| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calls to map_anno(), fold_anno(), and mapfold_anno() with lists of
erl_parse trees have been replaced. Those functions accept lists of
erl_parse trees, but it was not the intention when the functions were
introduced, and it is not documented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* sverk/safe-purging/OTP-13122:
erts: Ignore unexpected messages to erts_code_purger
erts: Optimize erlang:check_process_code
erts: Refactor check_process_code/3
erts: Make copy_literals more fail safe
erts: Move copy_literals/2 from erlang to erts_internal
erts: Make erlang:purge_module/1 safe
erts: Refactor code:purge/1 and code:soft_purge/1
erts: Introduce erts_code_purger
|
|
|
|
window_size
|
|
Also fixes minor error in ssh_protocol_SUITE that the new encoder found.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* egil/improve-map-cerl-prettypr/OTP-13238:
compiler, hipe: Fix pretty printing of Core Maps
hipe: Fix map pretty printing of pairs
dialyzer: Update Maps tests
|
|
* maint:
edoc: Assign correct names to list arguments
|
|
Bug reported by Josemic. See also ERL-63.
|
|
* maint:
dialyzer: Correct handling of parameters of opaque types
|
|
Correction of commit d57f5e.
|
|
Literal maps could cause dialyzer to crash when pretty printing the results.
Reported-by: Chris McGrath <[email protected]>
|
|
In commit f667931e2905797ffab63e224e56eaf07f77178a the core format changed
for map pairs. Let dialyzer and hipe pretty printing of maps also adhere to
those changes.
An Erlang map update, M#{foo := 1, bar => 2} will now be printed as:
~{ 'foo' := 1, 'bar' => 2 | M }~
|
|
|
|
Problem: erlang:purge_module/1 is not safe in the sense
that very bad things may happen if the code to be purged
is still referred to by live processes.
Introduce erts_internal:purge_module which is the same as the old
erlang:purge_module BIF (except it returns false if no such old module).
Implement erlang:purge_module in Erlang and let it invoke
erts_code_purger for safe purging where all clogging processes
first are killed.
|
|
* sverk/fvisibility-hidden/OTP-13227:
erts: Allow -fvisibility=hidden for NIFs and drivers
erts: Cleanup erl_driver.h for windows
erts: Refactor ERL_NIF_INIT macro
|
|
by moving code from code_server to erts_code_purger.
This is more or less a copy-paste from code_server.erl
to erts_code_purger.erl. All the inner mechanics of
code:purge/1 and code:soft_purge/1 are unchanged.
|
|
as a system process with preloaded code.
|
|
* maint:
Fix crash when attempting to update a fun as if it were a map
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/map-bug/OTP-13231:
Fix crash when attempting to update a fun as if it were a map
|
|
See also ERL-55.
|
|
* maint:
stdlib: Fix linter crash due to missing -module declaration
Conflicts:
lib/stdlib/test/erl_lint_SUITE.erl
|
|
The Erlang Code Linter no longer crashes if there is a -deprecated()
attribute but no -module() declaration.
See also ERL-62 at bugs.erlang.org.
|
|
* maint:
stdlib: fix erl_eval not using non-local function handler
|
|
See also ERL-32 at bugs.erlang.org. Thanks to Ben Paxton.
|
|
The following example would cause an internal consistency
failure in the compiler:
f() -> ok.
update() -> (fun f/0)#{u => 42}.
The reason is that internally, v3_core will (incorrectly)
rewrite update/0 to code similar to this:
update() ->
if
is_map(fun f/0) ->
maps:update(u, 42, fun f/0)
end.
Since funs are not allowed to be created in guards, incorrect and
unsafe code would be generated.
It is easy to fix the bug. There already is a is_valid_map_src/1
function in v3_core that tests whether the argument for the map update
operation can possibly be a valid map. A fun is represented as a
variable with a special name in Core Erlang, so it would not be
recognized as unsafe. All we'll need to do to fix the bug is to look
closer at variables to ensure they don't represent funs. That will
ensure that the code is rewritten in the correct way:
update() ->
error({badmap,fun f/0})
end.
Reported-by: Thomas Arts
|
|
Conflicts:
OTP_VERSION
|
|
|
|
* maint:
Eliminate crash in v3_codegen
|
|
The following code would crash v3_codegen:
order(From) ->
catch
if
From#{[] => sufficient} ->
saint
end.
Before explaining the crash, first some background on the stack
frame and the Y registers.
Certain instructions, most notably the 'call' instructions, clobber
all X registers. Before any such instruction, all X registers that
have values that will be used after the call must be saved to Y
registers (i.e. to the stack frame). adjust_stack/4 will be called
when X registers must be saved.
There is also another situation when X registers must be saved, namely
within a 'catch' if we are about to execute any instruction that may
cause an exception. Examples of such instructions are some guard BIFs
(such as length/1) and construction of binaries or maps. Within a
'catch', X registers must be be saved because if an exception is
thrown and catched all X registers will be destroyed. The same
adjust_stack/4 function will be called for those instructions, but
only if they occur within a 'catch'.
There is actually one more complication. If there is code in
a guard within a catch, the X registers should not be saved, because
the code in a guard never clobbers any X registers that were alive
before the guard code was entered. v3_codegen is written with the
implicit assumption that code in guards never cause anything
to be saved to Y registers.
The code for building maps and binaries would incorrectly save X
registers within a guard inside a 'catch'.
For construction of binaries, that would mean that a useless but
harmelss 'move' instruction was generated.
But for construction of maps, the saving of the Y register would not
be harmless. There would be a crash when attempting to merge #sr{}
records. #sr{} records keeps track of the contents of X and Y
registers. When two separate code paths are joined (e.g. at the end of
'case' statement), the register descriptors must be reconciled.
Basically, the register descriptors for both paths must be identical.
The #sr{} record for one path must not claim that {y,0} contains
a certain value, while another path claims that {y,0} is dead.
Thus, the crash occurs in sr_merge/2 when failing to reconcile the
Y registers.
To fix this bug this bug we will introduce a new function called
maybe_adjust_stack/5. It will save X registers on the stack only
if the code is inside a catch but not inside a guard. We will
change all existing code to use this new function when appropriate.
Reported-by: Thomas Arts
|
|
as is strongly recommended by gcc man page.
We use __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) to make sure
the init functions are properly exported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
