| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Include paths don't actually affect code generation in any way, but
it's reasonable for a build tool like rebar3 to recompile when the
include paths change. This commit restores the old behavior without
the +deterministic flag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
'john/compiler/fix-deterministic-include-paths/OTP-15204/ERL-679' into maint-21
* john/compiler/fix-deterministic-include-paths/OTP-15204/ERL-679:
Omit include path debug info for +deterministic builds
# Conflicts:
# lib/compiler/test/compile_SUITE.erl
|
|
Compiling the same file with different include paths resulted in
different files with the `+deterministic` flag even if everything
but the paths were identical. This was caused by the absolute path
of each include directory being unconditionally included in a
debug information chunk.
This commit fixes this by only including this information in
non-deterministic builds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
maint-21
* bjorn/compiler/fix-beam_jump-crash/ERL-660/OTP-15166:
Eliminate a crash in the beam_jump pass
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/fix-map_get/OTP-15157:
Fix internal compiler error for map_get/2
|
|
maint-21
* bjorn/compiler/fix-skipped-matching/ERL-655/OTP-15156:
beam_type: Fix unsafe optimization
|
|
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-660
|
|
Code such as that the following:
Val = map_get(a, Map),
Map#{a:=z} %Could be any map update
would incorrectly cause an internal consistency check failure:
Internal consistency check failed - please report this bug.
Instruction: {put_map_exact,{f,0},{x,0},{x,0},1,{list,[{atom,a},{atom,z}]}}
Error: {bad_type,{needed,map},{actual,term}}:
Update beam_validator so that it understands that the second
argument for map_get/2 is a map.
|
|
beam_type assumed that the operand for the bs_context_to_binary
instruction must be a binary. That is not correct;
bs_context_to_binary accepts anything. Based on the incorrect
assumption, beam_type would remove other test instructions.
The bug was introduced in eee8655788d2, which was supposed
to be just a refactoring commit.
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-655
|
|
|
|
The compiler would crash when compiling code such as:
serialize(#{tag := value, id := Id, domain := Domain}) ->
[case Id of
nil ->
error(id({required, id}));
_ ->
<<10, 1:16/signed, Id:16/signed>>
end,
case Domain of
nil ->
error(id({required, domain}));
_ ->
<<8, 2:16/signed, Domain:32/signed>>
end].
The crash would look like this:
Function: serialize/1
t.erl: internal error in block2;
crash reason: {badmatch,false}
in function beam_utils:live_opt/4 (beam_utils.erl, line 861)
in call from beam_utils:live_opt/1 (beam_utils.erl, line 285)
in call from beam_block:function/2 (beam_block.erl, line 47)
in call from beam_block:'-module/2-lc$^0/1-0-'/2 (beam_block.erl, line 33)
in call from beam_block:'-module/2-lc$^0/1-0-'/2 (beam_block.erl, line 33)
in call from beam_block:module/2 (beam_block.erl, line 33)
in call from compile:block2/2 (compile.erl, line 1358)
in call from compile:'-internal_comp/5-anonymous-1-'/3 (compile.erl, line 349)
The reason for the crash is an assertion failure caused by a previous
unsafe optimization. Here is the code before the unsafe optimization:
.
.
.
{bs_init2,{f,0},7,0,0,{field_flags,[]},{x,1}}.
{bs_put_string,3,{string,[8,0,2]}}.
{bs_put_integer,{f,0},{integer,32},1,{field_flags,[signed,big]},{y,1}}.
{move,{x,1},{x,0}}.
{test_heap,4,1}.
.
.
.
beam_block:move_allocate/1 moved up the test_heap/2 instruction past the
move/2 instruction, adjusting the number of live registers at the same
time:
.
.
.
{bs_init2,{f,0},7,0,0,{field_flags,[]},{x,1}}.
%% Only x1 is live now.
{bs_put_string,3,{string,[8,0,2]}}.
{bs_put_integer,{f,0},{integer,32},1,{field_flags,[signed,big]},{y,1}}.
{test_heap,4,2}. %Unsafe. x0 is dead.
{move,{x,1},{x,0}}.
.
.
.
This optimization is unsafe because the bs_init2 instruction killed
x0.
The bug is in beam_utils:anno_defs/1, which adds annotations indicating
the registers that are defined at the beginning of each block. The
annotation before the move/2 instruction incorrectly indicated that
x0 was live.
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-650
https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/issues/7782
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revert "Run the sharing optimisation in beam_jump until fixpoint"
|
|
Fix name capture problem in sys_core_fold
OTP-15115
|
|
We have found cases where compilation drastically slows down
due to this commit. We are working on a minimal cases and plan
to bring this patch back once we can work our the performance
issues.
This reverts commit f7c9383f4c3d4b6819b5ba4d54c7093df806fe4a.
|
|
sys_core_fold could do unsafe transformations on the
code from the old inliner (invoked using the compiler
option `{inline,[{F/A}]}` to request inlining of specific
functions).
To explain the bug, let's first look at an example that
sys_core_fold handles correctly. Consider this code:
'foo'/2 =
fun (Arg1,Arg2) ->
let <B> = Arg2
in let <A,B> = <B,Arg1>
in {A,B}
In this example, the lets can be completely eliminated,
since the arguments for the lets are variables (as opposed
to expressions). Since the variable B is rebound in the
inner let, `sys_core_fold` must take special care when
doing the substitutions.
