aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/ssl/src/dtls_connection.erl
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-05-23ssl: Generalize DTLS packet multiplexingIngela Anderton Andin
We want to prepare the code for more advanced DTLS usage and possibility to run over SCTP. First assumption was that the demultiplexer process "dtls listener" was needed for UDP only and SCTP could be made more TLS like. However the assumption seems not to hold. This commit prepares for customization possibilities.
2018-04-27Merge branch 'ingela/dtls/abbreviated'Ingela Anderton Andin
* ingela/dtls/abbreviated: dtls: Trigger resend in abbreviated handshake if change_cipher_spec is received to early.
2018-04-27dtls: Trigger resend in abbreviated handshake if change_cipher_specIngela Anderton Andin
is received to early.
2018-04-24ssl: Add new API functionsIngela Anderton Andin
2018-04-24ssl: Prepare to replace ssl:ssl_accept with ssl:handshakeIngela Anderton Andin
2018-03-09ssl: Remove interoperability option v2_hello_compatibleIngela Anderton Andin
2018-01-24Merge branch 'maint'Ingela Anderton Andin
2018-01-23ssl: Add record version sanity checkIngela Anderton Andin
2017-12-20Merge branch 'maint'Ingela Anderton Andin
2017-12-20dtls: Add handling of lost key exchange in cipher stateIngela Anderton Andin
2017-12-20ssl: Correct DTLS client close handlingIngela Anderton Andin
2017-12-20Merge branch 'maint'Ingela Anderton Andin
2017-12-18dtls: Use repeat_state to make sure retransmission timer is resetIngela Anderton Andin
2017-12-04Polish SSL distributionRaimo Niskanen
2017-11-24ssl: Add gracefullness to dtls codeIngela Anderton Andin
Also make tls code a little more direct for easier uderstanding
2017-11-24ssl: Use genstamtem properlyIngela Anderton Andin
2017-11-24ssl: Fix incorrect merge conflict resolutionIngela Anderton Andin
When handling merging of back ported Counter measurements for Bleichenbacher attack a line from DTLS was accidentally lost.
2017-11-23Merge branch 'maint-20' into maintIngela Anderton Andin
* maint-20: Updated OTP version Update release notes Update version numbers public_key: verify ip (both v4 and v6) public_key: Added IP4 address checks to hostname_verification tests ssl: Fix test cases to work on all test platforms public_key: Fix dialyzer spec ssl: Sessions must be registered with SNI if exists ssl: Extend hostname check to fallback to checking IP-address public_key, ssl: Handles keys so that APIs are preserved correctly ssl: Use ?FUNCTION_NAME ssl: Prepare for release ssl: Countermeasurements for Bleichenbacher attack Conflicts: lib/public_key/doc/src/public_key.xml lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE.erl lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName_IP.pem lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/verify_hostname_ip.conf lib/ssl/src/dtls_connection.erl lib/ssl/src/ssl_connection.erl lib/ssl/src/ssl_handshake.erl
2017-11-22Merge branch ↵Erlang/OTP
'ingela/maint-20/ssl/extend-hostname-check/OTP-14632/OTP-14655/OTP-14766' into maint-20 * ingela/maint-20/ssl/extend-hostname-check/OTP-14632/OTP-14655/OTP-14766: ssl: Fix test cases to work on all test platforms public_key: Fix dialyzer spec ssl: Sessions must be registered with SNI if exists ssl: Extend hostname check to fallback to checking IP-address public_key, ssl: Handles keys so that APIs are preserved correctly ssl: Use ?FUNCTION_NAME
2017-11-16ssl: Align code of main modules implementing the gen_statem behaviourIngela Anderton Andin
2017-11-16dtls: Add state specIngela Anderton Andin
2017-11-09 ssl: Use ?FUNCTION_NAMEIngela Anderton Andin
Use ?FUNCTION_NAME macro to enhance code as we will not back-port this version of the ssl application to versions pre OTP 19.
