Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Just morph include into include_lib when releasing. Not using
include_lib here is due to generated hrls not residing in
diameter/include until after release. See release.sed.
|
|
|
|
all = opt is now default target and run executes testsuites. Note that
parallel execution is unproblematic since each suite target starts
a node with a suite-specific name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tweak some comments and variable names, move things around a bit
(default src target is now opt, not debug), only clean what's built,
use +warn_export_vars.
|
|
Otherwise include_lib will fail.
|
|
|
|
Makes for a quieter rule with no recursion.
|
|
Simpler, no duplication of similar makefiles and makes for
better dependencies. (Aka, recursive make considered harmful.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a module-based alternative to the escript diameterc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is to enable dictionaries compiled with --name/--prefix
to be inherited using --inherits.
|
|
|
|
Has to follow the release_targets include for make not to
think that a misspelled dictionary is up to date just because
the exprecs dependency is.
|
|
Generated files are unchanged but the separation will be
especially pleasant when more dictionary files are added
as examples. It is still only the rfc3588 and relay
dictionaries that are known to the diameter implementation.
|
|
|
|
The section simply results in generated macros and has nothing
specifically to do with result codes. It's still not documented,
and neither are the macros generated from @enum, since the generated
names are typically so long as to be impractical/unreadable in source.
Better to use numeric values with a comment or define your own
shorter macros as the need arises.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* anders/diameter/tls_over_tcp/OTP-9605:
Move init/end_per_suite into testcases
Skip tls testsuite if there's no openssl
Clarify that ssl must be started for TLS support
Add tls support at connection establishment
Add tls testsuite
Documentation updates
Close transport if tls is requested over sctp
Handle tls notification for tcp
Lift recursion in tcp message reception up the call chain
Add tls support to capabilities exchange
|
|
* anders/diameter/testsuite_robustness/OTP-9619:
Make testsuites more robust in case of init failure
|
|
* anders/diameter/eprotonosupport/OTP-9615:
gen_sctp:open/0-2 might return {error, eprotonosupport}
|
|
See ac2810603b7aaad24129fadf887d9e8deff31d2f.
|
|
Previously error:badarg was raise if there was no underlying support
for SCTP. Handle both new and old failure until OTP-9239 is merged.
|
|
In particular, move code out of init_per_suite since failure
causes end_per_suite to be skipped. Cleanup is simpler if both
init and cleanup happen as testcases.
|
|
|
|
Sed on Solaris doesn't remember matches after branching.
|
|
Also update app testsuite to allow for "undefined" calls
from diameter_tcp to ssl.
|
|
This is the method added in draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis, whereby
a TLS handshake immediately follows connection establishment and
CER/CEA is sent over the secured connection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RFC 3588 requires that a Diameter server support TLS but in
practise this seems to mean TLS over SCTP since there are limitations
with running over SCTP: see RFC 6083 (DTLS over SCTP), which is a
response to RFC 3436 (TLS over SCTP). The current RFC 3588 draft
acknowledges this by equating the Inband-Security-Id value TLS
with TLS/TCP and DTLS/SCTP but underlying support for DTLS is
still thin on the ground.
|
|
If TLS has been configured on Inband-Security-Id then the transport
process receives a message from the peer_fsm process indicating
whether or not to upgrade to TLS.
The current draft of RFC 3588 deprecates (but retains for backwards
compatibility) the use of Inband-Security-Id for negotiating TLS,
adding the possibility of TLS having be negotiated before capabilities
exchange. This commit handles the deprecated case.
|
|
When an initial message is received and TLS is a possibility, must
wait for a message from the peer process before either commencing
a handshake or receiving more messages.
|
|
To upgrade a connection to TLS or not, that is the question. It
is possible for us to send a CER offering both NO_INBAND_SECURITY
and TLS and for the peer to answer likewise: RFC 3588 doesn't make
clear that a CEA should be unambiguous about the choice of security.
Thus, if TLS is offered then assume the server is prepared to
for a handshake. Similarly, when receiving a CER, choose TLS if
it's offered and be unambiguous about our choice in CEA. There is
no ssl:maybe_accept that would let us receive a handshake if it
comes or another message if it doesn't.
The choice of TLS should probably be made into a callback so that
an application can decide based on the peer's Origin-Realm for
example. Such a callback could also be used to reject a CER/CEA.
Handle Inband-Security-Id values other than NO_INBAND_SECURITY and
TLS by assuming that they require no intervention by the transport
module, treating them like NO_INBAND_SECURITY. Whether or not this
is reasonable (or useful) is unclear. There may be a need for more
sychronization than we have on offer. (Having to do something before
taking the connection up for example.)
Note that diameter_peer_fsm must be upgraded before diameter_capx
because of the new return value from diameter_capx:recv_CEA/2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* anders/diameter/testsuites/OTP-9553:
Remove forgotten dbg
|
|
|