Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The two noncharacter code points 16#FFFE and 16#FFFF were not
allowed to be encoded or decoded using the unicode module or
bit syntax. That causes an inconsistency, since the noncharacters
16#FDD0 to 16#FDEF could be encoded/decoded.
There is two ways to fix that inconsistency.
We have chosen to allow 16#FFFE and 16#FFFF to be encoded and
decoded, because the noncharacters could be useful internally
within an application and it will make encoding and decoding
slightly faster.
Reported-by: Alisdair Sullivan
|
|
In 3d0f4a3085f11389e5b22d10f96f0cbf08c9337f (an update to conform
with common_test), in all test_lib:recompile(?MODULE) calls, ?MODULE
was changed to the actual name of the module. That would cause
test_lib:recompile/1 to compile the module with the incorrect
compiler options in cloned modules such as record_no_opt_SUITE,
causing worse coverage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* bg/compiler-inliner:
pmod_SUITE: Again test inlining parameterized modules
compiler tests: Cope with missing args in function_clause for native code
compiler tests: Compile a few more modules with 'inline'
Consistently rewrite an inlined function_clause exception to case_clause
compiler tests: Test the 'inline' option better
compiler: Suppress bs_context_to_binary/1 for a literal operand
compiler: Fix binary matching bug in the inliner
sys_core_inline: Don't generated multiple compiler_generated annos
OTP-8552 bg/compiler-inliner
Several problems in the inliner have been fixed.
|
|
Since a function_clause exception in an inlined function will
be changed to a case_clause exception, we must test for both.
|
|
|