| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When beam_utils was first written, it did not have the functions
for testing whether a register was not used. Those were added
later, in sort of a hacky way.
Also, is_killed*() and is_not_used*() for Y registers would
return the same answer. Fix that to make the API more consistent
(an Y register can only be killed by a deallocate/1 instruction).
We will need to change beam_trim to call beam_utils:is_not_used/3
instead of beam_utils:is_killed/3.
|
|
During development, a bug in beam_utils caused a compiler failure
in xmerl. If the bug reappears, make sure that we catch it when
compiling the compiler test suite.
|
|
|
|
* maint:
beam_validator: Handle unreachable instructions
Turn off parallel make for start scripts Makefile
|
|
ab03678e introduced an optimization in the beam_z pass that could
introduce unreachable code in BEAM files (a 'jump' instruction is
removed after a 'raise' instruction, but the code following the
target of the 'jump' is not removed).
Since this situation happens very rarely, there is no point in adding
another pass that can remove unreachable code after beam_z. Instead we
will make sure that beam_validator can skip the unreachable code.
Skipping unreachable code is already done in valfun_1/2 (for
historical reasons), but we will also need to do it in val_dsetel/2.
|
|
* maint:
[snmp] Correct bug when path to mib contains UTF-8 characters
[ic] Fix but when UTF-8 character in path to idl spec
sys_core_fold: Don't move a fun into a guard
|
|
Moving a fun into a guard may cause code that is not accepted
by beam_validator.
|
|
* bjorn/floor-ceiling/OTP-13692:
Add math:floor/1 and math:ceil/1
Implement the new ceil/1 and floor/1 guard BIFs
|
|
Add math:floor/1 and math:ceil/1 to avoid unnecessary conversions
in floating point expressions. That is, instead of having to write
float(floor(X)) as part of a floating point expressions, we can
write simply math:floor(X).
|
|
Implement as ceil/1 and floor/1 as new guard BIFs (essentially part of
Erlang language). They are guard BIFs because trunc/1 is a guard
BIF. It would be strange to have trunc/1 as a part of the language, but
not ceil/1 and floor/1.
|
|
The filters in a list comprehension can be guard expressions or
an ordinary expressions.
If a guard expression is used as a filter, an exception will basically
mean the same as 'false':
t() ->
L = [{some_tag,42},an_atom],
[X || X <- L, element(1, X) =:= some_tag]
%% Returns [{some_tag,42}]
On the other hand, if an ordinary expression is used as a filter, there
will be an exception:
my_element(N, T) -> element(N, T).
t() ->
L = [{some_tag,42},an_atom],
[X || X <- L, my_element(1, X) =:= some_tag]
%% Causes a 'badarg' exception when element(1, an_atom) is evaluated
It has been allowed for several releases to override a BIF with
a local function. Thus, if we define a function called element/2,
it will be called instead of the BIF element/2 within the module.
We must use the "erlang:" prefix to call the BIF.
Therefore, the following code is expected to work the same way as in
our second example above:
-compile({no_auto_import,[element/2]}).
element(N, T) ->
erlang:element(N, T).
t() ->
L = [{some_tag,42},an_atom],
[X || X <- L, element(1, X) =:= some_tag].
%% Causes a 'badarg' exception when element(1, an_atom) is evaluated
But the compiler refuses to compile the code with the following
diagnostic:
call to local/imported function element/2 is illegal in guard
|
|
sys_pre_expand previously did a lot more work, for example,
translating records and funs, but now is merely a grab bag
of small transformations. Move those transformations to
v3_core.
|
|
Don't only test the case that failed; test it exhaustively.
|
|
* maint:
asn1_test_lib: Compile ASN.1 modules in parallel
Support 'make -j' when compiling ASN.1 modules
[ERL-209] Fix ambiguous_catch_try_state inconsistency error
|
|
It is not safe to share code between 'catch' blocks.
|
|
* josevalim/large-binary-strings/PR-1131/OTP-13794:
Move expansion of strings in binaries to v3_core
|
|
* maint:
Update primary bootstrap
beam_block: Fix potentially unsafe optimization in move_allocates/1
|
|
beam_block has an optimization that only is safe when it is applied
immediately after code generation. That is pointed out in a comment:
NOTE: Moving allocation instructions is only safe because it is done
immediately after code generation so that we KNOW that if {x,X} is
initialized, all x registers with lower numbers are also initialized.
