| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Beam path in dependency was wrong.
|
|
The value determines whether or not an unexpected message length in the
header of an incoming messages causes the peer process to exit, the
message to be discarded or handled as usual. The latter may only be
appropriate for message-oriented transport (eg. SCTP) since
stream-oriented transport (eg. TCP) may not be able to recover the
message boundary once a length error has occurred.
|
|
When the TCP socket is in passive mode, it is possible that a close
message has not been delivered to the controlling process before
calling send/2. This results in the returning {error, closed} to the
caller, in the same way that recv/2,3 does. This commit adjusts the
type of the error "Reason" to include the atom 'closed'.
|
|
|
|
* vd/tuple_constructor_bug/OTP-10819:
fix bug in OtpErlangTuple constructor
|
|
Binaries were pretty printed too often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* bjorn/remove-tuple-funs/OTP-10170:
erl_eval: Don't allow evaluation of {M,F} in the shell
|
|
* bjorn/compiler/beam_utils-crash/OTP-10825:
Fix unsafe optimization of funs
|
|
|
|
* vd/code_get_mode/OTP-10823:
Added name prefix to code.xml
Add a new function code:get_mode() can be used to detect how the code servers behaves
|
|
|
|
* hb/stdlib/erl_scan_unicode/OTP-10756:
[stdlib] Remove the undocumented 'unicode' option from the scanner
|
|
|
|
Don't start a new timer with each incoming message. Instead, start a
timer at timeout and flush after two successive timeouts with no message
reception.
|
|
Tuples funs were removed in de7e01c958ff7c9e6da4034a53567a30a4ae5792,
but it was still possible to evaluate tuple funs in the shell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which will be the case in R16B.
|
|
Commits 53bd4974a101 and 726f6e4c7afe simplified the handling of
match_fail (used to generated exceptions such as 'function_clause')
by first rewriting them to a call to erlang/error{1,2} and later
rewriting them to specialized BEAM instructions (to reduce the
code size).
There was one flaw, though, which only was exposed when more
aggressive optimizations were added in c3b60f86c622. Here is an
example to explain it:
t(V) ->
fun(get) -> V end.
The following BEAM code will be initially generated for the fun:
{function, '-t/1-fun-0-', 2, 5}.
{label,1}.
{line,[{location,"t.erl",5}]}.
{func_info,{atom,t},{atom,'-t/1-fun-0-'},2}.
{label,2}.
{test,is_eq_exact,{f,2},[{x,0},{atom,get}]}.
{move,{x,1},{x,0}}.
return.
{label,2}.
{test_heap,2,1}.
{put_list,{x,0},nil,{x,1}}.
{move,{atom,function_clause},{x,0}}.
{line,[{location,"t.erl",5}]}.
{call_ext_only,2,{extfunc,erlang,error,2}}.
Translating back to Erlang code, that would be roughly:
'-t/1-fun-0-'(get, V) -> V;
'-t/1-fun-0-'(Arg1, _) -> erlang:error(function_clause, [Arg1]).
Note that the second argument (the free variable V) is not included
in the call to erlang:error/2.
The beam_except pass will simplify the code to:
{function, '-t/1-fun-0-', 2, 8}.
{label,1}.
{line,[{location,"t.erl",5}]}.
{func_info,{atom,t},{atom,'-t/1-fun-0-'},2}.
{label,2}.
{test,is_eq_exact,{f,1},[{x,0},{atom,get}]}.
{move,{x,1},{x,0}}.
return.
The code has been shortened by jumping to the func_info/3 instruction.
Translating back to Erlang:
'-t/1-fun-0-'(get, V) -> V;
'-t/1-fun-0-'(Arg1, Arg2) -> erlang:error(function_clause, [Arg1,Arg2]).
it is clear that both arguments are now included in the
'function_clause' exception, even though the initially generated
code only included the first argument.
That is no problem in this particular case, but for some more complex
funs, optimizing the first version based on variable usage could make
the second version unsafe.
I rejected the following potential solutions:
- Including the free arguments in the call to erlang:error/2:
'-t/1-fun-0-'(get, V) -> V;
'-t/1-fun-0-'(Arg1, Arg2) -> erlang:error(function_clause, [Arg1,Arg2]).
Unfortunately, that is tricky. The free variables are only known
after the second pass in v3_kernel when variable usage has been
calculated. We would need to add a third pass (only for funs) that
would the free arguments to the second argument for erlang:error/2
*and* update the variable usage information.
- Calling beam_except earlier, from within beam_block before any
optimizations based on variable usages are done. But means that the
problem could reappear in some other form in the future when other
updates are done to the code generator and/or optimization passes.
The solution I have chosen is to modify beam_except to only replace
a call to erlang:error(function_class, Args) if the length of Args
is the same as the arity in the func_info/3 instruction. The code
will be slightly larger. Also, the free variables for funs and list
comprehensions will no longer be included in the function_clause
exception (that could be less confusing, but it also means less
information during debugging).
|
|
* anders/diameter/cover/OTP-10804:
Update diameter.cover
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic handling is connected to the service implementation through the
pick_peer callback and failover but diameter_service was getting
unwieldy as home to both the service process and traffic handling.
|
|
In particular, remove fields containing values that are known (as of the
preceding commit) to the request process.
|
|
In order to be able to remove fields from the request process that don't
need to be there and do less in the service process. The pick_peer
callback now takes place in the request process in the case of immutable
state, just as in the case of the initial send.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an inverse to '#get-'/1 in the preceding commit.
|
|
The generated '#get-'/1 has one clause for each exported record r, whose
definition is equivalent to the following.
'#get-'(#r{} = Rec) ->
[r | lists:zip(record_info(r, fields), tl(tuple_to_list(Rec)))];
The record name at the head of the list is the same format that diameter
accepts for outgoing message.
|
|
|
|
Instead, use whatever dictionary a transport has configured as
supporting application id 0. This is to support the updated RFC 6733
dictionaries (which bring with them updated records) and also to be able
to transparently support any changed semantics (eg. 5xxx in
answer-message).
|
|
The RFC 6733 accounting dictionary includes rfc6733 in its name. The RFC
3588 dictionary doesn't and is left as-is for backwards compatibility.
|
|
The transition INITIAL -> DOWN (fixed in the preceding commit) was
wrong.
|
|
There is no such transition in RFC 3539, the state remains in INITIAL.
|
|
* sverk/erl_interface-enum-typedef:
erl_interface: Change enum erlang_char_encoding to a typedef
|
|
* sverk/r16/erl_interface-fixup:
erl_interface: Fix ei_skip_term
|
|
|
|
This was the result of the watchdog process exiting as a consequence of
peer death in some casesi, causing a restarted transport to enter
INITIAL when it should enter REOPEN. The watchdog now remains alive as
long as peer shutdown isn't requested and a 'close' message to the
service process (instead of watchdog death) generates 'closed' events
from the service.
|
|
|
|
That is, make the naming match that of the corresponding modules.
This has long been fairly confusing.
|
|
That check for unexpected entries in the request table.
|
|
In particular, use watchdog messages as input and do away with the older
connection_up/down (and other) messages. Also, only maintain the
watchdog state, not the older up/down op state.
|
|
Service process informs the watchdog process which informs the peer
process. (Instead of going directly to the latter in one case.)
|
|
Which will be the case with R16B in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* hb/stdlib/bug_fixes/OTP-10622:
[stdlib] Fix a bug that could cause the Erlang shell to loop
[stdlib] Fix bugs in eval_bits
|
|
|