2017-11-09ssl: Countermeasurements for Bleichenbacher attackIngela Anderton Andin
2017-10-16 ssl: Use ?FUNCTION_NAMEIngela Anderton Andin
Use ?FUNCTION_NAME macro to enhance code as we will not back-port this version of the ssl application to versions pre OTP 19.
2017-09-30dtls: Compleate DTLS renegotiate implementationIngela Anderton Andin
2017-08-14dtls: Customize alert handling for DTLS over UDPIngela Anderton Andin
From RFC 6347: 4.1.2.7. Handling Invalid Records Unlike TLS, DTLS is resilient in the face of invalid records (e.g., invalid formatting, length, MAC, etc.). In general, invalid records SHOULD be silently discarded, thus preserving the association; however, an error MAY be logged for diagnostic purposes. Implementations which choose to generate an alert instead, MUST generate fatal level alerts to avoid attacks where the attacker repeatedly probes the implementation to see how it responds to various types of error. Note that if DTLS is run over UDP, then any implementation which does this will be extremely susceptible to denial-of-service (DoS) attacks because UDP forgery is so easy. Thus, this practice is NOT RECOMMENDED for such transports.
2017-07-07ssl: Enhance error loggingIngela Anderton Andin
2017-06-14Merge remote-tracking branch 'ingela/ingela/dtls/client-hello-verify/ERL-434'Hans Nilsson
2017-06-13dtls: Make HelloVerifyRequest version adhere to RFCIngela Anderton Andin
ERL-434 RFC6347 says about hello_verify_request version field as follow https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6347#page-16 The server_version field has the same syntax as in TLS. However, in order to avoid the requirement to do version negotiation in the initial handshake, DTLS 1.2 server implementations SHOULD use DTLS version 1.0 regardless of the version of TLS that is expected to be negotiated. But current DTLS server responses DTLS1.2 instead of DTLS1.0.
2017-06-13ssl: Correct epoch handlingIngela Anderton Andin
Consideration of which Epoch a message belongs to is needed in the dtls_connection:next_record function too.
2017-06-07dtls: Fetch next DTLS record when dropping resent handshake dataIngela Anderton Andin
2017-06-07dtls: Use enter actionsIngela Anderton Andin
Using enter actions for retransmission timers makes the code easier to understand. Previously the retransmission timer was incorrectly started in the connection state. Using enter actions feels like a cleaner approach than bloating the state with more flags.
2017-05-23dtls: Check for retransmitted changes_cipher_spec messagesIngela Anderton Andin
Make sure to use current epoch as input to send_handshake_flight.
2017-05-23dtls: Ask for next DTLS record when disregarding future packetIngela Anderton Andin
2017-05-16Merge branch 'ingela/dtls/opts'Ingela Anderton Andin
* ingela/dtls/opts: ssl: Adopt setopts and getopts for DTLS
2017-05-16ssl: Adopt setopts and getopts for DTLSIngela Anderton Andin
2017-05-16ssl: Remove debug printoutIngela Anderton Andin
2017-05-16dtls: Implement replay protectionIngela Anderton Andin
See RFC 6347 section 3.3
2017-05-04Update copyright yearRaimo Niskanen
2017-04-21ssl: TLS-1.2 clients will now always send hello messages on its own format.Ingela Anderton Andin
Note this is a change form how it works for earlier versions that will send the first hello message on the lowest supported version. From RFC 5246 Appendix E. Backward Compatibility E.1. Compatibility with TLS 1.0/1.1 and SSL 3.0 Since there are various versions of TLS (1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and any future versions) and SSL (2.0 and 3.0), means are needed to negotiate the specific protocol version to use. The TLS protocol provides a built-in mechanism for version negotiation so as not to bother other protocol components with the complexities of version selection. TLS versions 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, and SSL 3.0 are very similar, and use compatible ClientHello messages; thus, supporting all of them is relatively easy. Similarly, servers can easily handle clients trying to use future versions of TLS as long as the ClientHello format remains compatible, and the client supports the highest protocol version available in the server. A TLS 1.2 client who wishes to negotiate with such older servers will send a normal TLS 1.2 ClientHello, containing { 3, 3 } (TLS 1.2) in ClientHello.client_version. If the server does not support this version, it will respond with a ServerHello containing an older version number. If the client agrees to use this version, the negotiation will proceed as appropriate