| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
With L1, L2, C1, C2 integers such as L1 < L2 and C1 < C2, locations
are ordered like this:
L1 < {L1, C1} < {L1, C2} < L2
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was a colon missing after the column number, it must be an error
as it's not missing in list_errors/2.
|
|
If set, compile will call epp with a full location {1, 1} instead of 1,
thus making it keep the column numbers in the parsed AST.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/coverage-and-minor-fixes/OTP-9982:
v3_life: Use common code for guards and bodies
v3_core: Don't put negative line numbers in annotations
v3_kernel: Dig out the line number only when generating a warning
v3_kernel: Clean up handling of guards
v3_kernel: Introduce is_in_guard/1
v3_kernel: Removed unreached clause for #k_bin_int{} in sub_size_var/1
v3_kernel: Remove unreached handling of #k_bin_int{} in arg_con/1
v3_codegen: Eliminate the special case of 'put' without destination
v3_kernel: Don't attempt to share identical literals
v3_kernel: Handle sequences in guards
v3_kernel: Remove clauses that are never executed in arg_val/1
v3_kernel.hrl: Remove unused record #k_string{}
v3_kernel.erl: Remove unused define of EXPENSIVE_BINARY_LIMIT
sys_core_fold: Refactor previous_ctx_to_binary/2 to cover it completely
sys_core_fold: Fix opt_guard_try/1
sys_core_fold: Simplify opt_bool_not() to cover it completely
sys_core_fold: Remove duplicate optimization
|
|
|
|
In Core Erlang and later passes, compiler-generated code can be
indicated in two different ways: by negative line numbers and by
a 'compiler_generated' annotation.
Simplify the code and improve coverage by turning negative line
numbers positive and adding a 'compiler_generated' annotation in
the v3_core pass. That means that Core Erlang and latter passes
do not have deal with negative line numbers.
|
|
|
|
Handling of guards become a mess when andalso/orelse in guards
were introduced. Clean it up by using common code for most
constructs, regardless of where they occur, and when needed use
is_in_guard/1 to handle guard constructs differently.
|
|
* ks/compile_info-fix:
compiler: Fix discrepancy in compile_info
OTP-9917
|
|
The BEAM disassembler used the atom 'none' to signify the absence
of a compile_info chunk in a .beam file. This clashes with the type
declaration of the compile_info field of a #beam_file{} record as
containing a list. Use [] to signify the absence of this chunk.
This simplifies the code and avoids a dialyzer warning.
For fixing a similar problem and for consistency, changed also the
return type of the attributes field of the #beam_file{} record.
This required a change in the beam_disasm test suite.
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/inline-and-on_load/OTP-9910:
compiler: Teach the inliner to preserve on_load functions
|
|
The inliner was ignorant of on_load functions and would discard them
(unless they were exported or referenced).
Noticed-by: Yiannis Tsiouris <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
Compiling the same source code with the same options may not produce
the same BEAM file because the compilation time is included in the
"CInf" chunk.
|
|
In the following code excerpt, the instruction marked below was
incorrectly removed:
.
.
.
{'try',{y,2},{f,TryCaseLabel}}.
{bif,get,{f,0},[{x,0}],{x,0}}.
{move,{x,1},{y,0}}.
{move,{x,3},{y,1}}. <======= Incorrectly removed
{jump,{f,TryEndLabel}}.
{label,TryEndLabel}.
{try_end,{y,2}}.
{deallocate,3}.
return.
{label,TryCaseLabel}.
{try_case,{y,2}}.
.
.
.
beam_utils indicated that {y,1} was not used at TryEndLabel,
which by itself is correct. But it is still not safe to remove
the instruction, because {y,1} might be used at TryCaseLabel
if an exception occurs.
Noticed-by: Eric Merritt
|
|
|
|
The size field of a #k_bin_int{} is always a literal integer
(#k_int{}); thus there is no way this clause can match.
While we are at it, remove a duplicated call to
select_assert_match_possible/3 in select_bin_int/1.
|
|
arg_con/1 will never be called with #k_bin_int{} argument, since
a #k_bin_int{} is constructed out of #k_bin_seg{} only after
arg_con/1 has been called with a #k_bin_seg{} argument.
|
|
If we let v3_kernel make sure that a 'put' operation always has a
destination register, the special case in v3_codegen is not needed.
|
|
It is unlikely that sharing literals will actually save any time.
