aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/compiler/test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-08-22map_SUITE: Test is_map_key/2 followed by a map updateBjörn Gustavsson
2018-08-22map_SUITE: Cover map_get optimizations in beam_deadBjörn Gustavsson
2018-08-14Fix compiler crash when compiling double receivesBjörn Gustavsson
The compiler would crash when compiling a function with two receive statements. https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-703
2018-08-13Correct error behavior of is_map_key/2 in guardsBjörn Gustavsson
Consider the following functions: foo() -> bar(not_a_map). bar(M) when not is_map_key(a, M) -> ok; bar(_) -> error. What will `foo/0` return? It depends. If the module is compiled with the default compiler options, the return value will be `ok`. If the module is compiled with the `inline` option, the return value will be `error`. The correct value is `error`, because the call to `is_map_key/2` when the second argument is not a map should fail the entire guard. That is the way other failing guards BIFs are handled. For example: foo() -> bar(not_a_tuple). bar(T) when not element(1, T) -> ok; bar(_) -> error. `foo/0` always returns `error` (whether the code is inlined or not). This bug can be fixed by changing the classification of `is_map_key/2` in the `erl_internal` module. It is now classified as a type test, which is incorrect because type tests should not fail. Reclassifying it as a plain guard BIF corrects the bug. This correction also fixes the internal consistency check failure which was reported in: https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-699
2018-08-10Merge pull request #1911 from ↵Björn Gustavsson
bjorng/bjorn/compiler/binary-syntax/ERL-689/OTP-15219 Fix bug in binary matching
2018-08-09Merge branch ↵Rickard Green
'john/compiler/fix-deterministic-include-paths/OTP-15204/ERL-679' into maint * john/compiler/fix-deterministic-include-paths/OTP-15204/ERL-679: Omit include path debug info for +deterministic builds
2018-08-09Omit include path debug info for +deterministic buildsJohn Högberg
Compiling the same file with different include paths resulted in different files with the `+deterministic` flag even if everything but the paths were identical. This was caused by the absolute path of each include directory being unconditionally included in a debug information chunk. This commit fixes this by only including this information in non-deterministic builds.
2018-08-09Merge pull request #1910 from ↵Björn Gustavsson
bjorng/bjorn/compiler/letrec-side-effect-fix/ERL-658/OTP-15188 Fix side-effect optimization when compiling from Core Erlang
2018-08-08Fix bug in binary matchingBjörn Gustavsson
The compiler generates incorrect code for the following example: decode_binary(_, <<Length, Data/binary>>) -> case {Length, Data} of {0, _} -> %% When converting the match context back to a binary, %% Data will be set to the entire original binary, %% that is, to <<0>> instead of <<>>. {{0, 0, 0}, Data}; {4, <<Y:16/little, M, D, Rest/binary>>} -> {{Y, M, D}, Rest} end. The problem is the delayed sub binary creation optimization, which is not safe to do in this case. This commit introduces a heuristic that will disable the delayed sub binary creation optimization for this example. Unfortunately, the heuristic may turn off the optimization when it would actually be safe. In the OTP codebase, the optimization is turned off in two instances, once in string.erl and once in dets_v9.erl. https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-689
2018-08-08Fix side-effect optimization when compiling from Core ErlangJohn Högberg
When an expression is only used for its side effects, we try to remove everything that doesn't tie into a side-effect, but we went a bit too far when we applied the optimization to funs defined in such a context. Consider the following: do letrec 'f'/0 = fun () -> ... whatever ... in call 'side':'effect'(apply 'f'/0()) 'ok' When f/0 is optimized under the assumption that its return value is unused, side:effect/1 will be fed the result of the last side-effecting expression in f/0 instead of its actual result. https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-658 Co-authored-by: Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]>
2018-08-06beam_validator: Fix false diagnostic for a receive nested in a tryBjörn Gustavsson
When nesting a receive in a try/catch, there could be a false diagnostic that a fragile term is used. https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-684
2018-07-16Abort size calculation when a matched-out variable is usedJohn Högberg
Referencing a matched-out variable in a size expression makes it impossible to calculate the size of the result based on the size of the matched binary. The compiler would still generate code to do this however, which would crash since the variable isn't defined at the size calculation.
2018-07-06Call test_lib:recompile/1 from init_per_suite/1Björn Gustavsson
Call test_lib:recompile/1 from init_per_suite/1 instead of from all/0. That makes it easy to find the log from the compilation in the log file for the init_per_suite/1 test case.
