%% -*- erlang-indent-level: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; fill-column: 80 -*-
%% ex: ts=4 sw=4 et
%%
%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
%% Copyright 2012 Opscode, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
%%
%% This file is provided to you under the Apache License,
%% Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file
%% except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
%% a copy of the License at
%%
%% http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
%%
%% Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
%% software distributed under the License is distributed on an
%% "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
%% KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
%% specific language governing permissions and limitations
%% under the License.
%%
%% @author Eric Merritt <[email protected]>
%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
-module(rlx_depsolver_tests).
-include_lib("eunit/include/eunit.hrl").
%%============================================================================
%% Tests
%%============================================================================
first_test() ->
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.2+build.33"},
{app3, "0.2", '>='}]},
{"0.2", []},
{"0.3", []}]},
{app2, [{"0.1", []},
{"0.2+build.33",[{app3, "0.3"}]},
{"0.3", []}]},
{app3, [{"0.1", []},
{"0.2", []},
{"0.3", []}]}]),
case rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"}]) of
{ok,[{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{0,2},{[],[<<"build">>,33]}}},
{app3,{{0,3},{[],[]}}}]} ->
ok;
E ->
erlang:throw({invalid_result, E})
end.
second_test() ->
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.1", '>='},
{app4, "0.2"},
{app3, "0.2", '>='}]},
{"0.2", []},
{"0.3", []}]},
{app2, [{"0.1", [{app3, "0.2", gte}]},
{"0.2", [{app3, "0.2", gte}]},
{"0.3", [{app3, "0.2", '>='}]}]},
{app3, [{"0.1", [{app4, "0.2", '>='}]},
{"0.2", [{app4, "0.2"}]},
{"0.3", []}]},
{app4, [{"0.1", []},
{"0.2", [{app2, "0.2", gte},
{app3, "0.3"}]},
{"0.3", []}]}]),
X = rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"},
{app2, "0.3"}]),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}},
{app4,{{0,2},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{0,3},{[],[]}}},
{app3,{{0,3},{[],[]}}}]},
X).
third_test() ->
Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "0.1.0", '>='},
{app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}],
Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}],
Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}],
Pkg4Deps = [app5],
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps},
{"0.2", Pkg1Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]},
{app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"1.0", Pkg2Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]},
{app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps},
{"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]},
{app4, [{"0.1.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"0.3.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"5.0.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"6.0.0", Pkg4Deps}]},
{app5, [{"0.1.0", []},
{"0.3.0", []},
{"2.0.0", []},
{"6.0.0", []}]}]),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}},
{app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}},
{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}]},
rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}},
{app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}},
{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}]},
rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [app1])).
fail_test() ->
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(),
[{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.2"},
{app3, "0.2", gte}]},
{"0.2", []},
{"0.3", []}]},
{app2, [{"0.1", []},
{"0.2",[{app3, "0.1"}]},
{"0.3", []}]},
{app3, [{"0.1", []},
{"0.2", []},
{"0.3", []}]}]),
Ret = rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"}]),
%% We do this to make sure all errors can be formated.
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret),
?assertMatch({error,
[{[{[{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}}],
[{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}},[[{app2,{{0,2},{[],[]}}}]]]}],
[{{app2,{{0,2},{[],[]}}},[{app3,{{0,1},{[],[]}}}]},
{{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}},[{app3,{{0,2},{[],[]}},gte}]}]}]},
Ret).
conflicting_passing_test() ->
Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "0.1.0", '>='},
{app5, "2.0.0"},
{app4, "0.3.0", "5.0.0", between},
{app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}],
Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "3.0.0", gte}],
Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}],
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps},
{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps},
{"0.2", Pkg1Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]},
{app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"1.0", Pkg2Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]},
{app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps},
{"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]},
{app4, [{"0.1.0", [{app5, "0.1.0"}]},
{"0.3.0", [{app5, "0.3.0"}]},
{"5.0.0", [{app5, "2.0.0"}]},
{"6.0.0", [{app5, "6.0.0"}]}]},
{app5, [{"0.1.0", []},
{"0.3.0", []},
{"2.0.0", []},
{"6.0.0", []}]}]),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}},
{app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}},
{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}}}]},
rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}},
{app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}},
{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}}}]},
rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [app1, app2, app5])).
circular_dependencies_test() ->
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", [app2]}]},
{app2, [{"0.0.1", [app1]}]}]),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app2,{{0,0,1},{[],[]}}},{app1,{{0,1,0},{[],[]}}}]},
rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1.0"}])).
