1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
|
%%% -*- Erlang -*-
%%% -*- erlang-indent-level: 2 -*-
%%%
%%% Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
%%% you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
%%% You may obtain a copy of the License at
%%%
%%% http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
%%%
%%% Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
%%% distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
%%% WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
%%% See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
%%% limitations under the License.
%%%
%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
%%% File : hipe_ssa_copy_prop.inc
%%% Author : Tobias Lindahl <tobiasl@it.uu.se>
%%% Description : Copy propagation on SSA form.
%%%
%%% Created : 4 Apr 2003 by Tobias Lindahl <tobiasl@it.uu.se>
%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
-export([cfg/1]).
%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
%% Two passes through the code visiting the blocks in reverse
%% postorder. The first pass binds all destinations of copying moves
%% to the sources, and the second propagates the copies and removes
%% the copying moves.
%%
%% Problem:
%% Since phi-nodes are implemented as instructions they are not
%% atomic. If we are not careful we can get the situation (after propagation):
%%
%% v0 = phi(v0, v2)
%% v1 = phi(v0, v3)
%% ^^
%% where the underlined v0 really corresponds to the v0 before the first
%% phi-instruction.
%%
%% Solution:
%% * Find all dependencies between the uses of a phi-instruction to
%% the destination of any earlier phi-instruction in the same phi-node;
%% * Keep the copying move that defines the variable used in the
%% latter phi-instruction; and
%% * Do not propagate the copy into the phi-instruction
%%
%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
-spec cfg(#cfg{}) -> #cfg{}.
cfg(Cfg) ->
Labels = ?cfg:reverse_postorder(Cfg),
{Info,PhiDep} = analyse(Labels, Cfg, gb_trees:empty(), gb_trees:empty()),
rewrite(Labels, Cfg, Info, PhiDep).
analyse([Label|Left], Cfg, Info, PhiDep) ->
BB = ?cfg:bb(Cfg, Label),
Code = hipe_bb:code(BB),
NewPhiDep = get_phi_dep(Code, gb_sets:empty(), PhiDep),
NewInfo = analyse_code(Code, Info),
analyse(Left, Cfg, NewInfo, NewPhiDep);
analyse([], _Cfg, Info, PhiDep) ->
{Info,PhiDep}.
get_phi_dep([I|Left], Defined, Dep) ->
case ?code:is_phi(I) of
true ->
Use = ?code:uses(I),
[Def] = ?code:defines(I),
NewDep = add_dep(Use, Defined, Dep),
get_phi_dep(Left, gb_sets:insert(Def, Defined), NewDep);
false ->
Dep
end;
get_phi_dep([], _Defined, Dep) ->
Dep.
add_dep([Use|Left], Defined, Dep) ->
case gb_trees:lookup(Use, Dep) of
none ->
add_dep(Left, Defined, gb_trees:insert(Use, Defined, Dep));
{value, Set} ->
NewSet = gb_sets:union(Defined, Set),
add_dep(Left, Defined, gb_trees:enter(Use, NewSet, Dep))
end;
add_dep([], _Defined, Dep) ->
Dep.
has_dep(Use, Def, Dep) ->
case gb_trees:lookup(Use, Dep) of
none ->
false;
{value, Set} ->
gb_sets:is_member(Def, Set)
end.
analyse_code([I|Left], Info) ->
case ?code:is_move(I) of
true ->
NewInfo = get_info_move(I, Info),
analyse_code(Left, NewInfo);
false ->
analyse_code(Left, Info)
end;
analyse_code([], Info) ->
Info.
get_info_move(I, Info) ->
case ?code:uses(I) of
[] -> %% Constant.
Info;
[Src] ->
add_binding(?code:defines(I), Src, Info)
end.
rewrite([Label|Left], Cfg, Info, PhiDep) ->
BB = ?cfg:bb(Cfg, Label),
Code = hipe_bb:code(BB),
NewCode = rewrite_code(Code, Info, PhiDep, []),
NewBB = hipe_bb:code_update(BB, NewCode),
rewrite(Left, ?cfg:bb_add(Cfg, Label, NewBB), Info, PhiDep);
rewrite([], Cfg, _Info, _PhiDep) ->
Cfg.
rewrite_code([I|Left], Info, PhiDep, Acc) ->
case ?code:is_move(I) of
true ->
Fun = fun(X, Y) -> ?code:mk_move(X, Y) end,
NewI = rewrite_move(I, Fun, Info, PhiDep),
rewrite_code(Left, Info, PhiDep, NewI++Acc);
false ->
NewI = rewrite_instr(I, Info, PhiDep),
rewrite_code(Left, Info, PhiDep, [NewI|Acc])
end;
rewrite_code([], _Info, _PhiDep, Acc) ->
lists:reverse(Acc).
rewrite_move(I, Fun, Info, PhiDep) ->
case ?code:uses(I) of
[] ->%% Constant move. Keep it!
[I];
_ ->
Dst = hd(?code:defines(I)),
case gb_trees:lookup(Dst, Info) of
{value, Root} ->
case has_dep(Dst, Root, PhiDep) of
true -> %% Must keep the copying move!
[Fun(Dst, Root)];
false ->
[]
end;
none ->
[]
end
end.
rewrite_instr(I, Info, PhiDep) ->
rewrite_instr0(I, ?code:uses(I), Info, PhiDep, []).
rewrite_instr0(I, [Key|Left], Info, PhiDep, UpdateInfo) ->
case gb_trees:lookup(Key, Info) of
none ->
rewrite_instr0(I, Left, Info, PhiDep, UpdateInfo);
{value, Root} ->
case gb_trees:lookup(Key, Info) of
{value, Root} ->
case has_dep(Key, Root, PhiDep) of
true -> %% Must keep Key!
rewrite_instr0(I, Left, Info, PhiDep, UpdateInfo);
false ->
rewrite_instr0(I, Left, Info, PhiDep, [{Key, Root}|UpdateInfo])
end;
_ ->
rewrite_instr0(I, Left, Info, PhiDep, UpdateInfo)
end
end;
rewrite_instr0(I, [], _Info, _PhiDep, UpdateInfo) ->
?code:subst(UpdateInfo, I).
add_binding([Key|Left], Val, Info) ->
%% Make sure the key is bound to the end of any copy-chains.
NewInfo =
case gb_trees:lookup(Val, Info) of
{value, NewVal} ->
gb_trees:insert(Key, NewVal, Info);
none ->
gb_trees:insert(Key, Val, Info)
end,
add_binding(Left, Val, NewInfo);
add_binding([], _, Info) ->
Info.
|
