blob: ee3ce9bab04bfd6d2a1fe7987446387c8fd38153 (
plain) (
tree)
|
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [99s-extend] Distributed model?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:extend%40lists.ninenines.eu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5B99s-extend%5D%20Distributed%20model%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CADCAD0B2-A081-44CA-82F5-B544F355956F%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<style type="text/css">
pre {
white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */
}
</style>
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000097.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000099.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[99s-extend] Distributed model?</H1>
<B>Lee Sylvester</B>
<A HREF="mailto:extend%40lists.ninenines.eu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5B99s-extend%5D%20Distributed%20model%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CADCAD0B2-A081-44CA-82F5-B544F355956F%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[99s-extend] Distributed model?">lee.sylvester at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Apr 11 07:51:12 CEST 2013</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000097.html">[99s-extend] cowboy and chromium
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000099.html">[99s-extend] Distributed model?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#98">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#98">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#98">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#98">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hi guys,
So, I have my Cowboy / Bullet server working nicely, now, with much thanks to members on this list. I'm now looking at the best means of clustering this app. I want to set this up so that, should the connection count get very high (which it will), then I should only have to throw more machines at this problem and it'll all go away.
I've got most of the logic working for this, but what I'm worried about is sending a lot of content over the erlang inter-node connection. I've heard hogging this line can be both a bottleneck and can potentially interrupt the heartbeat between nodes. With this in mind, should I look at adding a ZMQ layer or some such to facilitate this? What is the general solution to high traffic between nodes?
Thanks,
Lee
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000097.html">[99s-extend] cowboy and chromium
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000099.html">[99s-extend] Distributed model?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#98">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#98">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#98">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#98">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend">More information about the Extend
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
