| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It was not possible to mix ssl 3 and 4 tuple cipher suites in the
ciphers option.
Some ssl_cipher:suite/1 clauses wrongly returned 3-tuples that
should have been 4 tuples
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl
|
|
ssl already used crypto:strong_rand_bytes/1 for most operations as
its use cases are mostly cryptographical. Now crypto:strong_rand_bytes/1
will be used everywhere.
However crypto:rand_bytes/1 was used as fallback if
crypto:strong_rand_bytes/1 throws low_entropy, this
will no longer be the case. This is a potential incompatibility.
The fallback was introduced a long time ago for interoperability reasons.
Now days this should not be a problem, and if it is, the security
compromise is not acceptable anyway.
|
|
* henrik/update-copyrightyear:
update copyright-year
|
|
|
|
In TLS-1.2 The signature algorithm and the hash function algorithm
used to produce the digest that is used when creating the digital signature
may be negotiated through the signature algorithm extension RFC 5246.
We want to make these algorithm pairs configurable.
In connections using lower versions of TLS these algorithms are
implicit defined and can not be negotiated or configured.
DTLS is updated to not cause dialyzer errors, but needs to get a real
implementation later.
|
|
In ssl_tls_dist_proxy:accept_loop/3, handle {error, closed} by
exiting normally. This prevents a spurious error report at node
shutdown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== OTP-18.3 ===
Changed Applications:
- asn1-4.0.2
- common_test-1.12
- compiler-6.0.3
- cosNotification-1.2.1
- cosTime-1.2.1
- cosTransactions-1.3.1
- crypto-3.6.3
- debugger-4.1.2
- dialyzer-2.9
- diameter-1.11.2
- edoc-0.7.18
- eldap-1.2.1
- erl_docgen-0.4.2
- erl_interface-3.8.2
- erts-7.3
- eunit-2.2.13
- hipe-3.15
- inets-6.2
- kernel-4.2
- mnesia-4.13.3
- observer-2.1.2
- orber-3.8.1
- public_key-1.1.1
- runtime_tools-1.9.3
- sasl-2.7
- snmp-5.2.2
- ssh-4.2.2
- ssl-7.3
- stdlib-2.8
- test_server-3.10
- tools-2.8.3
- webtool-0.9.1
- wx-1.6.1
- xmerl-1.3.10
Unchanged Applications:
- cosEvent-2.2
- cosEventDomain-1.2
- cosFileTransfer-1.2
- cosProperty-1.2
- et-1.5.1
- gs-1.6
- ic-4.4
- jinterface-1.6.1
- megaco-3.18
- odbc-2.11.1
- os_mon-2.4
- ose-1.1
- otp_mibs-1.1
- parsetools-2.1.1
- percept-0.8.11
- reltool-0.7
- syntax_tools-1.7
- typer-0.9.10
Conflicts:
OTP_VERSION
erts/vsn.mk
lib/test_server/doc/src/notes.xml
lib/test_server/vsn.mk
lib/webtool/doc/src/notes.xml
lib/webtool/vsn.mk
|
|
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/tls_ipv6_dist:
Add inet6_tls_dist, for TLS distribution over IPv6
Conflicts:
lib/ssl/src/ssl_tls_dist_proxy.erl
OTP-13391
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/fix-ssl-example/PR-976/OTP-13363:
ssl: Modernize utility function
Fix ssl example
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/crl-check-without-dp:
Be suspicious of certificates without CRL DPs
Refactor ssl_crl_SUITE: extract crl_verify_error/6
OTP-13378
|
|
* legoscia/critical-extension-verify-none:
ssl: with verify_none, accept critical extensions
OTP-13377
|
|
Use application:ensure_all_started/2 instead of hard coding dependencies
|
|
As recently discussed on the erlang-questions mailing list, this
example fails to start the ssl application because ssl depends on asn1
nowadays. Let's future-proof this by using
application:ensure_all_started/1.
|
|
|
|
Older SSL/TLS versions have cipher suites
that look like {key_exchange(), cipher(), MAC::hash()}
and the hash function used by the PRF (Pseudo Random function)
is implicit and always the same for that protocol version.
In TLS 1.2 a cipher suite is
{key_exchange(), cipher(), MAC::hash(), PRF::hash()}.