conflicting_failing_test() ->
Pkg1Deps = [app2,
{app5, "2.0.0", '='},
{app4, "0.3.0", "5.0.0", between}],
Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}],
Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "6.0.0"}],
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]},
{app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps}]},
{app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps}]},
{app4, [{"5.0.0", [{app5, "2.0.0"}]}]},
{app5, [{"2.0.0", []},
{"6.0.0", []}]}]),
Ret = rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [app1, app3]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret),
?assertMatch({error,
[{[{[app3],
[{app3,{{0,1,0},{[],[]}}},[[{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}]]]},
{[app1],
[{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
[[{app2,{{0,0,1},{[],[]}}},[[{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}}]]],
[{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}}]]]}],
[{{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}},[{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}}}]},
{{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},[{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},'='}]}]}]},
Ret).
pessimistic_major_minor_patch_test() ->
Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "2.1.1", '~>'},
{app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}],
Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}],
Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}],
Pkg4Deps = [app5],
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps},
{"0.2", Pkg1Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]},
{app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"1.0", Pkg2Deps},
{"2.1.5", Pkg2Deps},
{"2.2", Pkg2Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]},
{app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps},
{"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]},
{app4, [{"0.1.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"0.3.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"5.0.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"6.0.0", Pkg4Deps}]},
{app5, [{"0.1.0", []},
{"0.3.0", []},
{"2.0.0", []},
{"6.0.0", []}]}]),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{2,1,5},{[],[]}}},
{app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}},
{app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}},
{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}]},
rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])).
pessimistic_major_minor_test() ->
Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "2.1", '~>'},
{app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}],
Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}],
Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}],
Pkg4Deps = [app5],
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps},
{"0.2", Pkg1Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]},
{app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"0.1", Pkg2Deps},
{"1.0", Pkg2Deps},
{"2.1.5", Pkg2Deps},
{"2.2", Pkg2Deps},
{"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]},
{app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps},
{"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps},
{"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]},
{app4, [{"0.1.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"0.3.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"5.0.0", Pkg4Deps},
{"6.0.0", Pkg4Deps}]},
{app5, [{"0.1.0", []},
{"0.3.0", []},
{"2.0.0", []},
{"6.0.0", []}]}]),
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},
{app2,{{2,2},{[],[]}}},
{app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}},
{app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}},
{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}]},
rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])).
filter_versions_test() ->
Cons = [{app2, "2.1", '~>'},
{app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between},
{app4, "5.0.0", gte},
{app5, "2.0.0", '>='},
app5],
Packages = [{app1, "0.1.0"},
{app1, "0.2"},
{app1, "0.2"},
{app1, "3.0"},
{app2, "0.0.1"},
{app2, "0.1"},
{app2, "1.0"},
{app2, "2.1.5"},
{app2, "2.2"},
{app2, "3.0"},
{app3, "0.1.0"},
{app3, "0.1.3"},
{app3, "2.0.0"},
{app3, "3.0.0"},
{app3, "4.0.0"},
{app4, "0.1.0"},
{app4, "0.3.0"},
{app4, "5.0.0"},
{app4, "6.0.0"},
{app5, "0.1.0"},
{app5, "0.3.0"},
{app5, "2.0.0"},
{app5, "6.0.0"}],
?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,"0.1.0"},
{app1,"0.2"},
{app1,"0.2"},
{app1,"3.0"},
{app2,"2.1.5"},
{app2,"2.2"},
{app3,"0.1.3"},
{app4,"5.0.0"},
{app4,"6.0.0"},
{app5,"2.0.0"},
{app5,"6.0.0"}]},
rlx_depsolver:filter_packages(Packages, Cons)),
Ret = rlx_depsolver:filter_packages(Packages,
[{"foo", "1.0.0", '~~~~'} | Cons]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret),
?assertMatch({error, {invalid_constraints, [{<<"foo">>,{{1,0,0},{[],[]}},'~~~~'}]}}, Ret).
-spec missing_test() -> ok.
missing_test() ->
Dom0 = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.2"},
{app3, "0.2", '>='},
{app4, "0.2", '='}]},
{"0.2", [{app4, "0.2"}]},
{"0.3", [{app4, "0.2", '='}]}]},
{app2, [{"0.1", []},
{"0.2",[{app3, "0.3"}]},
{"0.3", []}]},
{app3, [{"0.1", []},
{"0.2", []},
{"0.3", []}]}]),
Ret1 = rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app4, "0.1"}, {app3, "0.1"}]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret1),
?assertMatch({error,{unreachable_package,app4}}, Ret1),
Ret2 = rlx_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"}]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret2),
?assertMatch({error,{unreachable_package,app4}},
Ret2).
binary_test() ->
World = [{<<"foo">>, [{<<"1.2.3">>, [{<<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]},
{<<"bar">>, [{<<"2.0.0">>, [{<<"foo">>, <<"3.0.0">>, gt}]}]}],
Ret = rlx_depsolver:solve(rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(),
World),
[<<"foo">>]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret),
?assertMatch({error,
[{[{[<<"foo">>],[{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}]}],
[{{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}},
[{<<"bar">>,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},gt}]}]}]}, Ret).
