| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
This tries to make bugs like 87156887b7d82a2db53f60441a4af87034cb8789 not
happen again.
The new test takes each file in the stdlib app, passes their forms through the
erl_syntax representation, reverts them and compiles them.
|
|
This partially reverts 290dc2b08a2f92157ac5358fba815f4dbb32f8f2 in which
implicit funs were mistakenly thought to be using abstract terms for their name
and arity.
|
|
This adds optional names to fun expressions. A named fun expression
is parsed as a tuple `{named_fun,Loc,Name,Clauses}` in erl_parse.
If a fun expression has a name, it must be present and be the same in
every of its clauses. The function name shadows the environment of the
expression shadowing the environment and it is shadowed by the
environment of the clauses' arguments. An unused function name triggers
a warning unless it is prefixed by _, just as every variable.
Variable _ is allowed as a function name.
It is not an error to put a named function in a record field default
value.
When transforming to Core Erlang, the named fun Fun is changed into
the following expression:
letrec 'Fun'/Arity =
fun (Args) ->
let <Fun> = 'Fun'/Arity
in Case
in 'Fun'/Arity
where Args is the list of arguments of 'Fun'/Arity and Case the
Core Erlang expression corresponding to the clauses of Fun.
This transformation allows us to entirely skip any k_var to k_local
transformation in the fun's clauses bodies.
|
|
The R16B03 release
Conflicts:
lib/sasl/vsn.mk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function erl_syntax_lib:analyze_implicit_fun/1 should not be called on
implicit external funs, as their parts can contain variables instead of
atoms and integers.
|
|
Implicit funs parts in plain AST are no longer in concrete form since
Erlang/OTP R15.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The code related to the introduction of unicode_string() and
unicode_char() has been removed. The types char() and string() have
been extended to include Unicode characters.
In fact char() was changed some time ago; this commit is about
cleaning up the documentation and introduce better names for some
functions.
|
|
|
|
* lh/forget-mnemosyne/OTP-10729:
Remove what remains of the Mnemosyne code
Remove support for the query keyword and query expressions
|
|
* nox/enable-silent-rules/OTP-10726:
Implement ./otp_build configure --enable-silent-rules
|
|
|
|
With silent rules, the output of make is less verbose and compilation
warnings are easier to spot. Silent rules are disabled by default and
can be disabled or enabled at will by make V=0 and make V=1.
|
|
|
|
Not complete.
Unicode in wild attribute doesn't work.
No support for Unicode regarding Igor stubs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTP-10106
OTP-10107
|
|
|
|
* Just remove the warnings, not fixing the actual problem.
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 38ee7a20cfdc22ead35b4711a086babcf6b3069b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit e21ff9b0b69219ab3853be7e80813156113152b7.
|
|
|
|
Currently, the external fun syntax "fun M:F/A" only supports
literals. That is, "fun lists:reverse/1" is allowed but not
"fun M:F/A".
In many real-life situations, some or all of M, F, A are
not known until run-time, and one is forced to either use
the undocumented erlang:make_fun/3 BIF or to use a
"tuple fun" (which is deprecated).
EEP-23 suggests that the parser (erl_parse) should immediately
transform "fun M:F/A" to "erlang:make_fun(M, F, A)". We have
not followed that approach in this implementation, because we
want the abstract code to mirror the source code as closely
as possible, and we also consider erlang:make_fun/3 to
be an implementation detail that we might want to remove in
the future.
Instead, we will change the abstract format for "fun M:F/A" (in a way
that is not backwards compatible), and while we are at it, we will
move the translation from "fun M:F/A" to "erlang:make_fun(M, F, A)"
from sys_pre_expand down to the v3_core pass. We will also update
the debugger and xref to use the new format.
We did consider making the abstract format backward compatible if
no variables were used in the fun, but decided against it. Keeping
it backward compatible would mean that there would be different
abstract formats for the no-variable and variable case, and tools
would have to handle both formats, probably forever.
Reference: http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0023.html
|
|
These dependency files was once used when building the documentation,
but are no longer needed.
|
|
Some applications still have support for an ancient documentation
build system. Eliminate the DOCSUPPORT define in otp.mk.in and the
not taken arm of the ifdefs in the Makefiles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