Literals that can be shared are usually small. It is more likely
that maintaining the dictionary of literals will waste time.
|
|
A guard with a sequence will cause a crash in v3_codegen. Currently,
it seems that a sequence in a guard will never happen when compiling
from Erlang code, but there are several reasons to fix this problem
anyway:
* There are other compilers that generate Core Erlang code.
* Changes to sys_core_fold (perhaps additional optimizations) may
cause sequences to be generated in guards.
* A previously uncovered line in sys_core_fold:opt_guard_try/1 will
now be covered.
|
|
arg_val/1 will never be called for single-valued types, so there
is no need handle these types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
opt_guard_try/1 assumed that it was only operating on guards, and
implicitly assumed that any function call was to BIFs without
any side effects.
|
|
In:
case not Expr of ...
we don't have the information to ascertain that Expr is a boolean
expression. Therefore, add the catch-all clause unconditionally.
|
|
The second clause in opt_case_in_let_2/3 attempts to do the same
optimization as opt_bool_case_redundant/1; it will never succeed.
|
|
|
|
Modules would not get excluded. While at it, no longer exclude
sys_pre_attributes since we will want to test it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also correct the comment in bsm_ensure_no_partition_2/5, and while at
it correct typos in the comment for bsm_nonempty/2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need to write a test case in Core Erlang in order to cover
make_effect_seq/2, since v3_core does not generate "deep" Core Erlang
code.
|
|
|
|
On my Mac Pro with 8 cores, this change make self_compile/1 more
than twice as fast, and self_compile_old_inliner/1 more than 4 times
faster.
|
|
In the self compilation test cases, the compiler compiles itself
and runs the newly compiled version on a slave node. Having the
cover server starting on the slave node defeats the purpose of
the test, since it will load the SAME cover-compiled code on the
slave node. (It will also be slower, but will not improve coverage
since it compiles the same source files again.)
Use a shielded node to prevent the cover server from getting
started on the slave node.
|
|
We probably don't gain anything by using more processes than available
schedulers. Also, if 'cover' is being run, using more than one process
may make it slower, so we will be very conservative and use only one
process in that case.
|
|
This test suite has been superseded by other test suites (e.g.
guard_SUITE). Removing it does not decrease the coverage.
|
|
In order to save space, rewrite suitable calls to erlang:error/{1,2}
to special BEAM instructions.
This code is probably longer than the code taken out of v3_life and
v3_codegen in the previous commit, but it is much easier to
understand and maintain since the BEAM assembler format is better
understood than the v3_life format.
|
|
In the v3_life pass, it is assumed that a 'match_fail' primop
only occur at the top-level and at the end of a function.
But this code:
do_split_cases(A) ->
case A of
x ->
Z = dummy1;
_ ->
Z = dummy2,
a=b
end,
Z.
will be optimized by sys_core_fold to the following code:
'split_cases'/1 =
fun (_cor0) ->
let <_cor7,Z> =
case _cor0 of
<'x'> when 'true' ->
< 'dummy1','dummy1' >
<_cor6> when 'true' ->
%% Here follows a 'match_fail' primop inside
%% multiple return values:
< primop 'match_fail'({'badmatch','b'}),'dummy2' >
end
in
Z
moving the 'match_fail' primop into a "values" construction.
In the future, we would like to get rid of the v3_life pass (it is
there for historical reasons), so in the mean-time we prefer to not
add more code to it by generalizing the handling of 'match_fail'.
Since the 'match_fail' primop can be simulated by erlang:error/{1,2},
the simplest solution is to translate 'match_fail' to a call to
erlang:error/{1,2} in v3_kernel and remove the handling of
'match_fail' in v3_life and v3_codegen.
It is tempting to get rid of 'match_fail' also in the Core Erlang
format, but there are two issues:
- Removing the support for 'match_fail' completely may break tools
that generate Core Erlang code. We should not do that in a minor
release.
- There is no easy way to generate a 'function_clause' exception
that will remain correct if it will be inlined into another
function. (Calling "erlang:error(function_clause, Args)" is
fine only if it is not inlined into another function.) A good
solution probably involves introducing new instructions, which
is better done in a major release.
Noticed-by: Håkan Matsson
Minimized-test-case-by: Erik Søe Sørensen
|
|
|
|
|
