| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
This reverts commit e09dd66dc4d89c62ddfd8c19791f9678d5d787c6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure that links from ssl to public_key work.
OTP-12670 - Ignoring 1.2 extension in 1.0 or TLS-1.1
solved by 5edda23ee854038c9d4bcddd0d676ee0ffd20da5
is mentioned here to make the release scripts happy,
as the branch solving this accidently had a name ending 1267
instead of 12670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* E.I bitstrings will not be decode as {Unused, Binary}, they are now
Erlang bitstrings.
* Also the compact_bit_string implies the legacy_erlang_types switch
- So removing the switch will also make OCTET STRING values be represented
as binaries.
- Undecoded open type will now be wrapped in a asn1_OPENTYPE tuple.
We need to handle this in pubkey_pbe.erl, maybe this can be eliminated
later by updating/refreshing ASN1-specs.
This will change some values in records returned by the public_key API
making this change a potentiall incompatibility.
|
|
|
|
* mururu/fix-type:
Fix typos in the public_key doc
OTP-12549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check that the certificate chain ends with a trusted ROOT CA e.i. a
self-signed certificate, but provide an option partial_chain to
enable the application to define an intermediat CA as trusted.
TLS RFC says:
"unknown_ca
A valid certificate chain or partial chain was received, but the
certificate was not accepted because the CA certificate could not
be located or couldn't be matched with a known, trusted CA. This
message is always fatal."
and also states:
"certificate_list
This is a sequence (chain) of certificates. The sender's
certificate MUST come first in the list. Each following
certificate MUST directly certify the one preceding it. Because
certificate validation requires that root keys be distributed
independently, the self-signed certificate that specifies the root
certificate authority MAY be omitted from the chain, under the
assumption that the remote end must already possess it in order to
validate it in any case."
X509 RFC says:
"The selection of a trust anchor is a matter of policy: it could be
the top CA in a hierarchical PKI, the CA that issued the verifier's
own certificate(s), or any other CA in a network PKI. The path
validation procedure is the same regardless of the choice of trust
anchor. In addition, different applications may rely on different
trust anchors, or may accept paths that begin with any of a set of
trust anchors."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When documenting public_key/0 and private_key/0, I noticed the
inconsistent state of formatting in public_key(3)'s Data Types section.
This should be fixed for consistency and readability.
|
|
public_key:private_key/0 was referenced but undefined, and lib/ssl had a
local definition of private_key/0.
To fix that, make the following changes:
* add public_key:private_key/0 type
* document public_key/0 and private_key/0
* fix incorrect definitions and references
|
|
ssh and public_key were referring to proplists:proplists/0
which does not exist. Fix by using the correct type proplists:proplist/0.
|
|
The R16B03 release
Conflicts:
lib/sasl/vsn.mk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the example of `public_key:pem_entry_encode/2`, the result
should match to `PemEntry` rather than to `PemBin` since `PemEntry`
is expected as an input argument of `public_key:pem_encode/1` called
just on the next line of the example.
|
|
The R16B02 release
Conflicts:
lib/sasl/vsn.mk
|
|
|
|
The R16B01 release
Conflicts:
lib/sasl/vsn.mk
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ia/public_key/crypto/prepare-for-release:
public_key & ssl: Add ASN-1 dependency
crypto & public_key: prepare for release
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the ASN-1 application relies on a nif in R16 for decodeing (that
was not the case in R15), public_key currently has a runtime
dependency on ASN-1. Hopefully we will be able to remove this
dependency again in the future.
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/crypto/doc/src/crypto_app.xml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