2018-06-29Merge branch 'bjorn/compiler/fix-beam_jump-crash/ERL-660/OTP-15166' into ↵Erlang/OTP
maint-21 * bjorn/compiler/fix-beam_jump-crash/ERL-660/OTP-15166: Eliminate a crash in the beam_jump pass
2018-06-29Merge branch 'bjorn/compiler/fix-map_get/OTP-15157' into maint-21Erlang/OTP
* bjorn/compiler/fix-map_get/OTP-15157: Fix internal compiler error for map_get/2
2018-06-29Merge branch 'bjorn/compiler/fix-skipped-matching/ERL-655/OTP-15156' into ↵Erlang/OTP
maint-21 * bjorn/compiler/fix-skipped-matching/ERL-655/OTP-15156: beam_type: Fix unsafe optimization
2018-06-29Eliminate a crash in the beam_jump passBjörn Gustavsson
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-660
2018-06-27Fix internal compiler error for map_get/2Björn Gustavsson
Code such as that the following: Val = map_get(a, Map), Map#{a:=z} %Could be any map update would incorrectly cause an internal consistency check failure: Internal consistency check failed - please report this bug. Instruction: {put_map_exact,{f,0},{x,0},{x,0},1,{list,[{atom,a},{atom,z}]}} Error: {bad_type,{needed,map},{actual,term}}: Update beam_validator so that it understands that the second argument for map_get/2 is a map.
2018-06-27beam_type: Fix unsafe optimizationBjörn Gustavsson
beam_type assumed that the operand for the bs_context_to_binary instruction must be a binary. That is not correct; bs_context_to_binary accepts anything. Based on the incorrect assumption, beam_type would remove other test instructions. The bug was introduced in eee8655788d2, which was supposed to be just a refactoring commit. https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-655
2018-06-25Fix unsafe optimization when running beam_block the second timeBjörn Gustavsson
The compiler would crash when compiling code such as: serialize(#{tag := value, id := Id, domain := Domain}) -> [case Id of nil -> error(id({required, id})); _ -> <<10, 1:16/signed, Id:16/signed>> end, case Domain of nil -> error(id({required, domain})); _ -> <<8, 2:16/signed, Domain:32/signed>> end]. The crash would look like this: Function: serialize/1 t.erl: internal error in block2; crash reason: {badmatch,false} in function beam_utils:live_opt/4 (beam_utils.erl, line 861) in call from beam_utils:live_opt/1 (beam_utils.erl, line 285) in call from beam_block:function/2 (beam_block.erl, line 47) in call from beam_block:'-module/2-lc$^0/1-0-'/2 (beam_block.erl, line 33) in call from beam_block:'-module/2-lc$^0/1-0-'/2 (beam_block.erl, line 33) in call from beam_block:module/2 (beam_block.erl, line 33) in call from compile:block2/2 (compile.erl, line 1358) in call from compile:'-internal_comp/5-anonymous-1-'/3 (compile.erl, line 349) The reason for the crash is an assertion failure caused by a previous unsafe optimization. Here is the code before the unsafe optimization: . . . {bs_init2,{f,0},7,0,0,{field_flags,[]},{x,1}}. {bs_put_string,3,{string,[8,0,2]}}. {bs_put_integer,{f,0},{integer,32},1,{field_flags,[signed,big]},{y,1}}. {move,{x,1},{x,0}}. {test_heap,4,1}. . . . beam_block:move_allocate/1 moved up the test_heap/2 instruction past the move/2 instruction, adjusting the number of live registers at the same time: . . . {bs_init2,{f,0},7,0,0,{field_flags,[]},{x,1}}. %% Only x1 is live now. {bs_put_string,3,{string,[8,0,2]}}. {bs_put_integer,{f,0},{integer,32},1,{field_flags,[signed,big]},{y,1}}. {test_heap,4,2}. %Unsafe. x0 is dead. {move,{x,1},{x,0}}. . . . This optimization is unsafe because the bs_init2 instruction killed x0. The bug is in beam_utils:anno_defs/1, which adds annotations indicating the registers that are defined at the beginning of each block. The annotation before the move/2 instruction incorrectly indicated that x0 was live. https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-650 https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/issues/7782
2018-06-18Update copyright yearHenrik Nord
2018-06-04sys_core_fold: Fix name capture problemBjörn Gustavsson
