| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
All other instructions that increment the stack pointer takes a 'Q'
operand.
|
|
Add the CHECK_ALIGNED() macro that can be used for testing that
the storage destination is word-aligned.
|
|
|
|
In the 'P' operator, don't assume that a packed target label ('f'
or 'j') is always the leftmost argument. Instead, transfer the
patch position from the accumulator to the stack.
|
|
process_main() is already too big.
|
|
Introduce the IsOpCode() macro that can be used to compare
instructions.
|
|
Consider the types in the code below:
BeamInstr* I;
.
.
.
BeamInstr* next;
next = (BeamInstr *) *I;
Goto(next);
This is illogical. If 'I' points to a BeamInstr, then 'next' should
be a BeamInstr, not a pointer to a BeamInstr. The Goto() macros does
not require a pointer, because it will cast its argument to a void*
anyway.
Therefore, this code example can be simplified to:
BeamInstr* I;
.
.
.
BeamInstr next;
next = *I;
Goto(next);
Similarly, we can remove the casts in the macros when NO_JUMP_TABLE
is defined.
|
|
The BeamOp() macro in erl_vm.h is clumsy to use. All users
cast the return value to BeamInstr.
Define new macros that are easier to use. In the future,
we might want to pack an operand into the same word as
the pointer to the instruction, so we will define two macros.
BeamIsOpCode() is used to rewrite code like this:
if (Instr == (BeamInstr) BeamOp(op_i_func_info_IaaI) {
...
}
to:
if (BeamIsOpCode(Instr, op_i_func_info_IaaI)) {
...
}
BeamOpCodeAddr(op_apply_bif) is used when we need the address
for an instruction.
Also elimiminate the global variables em_* in beam_emu.c.
They are not really needed. Use the BeamOpCodeAddr() macro
instead.
|
|
The inconsistent order has annoyed me for a long time.
While at it, also remove the unecessary definition of LabelAddr() if
NO_JUMP_TABLE is defined.
|
|
Test more instructions and use register numbers >= 512.
|
|
Eliminate MY_IS_SSMALL()
|
|
* maint:
Fix incorrect internal consistency failure for binary matching code
|
|
Fix incorrect internal consistency failure for binary matching code
|
|
* raimo/ssl-dist-skip-loopback/OTP-14465:
Update runtime dependencies
Disable debug function
Pass all info's to the ssl_connection state function
Remove ssl_tls_dist_ctrl module
Remove ssl_tls_dist_ctrl process
Remove ssl_tls_dist_proxy
Avoid dialyzer warning
Separate in and out in dist ctrl
Rewrite dist ctrl from port to process
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl.app.src
|
|
|
|
4c31fd0b9665 made the merging of match contexts stricter;
in fact, a little bit too strict.
Two match contexts with different number of slots would
be downgraded to the 'term' type. The correct way is to
keep the match context but set the number of slots to the
lowest number of slots of the two match contexts.
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-490
|
|
* maint:
Fix xmllint warning
|
|
* rickard/doc-fix:
Fix xmllint warning
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix grammar in 'ets' docs
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a long time, there has been the two macros IS_SSMALL() and
MY_IS_SSMALL() that do exactly the same thing.
There should only be one, and it should be called IS_SSMALL().
However, we must decide which implementation to use. When
MY_IS_SSMALL() was introduced a long time ago, it was the most
efficient. In a modern C compiler, there might not be any
difference.
To find out, I used the following small C program to examine
the code generation:
#include <stdio.h>
typedef unsigned int Uint32;
typedef unsigned long Uint64;
typedef long Sint;
#define SWORD_CONSTANT(Const) Const##L
#define SMALL_BITS (64-4)
#define MAX_SMALL ((SWORD_CONSTANT(1) << (SMALL_BITS-1))-1)
#define MIN_SMALL (-(SWORD_CONSTANT(1) << (SMALL_BITS-1)))
#define MY_IS_SSMALL32(x) (((Uint32) ((((x)) >> (SMALL_BITS-1)) + 1)) < 2)
#define MY_IS_SSMALL64(x) (((Uint64) ((((x)) >> (SMALL_BITS-1)) + 1)) < 2)
#define MY_IS_SSMALL(x) (sizeof(x) == sizeof(Uint32) ? MY_IS_SSMALL32(x) : MY_IS_SSMALL64(x))
#define IS_SSMALL(x) (((x) >= MIN_SMALL) && ((x) <= MAX_SMALL))
void original(Sint n)
{
if (IS_SSMALL(n)) {
printf("yes\n");
}
}
void enhanced(Sint n)
{
if (MY_IS_SSMALL(n)) {
printf("yes\n");
}
}
gcc 7.2 produced the following code for the original() function:
.LC0:
.string "yes"
original(long):
movabs rax, 576460752303423488
add rdi, rax
movabs rax, 1152921504606846975
cmp rdi, rax
jbe .L4
rep ret
.L4:
mov edi, OFFSET FLAT:.LC0
jmp puts
clang 5.0.0 produced the following code which is slightly better:
original(long):
movabs rax, 576460752303423488
add rax, rdi
shr rax, 60
jne .LBB0_1
mov edi, .Lstr
jmp puts # TAILCALL
.LBB0_1:
ret
.Lstr:
.asciz "yes"
However, in the context of beam_emu.c, clang could produce
similar to what gcc produced.
gcc 7.2 produced the following code when MY_IS_SSMALL() was used:
.LC0:
.string "yes"
enhanced(long):
sar rdi, 59
add rdi, 1
cmp rdi, 1
jbe .L4
rep ret
.L4:
mov edi, OFFSET FLAT:.LC0
jmp puts
clang produced similar code.
This code seems to be the cheapest. There are four instructions, and
there is no loading of huge integer constants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* lukas/erts/fix_threads_error_printout:
erts: Print the error reason when threads fail to start
|
|
* kvakvs/zero-size-read_file/ERL-327/PR-1524/OTP-14637:
erts: On zero-size files attempt to read until EOF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* dgud/stdlib/unicode-string-bench:
stdlib: Add unicode string benchmarks
|
|
|
|
fix off by one error in docs
|
|
|
|
* bjorn/speed-up-disassembler:
Add testing of erts_debug:df() to the emulator smoke tests
Speed up erts_debug:df()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The byte_offset of sub-binaries wasn't taken into account for
ProcBins, subtly ruining the results. The test suite didn't catch
it since it didn't check for sub-binaries in particular, and only
checked for equality between variations -- not whether the output
was equal to the input.
|
|
* maint:
stdlib: Remove gs removed warning
|
|
* dgud/stdlib/remove-gs-depr:
stdlib: Remove gs removed warning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caused warnings which could not be suppressed, if old 'gs' application
was compiled and used together with otp-20, which is fair usage even
if OTP does not support the application anymore.
|
|
It is too easy to break the disassembler. Make sure that we notice.
|
