| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
4c31fd0b9665 made the merging of match contexts stricter;
in fact, a little bit too strict.
Two match contexts with different number of slots would
be downgraded to the 'term' type. The correct way is to
keep the match context but set the number of slots to the
lowest number of slots of the two match contexts.
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-490
|
|
|
|
As part of sys_core_fold, variables involved in bit syntax
matching would be annotated when it would be safe for a later
pass to do the delayed sub-binary creation optimization.
An implicit assumption regarding the annotation was that the
code must not be further optimized. That assumption was broken
in 05130e48555891, which introduced a fixpoint iteration
(applying the optimizations until there were no more changes).
That means that a variable could be annotated as safe for
reusing the match context in one iteration, but a later iteration
could rewrite the code in a way that would make the optimization
unsafe.
One way to fix this would be to clear all reuse_for_context
annotations before each iteration. But that would be wasteful.
Instead I chose to fix the problem by moving out the annotation
code to a separate pass (sys_core_bsm) that is run later after
all major optimizations of Core Erlang has been done.
|
|
The compiler produces poor code for complex guard expressions with andalso/orelse.
Here is an example from the filename module:
-define(IS_DRIVELETTER(Letter),(((Letter >= $A) andalso (Letter =< $Z)) orelse
((Letter >= $a) andalso (Letter =< $z)))).
skip_prefix(Name, false) ->
Name;
skip_prefix([L, DrvSep|Name], DrvSep) when ?IS_DRIVELETTER(L) ->
Name;
skip_prefix(Name, _) ->
Name.
beam_bool fails to simplify the code for the guard, leaving several 'bif'
instructions:
{function, skip_prefix, 2, 49}.
{label,48}.
{line,[{location,"filename.erl",187}]}.
{func_info,{atom,filename},{atom,skip_prefix},2}.
{label,49}.
{test,is_ne_exact,{f,52},[{x,1},{atom,false}]}.
{test,is_nonempty_list,{f,52},[{x,0}]}.
{get_list,{x,0},{x,2},{x,3}}.
{test,is_nonempty_list,{f,52},[{x,3}]}.
{get_list,{x,3},{x,4},{x,5}}.
{bif,'=:=',{f,52},[{x,1},{x,4}],{x,6}}.
{test,is_ge,{f,50},[{x,2},{integer,65}]}.
{bif,'=<',{f,52},[{x,2},{integer,90}],{x,7}}.
{test,is_eq_exact,{f,51},[{x,7},{atom,false}]}.
{test,is_ge,{f,50},[{x,2},{integer,97}]}.
{bif,'=<',{f,52},[{x,2},{integer,122}],{x,7}}.
{jump,{f,51}}.
{label,50}.
{move,{atom,false},{x,7}}.
{label,51}.
{bif,'=:=',{f,52},[{x,7},{atom,true}],{x,7}}.
{test,is_eq_exact,{f,52},[{x,6},{atom,true}]}.
{test,is_eq_exact,{f,52},[{x,7},{atom,true}]}.
{move,{x,5},{x,0}}.
return.
{label,52}.
return.
We can add optimizations of guard tests to v3_kernel to achive a better result:
{function, skip_prefix, 2, 49}.
{label,48}.
{line,[{location,"filename.erl",187}]}.
{func_info,{atom,filename},{atom,skip_prefix},2}.
{label,49}.
{test,is_ne_exact,{f,51},[{x,1},{atom,false}]}.
{test,is_nonempty_list,{f,51},[{x,0}]}.
{get_list,{x,0},{x,2},{x,3}}.
{test,is_nonempty_list,{f,51},[{x,3}]}.
{get_list,{x,3},{x,4},{x,5}}.
{test,is_eq_exact,{f,51},[{x,1},{x,4}]}.
{test,is_ge,{f,51},[{x,2},{integer,65}]}.
{test,is_lt,{f,50},[{integer,90},{x,2}]}.
{test,is_ge,{f,51},[{x,2},{integer,97}]}.
{test,is_ge,{f,51},[{integer,122},{x,2}]}.
{label,50}.
{move,{x,5},{x,0}}.
return.
{label,51}.
return.
Looking at the STDLIB application, there were 112 lines of BIF calls in guards
that beam_bool failed to convert to test instructions. This commit eliminates
all those BIF calls.
