| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* Refactor the code to make it easier to configure the benchmark
* Add a test case for long benchmark runs. The new test case is run by
the OTP-team's benchmark infrastructure and can help in keeping
track of how the performance of ETS is affected by code changes.
|
|
The idea is to use memchr on the first lookup for
binary:match/2 and also after every match on binary:matches/2.
We only use memchr in case of matches because benchmarks
showed that using memchr even when we had false positives
could negatively affect performance.
This speeds up binary matching and binary splitting by 4x
in some cases and by 70x in other scenarios (when the last
character in the needle does not occur in the subject).
The reason to use memchr is that it is highly specialized
in most modern operating systems, often defaulting to
SIMD operations.
The implementation uses the reduction count to figure out
how many bytes should be read with memchr. We could increase
those numbers but they do not seem to make a large difference.
|
|
Conflicts:
lib/stdlib/test/stdlib_bench_SUITE.erl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