Here is the correct result:
'foo'/2 =
fun (Arg1, Arg2) ->
{Arg2,Arg1}
Consider a slight modifictation of the example:
'bar'/2 =
fun (Arg1,Arg2) ->
let <B> = [Arg2]
in let <A,B> = <B,[Arg1]>
in {A,B}
Here some of the arguments for the lets are expressions, so
the lets must be kept. sys_core_fold does not handle this
example correctly:
'bar'/2 =
fun (Arg1,Arg2) ->
let <B> = [Arg2]
in let <B> = [Arg1]
in {B,B}
In the inner let, the variable A has been eliminated and
replaced with the variable B in the body (the first B in
the tuple). Since the B in the outer let is never used,
the outer let will be eliminated, giving:
'bar'/2 =
fun (Arg1,Arg2) ->
let <B> = [Arg1]
in {B,B}
To handle this example correctly, sys_core_fold must
rename the variable B in the inner let like this to
avoid capturing B:
'bar'/2 =
fun (Arg1,Arg2) ->
let <B> = [Arg2]
in let <NewName> = [Arg1]
in {B,NewName}
(Note: The `v3_kernel` pass alreday handles those examples correctly
in case `sys_core_fold` has been disabled.)
|
|
Add more `compiler_generated` attributes to avoid spurious compiler
warnings triggered by the bug fix in the next commit.
|
|
This reverts commit fd8e49b5bddceaae803670121b603b5eee8c5c08.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* richcarl/eliminate_lib_module/PR-1786/OTP-15072:
Fix minor issues
Eliminate call to ct:get_progname() in ts_erl_config
Use \n escape instead of integer 10
Move error formatting to erl_error.erl and delete lib.erl
Move extended parse functions in lib.erl to erl_eval.erl
Move lib:eval_str/1 into mod_esi.erl
Remove lib:progname/0
Eliminate call to lib:progname/1 in slave.erl
Add ct:get_progname/0
Remove lib:error_message/2
Remove lib:flush_receive/0
Remove lib:send/2 and lib:sendw/2
Move lib:nonl/1 into yecc.erl
|
|
Fix syntactic issues in EDoc comments across some libs
|
|
Introduce is_map_key/2 guard BIF
OTP-15037
|
|
See https://github.com/erszcz/docsh/issues/23 for an explanation
about how the files were found.
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 202bb737e3deabfebee683266f4b7c42781eb521.
|
|
This reverts commit 345f7f527a4c26ef49cef0d81e2c8b71bf01ebc3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This complements the `map_get/2` guard BIF introduced in #1784.
Rationale.
`map_get/2` allows accessing map fields in guards, but it might be
problematic in more complex guard expressions, for example:
foo(X) when map_get(a, X) =:= 1 or is_list(X) -> ...
The `is_list/1` part of the guard could never succeed since the
`map_get/2` guard would fail the whole guard expression. In this
situation, this could be solved by using `;` instead of `or` to separate
the guards, but it is not possible in every case.
To solve this situation, this PR proposes a `is_map_key/2` guard that
allows to check if a map has key inside a guard before trying to access
that key. When combined with `is_map/1` this allows to construct a
purely boolean guard expression testing a value of a key in a map.
Implementation.
Given the use case motivating the introduction of this function, the PR
contains compiler optimisations that produce optimial code for the
following guard expression:
foo(X) when is_map(X) and is_map_key(a, X) and map_get(a, X) =:= 1 -> ok;
foo(_) -> error.
Given all three tests share the failure label, the `is_map_key/2` and
`is_map/2` tests are optimised away.
As with `map_get/2` the `is_map_key/2` BIF is allowed in match specs.
|
|
When an exception is handled, the stack will be scanned. Therefore
all Y registers must be initialized.
|
|
beam_utils:is_killed/3 could incorrectly indicate that a
register was killed.
The previous fix is 5da6b91ecab6c.
|
|
Rewrite a call of a literal external fun to a direct call
OTP-15044
|
|
Rewrite calls such as:
(fun erlang:abs/1)(-42)
to:
erlang:abs(-42)
While we are at it, also add rewriting of apply/2 with a fixed
number of arguments to a direct call of the fun. For example:
apply(F, [A,B])
would be rewritten to:
F(A, B)
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-614
|
|
Help us find more compiler bugs.
|
|
sys_core_fold would crash when attempting to optimize this code:
t() when (#{})#{}->
c.
|
|
* 'map-get-bif' of git://github.com/michalmuskala/otp:
Introduce map_get guard-safe function
OTP-15037
|
|
Rationale
Today all compound data types except for maps can be deconstructed in guards.
For tuples we have `element/2` and for lists `hd/1` and `tl/1`. Maps are
completely opaque to guards. This means matching on maps can't be
abstracted into macros, which is often done with repetitive guards. It
also means that maps have to be always selected whole from ETS tables,
even when only one field would be enough, which creates a potential
efficiency issue.
This PR introduces an `erlang:map_get/2` guard-safe function that allows
extracting a map field in guard. An alternative to this function would be
to introduce the syntax for extracting a value from a map that was planned
in the original EEP: `Map#{Key}`.
Even outside of guards, since this function is a guard-BIF it is more
efficient than using `maps:get/2` (since it does not need to set up the
stack), and more convenient from pattern matching on the map (compare:
`#{key := Value} = Map, Value` to `map_get(key, Map)`).
Performance considerations
A common concern against adding this function is the notion that "guards
have to be fast" and ideally execute in constant time. While there are
some counterexamples (`length/1`), what is more important is the fact
that adding those functions does not change in any way the time
complexity of pattern matching - it's already possible to match on map
fields today directly in patterns - adding this ability to guards will
niether slow down or speed up the execution, it will only make certain
programs more convenient to write.
This first version is very naive and does not perform any optimizations.
|
|
Deprecate erlang:get_stacktrace/1
|
|
Keys in map patterns are input variables, not pattern variables.
|
|
Those warnings don't make sense any more since erlang:get_stacktrace/0
is now deprecated.
|
|
|
