| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Add new API function for converting cipher suite maps
to their textual representation.
Change-Id: I43681930b38e0f3bdb4dfccbf9e8895aa2d6a281
|
|
The Key Usage extension is described in section 4.2.1.3 of X.509, with the following possible flags:
KeyUsage ::= BIT STRING {
digitalSignature (0),
nonRepudiation (1), -- recent editions of X.509 have
-- renamed this bit to contentCommitment
keyEncipherment (2),
dataEncipherment (3),
keyAgreement (4),
keyCertSign (5),
cRLSign (6),
encipherOnly (7),
decipherOnly (8) }
In SSL/TLS, when the server certificate contains a RSA key, then:
either a DHE or ECDHE cipher suite is used, in which case the RSA key
is used for a signature (see section 7.4.3 of RFC 5246: the "Server
Key Exchange" message); this exercises the digitalSignature key usage;
or "plain RSA" is used, with a random value (the 48-byte pre-master
secret) being encrypted by the client with the server's public key
(see section 7.4.7.1 of RFC 5246); this is right in the definition of
the keyEncipherment key usage flag.
dataEncipherment does not apply, because what is encrypted is not
directly meaningful data, but a value which is mostly generated
randomly and used to derive symmetric keys. keyAgreement does not
apply either, because that one is for key agreement algorithms which
are not a case of asymmetric encryption (e.g. Diffie-Hellman). The
keyAgreement usage flag would appear in a certificate which contains a
DH key, not a RSA key. nonRepudiation is not used, because whatever is
signed as part of a SSL/TLS key exchange cannot be used as proof for a
third party (there is nothing in a SSL/TLS tunnel that the client
could record and then use to convince a judge when tring to sue the
server itself; the data which is exchanged within the tunnel is not
signed by the server).
When a ECDSA key is used then "keyAgreement" flag is needed for beeing
ECDH "capable" (as opposed to ephemeral ECDHE)
|
|
ECDH suite handling did not use the EC parameters form the certs
as expected.
|
|
* maint:
Updated OTP version
Update release notes
ssl: Prepare for release
ssl: Remove duplicate release note
ssl: Fix filter function to not discard AEAD cipher suites
Conflicts:
OTP_VERSION
|
|
|
|
* hasse/dialyzer/extra-range/OTP-14970:
ssl: Correct some specs
os_mon: Correct a spec
Fix broken spec in beam_asm
Dialyzer should not throw away spec information because of overspec
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cipher suite handling improvments missed to make a few changes
for AEAD to be handled correctly see ERL-568
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/doc/src/ssl.xml
lib/ssl/src/ssl.erl
lib/ssl/src/ssl_cipher.erl
lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl
lib/ssl/test/ssl_test_lib.erl
|
|
Preferably customized cipher suites will be based on the default value.
But all may be used as base and hence it will be good to
handle anonymous suites separately as they are intended for testing purposes.
|
|
Authenticated encryption (AE) and authenticated encryption with
associated data (AEAD, variant of AE) is a form of encryption which
simultaneously provides confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity
assurances on the data.
This is more logical value then null that was used, this happened to
work as the AEAD property was derived form other data, but it is confusing!
|
|
|
|
* ingela/ssl/no-chacha-default-for-now/ERL-538/OTP-14882:
ssl: Remove chacha ciphers form default for now
|
|
We have discovered interoperability problems, ERL-538, that we
believe needs to be solved in crypto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stream ciphers are not valid fro DTLS
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl_cipher.erl
lib/ssl/src/ssl_handshake.erl
|
|
This is a preparation for improvements to come in option handling and
support for TLS-1.3
|
|
RFC: ecdhe_psk cipher suites
OTP-14547
|
|
This is mainly fixing the test suites so that they test the intended cipher
suites, issue reported in ERL-460.