sys_core_fold could do unsafe transformations on the code from the old inliner (invoked using the compiler option `{inline,[{F/A}]}` to request inlining of specific functions). To explain the bug, let's first look at an example that sys_core_fold handles correctly. Consider this code: 'foo'/2 = fun (Arg1,Arg2) -> let <B> = Arg2 in let <A,B> = <B,Arg1> in {A,B} In this example, the lets can be completely eliminated, since the arguments for the lets are variables (as opposed to expressions). Since the variable B is rebound in the inner let, `sys_core_fold` must take special care when doing the substitutions. Here is the correct result: 'foo'/2 = fun (Arg1, Arg2) -> {Arg2,Arg1} Consider a slight modifictation of the example: 'bar'/2 = fun (Arg1,Arg2) -> let <B> = [Arg2] in let <A,B> = <B,[Arg1]> in {A,B} Here some of the arguments for the lets are expressions, so the lets must be kept. sys_core_fold does not handle this example correctly: 'bar'/2 = fun (Arg1,Arg2) -> let <B> = [Arg2] in let <B> = [Arg1] in {B,B} In the inner let, the variable A has been eliminated and replaced with the variable B in the body (the first B in the tuple). Since the B in the outer let is never used, the outer let will be eliminated, giving: 'bar'/2 = fun (Arg1,Arg2) -> let <B> = [Arg1] in {B,B} To handle this example correctly, sys_core_fold must rename the variable B in the inner let like this to avoid capturing B: 'bar'/2 = fun (Arg1,Arg2) -> let <B> = [Arg2] in let <NewName> = [Arg1] in {B,NewName} (Note: The `v3_kernel` pass alreday handles those examples correctly in case `sys_core_fold` has been disabled.)
2018-05-21bs_match_SUITE: Add test of multiple matchesBjörn Gustavsson
2018-05-07Merge pull request #1802 from michalmuskala/map-is-key-bifBjörn Gustavsson
Introduce is_map_key/2 guard BIF OTP-15037
2018-04-29Introduce is_map_key/2 guard BIFMichał Muskała
This complements the `map_get/2` guard BIF introduced in #1784. Rationale. `map_get/2` allows accessing map fields in guards, but it might be problematic in more complex guard expressions, for example: foo(X) when map_get(a, X) =:= 1 or is_list(X) -> ... The `is_list/1` part of the guard could never succeed since the `map_get/2` guard would fail the whole guard expression. In this situation, this could be solved by using `;` instead of `or` to separate the guards, but it is not possible in every case. To solve this situation, this PR proposes a `is_map_key/2` guard that allows to check if a map has key inside a guard before trying to access that key. When combined with `is_map/1` this allows to construct a purely boolean guard expression testing a value of a key in a map. Implementation. Given the use case motivating the introduction of this function, the PR contains compiler optimisations that produce optimial code for the following guard expression: foo(X) when is_map(X) and is_map_key(a, X) and map_get(a, X) =:= 1 -> ok; foo(_) -> error. Given all three tests share the failure label, the `is_map_key/2` and `is_map/2` tests are optimised away. As with `map_get/2` the `is_map_key/2` BIF is allowed in match specs.
2018-04-27beam_validator: Verify Y registers in exception-causing instructionsBjörn Gustavsson
When an exception is handled, the stack will be scanned. Therefore all Y registers must be initialized.
2018-04-26Merge pull request #1797 from bjorng/bjorn/compiler/fold-apply/ERL-614Björn Gustavsson
Rewrite a call of a literal external fun to a direct call OTP-15044
2018-04-25Rewrite a call of a literal external fun to a direct callBjörn Gustavsson
Rewrite calls such as: (fun erlang:abs/1)(-42) to: erlang:abs(-42) While we are at it, also add rewriting of apply/2 with a fixed number of arguments to a direct call of the fun. For example: apply(F, [A,B]) would be rewritten to: F(A, B) https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-614
2018-04-25sys_core_fold: Eliminate crash for map update in guardBjörn Gustavsson
sys_core_fold would crash when attempting to optimize this code: t() when (#{})#{}-> c.
