_suppressions/OTP-12862:
xmerl: Remove 'no_return' Dialyzer warnings
xmerl: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
eunit: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
debugger: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
kernel: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
mnesia: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
observer: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
runtime_tools: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
stdlib: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
test_server: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
tools: Add suppression of Dialyzer warnings
|
|
|
|
|