diff options
author | Eric <[email protected]> | 2013-05-09 17:04:18 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric <[email protected]> | 2013-05-09 17:04:18 -0700 |
commit | efbdfbe117939cd50d0252a210b9b7634de42bb4 (patch) | |
tree | 74b0bad39d3a5b25bd4199728c16c0b1a4ade703 /test/rlx_depsolver_tests.erl | |
parent | 0d5a803a28010cc956948b614408b9d38997e9a1 (diff) | |
download | relx-efbdfbe117939cd50d0252a210b9b7634de42bb4.tar.gz relx-efbdfbe117939cd50d0252a210b9b7634de42bb4.tar.bz2 relx-efbdfbe117939cd50d0252a210b9b7634de42bb4.zip |
Basic file rename from rcl to rlx
Diffstat (limited to 'test/rlx_depsolver_tests.erl')
-rw-r--r-- | test/rlx_depsolver_tests.erl | 495 |
1 files changed, 495 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/rlx_depsolver_tests.erl b/test/rlx_depsolver_tests.erl new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eae31a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/rlx_depsolver_tests.erl @@ -0,0 +1,495 @@ +%% -*- erlang-indent-level: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; fill-column: 80 -*- +%% ex: ts=4 sx=4 et +%% +%%------------------------------------------------------------------- +%% Copyright 2012 Opscode, Inc. All Rights Reserved. +%% +%% This file is provided to you under the Apache License, +%% Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file +%% except in compliance with the License. You may obtain +%% a copy of the License at +%% +%% http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +%% +%% Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +%% software distributed under the License is distributed on an +%% "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +%% KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +%% specific language governing permissions and limitations +%% under the License. +%% +%% @author Eric Merritt <[email protected]> +%%------------------------------------------------------------------- +-module(rcl_depsolver_tests). + +-include_lib("eunit/include/eunit.hrl"). + +%%============================================================================ +%% Tests +%%============================================================================ + +first_test() -> + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.2+build.33"}, + {app3, "0.2", '>='}]}, + {"0.2", []}, + {"0.3", []}]}, + {app2, [{"0.1", []}, + {"0.2+build.33",[{app3, "0.3"}]}, + {"0.3", []}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1", []}, + {"0.2", []}, + {"0.3", []}]}]), + + + case rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"}]) of + {ok,[{app3,{{0,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{0,2},{[],[<<"build">>,33]}}}, + {app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}}]} -> + ok; + E -> + erlang:throw({invalid_result, E}) + end. + +second_test() -> + + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.1", '>='}, + {app4, "0.2"}, + {app3, "0.2", '>='}]}, + {"0.2", []}, + {"0.3", []}]}, + {app2, [{"0.1", [{app3, "0.2", gte}]}, + {"0.2", [{app3, "0.2", gte}]}, + {"0.3", [{app3, "0.2", '>='}]}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1", [{app4, "0.2", '>='}]}, + {"0.2", [{app4, "0.2"}]}, + {"0.3", []}]}, + {app4, [{"0.1", []}, + {"0.2", [{app2, "0.2", gte}, + {app3, "0.3"}]}, + {"0.3", []}]}]), + + X = rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"}, + {app2, "0.3"}]), + + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app3,{{0,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{0,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app4,{{0,2},{[],[]}}}, + {app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}}]}, + X). + +third_test() -> + + Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "0.1.0", '>='}, + {app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}], + + Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}], + Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}], + Pkg4Deps = [app5], + + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps}, + {"0.2", Pkg1Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]}, + {app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"1.0", Pkg2Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps}, + {"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]}, + {app4, [{"0.1.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"0.3.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"5.0.