Internally a cipher suite is always a four tuple but
for backwards compatibility older cipher suites
will be presented as a three tuples, however new cipher suites
should be presented as four tuples.
|
|
Make sure that options only relevant for one role (client|server) is set
to undefined when the other role is invoked. As there are many options to
ssl, and many are optional, we choose to filter out all undefined options
to avoid overwhelming the user with not relevant information.
This way there is no need for any special handling of the role specific options
which is also nice.
|
|
* ia/ssl/remove-default-DES/OTP-13195:
ssl: Remove DES ciphers from default configuration
|
|
DES is not considered secure.
Also correct 'Server Name Indication' support description.
|
|
* bjorn/remove-test_server/OTP-12705:
Remove test_server as a standalone application
Erlang mode for Emacs: Include ct.hrl instead test_server.hrl
Remove out-commented references to the test_server applications
Makefiles: Remove test_server from include path and code path
Eliminate use of test_server.hrl and test_server_line.hrl
|
|
* legoscia/ssl-doc-typos:
Fix typos in ssl.xml
OTP-13339
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously, if certificate revocation checking was turned on, and a
certificate didn't contain a CRL Distribution Points extension, and
there was no relevant CRL in the cache, then ssl_handshake:crl_check
would accept the certificate even if the crl_check option was set to
reject certificates for which the revocation status could not be
determined. With this change, such certificates will only be accepted
if the crl_check option was set to best_effort.
The process for CRL validation is described in section 6.3 of RFC
5280. The text doesn't mention any special treatment to be given to
certificates without distribution points: it just says "For each
distribution point..." (section 6.3.3), which would leave the
revocation status undetermined, unless there were "any available CRLs
not specified in a distribution point but issued by the certificate
issuer". Thus the result of this algorithm should be UNDETERMINED in
this case, not UNREVOKED, and the crl_check option should govern how
the implementation reacts to this result.
|
|
When establishing a TLS connection with {verify, verify_none}, if the
server has a certificate with a critical extension, for example a
"Netscape Cert Type" extension, certificate verification would fail,
which is surprising given that the name of the option suggests that no
verification would be performed.
With this change, certificate extensions marked as critical are
ignored when using verify_none.
|
|
Since no test suites includede test_server.hrl, there is no need
to have test_server in the include path or code path.
|
|
|
|
* ia/pr/958/OTP-13334:
ssl: verify cert signature against original cert binary
|
|
|
|
OTP-13311
* sverk/ecc-fixes:
Ensure testing ssl with supported ciphers only
Only use supported EC curves in crypto tests
Check the result of EC_GROUP_new_curve_* calls
|
|
When searching for a certificate's issuer in the `CertDB`, verify the signature
against the original DER certificate from the handshake instead of a re-encoding
of the parsed certificate. This avoids false negatives due to differences
between DER encoding implementations of OTP and other platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ia/ssl/validator:
ssl: Only start a new session validator if the old one has finished its work
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/tls-dist-listen-ip:
TLS distribution: bind erts socket to localhost
OTP-13300
|
|
Generalise much of inet_tls_dist, so that inet6_tls_dist can reuse it.
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/tls-dist-connect-options:
ssl_dist_SUITE: don't use deprecated functions
TLS distribution: support inet_dist_connect_options
OTP-13285
|
|
There are two problematic areas: EC curve selection and
interoperability tests with OpenSSL.
The tests shouldn't assume any particular EC curve is available, but
should always check the list of curves reported by
tls_v1:ecc_curves/1.
And during interoperability tests the tests shouldn't assume that any
cipher suite supported by Erlang is also supported by OpenSSL. There
are OpenSSL packages where the command line openssl tool only supports
a subset of the ciphers available in libcrypto. The actual list of
supported cipher suites thus shall be queried from OpenSSL.
|
|
Just like crl_verify_valid/5 checks for a positive result given
certain options, crl_verify_error/6 checks for a negative result.
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/tls_dist_wait_for_code_server:
TLS distribution: wait for code server
OTP-13268
|
|
If the session table is big the validator may not have finshed before
the validation interval is up, in this case we should not start a new
validator adding to the cpu load.
|
