| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Also, some of the branches were testing sizes in bits against a constant
?MAX_BINSIZE, which was in bytes. The signed comparisons masked this
mistake. These branches have been removed since all sizes in bits that
fit in a machine word are valid binary sizes.
Finally, a test that reproduces the issue was added to bs_construct,
along with a test for one of the cases (bs_init<0>(...)) when the test
against ?MAX_BINSIZE must be changed to unsigned rather than removed.
|
|
|
|
Some more cases (taken from the BEAM bs_construct suite) that used to
show different behaviour than BEAM when compiled to native code were
included in the appropriate test file of the HiPE test suite.
|
|
copy_offset_int_big was assuming (Offset + Size - 1) (Tmp9 in the first
BB) would not underflow. It was also unconditionally reading and writing
the binary even when Size was zero, unlike copy_int_little, which is the
only other case of bs_put_integer that does not have a short-circuit on
Size = 0.
This was causing segfaults when constructing binaries starting with a
zero-length integer field, because a logical right shift was used to
compute an offset in bytes (which became 0x1fffffffffffffff) to read in
the binary.
Tests, taken from the emulator bs_construct_SUITE, were also added.
The complete credit for the report and the fix goes to Magnus Lång.
|
|
Create tests for the HiPE native code compiler. This is the first
part of the effort and contains tests that check that the native
code produced by the HiPE compiler for binaries and bitstrings is
OK and behaves similarly to the code produced by the BEAM compiler.
|
