aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/ssl/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-06-19Update copyright yearHans Nilsson
2017-06-14Merge remote-tracking branch 'ingela/ingela/dtls/client-hello-verify/ERL-434'Hans Nilsson
2017-06-13dtls: Make HelloVerifyRequest version adhere to RFCIngela Anderton Andin
ERL-434 RFC6347 says about hello_verify_request version field as follow https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6347#page-16 The server_version field has the same syntax as in TLS. However, in order to avoid the requirement to do version negotiation in the initial handshake, DTLS 1.2 server implementations SHOULD use DTLS version 1.0 regardless of the version of TLS that is expected to be negotiated. But current DTLS server responses DTLS1.2 instead of DTLS1.0.
2017-06-13ssl: Correct epoch handlingIngela Anderton Andin
Consideration of which Epoch a message belongs to is needed in the dtls_connection:next_record function too.
2017-06-10dtls: Handle getopts and setopts for DTLSIngela Anderton Andin
2017-06-07dtls: Fetch next DTLS record when dropping resent handshake dataIngela Anderton Andin
2017-06-07dtls: Use enter actionsIngela Anderton Andin
Using enter actions for retransmission timers makes the code easier to understand. Previously the retransmission timer was incorrectly started in the connection state. Using enter actions feels like a cleaner approach than bloating the state with more flags.
2017-06-02Merge pull request #1479 from weisslj/fix-missing-ssl-closeIngela Andin
Correct close semantics for active once connections. This was a timing dependent bug the resulted in the close message not always reaching the ssl user process. OTP-14443
2017-05-30Better fix for non-delivery of ssl_closed message in active onceIngela Andin
This is taken from https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/1479#issuecomment-304667528 with permission from Ingela Andin and improves commit 8abe16c22d.
2017-05-25Fix non-delivery of ssl_closed message in active onceJohannes Weißl
The commit 8b10920 (OTP 19.3.1) fixed the non-delivery of final TLS record in {active, once}, but this causes the ssl_closed message to be lost when the TCP connection closes before ssl:close/1. The patch restores the behavior of OTP 18. This is the second part to fix https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-420
2017-05-23dtls: Check for retransmitted changes_cipher_spec messagesIngela Anderton Andin
Make sure to use current epoch as input to send_handshake_flight.
2017-05-23dtls: Ask for next DTLS record when disregarding future packetIngela Anderton Andin
2017-05-22ssl: Handle econnreset windows obscuritiesIngela Anderton Andin
An UDP socket does note have a connection and should not recive econnreset, however this happens on on some windows versions. Just ignoring it appears to make things work as expected!
2017-05-19ssl: Add missing algorithm ecdh_ecdsaIngela Anderton Andin
2017-05-16Merge branch 'ingela/dtls/opts'Ingela Anderton Andin
* ingela/dtls/opts: ssl: Adopt setopts and getopts for DTLS
2017-05-16ssl: Adopt setopts and getopts for DTLSIngela Anderton Andin
2017-05-16ssl: Remove debug printoutIngela Anderton Andin
2017-05-16Merge branch 'ingela/dtls/replay-protect/OTP-14077'Ingela Anderton Andin
* ingela/dtls/replay-protect/OTP-14077: dtls: Implement replay protection
2017-05-16dtls: Implement replay protectionIngela Anderton Andin
See RFC 6347 section 3.3
2017-05-12Merge branch 'maint'Hans Nilsson
Conflicts: OTP_VERSION lib/inets/vsn.mk lib/ssl/vsn.mk
2017-05-11removed ct:pal call in ssl_connectionJoe DeVivo
2017-05-06ssl: Add hostname check of server certificateIngela Anderton Andin
When the server_name_indication is sent automatize the clients check of that the hostname is present in the servers certificate. Currently server_name_indication shall be on the dns_id format. If server_name_indication is disabled it is up to the user to do its own check in the verify_fun.
2017-05-04Update copyright yearRaimo Niskanen
2017-04-28ssl: Prepare for releaseIngela Anderton Andin
2017-04-28Merge branch 'ingela/ssl/cacha-default/OTP-14382'Ingela Anderton Andin
* ingela/ssl/cacha-default/OTP-14382: ssl: Cacha is currently not tested enough to be most prefered.