That assumption may not be true after other optimizations, such as
the beam_utils:live_opt/1 optimization.
The new beam_reorder pass added in OTP 19 runs before beam_block.
Therefore, the optimization is potentially unsafe. The optimization
is also unsafe if compilation is started from assembly code in a
.S file.
Rewrite the optimization to make it safe. See the newly added comment
for details.
ERL-202
|
|
This speeds up the compilation of binary literals
with string values in them. For example, compiling
a file with a ~340kB binary would yield the following
times by the compiler:
Compiling "foo"
parse_module : 0.130 s 5327.6 kB
transform_module : 0.000 s 5327.6 kB
lint_module : 0.011 s 5327.8 kB
expand_module : 0.508 s 71881.2 kB
v3_core : 0.463 s 11.5 kB
Notice the increase in memory and processing time
in expand_module and v3_core. This happened because
expand_module would expand the string in binaries
into chars. For example, the binary <<"foo">>, which
is represented as
{bin, 1, [
{bin_element, 1, {string, 1, "foo"}, default, default}
]}
would be converted to
{bin, 1, [
{bin_element, 1, {char, 1, $f}, default, default},
{bin_element, 1, {char, 1, $o}, default, default},
{bin_element, 1, {char, 1, $o}, default, default}
]}
However, v3_core would then traverse all of those
characters and convert it into an actual binary, as it
is a literal value.
This patch addresses this issue by moving the expansion
of string into chars to v3_core and only if a literal
value cannot not be built. This reduces the compilation
time of the file mentioned above to the values below:
Compiling "bar"
parse_module : 0.134 s 5327.6 kB
transform_module : 0.000 s 5327.6 kB
lint_module : 0.005 s 5327.8 kB
expand_module : 0.000 s 5328.7 kB
v3_core : 0.013 s 11.2 kB
|
|
Conflicts:
OTP_VERSION
|
|
The following regression was introduced in 19.0:
foo(bar, <<"x">>) -> 1;
foo(_, <<"x">>) -> 2;
foo(_, <<"y">>) -> 3;
foo(_, _) -> fail.
The call foo(bar,<<"y">>) would errorneous return 'fail' instead of 3.
A testcase in match_SUITE has been added to verify this.
|
|
num_bif_SUITE.erl was originally copied from the emulator test
suite. It does not test much of the compiler.
Therefore, remove num_bif_SUITE. Add a new test to bif_SUITE
to test trunc/1 and round/1 in contexts that could be tricky
for the compiler to handle correctly. Note that there is no
need to test abs/1 in bif_SUITE, since it is tested in many
other places (e.g. in guard_SUITE).
|
|
retrieve the value of the environment variable ERL_COMPILER_OPTIONS
in the same manner as used by file/2, forms/2 and output_generated/2
|
|
|
|
Add more filename/line number annotations while translating to
Core Erlang in v3_core, and ensure that sys_core_fold retains
existing annotations. The goal is to avoid that sys_core_fold
generate warnings with "no_file" instead of a filename.
|
|
beam_validator would complain that x(1) is uninitialized
in a test_heap instruction when attempting to compile
the following code with sys_core_fold turned off:
foo(M) when not (M#{true := 0}); [M] ->
ok.
Simplified, the generated BEAM assembly code looked like
this:
test is_map BadMap x(0)
put_map_exact Fail x(0) => x(1) ...
jump BooleanStuff
BadMap:
move ok => x(1)
jump Fail
BooleanStuff:
...
move Boolean => x(2)
jump Build
Fail:
move false => x(2)
Build:
test_heap 2 3 %% x(0), x(1), x(2) must be live.
...
That is, if put_map_exact failed, control would transfer
to the label Fail without initializing x(1).
Fix that by making sure that x(1) is initilized even if
put_map_exact fails:
test is_map BadMap x(0)
put_map_exact BadLbl x(0) => x(1) ...
jump OkLbl
BadLbl:
move ok => x(1)
jump Fail
OkLbl:
jump BooleanStuff
BadMap:
move ok => x(1)
jump Fail
BooleanStuff:
...
move Boolean => x(2)
jump Build
Fail:
move false => x(2)
Build:
test_heap 2 3 %% x(0), x(1), x(2) must be live.
