| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We must not do the delayed binary creation optimization if the
code attempts to call the matched out binary. Calling a matchstate
will crash the run-time system.
Reported-by: Loïc Hoguin
|
|
|
|
The following code:
check(<<"string">>, a1) ->
one;
check(_, a2) ->
two;
check(undefined, a3) ->
three.
produces an internal consistency failure:
check: function check/2+17:
Internal consistency check failed - please report this bug.
Instruction: {test,is_eq_exact,{f,7},[{x,0},{atom,undefined}]}
Error: {match_context,{x,0}}:
Actually, in the current implementation of the run-time system,
comparing a match context to an atom is safe, so I briefly considered
updating the beam_validator to let this code pass through. I
abandoned that approach because not all terms would be safe to
compare to a match context, and the implementation might change
in the future.
Therefore, fix this problem by not allowing any matching of non-variables
(in the argument position for binary being matched) following binary
matching. That solution is simple and safe, and since this kind of
code seems to be rare in practice, there is no need to pursue any
more compilicated solution.
Reported-by: Viktor Sovietov
|
|
The handling of bs_start_match2 was both too conservative and too
careless. It was too conservative in that would not do the
optimization if the were copies of the match state in other
registers. It was careless in that it did not consider the
failure branch.
Reorganize the code and fix both these issues. Add a test case
to test that the failure branch is considered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* maint:
Fix compiler crash for binary matching and a complicated guard
|
|
The compiler would crash when attempting to compile a function
head that did binary matching and had a complex expression using
'andalso' and 'not'.
Noticed-by: José Valim
|
|
Run testcases in parallel will make the test suite run slightly
faster. Another reason for this change is that we want more testing
of parallel testcase support in common_test.
|
|
When matched variable is used as a size field in multiple clauses,
as in:
foo(<<L:8,A:L>>) -> A;
foo(<<L:8,A:L,B:8>>) -> {A,B}.
the match tree would branch out before the segment that used the
matched-out variable (in this example, the tree would branch out before
the matching of A:L). That happens because the pattern matching
compilator did not take variable substitutions into account when
grouping clauses that match the same value.
That is, the generated code would work similarly to this code:
foo(<<L:8,T/binary>>) ->
case T of
<<A:L>> ->
A;
_ ->
case T of
<<A:L,B:8>> -> %% A matched out again!
{A,B}
end
end.
We would like the matching to work more like:
foo(<<L,A:L,T/binary>>) ->
case T of
<<>> -> A;
<<B:8>> -> {A,B}
end.
Fix the problem by taking the substitutions into account when grouping
clauses that match out the same value.
|
|
Also correct the comment in bsm_ensure_no_partition_2/5, and while at
it correct typos in the comment for bsm_nonempty/2.
|
|
This commit is a preparation for introducing location information
(filename/line number) in stacktraces in exceptions. Currently
a stack trace looks like:
[{Mod1,Function1,Arity1},
.
.
.
{ModN,FunctionN,ArityN}]
Add a forth element to each tuple that can be used indication
the filename and line number of the source file:
[{Mod1,Function1,Arity1,Location1},
.
.
.
{ModN,FunctionN,ArityN,LocationN}]
In this commit, the fourth element will just be an empty list,
and we will change all code that look at or manipulate stacktraces.
|
|
|
|
In 3d0f4a3085f11389e5b22d10f96f0cbf08c9337f (an update to conform
with common_test), in all test_lib:recompile(?MODULE) calls, ?MODULE
was changed to the actual name of the module. That would cause
test_lib:recompile/1 to compile the module with the incorrect
compiler options in cloned modules such as record_no_opt_SUITE,
causing worse coverage.
|
|
In the following code:
m(<<Sz:8,_:Sz/binary>>) ->
Sz = wrong.
the Sz variable is supposed to be bound in the function header and the
matching "Sz = wrong" should cause a badarg exception. But what
happens is that the Sz variables seems to be unbound and the matching
succeds and the m/1 function returns 'wrong'.
If the Sz variable is used directly (not matched), it will have
the expected value. Thus the following code:
m(<<Sz:8,_:Sz/binary>>) ->
Sz.
will correctly return the value of Sz that was matched out from
the binary.
Reported-by: Bernard Duggan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a test case (derived from dets_v9:scan_skip/8), to cover the
clause in initialized_regs/2 that handles bs_context_to_binary.
|
|
* bg/compiler-inliner:
pmod_SUITE: Again test inlining parameterized modules
compiler tests: Cope with missing args in function_clause for native code
compiler tests: Compile a few more modules with 'inline'
Consistently rewrite an inlined function_clause exception to case_clause
compiler tests: Test the 'inline' option better
compiler: Suppress bs_context_to_binary/1 for a literal operand
compiler: Fix binary matching bug in the inliner
sys_core_inline: Don't generated multiple compiler_generated annos
OTP-8552 bg/compiler-inliner
Several problems in the inliner have been fixed.
|
|
Native-compiled code generates a different stack trace for
function_clause exceptions - instead of the arguments for the
function, only the arity is reported. Accept missing arguments
if the test suite is native-compiled.
|
|
Since a function_clause exception in an inlined function will
be changed to a case_clause exception, we must test for both.
|
|
|