Here is how I counted the instructions:
$ PATH=$ERL_TOP/bin:$PATH erlc -I ../include -I ../../kernel/include -S *.erl
$ grep "bif,'[=<>]" *.S | grep -v f,0
dets.S: {bif,'=:=',{f,547},[{x,4},{atom,read_write}],{x,4}}.
dets.S: {bif,'=:=',{f,547},[{x,5},{atom,saved}],{x,5}}.
dets.S: {bif,'=:=',{f,589},[{x,5},{atom,read}],{x,5}}.
.
.
.
$ grep "bif,'[=<>]" *.S | grep -v f,0 | wc
112 224 6765
$
|
|
* maint:
beam_bsm: Eliminate unsafe optimization
|
|
The following code causes a compiler failure:
first_after(Data, Offset) ->
case byte_size(Data) > Offset of
false ->
{First, Rest} = {ok, ok},
ok;
true ->
<<_:Offset/binary, Rest/binary>> = Data,
%% 'Rest' saved in y(0) before the call.
{First, _} = match_first(Data, Rest),
%% When beam_bsm sees the code, the following line
%% which uses y(0) has been optimized away.
{First, Rest} = {First, Rest},
First
end.
match_first(_, <<First:1/binary, Rest/binary>>) ->
{First, Rest}.
Here is the error message from beam_validator:
t: function first_after/2+15:
Internal consistency check failed - please report this bug.
Instruction: {call,2,{f,7}}
Error: {multiple_match_contexts,[{x,1},0]}:
Basically, what happens is that at time of code generation,
the variable 'Rest' is needed after the call to match_first/2
and is therefore saved in y(0). When beam_bsm (a late optimization
pass) sees the code, the use of y(0) following the call
to match_first/2 has been optimized away. beam_bsm therefore
assumes that the delayed sub-binary creation is safe. (Actually,
it is safe, but beam_validator does not realize it.)
The bug was caused by two separate commits:
e199e2471a reduced the number of special cases to handle in BEAM
optimization passed by breaking apart the tail-recursive call
instructions (call_only and call_last) into separate instructions.
Unfortunately, the special handling for tail calls was lost, which
resulted in worse code (i.e. the delayed sub-binary creation
optimization could not be applied).
e1aa422290 tried to compensate, but did so in a way that was not
always safe.
Teaching beam_validator that this kind of code is safe would be
expensive.
Instead, we will undo the damage caused by the two
commits. Re-introduce the special handling of tail-recursive calls in
beam_bsm that was lost in the first commit. (Effectively) revert the
change in the second commit.
ERL-268
|
|
During development, a bug in beam_utils caused a compiler failure
in xmerl. If the bug reappears, make sure that we catch it when
compiling the compiler test suite.
|
|
We used to put code that would crash the compiler into
compilation_SUITE_data. That way we would have a failing test case to
remind us to fix a bug.
Nowadays, we generally fix the bug and write the test case at the same
time. Therefore it makes more sense to put the test code directly into
a test suite.
Move out bin_syntax_1 through bin_syntax_5 test cases. Scrap
bin_syntax_6 because it does not longer seems to be relevant.
While we are it, rename the fun_shadow/1 test to size_shadow/1. Also
make sure that the code produces the correct result.
|
|
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/modernize-tests:
Remove ?line macros
Replace use of lists:keysearch/3 with lists:keyfind/3
Eliminate use of doc and suite clauses
Replace ?t with test_server
Replace use of test_server:format/2 with io:format/2
Eliminate use of test_server:fail/0,1
Eliminate use of ?config() macro
Modernize use of timetraps
Eliminate useless helper functions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Either rely on the default 30 minutes timetrap, or set the timeout
using the supported methods in common_test.
|
|
Binary matching can be confusing. For example:
1> <<-1>> = <<-1>>.
** exception error: no match of right hand side value <<"ÿ">>
2>
When constructing binaries, the value will be masked to fit in
the binary segment. But no such masking happens when matching
binaries.
One solution that we considered was to do the same masking when
matching. We have rejected that solution for several reasons:
* Masking in construction is highly controversial and by some
people considered a bad design decision.
* While masking of unsigned numbers can be understood, masking of
signed numbers it not easy to understand.
* Then there is the question of backward compatibility. Adding
masking to matching would mean that clauses that did not match
earlier would start to match. That means that code that has
never been tested will be executed. Code that has not been
tested will usually not work.
Therefore, we have decided to warn for binary patterns that cannot
possibly match.
While we are it, we will also warn for the following example where
size for a binary segment is invalid:
bad_size(Bin) ->
BadSize = bad_size,
<<42:BadSize>> = Bin.
