| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It is possible that '...' is added later (OTP 20.0), but for now we
are not sure of all details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* raimo/polish-gen_statem/OTP-13065:
Reword 'dispatch' into 'branch depending'
|
|
|
|
* raimo/polish-gen_statem/OTP-13065:
Fix all seealso and other minor changes
Editorial update
|
|
|
|
raimo/polish-gen_statem/OTP-13065
Conflicts:
lib/stdlib/doc/src/gen_statem.xml
|
|
* bjorn/stdlib/warning-and-error/OTP-13476:
Add documentation
epp: Add the -error and -warning directives
epp: Refactor expansion of header path
|
|
|
|
* bjorn/fix-on_load/OTP-12593:
Update documentation regarding improvements
Correctly handle multiple load attempts when on_load is pending
Avoid deadlock when an on_load function makes an external call to the module itself
code_server: Eliminate unnecessary Tag in handle_call/3
Reimplement -on_load()
Refactor erts_finish_loading() and insert_new_code()
code_SUITE: Make on_load_binary/1 clearer by using merl
|
|
|
|
* raimo/polish-gen_statem/OTP-13065:
Fix documentation
Clean up terminate functions
Fix callback mode after code change not used
Restructure loop_* to clarify S handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
erl_types typesets mandatory keys with :=, and uses "..." as a shorthand
for "any() => any()". Add these to erl_parse so that all representable
types can be written in type-specs.
|
|
|
|
* raimo/new-gen-state-machine/OTP-13065: (52 commits)
Add section on state filtering
Promote gen_statem over gen_fsm
Modify code_change/4 to return CallbackMode
Use ?NAME macro in examples
Introduce Fred Herbert suggested additions
Introduce corrections from Fred Hebert and Ingela
Use .png pictures instead of .gif
Write Design Principles chapter
Fix missing short forms for event timeout
Do more intricate Fred Hebert doc changes
Change Caller -> From as suggested by Fred Hebert
Do documentation improvements from Fred Hebert
Fix broken documenation reference
Rename state_timeout -> event_timeout
Fix most of the system docs and emacs mode
Change code_change/4 to {ok,State,Data}
Fixup sharpened test suite
Sharpen test suite
Remove the remove_event action and all alike
Relax caller() type check and cleanup
...
Conflicts:
lib/stdlib/src/gen.erl
lib/stdlib/src/gen_event.erl
lib/stdlib/src/gen_fsm.erl
lib/stdlib/src/gen_server.erl
lib/stdlib/test/error_logger_forwarder.erl
|
|
Misc documentation fixes.
|
|
|
|
Also move check of non-atom states in callback mode
state_functions to where the state function is called.
This gives homogenous diagnostics for state functions,
code_change/4 and system_replace_state StateFun.
Irregularities pointed out by James Fish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* henrik/update-copyrightyear:
update copyright-year
|
|
* derek121/mention_intellij_plugin/PR-970:
Add mention of IntelliJ plugin
|
|
* derek121/supervisor_docs/PR-974:
Fix small supervisor docs grammar issue
|
|
* minostro/maint/PR-986:
Fix typo in funs programming examples document
|
|
Eclipse plugin was mentioned, but not for IntelliJ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expression in a bit string comprehension is limited to a
literal bit string expression. That is, the following code
is legal:
<< <<X>> || X <- List >>
but not this code:
<< foo(X) || X <- List >>
The limitation is annoying. For one thing, tools that transform
the abstract format must be careful not to produce code such as:
<< begin
%% Some instrumentation code.
<<X>>
end || X <- List >>
One reason for the limitation could be that we'll get
reduce/reduce conflicts if we try to allow an arbitrary
expression in a bit string comprehension:
binary_comprehension -> '<<' expr '||' lc_exprs '>>' :
{bc,?anno('$1'),'$2','$4'}.
Unfortunately, there does not seem to be an easy way to work
around that problem. The best we can do is to allow 'expr_max'
expressions (as in the binary syntax):
binary_comprehension -> '<<' expr_max '||' lc_exprs '>>' :
{bc,?anno('$1'),'$2','$4'}.
That will work, but functions calls must be enclosed in
parentheses:
<< (foo(X)) || X <- List >>
|
|
|
|
For a long time, users have asked for one or more macros that would
return the name and arity of the current function.
We could define a single ?FUNCTION macro that would return
a {Name,Arity} tuple. However, to access just the name or
just the arity for the function, element/2 must be used.
That would limit its usefulness, because element/2 is not
allowed in all contexts.
Therefore, it seems that we will need two macros.
?FUNCTION_NAME that expands to the name of the current function
and ?FUNCTION_ARITY that expands to arity of the current
function.
Converting the function name to a string can be done like this:
f() ->
atom_to_list(?FUNCTION_NAME) ++ "/" ++
integer_to_list(?FUNCTION_ARITY).
f/0 will return "f/0". The BEAM compiler will evaluate the
entire expression at compile-time, so there will not be
any run-time penalty for the function calls.
The implementation is non-trivial because the preprocessor is
run before the parser.
One way to implement the macros would be to replace them with some
placeholder and then let the parser or possibly a later pass replace
the placeholder with correct value. That could potentially slow
down the compiler and cause incompatibilities for parse transforms.
Another way is to let the preprocessor do the whole job. That means
that the preprocessor will have to scan the function head to find
out the name and arity. The scanning of the function head can be
delayed until the first occurrence of a ?FUNCTION_NAME or
?FUNCTION_ARITY.
I have chosen the second way because it seems less likely to cause
weird compatibility problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is harder to remove is_subtype from the parser since the abstract
format does not separate is_subtype from the '::' syntax.
|
|
|
|
* legoscia/patch-2:
Remove mention of erlang:fault
|
|
* essen/weird-strncmp-len:
Fix weird strncmp length in erl_interface example
OTP-13081
|