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"6.0.0", Pkg4Deps}]}, + {app5, [{"0.1.0", []}, + {"0.3.0", []}, + {"2.0.0", []}, + {"6.0.0", []}]}]), + + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}]}, + rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])), + + + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}]}, + rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [app1])). + +fail_test() -> + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), + [{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.2"}, + {app3, "0.2", gte}]}, + {"0.2", []}, + {"0.3", []}]}, + {app2, [{"0.1", []}, + {"0.2",[{app3, "0.1"}]}, + {"0.3", []}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1", []}, + {"0.2", []}, + {"0.3", []}]}]), + + Ret = rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"}]), + %% We do this to make sure all errors can be formated. + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret), + ?assertMatch({error, + [{[{[{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}}], + [{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}},[[{app2,{{0,2},{[],[]}}}]]]}], + [{{app2,{{0,2},{[],[]}}},[{app3,{{0,1},{[],[]}}}]}, + {{app1,{{0,1},{[],[]}}},[{app3,{{0,2},{[],[]}},gte}]}]}]}, + Ret). + +conflicting_passing_test() -> + Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "0.1.0", '>='}, + {app5, "2.0.0"}, + {app4, "0.3.0", "5.0.0", between}, + {app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}], + + Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "3.0.0", gte}], + Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}], + + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps}, + {"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps}, + {"0.2", Pkg1Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]}, + {app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"1.0", Pkg2Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps}, + {"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]}, + {app4, [{"0.1.0", [{app5, "0.1.0"}]}, + {"0.3.0", [{app5, "0.3.0"}]}, + {"5.0.0", [{app5, "2.0.0"}]}, + {"6.0.0", [{app5, "6.0.0"}]}]}, + {app5, [{"0.1.0", []}, + {"0.3.0", []}, + {"2.0.0", []}, + {"6.0.0", []}]}]), + + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}]}, + rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])), + + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}]}, + rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [app1, app2, app5])). + + + +circular_dependencies_test() -> + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", [app2]}]}, + {app2, [{"0.0.1", [app1]}]}]), + + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,{{0,1,0},{[],[]}}},{app2,{{0,0,1},{[],[]}}}]}, + rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1.0"}])). + +conflicting_failing_test() -> + Pkg1Deps = [app2, + {app5, "2.0.0", '='}, + {app4, "0.3.0", "5.0.0", between}], + + Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}], + Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "6.0.0"}], + + + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]}, + {app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps}]}, + {app4, [{"5.0.0", [{app5, "2.0.0"}]}]}, + {app5, [{"2.0.0", []}, + {"6.0.0", []}]}]), + Ret = rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [app1, app3]), + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret), + ?assertMatch({error, + [{[{[app1], + [{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}, + [[{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}}], + [{app2,{{0,0,1},{[],[]}}},[[{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}}]]]]]}, + {[app3], + [{app3,{{0,1,0},{[],[]}}},[[{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}]]]}], + [{{app4,{{5,0,0},{[],[]}}},[{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}}}]}, + {{app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}},[{app5,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},'='}]}]}]}, + Ret). + + +pessimistic_major_minor_patch_test() -> + + Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "2.1.1", '~>'}, + {app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}], + + Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}], + Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}], + Pkg4Deps = [app5], + + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps}, + {"0.2", Pkg1Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]}, + {app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"1.0", Pkg2Deps}, + {"2.1.5", Pkg2Deps}, + {"2.2", Pkg2Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps}, + {"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]}, + {app4, [{"0.1.