2018-04-25Merge branch 'map-get-bif' of git://github.com/michalmuskala/otpBjörn Gustavsson
* 'map-get-bif' of git://github.com/michalmuskala/otp: Introduce map_get guard-safe function OTP-15037
2018-04-24Introduce map_get guard-safe functionMichał Muskała
Rationale Today all compound data types except for maps can be deconstructed in guards. For tuples we have `element/2` and for lists `hd/1` and `tl/1`. Maps are completely opaque to guards. This means matching on maps can't be abstracted into macros, which is often done with repetitive guards. It also means that maps have to be always selected whole from ETS tables, even when only one field would be enough, which creates a potential efficiency issue. This PR introduces an `erlang:map_get/2` guard-safe function that allows extracting a map field in guard. An alternative to this function would be to introduce the syntax for extracting a value from a map that was planned in the original EEP: `Map#{Key}`. Even outside of guards, since this function is a guard-BIF it is more efficient than using `maps:get/2` (since it does not need to set up the stack), and more convenient from pattern matching on the map (compare: `#{key := Value} = Map, Value` to `map_get(key, Map)`). Performance considerations A common concern against adding this function is the notion that "guards have to be fast" and ideally execute in constant time. While there are some counterexamples (`length/1`), what is more important is the fact that adding those functions does not change in any way the time complexity of pattern matching - it's already possible to match on map fields today directly in patterns - adding this ability to guards will niether slow down or speed up the execution, it will only make certain programs more convenient to write. This first version is very naive and does not perform any optimizations.
2018-04-18core_lint: Handle repeated variables in map patterns correctlyBjörn Gustavsson
Keys in map patterns are input variables, not pattern variables.
2018-04-06Check that messages outside of the heap are not corruptedBjörn Gustavsson
Waiting messages for a process may be stored in a queue outside of any heap or heap fragment belonging to the process. This is an optimization added in a recent major release to avoid garbage collection messages again and again if there is a long message queue. Until such message has been matched and accepted by the remove_message/0 instruction, the message must not be included in the root set for a garbage collection, as that would corrupt the message. The loop_rec/2 instruction explicitly turns off garbage collection of the process as long messages are being matched. However, if the compiler were to put references to a message outside of the heap in an Y register (on the stack) and there happened to be a GC when the process had been scheduled out, the message would be corrupted and the runtime system would crash sooner or later. To ensure that doesn't happen, teach beam_validator to check for references on the stack to messages outside of the heap.
2018-04-04Fix unsafe optimization of record testBjörn Gustavsson
beam_record would make an unsafe optimization for the not_used_p/4 function added to beam_utils_SUITE in this commit. The bug is in beam_utils, which would falsely report that {x,4} was unused when it in fact was used. The bug was in the function not_used/1. The purpose of not_used/1 is to return a 'not_used' result unless the actual result is 'used'. Unfortunately it was not implemented in that way. It would let a 'transparent' result slip through, which the caller in this case would convert to 'killed' (because the register was killed on all other paths). Reported-by: Richard Carlsson
2018-03-21Point out the correct line in an exception for a bad generatorBjörn Gustavsson
When a generator in a list comprehension was given some other term than a list, the wrong line could be pointed out in the exception. Here is an example: bad_generator() -> [I || %%This line would be pointed out. I <- not_a_list]. https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-572
2018-03-19core_parse: Fix handling of negative sizes in binariesBjörn Gustavsson
A literal negative size in binary construction would cause a crash.
2018-03-07Merge pull request #1732 from bjorng/bjorn/compiler/beam_typeBjörn Gustavsson
Refactor and fix minor bugs in beam_type
2018-03-02beam_type: Refactor simplifications of instructionsBjörn Gustavsson
2018-03-01Enhance beam_validator to check proper nesting of try/catch and catchBjörn Gustavsson
Every catch or try/catch must use a lower Y register number than any enclosing catch or try/catch. That will ensure that when the stack is scanned when an exception occurs, the innermost try/catch tag is found first.