2017-04-28ssl: Cacha is currently not tested enough to be most prefered.Ingela Anderton Andin
2017-04-26ssl: Correct DTLS mac handlingIngela Anderton Andin
2017-04-21ssl: TLS-1.2 clients will now always send hello messages on its own format.Ingela Anderton Andin
Note this is a change form how it works for earlier versions that will send the first hello message on the lowest supported version. From RFC 5246 Appendix E. Backward Compatibility E.1. Compatibility with TLS 1.0/1.1 and SSL 3.0 Since there are various versions of TLS (1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and any future versions) and SSL (2.0 and 3.0), means are needed to negotiate the specific protocol version to use. The TLS protocol provides a built-in mechanism for version negotiation so as not to bother other protocol components with the complexities of version selection. TLS versions 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, and SSL 3.0 are very similar, and use compatible ClientHello messages; thus, supporting all of them is relatively easy. Similarly, servers can easily handle clients trying to use future versions of TLS as long as the ClientHello format remains compatible, and the client supports the highest protocol version available in the server. A TLS 1.2 client who wishes to negotiate with such older servers will send a normal TLS 1.2 ClientHello, containing { 3, 3 } (TLS 1.2) in ClientHello.client_version. If the server does not support this version, it will respond with a ServerHello containing an older version number. If the client agrees to use this version, the negotiation will proceed as appropriate for the negotiated protocol. If the version chosen by the server is not supported by the client (or not acceptable), the client MUST send a "protocol_version" alert message and close the connection. If a TLS server receives a ClientHello containing a version number greater than the highest version supported by the server, it MUST reply according to the highest version supported by the server. A TLS server can also receive a ClientHello containing a version number smaller than the highest supported version. If the server wishes to negotiate with old clients, it will proceed as appropriate for the highest version supported by the server that is not greater than ClientHello.client_version. For example, if the server supports TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, and client_version is TLS 1.0, the server will proceed with a TLS 1.0 ServerHello. If server supports (or is willing to use) only versions greater than client_version, it MUST send a "protocol_version" alert message and close the connection. Whenever a client already knows the highest protocol version known to a server (for example, when resuming a session), it SHOULD initiate the connection in that native protocol. Note: some server implementations are known to implement version negotiation incorrectly. For example, there are buggy TLS 1.0 servers that simply close the connection when the client offers a version newer than TLS 1.0. Also, it is known that some servers will refuse the connection if any TLS extensions are included in ClientHello. Interoperability with such buggy servers is a complex topic beyond the scope of this document, and may require multiple connection attempts by the client. Earlier versions of the TLS specification were not fully clear on what the record layer version number (TLSPlaintext.version) should contain when sending ClientHello (i.e., before it is known which version of the protocol will be employed). Thus, TLS servers compliant with this specification MUST accept any value {03,XX} as the record layer version number for ClientHello. TLS clients that wish to negotiate with older servers MAY send any value {03,XX} as the record layer version number. Typical values would be {03,00}, the lowest version number supported by the client, and the value of ClientHello.client_version. No single value will guarantee interoperability with all old servers, but this is a complex topic beyond the scope of this document.
2017-04-13ssl, dtls: Refactor so that DTLS records are handled correctly together with ↵Ingela Anderton Andin
AEAD handling
2017-04-13ssl, dtls: Correct integer type for sequence numberIngela Anderton Andin
2017-04-13dtls: Correct cookie map nameIngela Anderton Andin
2017-04-13dtls: Fix active once emulation for DTLSIngela Anderton Andin
2017-04-05Merge branch 'ingela/ssl/dtls-cookie/OTP-14076'Ingela Anderton Andin
* ingela/ssl/dtls-cookie/OTP-14076: dtls: Implement DTLS cookie secret generation
2017-04-04Merge branch 'maint'Ingela Anderton Andin
Conflicts: OTP_VERSION erts/vsn.mk lib/crypto/c_src/crypto.c lib/crypto/src/crypto.erl lib/ssh/src/ssh.erl
2017-03-30dtls: Implement DTLS cookie secret generationIngela Anderton Andin
2017-03-27ssl: Prepare for releaseIngela Anderton Andin
2017-03-27ssl: Avoid data loss in active onceIngela Anderton Andin
Emulate active once in such a way that data recived by the TLS connection process, but not fetch via active once option by the user, can be delivered at next active once before final close.
2017-03-23Merge branch 'ingela/ssl/dtls-frag'Ingela Anderton Andin
* ingela/ssl/dtls-frag: dtls: Handle overlapping fragments
2017-03-23dtls: Handle overlapping fragmentsIngela Anderton Andin
Fragment reassembling needs to handle that a smaller fragment then sent originally might overlap an earlier received fragment.
2017-03-21ssl: Add connection information itemsIngela Anderton Andin
Add session_id and remove undocumented ssl:session_info/1 Add client_random, server_random and master_secret, they will not be included in ssl:connection_information/1 as they may affect the connections security if used recklessly.
2017-03-16ssl: Remove deprecated functionsIngela Anderton Andin
2017-03-10Update copyright yearRickard Green
2017-03-10dtls: Correct version checkIngela Anderton Andin
2017-03-08Merge branch 'maint'Ingela Anderton Andin
2017-03-08Merge branch 'ingela/ssl/next-maint-version' into maintIngela Anderton Andin
* ingela/ssl/next-maint-version: ssl: Version update
2017-03-07dtls: 'dtlsv1.2' corresponds to 'tlsv1.2'Ingela Anderton Andin
'dtlsv1.2' should not be included in MIN_DATAGRAM_SUPPORTED_VERSIONS as this is the default when crypto does not have sufficient support for 'tlsv1.2' and 'dtlsv1.2'
2017-03-06dtls: Correct dialyzer spec and postpone inclusion of testIngela Anderton Andin
The new_options_in_accept test is not working yet, however DTLS is still work in progress and we want to make a progress merge to avoid merge conflicts with other progress of the ssl application.
2017-03-06dtls: Erlang distribution over DTLS is not supportedIngela Anderton Andin
Erlang distribution requiers a reliable transport, which udp is not. Maybe could be interesting later when SCTP support is added to DTLS.
2017-03-06dtls: Hibernation and retransmit timersIngela Anderton Andin
Change retransmissions timers to use gen_statem state timeouts. We do not need a retransmission timer in the state connection as data traffic in DTLS over UDP is not retransmitted. If the last flight before transitioning into connection is lost, it will be resent when the peer resends its last flight. This will also make hibernation testing more straight forward. We need more adjustments later to handle a reliable DTLS transport such as SCTP.
2017-03-06dtls: Make sure retransmission timers are runIngela Anderton Andin