| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The following regression was introduced in 19.0:
foo(bar, <<"x">>) -> 1;
foo(_, <<"x">>) -> 2;
foo(_, <<"y">>) -> 3;
foo(_, _) -> fail.
The call foo(bar,<<"y">>) would errorneous return 'fail' instead of 3.
A testcase in match_SUITE has been added to verify this.
|
|
a3ec2644f5 attempted to teach v3_core not to generate code with
unbound variables. The approach taken in that commit is to
discard all expressions following a badmatch. That does not
work if the badmatch is nested:
{[V] = [] = foo,V},
V
That would be rewritten to:
{error({badmatch,foo})},
V
where V is unbound.
If we were to follow the same approach, the tuple construction
code would have to look out for a badmatch. As would list construction,
begin...end, and so on.
Therefore, as it is impractical to discard all expressions that
follow a badmatch, the only other solution is to ensure that the
variables that the pattern binds will somehow be bound. That can
be arranged by rewriting the pattern to a pattern that binds the
same variables. Thus:
error({badmatch,foo}),
E = foo,
case E of
{[V],[]} ->
V;
Other ->
error({badmatch,Other}
end
|
|
v3_core would generate unsafe code for the following example:
f() ->
{ok={error,E}} = foo(),
E.
Internally, the code would look similar to:
f() ->
Var = foo(),
error({badmatch,Var}),
E.
That is, there would remain a reference to an unbound variable.
Normally, sys_core_fold would remove the reference to 'E', but if
if optimization was disabled the compiler would crash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a first step to removing the test_server application as
as its own separate application, change the inclusion of
test_server.hrl to an inclusion of ct.hrl and remove the
inclusion of test_server_line.hrl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duplicated variables as aliases in patterns, such as:
f({_,_}=Dup=Dup) -> ...
will work, but produce sub-optimal code similar to:
f({_,_}=Dup=NewVar) when Dup =:= NewVar -> ...
with one extra guard test for each duplicated variable.
Rewrite pat_alias/2 to eliminate all duplicated variables. While
we are at it, also simplify handling of tuples, conses, and literals
by using the data functions in the cerl module.
|
|
* maint:
Update primary bootstrap
Be more careful about map patterns when evalutating element/2
Do not convert map patterns to map expressions
Conflicts:
bootstrap/lib/compiler/ebin/sys_core_fold.beam
lib/compiler/test/match_SUITE.erl
|
|
In code such as:
case {a,Map} of
{a,#{}}=T ->
T
end
we must NOT rewrite a map pattern to a map expression like this:
case Map of
#{} ->
{a,#{}}
end
because the pattern '#{}' will match any map, but the expression
'#{}' will construct an empty map.
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/map-fixes:
cerl: Remove a clause in fold_map_pairs/3 that will never be reached
Move grouping of map constructions from v3_core to v3_kernel
core_pp: Correct printing of map literals
Strengthen and modernize compile_SUITE
core_parse: Always fold literal conses
cerl: Make sure that we preserve the invariants for maps
cerl_clauses: Fix indentation
sys_core_fold: Strengthen optimization of letrecs in effect context
Fix handling of binary map keys in comprehensions
core_lib: Teach is_var_used/2 to handle keys in map patterns
warnings_SUITE: Eliminate compiler warning for a shadowed variable
lc_SUITE: Add shadow/1
Modernize lc_SUITE
|
|
I have spent too much time lately waiting for 'cover' to finish,
so now its time to optimize the running time of the tests suite
in coverage mode.
Basically, when 'cover' is running, the test suites would not
run any tests in parallel. The reason is that using too many
parallel processes when running 'cover' would be slower than
running them sequentially. But those measurements were made
several years ago, and many improvements have been made to
improve the parallelism of the run-time system.
Experimenting with the test_lib:p_run/2 function, I found that
increasing the number of parallel processes would speed up the
self_compile tests cases in compilation_SUITE. The difference
between using 3 processes or 4 processes was slight, though,
so it seems that we should not use more than 4 processes when
running 'cover'.
We don't want to change test_lib:parallel/0, because there is
no way to limit the number of test cases that will be run in
parallel by common_test. However, there as test suites (such as
andor_SUITE) that don't invoke the compiler at run-time. We can
run the cases in such test suites in parallel even if 'cover'
is running.
|
|
is_var_used/2 did not notice that variable keys in map patterns
were used, which could cause sys_core_fold to do unsafe
optimizations.
|
|
The optimization of a 'case' statement could lead to incorrect
code that would cause an exception at run-time.
Here is an example to show how the optimization went wrong. Start
with the following code:
f({r,#{key:=Val},X}=S) ->
case S of
{r,_,_} ->
setelement(3, Val, S)
end.
(The record operations have already been translated to the
corresponding tuple operations.) The first step in case_opt/3 is
to substitute S to obtain:
f({r,#{key:=Val},X}=S) ->
case {r,#{key:=Val},X} of
{r,_,_} ->
setelement(3, Val, S)
end.
After that substitution the 'case' can be simplified to:
f({r,#{key:=Val},_}=S) ->
case #{key:=Val} of
NewVar ->
setelement(3, Val, S)
end.
That is the result from case_opt/3. Now eval_case/2 notices
that since there is only one clause left in the 'case', the
'case' can eliminated:
f({r,#{key:=Val},_}=S) ->
NewVar = #{key:=Val},
setelement(3, Val, S).
Since the map construction may have a side effect, it was not
eliminated, but assigned to a variable that is never used.
The problem is that '#{key:=Val}' is fine as a pattern, but in a
construction of a new map, the '=>' operator must be used. So the
map construction will fail, generating an exception.
As a conservative correction for a maintenance release, we will
abort the 'case' optimization if the substitution into the 'case'
expression is anything but data items (tuples, conses, or
literals) or variables.
Reported-by: Dmitry Aleksandrov
|
|
|
|
Run testcases in parallel will make the test suite run slightly
faster. Another reason for this change is that we want more testing
of parallel testcase support in common_test.
|
|
|
|
In 3d0f4a3085f11389e5b22d10f96f0cbf08c9337f (an update to conform
with common_test), in all test_lib:recompile(?MODULE) calls, ?MODULE
was changed to the actual name of the module. That would cause
test_lib:recompile/1 to compile the module with the incorrect
compiler options in cloned modules such as record_no_opt_SUITE,
causing worse coverage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* bg/compiler-suppress-result-ignored:
compiler tests: Eliminate "result of expression is ignored" warnings
Silence warnings for expressions that are assigned to "_"
OTP-8602 bg/compiler-suppress-result-ignored
It is now possible to suppress the warning in code such as
"list_to_integer(S), ok" by assigning the ignored value "_" like this: "_ =
list_to_integer(S), ok".
|
|
There is currently no zero-cost way to silence the warning
"the result of the expression is ignored", which is issued
for code such as:
list_to_integer(S),
ok
Such code can be useful for assertions or input validation.
Teach the compiler to silence the warning for expressions
that are explicitly assigned to to the "_" variable,
such as:
_ = list_to_integer(S),
ok
Implement it by having the v3_core pass annotate calls in
Core Erlang like this:
let <_> = ( call 'erlang':'list_to_integer'(S) -| ['result_not_wanted'] )
in 'ok'
and modifiy sys_core_fold to suppress the warning for any call
having the annotation.
We deliberately do not make it possible to silence the warnings
for expressions like:
{build,an,unnecessary,term}, ok
or
is_list(L), ok
because we don't know of any real-world scenarios in which that would
be useful.
|
|
|
