Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
When a SEQUENCE was defined inline inside extension addition group
like this:
InlinedSeq ::= SEQUENCE {
...,
[[
s SEQUENCE {
a INTEGER,
b BOOLEAN
}
]]
}
the decoding code would return the contents of the SEQUENCE in a
record named 'InlinedSeq_ExtAddGroup1_s', while the record definition
in the generated HRL file would be 'InlinedSeq_s'.
Since there is no reason to use the longer record name (no risk for
ambiguity), correct the name in the decoding code.
|
|
For the example from X.691, make sure to test that our encoded
value is the same as given in X.691.
Run the test for BER, too.
|
|
|
|
Add the option 'legacy_bit_string' to decode to the old list format.
|
|
Encoding would fail.
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/asn1/doc/src/notes.xml
lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE.erl.src
lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE_data/extensionAdditionGroup.erl
lib/asn1/test/test_undecoded_rest.erl
lib/asn1/vsn.mk
|
|
|
|
In the previous version support for ExtensionAdditionGroups (i.e [[...]])
was added but it did not handle the occurence of the notation in nested types.
Now this is handled as well and the support is hopefully complete.
Also cleanup of warnings for obsolete guard functions in test suites.
|
|
In the previous version support for ExtensionAdditionGroups (i.e [[...]])
was added but it did not handle the occurence of the notation in nested types.
Now this is handled as well and the support is hopefully complete.
Also cleanup of warnings for obsolete guard functions in test suites.
|
|
|