| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Hardware watchdog support was removed from heart in R13A, but there were
still some vestiges in the code and the documentation.
- Remove mentions of the HW_WD_DISABLE variable, as it's no longer used.
- Remove the HEART_BEAT_BOOT_DELAY variable, as it was only used for the
hardware watchdog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
release_handler_SUITE:otp_10463_upgrade_script_regexp reads
kernel.appup and tries to fetch upgrade instructions for upgrade from
current version to current version. The point of the test is to see
that release_handler can read an appup with regexps.
In some cases, however, kernel.appup does not support upgrade from
current to current version, since this is not necessary in real
life. Therefore this test is now updated to use a dummy application
(release_handler_SUITE_data/regexp_appup/app1) for this test.
|
|
The upgrade instruction 'remove_module' was added in OTP R7B (and
possibly in a patch in R5B or R6B, ticket OTP-3477), and translates to
the low level instruction 'remove', but adds the parameter DepMods
(modules on which Mod is dependent). The ticket says that
"remove_module should be added for symmetry with the add_module
instruction". remove_module was never documented or tested, and it was
never mentioned in a release note. It therefore seems to be low risk
in removing it.
The correct instruction to use when removing a module is
{delete_module,Mod}
which was added in OTP R10B and which is also documented and
tested. This translates to low level instructions 'remove' and 'purge'
i.e. the module is brutally purged after setting the current code to
old. This hardcoded brutal purge is the reason why PrePurge and
PostPurge parameters can not be given with the delete_module
instruction.
The parameter DepMods which was inclued in the remove_module
instruction does not exist for delete_module. From the documentation's
point of view, this is the same for add_module, and thus the two
instructions {add_module,Mod} and {delete_module,Mod} are now
symmetric. However, in the code there is a second instruction for
adding a module, {add_module,Mod,DepMods}, which is not documented. To
add symmetry even for this, {delete_module,Mod,DepMods} is now also
added. Documentation is added for all instructions.
|
|
OTP-11529
|
|
It was possible to insert {Mod::atom(),Vsn::term()} instead of
Mod::atom() in the modules list in a .app file. This was not visible
in the documentation of .app files, but it was visible in the
documentation of application:load/[1,2] (where the .app file term can
be used directly as first argument).
The Vsn part was never used, so this possibility has now been removed.
|
|
The test is added in release_handler_SUITE since this makes it
possible to test the full upgrade instead of just a simple library
test of supervisor:code_change.
|
|
Changes to the mechanism for upgrading the emulator in OTP R15 was
erronously not handled in release_handler:upgrade_app, downgrade_app,
upgrade_script and downgrade_script. This has been corrected,
including test and documentation.
|
|
* siri/sasl/upgrade-erts/OTP-9438:
Fix bug in erts upgrade on windows
Add release vsn info to erts_vsn_changed warning
Check for sasl application in systools:make_script and make_relup
Add syntax check of relup to check_install_release and install_release
Add documentation for upgrade from pre R15 to post R15 sasl
Handle upgrade from pre R15 to post R15 sasl
Step version of sasl to 2.2 for R15
Document upgrade instructions restart_new_emulator and restart_emulator
Wait for two restarts in upgrade_restart test
Add restart_new_emulator instruction to kernel, stdlib and sasl appups
Distinguish restart_new_emulator from restart_emulator in upgrade instructions
Upgrade erts: merge sys.config for tmp release instead of using old
Allow regexp for version in .appup
Restart emulator before running upgrade script when erts is upgraded
Conflicts:
lib/sasl/src/release_handler.erl
lib/sasl/test/release_handler_SUITE.erl
|
|
If the version of erts differs between two releases, the release
handler automatically adds a 'restart_new_emulator' instruction to the
upgrade script (relup). Earlier, this instruction was always added at
the end of the upgrade script, causing the following sequence of
operations during an upgrade (a bit simplified):
1. suspend processes
2. load new code
3. execute code_change functions
4. resume processes
5. restart emulator with new erts version
Obviously, this caused the new code to be loaded into the old emulator
and this would fail if the beam format had been changed in the new
version of the emulator.
To overcome this problem, this commit changes the order of the
instructions, so for upgrade with changed erts version we now have:
1. restart emulator with new erts, kernel, stdlib and sasl versions,
but old versions of all other applications.
2. suspend processes
3. load new code
4. execute code_change functions
5. resume processes
This is implemented by creating a temporary release, including new
erts, kernel, stdlib and sasl from the new release and all other
applications from the old release. A new boot file for this temporary
release is created, which includes a new 'apply' instruction to run
release_handler:new_emulator_upgrade/2. Then the emulator is restarted
using this boot file - and release_handler:new_emulator_upgrade/2
executes the rest of the upgrade script.
For downgrade, the order will be as before:
1. suspend processes
2. execute code_change functions with 'down'-indication
3. load old code
4. resume processes
5. restart emulator with old erts version
|
|
|
|
* jw/release_handler_1:
General improvements to release_handler_1:get_supervised_procs
Conflicts:
lib/sasl/src/release_handler_1.erl
lib/sasl/test/release_handler_SUITE.erl
OTP-9546
|
|
The core issues this patch attempts to solve is two fold, 1) have
release_handler_1 act slightly differently in two corner cases and 2)
clean up the code in get_supervised_procs/0 to remove nested cases and
etc.
Regarding #1, get_supervised_procs/0 will now call functions to
test to see if the supervisor is suspended before attempting to ask it
for a list of children. It now will print an error message regarding
the suspended supervisor and produce an error that will cause the VM
to restart. Previously it would timeout attempting the call to
which_children and the VM would restart without any details regarding
the reason.
The second corner case is if in a child specification a supervisor is
incorrectly stated to be a worker and get_modules is called against it.
A timeout will occur causing a VM restart. Similar to the last corner
case in this patch an error message is printed and an error is emitted
causing a VM restart.
When first looking into the issue it was hard to discover why my
upgrades where failing. All I received during the upgrade process was
a timeout and a VM restart, no other information. This patch should
help users track down issues like these.
Regarding #2, due to the above confusion in trying to figure out what
had happened I dug into the code and started tracing it through and
found that the nested case statements and etc made it confusing. So I
started to rework and clean up, hopefully making this code path clearer
to future readers.
|
|
Given this option, all modules that are to be purged by indicated
upgrade,and that can be soft purged, will be purged when all other
check of check_install_release have been successfully completed.
I added a note under install_release in the reference manual about how
to use check_install_release with this new option in order to speed up
the execution of install_release.
I also added three more test cases for this functionality.
|
|
The appup instruction 'delete_module' would cause a crash during
upgrade if the module to be deleted was not loaded. The reason was
that the release_handler tried to read the version number of the old
module after the code path had changed to point to the new version of
the application. Thus, if the module had not been loaded before the
upgrade, there would no longer be any such module in the path
(delete_module indicates that the module is deleted from the new
version of the application).
This is corrected by letting the release_handler read the old version
of the module only if the module is updated - not if it is
removed. And it is always read before the code path is changed.
|
|
If a new version of an application did not include any erlang module
changes, the code path of the application was not updasted unless a
'load_object_code' instruction was added for the application. This
would be a problem if e.g. only some files in the priv dir were
changed, since calls to code:lib_dir or code:priv_dir would then point
to the old location of the application. This has been corrected - now
code:replace_path/2 will be called for all applications that are
changed (i.e. when the application's vsn is changed in the .rel file).
|
|
This commit adds test cases from release_handler_SUITE on windows,
including some corrections in erlsrv and release_handler.
|
|
|
