aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/erts/emulator/beam/instrs.tab
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-06-18Update copyright yearHenrik Nord
2018-01-26Eliminate get_list/3 internally in the compilerBjörn Gustavsson
Instructions that produce more than one result complicate optimizations. get_list/3 is one of two instructions that produce multiple results (get_map_elements/3 is the other). Introduce the get_hd/2 and get_tl/2 instructions that return the head and tail of a cons cell, respectively, and use it internally in all optimization passes. For efficiency, we still want to use get_list/3 if both head and tail are used, so we will translate matching pairs of get_hd and get_tl back to get_list instructions.
2018-01-22Don't build a stacktrace if it's only passed to erlang:raise/3Björn Gustavsson
Consider the following function: function({function,Name,Arity,CLabel,Is0}, Lc0) -> try %% Optimize the code for the function. catch Class:Error:Stack -> io:format("Function: ~w/~w\n", [Name,Arity]), erlang:raise(Class, Error, Stack) end. The stacktrace is retrieved, but it is only used in the call to erlang:raise/3. There is no need to build a stacktrace in this function. We can avoid the building if we introduce an instruction called raw_raise/3 that works exactly like the erlang:raise/3 BIF except that its third argument must be a raw stacktrace.
2017-12-08Merge pull request #1634 from bjorng/bjorn/get_stacktrace-syntax/OTP-14692Björn Gustavsson
Add syntax in try/catch to retrieve the stacktrace directly
2017-11-30Add syntax in try/catch to retrieve the stacktrace directlyBjörn Gustavsson
This commit adds a new syntax for retrieving the stacktrace without calling erlang:get_stacktrace/0. That allow us to deprecate erlang:get_stacktrace/0 and ultimately remove it. The problem with erlang:get_stacktrace/0 is that it can keep huge terms in a process for an indefinite time after an exception. The stacktrace can be huge after a 'function_clause' exception or a failed call to a BIF or operator, because the arguments for the call will be included in the stacktrace. For example: 1> catch abs(lists:seq(1, 1000)). {'EXIT',{badarg,[{erlang,abs, [[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20|...]], []}, {erl_eval,do_apply,6,[{file,"erl_eval.erl"},{line,674}]}, {erl_eval,expr,5,[{file,"erl_eval.erl"},{line,431}]}, {shell,exprs,7,[{file,"shell.erl"},{line,687}]}, {shell,eval_exprs,7,[{file,"shell.erl"},{line,642}]}, {shell,eval_loop,3,[{file,"shell.erl"},{line,627}]}]}} 2> erlang:get_stacktrace(). [{erlang,abs, [[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22, 23,24|...]], []}, {erl_eval,do_apply,6,[{file,"erl_eval.erl"},{line,674}]}, {erl_eval,expr,5,[{file,"erl_eval.erl"},{line,431}]}, {shell,exprs,7,[{file,"shell.erl"},{line,687}]}, {shell,eval_exprs,7,[{file,"shell.erl"},{line,642}]}, {shell,eval_loop,3,[{file,"shell.erl"},{line,627}]}] 3> We can extend the syntax for clauses in try/catch to optionally bind the stacktrace to a variable. Here is an example using the current syntax: try Expr catch C:E -> Stk = erlang:get_stacktrace(), . . . In the new syntax, it would look like: try Expr catch C:E:Stk -> . . . Only a variable (not a pattern) is allowed in the stacktrace position, to discourage matching of the stacktrace. (Matching would also be expensive, because the raw format of the stacktrace would have to be converted to the cooked form before matching.) Note that: try Expr catch E -> . . . is a shorthand for: try Expr catch throw:E -> . . . If the stacktrace is to be retrieved for a throw, the 'throw:' prefix must be explicitly included: try Expr catch throw:E:Stk -> . . .
2017-11-30Stop trying to maximize the use of x(0)Björn Gustavsson
X register 0 used to be mapped to a hardware register, and therefore faster than the other registers. Because of that, the compiler tried to use x(0) as much as possible as a temporary register. That was changed a few releases ago. X register 0 is now placed in the array of all X registers and has no special speed advantage compared to the other registers. Remove the code in the compiler that attempts to use x(0) as much as possible. As a result, the following type of instruction will be much less frequent: {put_list,Src,{x,0},{x,0}} Instead, the following type of instruction will be more frequent: {put_list,Src,{x,X},{x,X}} (Where X is an arbitrary X register.) Update the runtime system to specialize that kind of put_list instruction.
2017-10-21Optimize instructions for comparing a register with a literalBjörn Gustavsson
We can avoid calling eq() from the is_eq_exact_literal/3 and is_ne_exact_literal/3 instructions if the source operand is an immediate (since a literal is either a boxed or a list, never an immediate).
2017-10-09Slightly speed up try/catchBjörn Gustavsson
The try_end and try_case instructions are implemented the same way (try_case is translated to try_end by the loader). We can do better than that. We know that try_case will only be executed when an exception has been caught. Therefore, we know that x(0) is the non-value and that x(1) through x(3) need to be shifted down to x(0) through x(2). There is no need to test x(0) before shifting down. try_end does not need the register shifting code at all.
2017-10-01Move out variables from the head of combined instructionsBjörn Gustavsson
Move out from the head the variables that are only used in the excute phase.
2017-10-01instrs.tab: Add missing -no_next directivesBjörn Gustavsson
2017-09-13Refactor instructions to support relative jumpsBjörn Gustavsson
Introduce new macros that can be used for relative jumps and use them consistently. Test that everything works by using a non-zero constant JUMP_OFFSET. The loader subtracts JUMP_OFFSET from loaded labels, and all instructions that use 'f' operands add it back.
2017-09-11Avoid using $Src more than onceBjörn Gustavsson
The C compiler will probably optimize this, but just to be sure...
2017-09-04Don't allow macros to assign to hard-coded variablesBjörn Gustavsson
It's bad style. Pass the name of the variable as an extra argument to the macro.
2017-09-04Eliminate unecessary instruction macro i_move_call_only()Björn Gustavsson
2017-08-31Add missing -no_next directivesBjörn Gustavsson
2017-08-31Eliminate three arguments for the apply() helperBjörn Gustavsson
We don't need to pass x(0), x(1), and x(2) because they can already be found in the register array.
2017-08-31Add annotations for likely/unlikelyBjörn Gustavsson
In a correct Erlang programs, we can expect that: * A GC test instruction (such as test_heap) is more likely not to do the GC. * A BIF is more likely to succeed than to fail. * A BIF is more likely to fail in a guard than in a body. * An apply or fun call is likely to succeed. Annotate conditions accordingly.
2017-08-22Add missing -no_next for badarg instructionBjörn Gustavsson
2017-08-11Break out most instructions from beam_emu.cBjörn Gustavsson
2017-08-08Simplify specifying implementation of instructionsBjörn Gustavsson
Eliminate the need to write pre-processor macros for each instruction. Instead allow the implementation of instruction to be written in C directly in the .tab files. Rewrite all existing macros in this way and remove the %macro directive.