for the negotiated protocol. If the version chosen by the server is not supported by the client (or not acceptable), the client MUST send a "protocol_version" alert message and close the connection. If a TLS server receives a ClientHello containing a version number greater than the highest version supported by the server, it MUST reply according to the highest version supported by the server. A TLS server can also receive a ClientHello containing a version number smaller than the highest supported version. If the server wishes to negotiate with old clients, it will proceed as appropriate for the highest version supported by the server that is not greater than ClientHello.client_version. For example, if the server supports TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, and client_version is TLS 1.0, the server will proceed with a TLS 1.0 ServerHello. If server supports (or is willing to use) only versions greater than client_version, it MUST send a "protocol_version" alert message and close the connection. Whenever a client already knows the highest protocol version known to a server (for example, when resuming a session), it SHOULD initiate the connection in that native protocol. Note: some server implementations are known to implement version negotiation incorrectly. For example, there are buggy TLS 1.0 servers that simply close the connection when the client offers a version newer than TLS 1.0. Also, it is known that some servers will refuse the connection if any TLS extensions are included in ClientHello. Interoperability with such buggy servers is a complex topic beyond the scope of this document, and may require multiple connection attempts by the client. Earlier versions of the TLS specification were not fully clear on what the record layer version number (TLSPlaintext.version) should contain when sending ClientHello (i.e., before it is known which version of the protocol will be employed). Thus, TLS servers compliant with this specification MUST accept any value {03,XX} as the record layer version number for ClientHello. TLS clients that wish to negotiate with older servers MAY send any value {03,XX} as the record layer version number. Typical values would be {03,00}, the lowest version number supported by the client, and the value of ClientHello.client_version. No single value will guarantee interoperability with all old servers, but this is a complex topic beyond the scope of this document.
2017-04-13dtls: Correct cookie map nameIngela Anderton Andin
2017-04-13dtls: Fix active once emulation for DTLSIngela Anderton Andin
2017-03-30dtls: Implement DTLS cookie secret generationIngela Anderton Andin
2017-03-06dtls: Correct dialyzer spec and postpone inclusion of testIngela Anderton Andin
The new_options_in_accept test is not working yet, however DTLS is still work in progress and we want to make a progress merge to avoid merge conflicts with other progress of the ssl application.
2017-03-06dtls: Erlang distribution over DTLS is not supportedIngela Anderton Andin
Erlang distribution requiers a reliable transport, which udp is not. Maybe could be interesting later when SCTP support is added to DTLS.
2017-03-06dtls: Hibernation and retransmit timersIngela Anderton Andin
Change retransmissions timers to use gen_statem state timeouts. We do not need a retransmission timer in the state connection as data traffic in DTLS over UDP is not retransmitted. If the last flight before transitioning into connection is lost, it will be resent when the peer resends its last flight. This will also make hibernation testing more straight forward. We need more adjustments later to handle a reliable DTLS transport such as SCTP.
2017-03-06dtls: Make sure retransmission timers are runIngela Anderton Andin
2017-03-06dtls: DTLS specific handling of socket and ciphersIngela Anderton Andin
DTLS does not support stream ciphers and needs diffrent handling of the "#ssl_socket{}" handle .
2016-12-07Update copyright-yearErlang/OTP
2016-12-05ssl: Implement DTLS state machineIngela Anderton Andin
Beta DTLS, not production ready. Only very basically tested, and not everything in the SPEC is implemented and some things are hard coded that should not be, so this implementation can not be consider secure. Refactor "TLS connection state" and socket handling, to facilitate DTLS implementation. Create dtls "listner" (multiplexor) process that spawns DTLS connection process handlers. Handle DTLS fragmentation. Framework for handling retransmissions. Replay Detection is not implemented yet. Alerts currently always handled as in TLS.