Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
In TLS-1.2 The signature algorithm and the hash function algorithm
used to produce the digest that is used when creating the digital signature
may be negotiated through the signature algorithm extension RFC 5246.
We want to make these algorithm pairs configurable.
In connections using lower versions of TLS these algorithms are
implicit defined and can not be negotiated or configured.
DTLS is updated to not cause dialyzer errors, but needs to get a real
implementation later.
|
|
DES is not considered secure.
Also correct 'Server Name Indication' support description.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
algorithms
With the addition of more ciphers that are not supported in all
configurations, using a manually prefiltered cipher list (e.g. EC vs.
non-EC ciphers) becomes to complex. Replace the manual split with
ssl_cipher:filter_suites/1 in all places.
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl.erl
lib/ssl/src/tls_v1.erl
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/dtls_record.erl
|
|
crashing.
When TLS client sends Supported Elliptic Curves Client Hello Extension
the server shall select a curve supported by both sides or refuse to
negotiate the use of an ECC cipher suite.
|
|
Newer OpenSSL versions allow to selectively disable GF2m elliptic curves.
Selectively enable GF2m curves is support for them is available.
|
|
|
|
Also refactor so that TLS and DTLS can have common functions when possible.
|