...
Note that this situation is rare, and that other optimization passes
(beam_dead and beam_jump in particular) will clean up this mess.
|
|
Somewhat simplified, beam_block would rewrite the target for
the first instruction in this code sequence:
move x(0) => y(1)
gc_bif '+' 1 x(0) => y(0)
move y(1) => x(1)
move nil => x(0)
call 2 local_function/2
The resulting code would be:
move x(0) => x(1) %% Changed target.
gc_bif '+' 1 x(0) => y(0)
move x(1) => y(1) %% Operands swapped (see 02d6135813).
move nil => x(0)
call 2 local_function/2
The resulting code is not safe because the x(1) will be killed
by the gc_bif instruction.
7a47b20c3a cleaned up move optimizations and would reject the
optimization if the target was an X register and an allocating
instruction was found. To avoid this bug, the optimization must be
rejected even if the target is a Y register.
|
|
|
|
If the Core Erlang optimization were turned off (using no_copt),
the optimization passes for Beam assembly could generate unsafe
code that did not initialize all Y registers before (for example)
a call instruction.
To fix this, beam_dead should not attempt to remove stores to Y
registers. That is not safe if there is an exception-generating
instruction inside a try...catch block.
|
|
beam_validator wrongly complained that the following was
not safe because it didn't know that is_bitstring/1 is safe:
food(Curriculum) ->
[try
is_bitstring(functions)
catch _ ->
0
end, Curriculum].
While we are it, also add a new bif_SUITE test suite to cover some
more code in beam_validator.
|
|
In complicated code with many indirect jumps to the func_info label,
a label could get lost.
|
|
A negative allocation could be calculated if a block had multiple
allocations. Make sure to process the block in the right order
so that the correct allocation is processed. Also add an assertion.
This bug was often not noticed because beam_type usually silently
recalculates the allocation amount in test_heap/2 instructions.
|
|
Generate code that not only is safe, but can easily be seen by
beam_validator to be safe.
|
|
Sometimes v3_codegen would generate unsafe code when there was
a call to error/1 in a guard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By first adding a call to error/1 to each uncovered line,
QuickCheck could find test cases that would cover the lines.
|
|
Make sure we don't optimize code such as:
is_tuple Fail Src
test_arity Fail Src Arity
get_tuple_element Src Pos Dst
is_map Fail Src
If we would reorder the instructions like this:
is_tuple Fail Src
test_arity Fail Src Arity
is_map Fail Src
get_tuple_element Src Pos Dst
beam_validator would complain that the type for Src is a map
instead of a tuple. Since the code has problems to begin with,
there is no need to do the optimization.
|
|
When calculating the sets of registers that must be killed or
unused, registers set in a {protected,_,_,_} block were not
considered. That could result in a crash in the
assertion in beam_utils:live_opt_block/4.
|
|
a3ec2644f5 attempted to teach v3_core not to generate code with
unbound variables. The approach taken in that commit is to
discard all expressions following a badmatch. That does not
work if the badmatch is nested:
{[V] = [] = foo,V},
V
That would be rewritten to:
{error({badmatch,foo})},
V
where V is unbound.
If we were to follow the same approach, the tuple construction
code would have to look out for a badmatch. As would list construction,
begin...end, and so on.
Therefore, as it is impractical to discard all expressions that
follow a badmatch, the only other solution is to ensure that the
variables that the pattern binds will somehow be bound. That can
be arranged by rewriting the pattern to a pattern that binds the
same variables. Thus:
error({badmatch,foo}),
E = foo,
case E of
{[V],[]} ->
V;
Other ->
error({badmatch,Other}
end
|
|
The following code:
simple() ->
case try 0 after [] end of
0 -> college;
1 -> 0
end.