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"0.3.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"5.0.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"6.0.0", Pkg4Deps}]}, + {app5, [{"0.1.0", []}, + {"0.3.0", []}, + {"2.0.0", []}, + {"6.0.0", []}]}]), + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{2,1,5},{[],[]}}}, + {app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}]}, + rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])). + +pessimistic_major_minor_test() -> + + Pkg1Deps = [{app2, "2.1", '~>'}, + {app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}], + + Pkg2Deps = [{app4, "5.0.0", gte}], + Pkg3Deps = [{app5, "2.0.0", '>='}], + Pkg4Deps = [app5], + + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1.0", Pkg1Deps}, + {"0.2", Pkg1Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg1Deps}]}, + {app2, [{"0.0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"0.1", Pkg2Deps}, + {"1.0", Pkg2Deps}, + {"2.1.5", Pkg2Deps}, + {"2.2", Pkg2Deps}, + {"3.0", Pkg2Deps}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"0.1.3", Pkg3Deps}, + {"2.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"3.0.0", Pkg3Deps}, + {"4.0.0", Pkg3Deps}]}, + {app4, [{"0.1.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"0.3.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"5.0.0", Pkg4Deps}, + {"6.0.0", Pkg4Deps}]}, + {app5, [{"0.1.0", []}, + {"0.3.0", []}, + {"2.0.0", []}, + {"6.0.0", []}]}]), + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app5,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app3,{{0,1,3},{[],[]}}}, + {app4,{{6,0,0},{[],[]}}}, + {app2,{{2,2},{[],[]}}}, + {app1,{{3,0},{[],[]}}}]}, + rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "3.0"}])). + +filter_versions_test() -> + + Cons = [{app2, "2.1", '~>'}, + {app3, "0.1.1", "0.1.5", between}, + {app4, "5.0.0", gte}, + {app5, "2.0.0", '>='}, + app5], + + Packages = [{app1, "0.1.0"}, + {app1, "0.2"}, + {app1, "0.2"}, + {app1, "3.0"}, + {app2, "0.0.1"}, + {app2, "0.1"}, + {app2, "1.0"}, + {app2, "2.1.5"}, + {app2, "2.2"}, + {app2, "3.0"}, + {app3, "0.1.0"}, + {app3, "0.1.3"}, + {app3, "2.0.0"}, + {app3, "3.0.0"}, + {app3, "4.0.0"}, + {app4, "0.1.0"}, + {app4, "0.3.0"}, + {app4, "5.0.0"}, + {app4, "6.0.0"}, + {app5, "0.1.0"}, + {app5, "0.3.0"}, + {app5, "2.0.0"}, + {app5, "6.0.0"}], + + ?assertMatch({ok, [{app1,"0.1.0"}, + {app1,"0.2"}, + {app1,"0.2"}, + {app1,"3.0"}, + {app2,"2.1.5"}, + {app2,"2.2"}, + {app3,"0.1.3"}, + {app4,"5.0.0"}, + {app4,"6.0.0"}, + {app5,"2.0.0"}, + {app5,"6.0.0"}]}, + rcl_depsolver:filter_packages(Packages, Cons)), + + Ret = rcl_depsolver:filter_packages(Packages, + [{"foo", "1.0.0", '~~~~'} | Cons]), + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret), + ?assertMatch({error, {invalid_constraints, [{<<"foo">>,{{1,0,0},{[],[]}},'~~~~'}]}}, Ret). + + +-spec missing_test() -> ok. +missing_test() -> + + Dom0 = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), [{app1, [{"0.1", [{app2, "0.2"}, + {app3, "0.2", '>='}, + {app4, "0.2", '='}]}, + {"0.2", [{app4, "0.2"}]}, + {"0.3", [{app4, "0.2", '='}]}]}, + {app2, [{"0.1", []}, + {"0.2",[{app3, "0.3"}]}, + {"0.3", []}]}, + {app3, [{"0.1", []}, + {"0.2", []}, + {"0.3", []}]}]), + Ret1 = rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app4, "0.1"}, {app3, "0.1"}]), + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret1), + ?assertMatch({error,{unreachable_package,app4}}, Ret1), + + Ret2 = rcl_depsolver:solve(Dom0, [{app1, "0.1"}]), + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret2), + ?assertMatch({error,{unreachable_package,app4}}, + Ret2). + + +binary_test() -> + + World = [{<<"foo">>, [{<<"1.2.3">>, [{<<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]}, + {<<"bar">>, [{<<"2.0.0">>, [{<<"foo">>, <<"3.0.0">>, gt}]}]}], + Ret = rcl_depsolver:solve(rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), + World), + [<<"foo">>]), + + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret), + ?assertMatch({error, + [{[{[<<"foo">>],[{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}]}], + [{{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}, + [{<<"bar">>,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},gt}]}]}]}, Ret). + +%% +%% We