2018-02-01Merge pull request #1701 from bjorng/bjorn/get_hd_tlBjörn Gustavsson
Eliminate get_list/3 internally in the compiler
2018-01-31Merge pull request #1696 from bjorng/bjorn/compiler/fix-beam_block-bug/ERL-555Björn Gustavsson
Fix incorrect handling of floating point instructions
2018-01-31Merge branch 'maint'Björn Gustavsson
* maint: Fix incorrect type interference of integer ranges Conflicts: lib/compiler/src/beam_type.erl
2018-01-30Fix incorrect handling of floating point instructionsBjörn Gustavsson
1a029efd1ad47f started to run the beam_block pass a second time. Since it is run after introduction of the optimized floating point instructions, it must handle those instructions correctly. In particular, it must be careful when hoisting allocation instructions. For example, the following code: {test_heap,{alloc,[{words,0},{floats,1}]},5}. . . . {fmove,{fr,2},{x,0}}. {allocate_zero,1,4}. must not be rewritten to: {test_heap,{alloc,[{words,0},{floats,1}]},5}. . . . {allocate_zero,1,4}. {fmove,{fr,2},{x,0}}. because beam_validator will not consider it safe. (The code may actually be safe depending on what the code between the two allocation instructions do.) https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-555
2018-01-29Fix incorrect type interference of integer rangesBjörn Gustavsson
2018-01-26Eliminate get_list/3 internally in the compilerBjörn Gustavsson
Instructions that produce more than one result complicate optimizations. get_list/3 is one of two instructions that produce multiple results (get_map_elements/3 is the other). Introduce the get_hd/2 and get_tl/2 instructions that return the head and tail of a cons cell, respectively, and use it internally in all optimization passes. For efficiency, we still want to use get_list/3 if both head and tail are used, so we will translate matching pairs of get_hd and get_tl back to get_list instructions.
2018-01-26Speed up misc_SUITE:integer_encoding/1Björn Gustavsson
misc_SUITE:integer_encoding/1 was written to make sure that big integers were encoding correctly in a reasonable amount of time. Now that beam_asm will encode big integers as literals, we can reduce the scope of integer_encode/1. That will make it significantly faster, especially when cover is running.
2018-01-26Merge pull request #1691 from bjorng/bjorn/compiler/local-cseBjörn Gustavsson
Do local common sub expression elimination (CSE)
2018-01-25beam_type: Optimize away unnecessary test_unit instructionsBjörn Gustavsson
Optimize away unnecessary test_unit instructions that verify that binaries are byte-aligned. In a tight loop, eliminating an instruction can have a small but measurable improvement of the execution time.
2018-01-24Optimize matching of empty binariesBjörn Gustavsson
Extend an existing optimization in beam_dead to avoid creating a match context when matching an empty binary.
2018-01-24Apply common subexpression elimination in blocksBjörn Gustavsson
Eliminate repeated evaluation of guard BIFs and building of cons cells in blocks. This optimization is applicable in more places than might be expected, because code generation for binaries and record can generate common sub expressions not visible in the original source code. For example, consider this function: make_binary(Term) -> Bin = term_to_binary(Term), Size = byte_size(Bin), <<Size:32,Bin/binary>>. The compiler inserts a call to byte_size/2 to calculate the size of the binary being built: {function, make_binary, 1, 2}. {label,1}. {line,...}. {func_info,{atom,t},{atom,make_binary},1}. {label,2}. {allocate,0,1}. {line,...}. {call_ext,1,{extfunc,erlang,term_to_binary,1}}. {line,...}. {gc_bif,byte_size,{f,0},1,[{x,0}],{x,1}}. %Present in original code. {line,...}. {gc_bif,byte_size,{f,0},2,[{x,0}],{x,2}}. %Inserted by compiler. {bs_add,{f,0},[{x,2},{integer,4},1],{x,2}}. {bs_init2,{f,0},{x,2},0,2,{field_flags,[]},{x,2}}. {bs_put_integer,{f,0},{integer,32},1,{field_flags,[unsigned,big]},{x,1}}. {bs_put_binary,{f,0},{atom,all},8,{field_flags,[unsigned,big]},{x,0}}. {move,{x,2},{x,0}}. {deallocate,0}. return. Common sub expression elimination (CSE) eliminates the second call to byte_size/2: {function, make_binary, 1, 2}. {label,1}. {line,...}. {func_info,{atom,t},{atom,make_binary},1}. {label,2}. {allocate,0,1}. {line,...}. {call_ext,1,{extfunc,erlang,term_to_binary,1}}. {line,...}. {gc_bif,byte_size,{f,0},1,[{x,0}],{x,1}}. {move,{x,1},{x,2}}. {bs_add,{f,0},[{x,2},{integer,4},1],{x,2}}. {bs_init2,{f,0},{x,2},0,2,{field_flags,[]},{x,2}}. {bs_put_integer,{f,0},{integer,32},1,{field_flags,[unsigned,big]},{x,1}}. {bs_put_binary,{f,0},{atom,all},8,{field_flags,[unsigned,big]},{x,0}}. {move,{x,2},{x,0}}. {deallocate,0}. return. Note: A possible future optimization would be to include binary construction instructions in blocks. If that is done, the {move,{x,1},{x,2}} instruction could also be eliminated.