| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Having the peer_fsm process answer DWR meant that watchdog timer expiry
could result in an outgoing DWR despite the fact that an incoming DWR
was just answered. Having the watchdog process answer avoids this.
diameter_peer_fsm must be loaded before diameter_watchdog. It's
possible for one incoming DWR to go unanswered but a subsequent DWR will
be answered so no harm is done.
|
|
Commit 0b7c87dc caused diameter_watchdog:restart/2 to start returning
'stop', so that a watchdog process for a listening transport that
allowed multiple connections to the same peer would die one watchdog
timeout after losing a connection. The new return value was supposed to
be passed up to transition/2, but was instead passed to set_watchdog/1,
resulting in a function_clause error. The resulting crash was harmless
but unseemly.
Not detected by dialyzer.
Thanks to Aleksander Nycz.
|
|
Crashing watchdog and peer_fsm processes was somewhat unseemly. Emit an
error report and die silently instead.
|
|
Faulty configuration was previously passed directly on to watchdog and
peer_fsm processes, diameter:add_transport/2 happily returning ok and
the error resulting on failure of watchdog and/or peer_fsm processes.
Now check for errors before getting this far, returning {error, Reason}
from diameter:add_transport/2 when one is detected. There are still
some errors that can only be detected after transport start (eg. a
misbehaving callback) but most will be caught early.
|
|
Make it just a number of timeouts, without a new DWR being sent.
|
|
To make the number of watchdogs sent before the transitions REOPEN ->
OKAY and OKAY -> SUSPECT configurable. Using anything other then the
default config is non-standard and should only be used for test.
|
|
Traffic handling is connected to the service implementation through the
pick_peer callback and failover but diameter_service was getting
unwieldy as home to both the service process and traffic handling.
|
|
Instead, use whatever dictionary a transport has configured as
supporting application id 0. This is to support the updated RFC 6733
dictionaries (which bring with them updated records) and also to be able
to transparently support any changed semantics (eg. 5xxx in
answer-message).
|
|
There is no such transition in RFC 3539, the state remains in INITIAL.
|
|
This was the result of the watchdog process exiting as a consequence of
peer death in some casesi, causing a restarted transport to enter
INITIAL when it should enter REOPEN. The watchdog now remains alive as
long as peer shutdown isn't requested and a 'close' message to the
service process (instead of watchdog death) generates 'closed' events
from the service.
|
|
In particular, use watchdog messages as input and do away with the older
connection_up/down (and other) messages. Also, only maintain the
watchdog state, not the older up/down op state.
|
|
Service process informs the watchdog process which informs the peer
process. (Instead of going directly to the latter in one case.)
|
|
Which will be the case with R16B in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A watchdog timeout after DPR but before DPA would previously result
in the watchdog restarting the transport.
|
|
|
|
This makes capabilities available to service_info as soon as
capabilities exchange has been completed. In particular, before state
OKAY is reached.
|
|
Code should be loaded in this order:
diameter_session (sequence/1)
diameter_peer_fsm (calls to sequence/1)
diameter_service (sequence config, mask in receive_message/3)
diameter_watchdog (mask in peer start and receive_message/3)
diameter_config (accept sequence config)
Order of diameter and diameter_peer doesn't matter.
|
|
This was a remnant of the time when sasl interpreted everything but
shutdown or normal as a crash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In particular, not before the service process has a monitor on
the watchdog since the watchdog's exit reason is meaningful.
|
|
In diameter_service:
make_packet -> make_request_packet
make_header -> make_request_header
make_reply_packet -> make_answer_packet
|
|
Simpler, no duplication of similar makefiles and makes for
better dependencies. (Aka, recursive make considered harmful.)
|