would crash the compiler like this:
crash reason: {case_clause,
{'EXIT',
{function_clause,
[{beam_type,simplify_select_val_int,
[{select,select_val,
{x,0},
{f,7},
[{integer,1},{f,9},{integer,0},{f,8}]},
0],
[{file,"beam_type.erl"},{line,169}]},
{beam_type,simplify_basic_1,3,
[{file,"beam_type.erl"},{line,155}]},
{beam_type,opt,3,[{file,"beam_type.erl"},{line,57}]},
{beam_type,function,1,[{file,"beam_type.erl"},{line,36}]},
{beam_type,'-module/2-lc$^0/1-0-',1,
[{file,"beam_type.erl"},{line,30}]},
{beam_type,module,2,[{file,"beam_type.erl"},{line,30}]},
{compile,'-select_passes/2-anonymous-2-',2,
[{file,"compile.erl"},{line,521}]},
{compile,'-internal_comp/4-anonymous-1-',2,
[{file,"compile.erl"},{line,306}]}]}}}
The root cause is that the type representation is not well-defined.
Integers could be represented in three different ways:
integer
{integer,{1,10}}
{integer,0}
However, only the first two forms were handled.
To avoid similar problems in the future:
* Make the type representation stricter. Make sure that integers are
only represented as 'integer' or {integer,{Min,Max}}.
* Call verify_type/1 whenever a new type is added (not only when
merging types) to ensure that only the supported types are added
to the type database).
(ERL-150)
|
|
We must be careful how we treat the type info for the result of:
setelement(Index, Tuple, NewValue)
If Tuple had type information, the result of setelement/3 (in x(0))
would be assigned the same type information. But that is not safe
for:
setelement(1, Tuple, NewValue)
since the type for the first element will be changed.
Therefore, we must take care to remove the type information for
the first element of the tuple if might have been modified by
setelement/3.
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/beam_bool/ERL-143:
Eliminate crash in beam_bool
Add beam_bool_SUITE
Add missing test cases in andor_SUITE and beam_block_SUITE
|
|
beam_bool would crash when attempting to optimize BEAM code similar
to this code:
bif '=:=' Reg1 SomeValue => y(0)
bif '=:=' Reg2 {atom,true} => x(2)
bif '=:=' Reg3 {atom,true} => x(3)
bif 'or' x(2) x(3) => x(2)
is_eq_exact Fail x(2) {atom,true}
The problem is that the first instruction that assigns a value to a Y
register. beam_bool:ssa_assign/2 will not accept a Y register
argument.
We could change ssa_assign/2 to accept a Y register, but that would
only cause the entire optimization to be rejected later because the Y
register is alive in the code that follows. Therefore, a better
solution is to modify extend_block/3 so that the instruction that
assign to Y registers are not added to the block. That is, the
optimizer will only operate on the following code:
bif '=:=' Reg2 {atom,true} => x(2)
bif '=:=' Reg3 {atom,true} => x(3)
bif 'or' x(2) x(3) => x(2)
is_eq_exact Fail x(2) {atom,true}
Usually the optimization will succeed, rewriting the four instructions
to a select_val instruction.
Assembly code such as the above can be produced by code similar to:
Y = Something == SomethingElse,
case Y of
Condition; OtherCondition ->
. . .
end,
. . .,
Y.
Reported-by: http://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-143
Reported-by: José Valim
|
|
It's time that we have a dedicated test suite for beam_bool.
|
|
Two test cases were not actually run. Even if their main purpose is to
ensure that the compiler doesn't crash, we always try to also run the
test case (when practial) to also ensure that the generated code is
correct.
|
|
The inliner generates variable whose names are numeric. Run
the inliner to cover one more line in core_pp.
|
|
Several test cases in compile_SUITE (e.g. core/1) extracts the
abstract code from a BEAM file and runs the compiler on it.
It is only a waste of time to use the abstract code from
cloned versions of test case modules. That is, use record_SUITE,
but don't use record_no_opt_SUITE, record_post_opt_SUITE, or
record_inline_SUITE since they all contain essentially the same
abstract code.
|
|
Add is_cloned_mod(Mod) to determine whether Mod is the original
name for a module (e.g. record_SUITE) or a cloned module
(e.g. record_no_opt_SUITE).
|
|
Recent spring cleaning in the test suite left a line in sys_core_fold
dealing with an unnecessary catch uncovered.
|