don't have bar cookbook +%% +%% Ruby gives +%% "message":"Unable to satisfy constraints on cookbook bar, which does not +%% exist, due to run list item (foo >= 0.0.0). Run list items that may result +%% in a constraint on bar: [(foo = 1.2.3) -> (bar > 2.0.0)]", +%% "unsatisfiable_run_list_item":"(foo >= 0.0.0)", +%% "non_existent_cookbooks":["bar"]," +%% "most_constrained_cookbooks":[]}" +%% +doesnt_exist_test() -> + Constraints = [{<<"foo">>,[{<<"1.2.3">>, [{<<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]}], + World = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), Constraints), + Ret = rcl_depsolver:solve(World, [<<"foo">>]), + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret), + ?assertMatch({error,{unreachable_package,<<"bar">>}}, Ret). + +%% +%% We have v 2.0.0 of bar but want > 2.0.0 +%% +%% Ruby gives +%% "message":"Unable to satisfy constraints on cookbook bar due to run list item +%% (foo >= 0.0.0). Run list items that may result in a constraint on bar: [(foo +%% = 1.2.3) -> (bar > 2.0.0)]", +%% "unsatisfiable_run_list_item":"(foo >= 0.0.0)", +%% "non_existent_cookbooks":[], +%% "most_constrained_cookbooks":["bar 2.0.0 -> []"] +%% +not_new_enough_test() -> + + Constraints = [{<<"foo">>, [{<<"1.2.3">>, [{<<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]}, + {<<"bar">>, [{<<"2.0.0">>, []}]}], + World = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), Constraints), + Ret = rcl_depsolver:solve(World, [<<"foo">>]), + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret), + ?assertMatch({error, + [{[{[<<"foo">>],[{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}]}], + [{{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}, + [{<<"bar">>,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},gt}]}]}]}, Ret). + +%% +%% circular deps are bad +%% +%% Ruby gives +%% "message":"Unable to satisfy constraints on cookbook bar due to run list item (foo >= 0.0.0). +%% Run list items that may result in a constraint on bar: [(foo = 1.2.3) -> (bar > 2.0.0)]", +%% "unsatisfiable_run_list_item":"(foo >= 0.0.0)", +%% "non_existent_cookbooks":[], +%% "most_constrained_cookbooks:["bar = 2.0.0 -> [(foo > 3.0.0)]"] +%% +impossible_dependency_test() -> + World = rcl_depsolver:add_packages(rcl_depsolver:new_graph(), + [{<<"foo">>, [{<<"1.2.3">>,[{ <<"bar">>, <<"2.0.0">>, gt}]}]}, + {<<"bar">>, [{<<"2.0.0">>, [{ <<"foo">>, <<"3.0.0">>, gt}]}]}]), + Ret = rcl_depsolver:solve(World, [<<"foo">>]), + _ = rcl_depsolver:format_error(Ret), + ?assertMatch({error, + [{[{[<<"foo">>],[{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}]}], + [{{<<"foo">>,{{1,2,3},{[],[]}}}, + [{<<"bar">>,{{2,0,0},{[],[]}},gt}]}]}]}, Ret). + +%% +%% Formatting tests +%% +format_test_() -> + [{"format constraint", + [equal_bin_string(<<"foo">>, rcl_depsolver:format_constraint(<<"foo">>)), + equal_bin_string(<<"foo">>, rcl_depsolver:format_constraint(foo)), + equal_bin_string(<<"(foo = 1.2.0)">>, rcl_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}})), + equal_bin_string(<<"(foo = 1.2.0)">>, rcl_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}, '='})), + equal_bin_string(<<"(foo > 1.2.0)">>, + rcl_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}, '>'})), + equal_bin_string(<<"(foo > 1.2.0)">>, + rcl_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, {{1,2,0}, {[], []}}, gt})), + equal_bin_string(<<"(foo between 1.2.0 and 1.3.0)">>, + rcl_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>,{{1,2,0}, {[], []}}, + {{1,3,0}, {[], []}}, between})), + equal_bin_string(<<"(foo > 1.2.0-alpha.1+build.36)">>, + rcl_depsolver:format_constraint({<<"foo">>, + {{1,2,0}, {["alpha", 1], ["build", 36]}}, gt})) + ] + }, + {"format roots", + [equal_bin_string(<<"(bar = 1.2.0)">>, + rcl_depsolver:format_roots([ [{<<"bar">>, {{1,2,0},{[],[]}}}] ])), + equal_bin_string(<<"(bar = 1.2.0), foo">>, + rcl_depsolver:format_roots([[<<"foo">>, + {<<"bar">>, {{1,2,0},{[],[]}}}]])), + equal_bin_string(<<"(bar = 1.2.0), foo">>, + rcl_depsolver:format_roots([[<<"foo">>], [{<<"bar">>, {{1,2,0},{[],[]}}}]])) + ] + } + ]. + +%% +%% Internal functions +%% +equal_bin_string(Expected, Got) -> + ?_assertEqual(Expected, erlang:iolist_to_binary(Got)). |