That example would crash the HiPE compiler because the BEAM compiler
would generate a bs_get_integer2 instruction with an invalid size
field. We can avoid that crash if sys_core_fold not only warns for bad
binary pattern, but also removes the clauses that will not match.
Reported-by: http://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-44
Reported-by: Kostis Sagonas
|
|
As a first step to removing the test_server application as
as its own separate application, change the inclusion of
test_server.hrl to an inclusion of ct.hrl and remove the
inclusion of test_server_line.hrl.
|
|
* maint:
Eliminate crash because of unsafe delaying of sub-binary creation
|
|
The following code would fail to compile:
decode(<<Code/integer, Bin/binary>>) ->
<<C1/integer, B1/binary>> = Bin,
case C1 of
X when X =:= 1 orelse X =:= 2 ->
Bin2 = <<>>;
_ ->
Bin2 = B1
end,
case Code of
1 -> decode(Bin2);
_ -> Bin2
end.
The error message would be:
t: function decode/1+28:
Internal consistency check failed - please report this bug.
Instruction: return
Error: {match_context,{x,0}}:
The beam_bsm pass would delay the creation of a sub-binary when it was
unsafe to do so. The culprit was the btb_follow_branch/3 function that
for performance reasons cached labels that had already been checked.
The problem was the safety of a label also depends on the contents
of the registers. Therefore, the key for caching needs to be both
the label and the register contents.
Reported-by: José Valim
|
|
* maint:
Fix missing filename and line number in warning
Conflicts:
lib/compiler/test/bs_match_SUITE.erl
|
|
When the 'bin_opt_info' is given, warnings without filenames
and line numbers could sometimes be produced:
no_file: Warning: INFO: matching non-variables after
a previous clause matching a variable will prevent delayed
sub binary optimization
The reason for the missing information is that #c_alias{} records lack
location information. There are several ways to fix the problem. The
easiest seems to be to get the location information from the
code).
Noticed-by: José Valim
|
|
|
|
The ASN.1 compiler often generates code similar to:
f(<<0:1,...>>) -> ...;
f(<<1:1,...>>) -> ....
Internally that will be rewritten to (conceptually):
f(<<B:1,Tail/binary>>) ->
case B of
0 ->
case Tail of ... end;
1 ->
case Tail of ... end;
_ ->
error(case_clause)
end.
Since B comes from a bit field of one bit, we know that the only
possible values are 0 and 1. Therefore the error clause can be
eliminated like this:
f(<<B:1,Tail/binary>>) ->
case B of
0 ->
case Tail of ... end;
_ ->
case Tail of ... end
end.
Similarly, we can also a deduce the range for an integer from
a 'band' operation with a literal integer.
While we are at it, also add a test case to improve the coverage.
|
|
|
|
When matching a binary literal as in:
<<"abc">> = Bin
the compiler will produce a sequence of three instructions
(some details in the instructions removed for simplicity):
bs_start_match2 Fail BinReg CtxtReg
bs_match_string Fail CtxtReg "abc"
bs_test_tail2 Fail CtxtReg 0
The sequence can be replaced with:
is_eq_exact Fail BinReg "abc"
|
|
For tidiness, always place .core files in data directories.
|
|
I have spent too much time lately waiting for 'cover' to finish,
so now its time to optimize the running time of the tests suite
in coverage mode.
Basically, when 'cover' is running, the test suites would not
run any tests in parallel. The reason is that using too many
parallel processes when running 'cover' would be slower than
running them sequentially. But those measurements were made
several years ago, and many improvements have been made to
improve the parallelism of the run-time system.
Experimenting with the test_lib:p_run/2 function, I found that
increasing the number of parallel processes would speed up the
self_compile tests cases in compilation_SUITE. The difference
between using 3 processes or 4 processes was slight, though,
so it seems that we should not use more than 4 processes when
running 'cover'.
We don't want to change test_lib:parallel/0, because there is
no way to limit the number of test cases that will be run in
parallel by common_test. However, there as test suites (such as
andor_SUITE) that don't invoke the compiler at run-time. We can
run the cases in such test suites in parallel even if 'cover'
is running.
|
|
* maint:
Update primary bootstrap
core_lib: Handle patterns in map values
|
|
core_lib:is_var_used/2 would not consider a variable used in the
value of a map pattern such as:
case Map of
#{key := <<42:N>>} -> ok
end
Here the variable 'N' would not be considered used.
