aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/debugger/test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-02-06debugger tests: Increase time trap timeoutBjörn Gustavsson
Some bit syntax test cases take much longer time to complete when libraries are in native code, probably because of context switches between the eval_bits module and the debugger modules.
2011-12-09Update copyright yearsBjörn-Egil Dahlberg
2011-11-07EEP-23: Allow variables in fun M:F/ABjörn Gustavsson
Currently, the external fun syntax "fun M:F/A" only supports literals. That is, "fun lists:reverse/1" is allowed but not "fun M:F/A". In many real-life situations, some or all of M, F, A are not known until run-time, and one is forced to either use the undocumented erlang:make_fun/3 BIF or to use a "tuple fun" (which is deprecated). EEP-23 suggests that the parser (erl_parse) should immediately transform "fun M:F/A" to "erlang:make_fun(M, F, A)". We have not followed that approach in this implementation, because we want the abstract code to mirror the source code as closely as possible, and we also consider erlang:make_fun/3 to be an implementation detail that we might want to remove in the future. Instead, we will change the abstract format for "fun M:F/A" (in a way that is not backwards compatible), and while we are at it, we will move the translation from "fun M:F/A" to "erlang:make_fun(M, F, A)" from sys_pre_expand down to the v3_core pass. We will also update the debugger and xref to use the new format. We did consider making the abstract format backward compatible if no variables were used in the fun, but decided against it. Keeping it backward compatible would mean that there would be different abstract formats for the no-variable and variable case, and tools would have to handle both formats, probably forever. Reference: http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0023.html
2011-08-18debugger: Add line_number_SUITEBjörn Gustavsson
2011-08-18debugger: Include line numbers in exceptionsBjörn Gustavsson
2011-08-16emulator: Add a fourth element in exception stacktracesBjörn Gustavsson
This commit is a preparation for introducing location information (filename/line number) in stacktraces in exceptions. Currently a stack trace looks like: [{Mod1,Function1,Arity1}, . . . {ModN,FunctionN,ArityN}] Add a forth element to each tuple that can be used indication the filename and line number of the source file: [{Mod1,Function1,Arity1,Location1}, . . . {ModN,FunctionN,ArityN,LocationN}] In this commit, the fourth element will just be an empty list, and we will change all code that look at or manipulate stacktraces.
2011-08-16Don't include tail-recursive calls in stacktracesBjörn Gustavsson
The stacktrace in debugger-generated exceptions should be as similar to stacktraces in BEAM-generated exceptions as possible.
2011-08-16Fix binary matching in the debuggerBjörn Gustavsson
'eval_bits' is a common utility module used for evaluting binary construction and matching. The functions that do matching (match_bits/{6,7} and bin_gen/6) are supposed to treat the bindings as an abstract data type, but they assume that the bindings have the same representation as in the erl_eval module. That may cause binary matching to fail in the debugger, because the debugger represents the bindings as an unordered list of two-tuples, while the erl_eval modules uses an ordered list of two-tuple (an ordset). One way to fix the problem would be to let the debugger to use ordered lists to represent the bindings. Unfortunately, that would also change how the bindings are presented in the user interface. Currently, the variable have most been recently assigned is shown first, which is convenient. Fix the matching problem by mending the leaky abstraction in eval_bits. The matching functions needs to be passed two additional operations: one for looking up a variable in the bindings and one for adding a binding. Those operations could be passed as two more funs (in addition to the evaluation and match fun already passed), but the functions already have too many arguments. Therefore, change the meaning of the match fun, so that the first argument is the operation to perform ('match', 'binding', or 'add_binding') and second argument is a tuple with arguments for the operation.
2011-08-16Eliminate warnings in test suitesBjörn Gustavsson
2011-08-16Update test suites that have been copied from other applicationsBjörn Gustavsson
A long time ago, test suites were copied from other applications. Copy the tests again to get more test cases.
2011-03-30Merge branch 'hw/call-chmod-without-f' into devHenrik Nord
* hw/call-chmod-without-f: Call chmod without the "-f" flag Conflicts: erts/emulator/test/Makefile lib/asn1/test/Makefile lib/crypto/test/Makefile lib/debugger/test/Makefile lib/docbuilder/test/Makefile lib/edoc/test/Makefile lib/erl_interface/test/Makefile lib/inviso/test/Makefile lib/parsetools/test/Makefile lib/percept/test/Makefile lib/ssl/test/Makefile lib/syntax_tools/test/Makefile lib/test_server/test/Makefile lib/tools/test/Makefile OTP-9170
2011-03-11Update copyright yearsBjörn-Egil Dahlberg
2011-02-17Rename Suite Callback to Common Test HookLukas Larsson
2011-02-17Update and add cover spec files to work with common_testLukas Larsson
2011-02-17Update all test specsLukas Larsson
2011-02-17Fix formatting and also some migration fixes for debuggerLukas Larsson
2011-02-17Add init_per_suite and end_per_suiteLukas Larsson
2011-02-17Add ts_install_scb to suite/0Lukas Larsson
2011-02-17Update debugger tests to conform with common_test standardLukas Larsson
2011-02-17Update all fin_per_testcase to end_per_testcase.Lukas Larsson
2010-11-30debugger: fix int eval testcaseBjörn-Egil Dahlberg
2010-11-15Call chmod without the "-f" flagHolger Weiß
"-f" is a non-standard chmod option which at least SGI IRIX and HP UX do not support. As the only effect of the "-f" flag is to suppress warning messages, it can be safely omitted.
2010-09-03Add test suite for debuggerBjörn Gustavsson
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-15 05:30:07 +0000