Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Beta DTLS, not production ready. Only very basically tested, and
not everything in the SPEC is implemented and some things
are hard coded that should not be, so this implementation can not be consider
secure.
Refactor "TLS connection state" and socket handling, to facilitate
DTLS implementation.
Create dtls "listner" (multiplexor) process that spawns
DTLS connection process handlers.
Handle DTLS fragmentation.
Framework for handling retransmissions.
Replay Detection is not implemented yet.
Alerts currently always handled as in TLS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
willing to support
Refactor highest_protocol_version so that code is symmetrical with lowest_protocol_version. For clarity and possible future use cases of highest_protocol_version/2
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl_cipher.erl
lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl
|
|
|
|
disable option
|
|
|
|
disable option
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl_cipher.erl
lib/ssl/src/ssl_record.erl
lib/ssl/src/tls_record.erl
lib/ssl/test/ssl_cipher_SUITE.erl
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/dtls_record.erl
|
|
Errors discovered using `erldocs`:
Superfluous @hidden tag would exit edoc application;
'Multiple @spec tag': appended a @clear tag after macro condition;
'@spec arity does not match': added missing argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also refactor so that TLS and DTLS can have common functions when possible.
|
|
Also phase in tls module as main API instead of ssl. To
make API clearer. As TLS is the new protocol name.
Maybe keep some API functions in ssl
|