| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In some situations, the indentation of record fields in Emacs was
strange. This example below shows how Emacs previously would indent
two similar pieces of code very differently:
some_function_with_a_very_long_name() ->
#'a-long-record-name-like-it-sometimes-is-with-asn.1-records'{
field1=a,
field2=b}.
x() ->
#some_record_name{
field1=a,
field2=b}.
This changes the indentation to be like below for both cases:
some_function() ->
#some_record{
field1=a,
field2=b}.
|
|
An example that didn't work previously.
case Foo of
{ok, X} ->
ok;
_ ->
catch file:close(FD)
end.
|
|
Type highlighting reported by Jay Nelson
non_neg_integer() will highlight purple but pos_integer() does not.
Closing record indentation problem reported by Maxim Treskin:
-record(state, {
sequence_number = 1 :: integer()
}).
|
|
Trying to indent this piece of code by hitting TAB on each line:
foo() ->
[#foo{
foo = foo}].
used to cause an error. Fix by ignoring errors when trying to skip
backwards from a record.
Also add this test case to test.erl.orig and test.erl.indented.
|
|
* dgud/emacs-bugfixes:
Fix another -spec() problem
Add missing elisp files to the the release target
Fix electric semi-colon and tuples inside lists
OTP-8530 dgud/emacs-bugfixes
Fixed emacs-mode installation problems and some other minor issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in records or tuple creation:
-record(record3, {a = 8#42423 bor
8#4234,
b = 8#5432
bor 2#1010101
c = 123 +
234,
d}).
and in functions calls
call(2#42423 bor
#4234,
2#5432,
other_arg),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
