| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
- Add 'tlsv1.3' to the available versions. It can be used to
trigger experimental behavior while implementing TLS 1.3.
- Add dummy clauses for handling version {3,4} of TLS.
- Update ssl_logger to handle unknown versions of TLS.
Change-Id: I564ffa47dca18b59f0dc16c9809dfd7adaf2d333
|
|
- Introduce stateful logging levels to the ssl application:
The SSL option 'log_alert' sets log level to notice/warning
if it is set to true/false. Default log level is notice.
- Add new SSL option 'log_level' that overrides the value of
'log_alert'. Default value is notice.
- 'log_level' debug triggers verbose logging of TLS protocol
messages and logging of ignored alerts in DTLS.
Change-Id: I28d3f4029a5d504ec612abe4b9ae0b7d9b115197
|
|
Change-Id: Id52990a105c81373c7c6034df9a2675f9d0e429a
|
|
- Add logging for TLS Handshake messages.
- Remove version from the input map used in format/2.
Change-Id: I1a8a3dbe5854d3b25cca33e9a6634ac9a53d5867
|
|
Change-Id: I18786a9a8523d0ec3d9ca37ad5b2284721c5c4a1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note this is a change form how it works for earlier versions that will
send the first hello message on the lowest supported version.
From RFC 5246
Appendix E. Backward Compatibility
E.1. Compatibility with TLS 1.0/1.1 and SSL 3.0
Since there are various versions of TLS (1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and any
future versions) and SSL (2.0 and 3.0), means are needed to negotiate
the specific protocol version to use. The TLS protocol provides a
built-in mechanism for version negotiation so as not to bother other
protocol components with the complexities of version selection.
TLS versions 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, and SSL 3.0 are very similar, and use
compatible ClientHello messages; thus, supporting all of them is
relatively easy. Similarly, servers can easily handle clients trying
to use future versions of TLS as long as the ClientHello format
remains compatible, and the client supports the highest protocol
version available in the server.
A TLS 1.2 client who wishes to negotiate with such older servers will
send a normal TLS 1.2 ClientHello, containing { 3, 3 } (TLS 1.2) in
ClientHello.client_version. If the server does not support this
version, it will respond with a ServerHello containing an older
version number. If the client agrees to use this version, the
negotiation will proceed as appropriate for the negotiated protocol.
If the version chosen by the server is not supported by the client
(or not acceptable), the client MUST send a "protocol_version" alert
message and close the connection.
If a TLS server receives a ClientHello containing a version number
greater than the highest version supported by the server, it MUST
reply according to the highest version supported by the server.
A TLS server can also receive a ClientHello containing a version
number smaller than the highest supported version. If the server
wishes to negotiate with old clients, it will proceed as appropriate
for the highest version supported by the server that is not greater
than ClientHello.client_version. For example, if the server supports
TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, and client_version is TLS 1.0, the server will
proceed with a TLS 1.0 ServerHello. If server supports (or is
willing to use) only versions greater than client_version, it MUST
send a "protocol_version" alert message and close the connection.
Whenever a client already knows the highest protocol version known to
a server (for example, when resuming a session), it SHOULD initiate
the connection in that native protocol.
Note: some server implementations are known to implement version
negotiation incorrectly. For example, there are buggy TLS 1.0
servers that simply close the connection when the client offers a
version newer than TLS 1.0. Also, it is known that some servers will
refuse the connection if any TLS extensions are included in
ClientHello. Interoperability with such buggy servers is a complex
topic beyond the scope of this document, and may require multiple
connection attempts by the client.
Earlier versions of the TLS specification were not fully clear on
what the record layer version number (TLSPlaintext.version) should
contain when sending ClientHello (i.e., before it is known which
version of the protocol will be employed). Thus, TLS servers
compliant with this specification MUST accept any value {03,XX} as
the record layer version number for ClientHello.
TLS clients that wish to negotiate with older servers MAY send any
value {03,XX} as the record layer version number. Typical values
would be {03,00}, the lowest version number supported by the client,
and the value of ClientHello.client_version. No single value will
guarantee interoperability with all old servers, but this is a
complex topic beyond the scope of this document.
|
|
AEAD handling
|
|
|
|
Beta DTLS, not production ready. Only very basically tested, and
not everything in the SPEC is implemented and some things
are hard coded that should not be, so this implementation can not be consider
secure.
Refactor "TLS connection state" and socket handling, to facilitate
DTLS implementation.
Create dtls "listner" (multiplexor) process that spawns
DTLS connection process handlers.
Handle DTLS fragmentation.
Framework for handling retransmissions.
Replay Detection is not implemented yet.
Alerts currently always handled as in TLS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
willing to support
Refactor highest_protocol_version so that code is symmetrical with lowest_protocol_version. For clarity and possible future use cases of highest_protocol_version/2
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl_cipher.erl
lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl
|
|
|
|
disable option
|
|
|
|
disable option
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl_cipher.erl
lib/ssl/src/ssl_record.erl
lib/ssl/src/tls_record.erl
lib/ssl/test/ssl_cipher_SUITE.erl
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/dtls_record.erl
|
|
Errors discovered using `erldocs`:
Superfluous @hidden tag would exit edoc application;
'Multiple @spec tag': appended a @clear tag after macro condition;
'@spec arity does not match': added missing argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also refactor so that TLS and DTLS can have common functions when possible.
|
|
Also phase in tls module as main API instead of ssl. To
make API clearer. As TLS is the new protocol name.
Maybe keep some API functions in ssl
|