Also ssl_cipher:anonymous_suites was corrected for DTLS.
|
|
Add the GCM ciphers from draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead and the
specification for the CCM cipher (but leave them commented out as
we don't support CCM yet).
|
|
|
|
|
|
AEAD handling
|
|
|
|
DTLS does not support stream ciphers and needs diffrent
handling of the "#ssl_socket{}" handle .
|
|
Beta DTLS, not production ready. Only very basically tested, and
not everything in the SPEC is implemented and some things
are hard coded that should not be, so this implementation can not be consider
secure.
Refactor "TLS connection state" and socket handling, to facilitate
DTLS implementation.
Create dtls "listner" (multiplexor) process that spawns
DTLS connection process handlers.
Handle DTLS fragmentation.
Framework for handling retransmissions.
Replay Detection is not implemented yet.
Alerts currently always handled as in TLS.
|
|
Adapted from commit 675ee6860d2c273bcc6c6a0536634a107e2a3d9f.
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl_cipher.erl
|
|
* ingela/ssl/cipher-type-spec:
ssl: Adjust cipher type to conform to implementation
|
|
|
|
* RoadRunnr/crypto/no-rc4/PR-1169/OTP-13896:
disable RC4 in SSL when crypto doesn't support it
Fix compilation when OpenSSL doesn't support RC4
Conflicts:
lib/crypto/c_src/crypto.c
|
|
Test suite did not take TLS-version in to account. Also
some anonymous suites where included incorrectly in some TLS versions.
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of cases where `ssl` application just returns unhelpful
`handshake failure` or `internal error`. This patch tries to provide
better diagnostics so operator can debug his SSL misconfiguration
without doing hardcore erlang debugging.
Here is an example escript that incorrectly uses server certificate as a
client one:
https://gist.github.com/binarin/35c34c2df7556bf04c8a878682ef3d67
With the patch it is properly reported as an error in "extended key
usage".
|
|
Correct conversion errors form commit d2381e1a8d7cd54f7dc0a5105d172460b005a8fb
|
|
It was not possible to mix ssl 3 and 4 tuple cipher suites in the
ciphers option.
Some ssl_cipher:suite/1 clauses wrongly returned 3-tuples that
should have been 4 tuples
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl
|
|
ssl already used crypto:strong_rand_bytes/1 for most operations as
its use cases are mostly cryptographical. Now crypto:strong_rand_bytes/1
will be used everywhere.
However crypto:rand_bytes/1 was used as fallback if
crypto:strong_rand_bytes/1 throws low_entropy, this
will no longer be the case. This is a potential incompatibility.
The fallback was introduced a long time ago for interoperability reasons.
Now days this should not be a problem, and if it is, the security
compromise is not acceptable anyway.
|
|
* henrik/update-copyrightyear:
update copyright-year
|
|
In TLS-1.2 The signature algorithm and the hash function algorithm
used to produce the digest that is used when creating the digital signature
may be negotiated through the signature algorithm extension RFC 5246.
We want to make these algorithm pairs configurable.
In connections using lower versions of TLS these algorithms are
implicit defined and can not be negotiated or configured.
DTLS is updated to not cause dialyzer errors, but needs to get a real
implementation later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Older SSL/TLS versions have cipher suites
that look like {key_exchange(), cipher(), MAC::hash()}
and the hash function used by the PRF (Pseudo Random function)
is implicit and always the same for that protocol version.
In TLS 1.2 a cipher suite is
{key_exchange(), cipher(), MAC::hash(), PRF::hash()}.
Internally a cipher suite is always a four tuple but
for backwards compatibility older cipher suites
will be presented as a three tuples, however new cipher suites
should be presented as four tuples.
|
|
Make sure that options only relevant for one role (client|server) is set
to undefined when the other role is invoked. As there are many options to
ssl, and many are optional, we choose to filter out all undefined options
to avoid overwhelming the user with not relevant information.
This way there is no need for any special handling of the role specific options
which is also nice.
|