It was assumed that there was no need to check map patterns at
all, since maps currently don't support variables in keys.
|
|
While we are, clean up the comments and rearrange the code for
clarity. Also add a test to cover the last uncovered line in
beam_dead.erl.
|
|
We must not do the delayed binary creation optimization if the
code attempts to call the matched out binary. Calling a matchstate
will crash the run-time system.
Reported-by: Loïc Hoguin
|
|
|
|
The following code:
check(<<"string">>, a1) ->
one;
check(_, a2) ->
two;
check(undefined, a3) ->
three.
produces an internal consistency failure:
check: function check/2+17:
Internal consistency check failed - please report this bug.
Instruction: {test,is_eq_exact,{f,7},[{x,0},{atom,undefined}]}
Error: {match_context,{x,0}}:
Actually, in the current implementation of the run-time system,
comparing a match context to an atom is safe, so I briefly considered
updating the beam_validator to let this code pass through. I
abandoned that approach because not all terms would be safe to
compare to a match context, and the implementation might change
in the future.
Therefore, fix this problem by not allowing any matching of non-variables
(in the argument position for binary being matched) following binary
matching. That solution is simple and safe, and since this kind of
code seems to be rare in practice, there is no need to pursue any
more compilicated solution.
Reported-by: Viktor Sovietov
|
|
The handling of bs_start_match2 was both too conservative and too
careless. It was too conservative in that would not do the
optimization if the were copies of the match state in other
registers. It was careless in that it did not consider the
failure branch.
Reorganize the code and fix both these issues. Add a test case
to test that the failure branch is considered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* maint:
Fix compiler crash for binary matching and a complicated guard
|
|
The compiler would crash when attempting to compile a function
head that did binary matching and had a complex expression using
'andalso' and 'not'.
Noticed-by: José Valim
|
|
Run testcases in parallel will make the test suite run slightly
faster. Another reason for this change is that we want more testing
of parallel testcase support in common_test.
|
|
When matched variable is used as a size field in multiple clauses,
as in:
foo(<<L:8,A:L>>) -> A;
foo(<<L:8,A:L,B:8>>) -> {A,B}.
the match tree would branch out before the segment that used the
matched-out variable (in this example, the tree would branch out before
the matching of A:L). That happens because the pattern matching
compilator did not take variable substitutions into account when
grouping clauses that match the same value.
That is, the generated code would work similarly to this code:
foo(<<L:8,T/binary>>) ->
case T of
<<A:L>> ->
A;
_ ->
case T of
<<A:L,B:8>> -> %% A matched out again!
{A,B}
end
end.
We would like the matching to work more like:
foo(<<L,A:L,T/binary>>) ->
case T of
<<>> -> A;
<<B:8>> -> {A,B}
end.
Fix the problem by taking the substitutions into account when grouping
clauses that match out the same value.
|
|
Also correct the comment in bsm_ensure_no_partition_2/5, and while at
it correct typos in the comment for bsm_nonempty/2.
|
|
This commit is a preparation for introducing location information
(filename/line number) in stacktraces in exceptions. Currently
a stack trace looks like:
[{Mod1,Function1,Arity1},
.
.
.
{ModN,FunctionN,ArityN}]
Add a forth element to each tuple that can be used indication
the filename and line number of the source file:
[{Mod1,Function1,Arity1,Location1},
.
.
.
{ModN,FunctionN,ArityN,LocationN}]
In this commit, the fourth element will just be an empty list,
and we will change all code that look at or manipulate stacktraces.
|
|
|
|
In 3d0f4a3085f11389e5b22d10f96f0cbf08c9337f (an update to conform
with common_test), in all test_lib:recompile(?MODULE) calls, ?MODULE
was changed to the actual name of the module. That would cause
test_lib:recompile/1 to compile the module with the incorrect
compiler options in cloned modules such as record_no_opt_SUITE,
causing worse coverage.
|
|
In the following code:
m(<<Sz:8,_:Sz/binary>>) ->
Sz = wrong.
the Sz variable is supposed to be bound in the function header and the
matching "Sz = wrong" should cause a badarg exception. But what
happens is that the Sz variables seems to be unbound and the matching
succeds and the m/1 function returns 'wrong'.
If the Sz variable is used directly (not matched), it will have
the expected value. Thus the following code:
m(<<Sz:8,_:Sz/binary>>) ->
Sz.
will correctly return the value of Sz that was matched out from
the binary.
Reported-by: Bernard Duggan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
