Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
* henrik/update-copyrightyear:
update copyright-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a first step to removing the test_server application as
as its own separate application, change the inclusion of
test_server.hrl to an inclusion of ct.hrl and remove the
inclusion of test_server_line.hrl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three fields ('type','value', and 'vname') are almost unused. They
are set, but almost never read. Eliminate the last remaining uses
and the fields themselves.
|
|
|
|
To keep the error reporting code in asn1ct_parser2 simple, we
only want to handle pure syntactic errors. Therefore, move the check
that UNIQUE and DEFAULT are not applied to the same field to
asn1ct_check.
|
|
While we are at it, also remove an unreachable (too many extensions)
error case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clean up the checking of ENUMERATED and modernize the error reporting.
Also eliminate the unused constraints argument for check_enumerated().
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_unique_fieldname/2 would throw an exception that *all* callers
would catch and handle. Since all callers catch the exception, it
is much easier to return a special return value.
Also use the new error reporting style.
While we are at it, remove all catches of {asn1,Error} which
are no longer thrown.
|
|
Split the test case duplicate_tags/1 into two parts. Do the
error checking test in error_SUITE. Keep the SeqOptional2
specification and compile it from the per/1 and ber_other/1
test cases (for coverage).
|
|
|
|
Change to new error handling system and cover with tests.
|
|
All errors were not reported. Furthermore, get_referenced_type/2
will report errors if any module is missing, so the attempt to
report additional errors in chained_import/4 would not find any
errors.
|
|
The internal representation for constraints (and object sets)
as produced by the parser was awkward, making further processing
convoluted. Here follows some examples of the old representation
for INTEGER constraints.
The constraint 1..2 is represented as:
{'ValueRange',{1,2}}
If we extend the constraint like this:
1..2, ...,
or like this:
1..2, ..., 3
the representation would be:
{{'ValueRange',{1,2}},[]}
and
{{'ValueRange',{1,2}},{'SingleValue',3}}
respectively. Note that the pattern {A,B} will match all these
constraints.
When combining constraints using set operators:
1..2 | 3..4 ^ 5..6
the representation will no longer be a tuple but a list:
[{'ValueRange',{1..2}} union
{'ValueRange',{3..4}} intersection
{'ValueRange',{5..6}}]
The parse has full knowledge of the operator precedence; unfortunately,
the following pass (asn1ct_check) must also have the same knowledge
in order to correctly evaluate the constraints.
If we would change the order of the evaulation with round brackets:
(1..2 | 3..4) ^ 5..6
there would be a nested listed in the representation:
[[{'ValueRange',{1..2}} union {'ValueRange',{3..4}}]
intersection {'ValueRange',{5..6}}]
We will change the representation to make it more explicit.
At the outer level, a constraint is always represented as
{element_set,Root,Extension}
Extension will be 'none' if there is no extension, and 'empty' if
there is an empty extension. Root may also be 'empty' in an object set
if there are no objects in the root. Thus the constraints:
1..2
1..2, ...
1..2, ..., 3
will be represented as:
{element_set,{'ValueRange',{1,2}},none}
{element_set,{'ValueRange',{1,2}},empty}
{element_set,{'ValueRange',{1,2}},{'SingleValue',3}}
We will change the set operators too. This constraint:
1..2 | 3..4 ^ 5..6
will be represented as:
{element_set,
{union,
{'ValueRange',{1,2}},
{intersection,
{'ValueRange',{3,4}},
{'ValueRange',{5,6}}},
none}}
which is trivial to understand and evaluate. Similarly:
(1..2 | 3..4) ^ 5..6
will be represented as:
{element_set,
{intersection,
{union,{'ValueRange',{1,2}},{'ValueRange',{3,4}}},
{'ValueRange',{5,6}}},
none}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An optional group must not contain mandatory class fields. All
mandatory fields must be included in the simplified syntax.
|
|
Besides simplifying the code and doing better error checking
and error reporting, fix the following bugs:
Support retrieving an OBJECT IDENTIFIER/RELATIVE-OID from an
object. Example:
oid OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= some-object.&some-field
Allow an integer constant first in an OBJECT IDENTIFIER:
integer INTEGER ::= 0
oid OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {integer 1}
|
|
Wrong fields in the record where checked when sorting, which caused
duplicate objects to exist in constructed object sets and later caused
an error.
|
|
|
|
Also add proper error handling.
|
|
Rewrite the confusing and buggy matching of an object definition
against the simplified syntax.
While we are at it, we will also add proper error handling.
|
|
When the parser sees:
something SOMETHING ::= {}
it has no way of knowing whether 'something' is an value or an
object. It depends on how SOMETHING is defined. For example:
SOMETHING ::= SEQUENCE {}
or
SOMETHING ::= CLASS { &id OPTIONAL }
Because of that ambiguity, there is no way to avoid a special case
when we check an object definition. However, there is no need to
invent an entire new checking function for this special case. It is
much easier to just pretend that the parser gave us
{object,defaultsyntax,[]} and let check_objectdefn/3 check it in the
usual way.
|
|
Refactor and clean up code. While at it, add error handling and
test cases. (Also add test cases for the existing values in
ValueTest.asn while we are it.)
Add support for defining INTEGER constants by extracting
fields from objects. Example:
int-from-object INTEGER ::= object.&id
When extracting values from objects in constraints, only one
level of extraction would work. That is, the following would
work:
SomeName ::= INTEGER (object.&int)
but not:
SomeName ::= INTEGER (object.&obj.&int)
|
|
There is duplicated effort in that validate_integer() checks
whether the integer value is valid, and then normalize_integer()
does mostly the same work in order to convert the value to an
integer.
Eliminate the validate_integer() function and incorporate
its checks into normalize_integer(). Also produce proper
error messages.
|
|
Class names must start with an uppercase letter and only contain
uppercase letters, digits, or hyphens. The parser will not allow
class names that don't start with an uppercase letter, so we don't
have to check that.
|
|
Check the formal parameters for a parameterized type definition.
If the governor for a formal parameter is absent, the formal parameter
must be in upper case.
|
|
|
|
This will also eliminate a dialyzer warning for unmatched returns,
and increase the coverage.
|
|
The error checking code for INTEGER and BIT STRING was broken,
since it built an error tuple that was never returned.
Rewrite the error checking code, sharing most of the code between
INTEGER and BIT STRING. Make sure that we test for both duplicated
names and number, as well as for negative bit numbers for
BIT STRING.
This rewrite will eliminate two dialyzer warnings for unmatched
returns.
|
|
The value for an OCTET STRING must be specified as either a bstring
or an hstring. Everything else (including character strings) is
illegal.
This correction also removes the offending code that caused an
unmatched return warning from dialyzer.
|
|
|
|
Unify the code for checking an enumeration value named in a
DEFAULT and in an ENUMERATED value. There is no need to handle
those cases differently. That also will also make sure that
the following works:
E ::= ENUMERATED { x, ..., y }
e E ::= x
(Extensible ENUMERATEDs were not handled when defining values.)
Always generate an error when an unknown enumeration value is
given (used in a DEFAULT, a message would be printed, but the
compilation would succeed). Also make sure that we always include
the line number for the incorrect enumeration.
Write a new test case and remove the extremely rudimentary
value_bad_enum_test/1 test case.
|
|
|