%%
%% We don't have bar cookbook
%%
%% Ruby gives
%% "message":"Unable to satisfy constraints on cookbook bar, which does not
%% exist, due to run list item (foo >= 0.0.0). Run list items that may result
%% in a constraint on bar: [(foo = 1.2.3) -> (bar > 2.0.0)]",
%% "unsatisfiable_run_list_item":"(foo >= 0.0.0)",
%% "non_existent_cookbooks":["bar"],"
%% "most_constrained_cookbooks":[]}"
%%
doesnt_exist_test() ->
Constraints = [{<<"foo">>,[{<<"1.2.3">>, [{<<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]}],
World = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), Constraints),
Ret = rlx_depsolver:solve(World, [<<"foo">>]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret),
?assertMatch({error,{unreachable_package,<<"bar">>}}, Ret).
%%
%% We have v 2.0.0 of bar but want > 2.0.0
%%
%% Ruby gives
%% "message":"Unable to satisfy constraints on cookbook bar due to run list item
%% (foo >= 0.0.0). Run list items that may result in a constraint on bar: [(foo
%% = 1.2.3) -> (bar > 2.0.0)]",
%% "unsatisfiable_run_list_item":"(foo >= 0.0.0)",
%% "non_existent_cookbooks":[],
%% "most_constrained_cookbooks":["bar 2.0.0 -> []"]
%%
not_new_enough_test() ->
Constraints = [{<<"foo">>, [{<<"1.2.3">>, [{<<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]},
{<<"bar">>, [{<<"2.0.0">>, []}]}],
World = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(), Constraints),
Ret = rlx_depsolver:solve(World, [<<"foo">>]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret),
?assertMatch({error,
[{[{[<<"foo">>],[{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}]}],
[{{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}},
[{<<"bar">>,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},gt}]}]}]}, Ret).
%%
%% circular deps are bad
%%
%% Ruby gives
%% "message":"Unable to satisfy constraints on cookbook bar due to run list item (foo >= 0.0.0).
%% Run list items that may result in a constraint on bar: [(foo = 1.2.3) -> (bar > 2.0.0)]",
%% "unsatisfiable_run_list_item":"(foo >= 0.0.0)",
%% "non_existent_cookbooks":[],
%% "most_constrained_cookbooks:["bar = 2.0.0 -> [(foo > 3.0.0)]"]
%%
impossible_dependency_test() ->
World = rlx_depsolver:add_packages(rlx_depsolver:new_graph(),
[{<<"foo">>, [{<<"1.2.3">>,[{ <<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]},
{<<"bar">>, [{<<"2.0.0">>, [{ <<"foo">>, <<"3.0.0">>, gt}]}]}]),
Ret = rlx_depsolver:solve(World, [<<"foo">>]),
_ = rlx_depsolver:format_error(Ret),
?assertMatch({error,
[{[{[<<"foo">>],[{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}]}],
[{{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}},
[{<<"bar">>,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},gt}]}]}]}, Ret).
%%
%% Formatting tests
%%
format_test_() ->
[{"format constraint",
[equal_bin_string(<<"foo">>, rlx_depsolver:format_constraint(<<"foo">>)),
equal_bin_string(<<"foo">>, rlx_depsolver:format_constraint(foo)),
equal_bin_string(<<"(foo = 1.2.0)">>, rlx_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}})),
equal_bin_string(<<"(foo = 1.2.0)">>, rlx_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}, '='})),
equal_bin_string(<<"(foo > 1.2.0)">>,
rlx_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}, '>'})),
equal_bin_string(<<"(foo > 1.2.0)">>,
rlx_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}, gt})),
equal_bin_string(<<"(foo between 1.2.0 and 1.3.0)">>,
rlx_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>,{{1,2,0}, {[], []}},
{{1,3,0}, {[], []}}, between})),
equal_bin_string(<<"(foo > 1.2.0-alpha.1+build.36)">>,
rlx_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>,
{{1,2,0}, {["alpha", 1], ["build", 36]}}, gt}))
]
},
{"format roots",
[equal_bin_string(<<"(bar = 1.2.0)">>,
rlx_depsolver:format_roots([ [{<<"bar">>, {{1,2,0},{[],[]}}}] ])),
equal_bin_string(<<"(bar = 1.2.0), foo">>,
rlx_depsolver:format_roots([[<<"foo">>,
{<<"bar">>, {{1,2,0},{[],[]}}}]])),
equal_bin_string(<<"(bar = 1.2.0), foo">>,
rlx_depsolver:format_roots([[<<"foo">>], [{<<"bar">>, {{1,2,0},{[],[]}}}]]))
]
}
].
%%
%% Internal functions
%%
equal_bin_string(Expected, Got) ->
?_assertEqual(Expected, erlang:iolist_to_binary(Got)).