From samset at wanadoo.fr Mon Aug 4 18:39:26 2014
From: samset at wanadoo.fr (Samir Sow)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:39:26 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi,
I?ve moved a working http server to https.
SSL handshaking is ok but i got the following Ranch error :
[error] Ranch listener https_mta had connection process started with cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.601.0> exit with reason: {badarg,[{binary,match,[[<<"com">>,<<"oockit">>,<<"www">>],<<".">>],[]},{cowboy_router,split_host,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,305}]},{cowboy_router,match,3,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,240}]},{cowboy_router,execute,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,169}]},{cowboy_protocol,execute,4,[{file,"src/cowboy_protocol.erl"},{line,435}]}]}
call is
curl --cacert priv/cert/root.crt "https://www.oockit.com:7171/mtagw?
dispatch is
[{'_', [
{["/static/[...]"], cowboy_static, [{directory, {priv_dir, ?APP, [<<"static">>]}},
{mimetypes, {fun mimetypes:path_to_mimes/2, default}}]},
{"/mtagw", hck_mta, []}
]}]).
Any clue ?
Thanks
sincerely
Samir
From essen at ninenines.eu Mon Aug 4 18:49:32 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:49:32 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Surely there's something else that you're not showing there. For some
reason you got a list of segments in the error, and we haven't had that
for a very long time. Do you have an onrequest hook or middleware that
does weird things perhaps?
On 08/04/2014 06:39 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I?ve moved a working http server to https.
> SSL handshaking is ok but i got the following Ranch error :
>
> [error] Ranch listener https_mta had connection process started with cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.601.0> exit with reason: {badarg,[{binary,match,[[<<"com">>,<<"oockit">>,<<"www">>],<<".">>],[]},{cowboy_router,split_host,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,305}]},{cowboy_router,match,3,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,240}]},{cowboy_router,execute,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,169}]},{cowboy_protocol,execute,4,[{file,"src/cowboy_protocol.erl"},{line,435}]}]}
>
> call is
>
> curl --cacert priv/cert/root.crt "https://www.oockit.com:7171/mtagw?
>
>
> dispatch is
>
> [{'_', [
> {["/static/[...]"], cowboy_static, [{directory, {priv_dir, ?APP, [<<"static">>]}},
> {mimetypes, {fun mimetypes:path_to_mimes/2, default}}]},
> {"/mtagw", hck_mta, []}
> ]}]).
>
>
> Any clue ?
>
> Thanks
>
> sincerely
>
> Samir
>
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From samset at wanadoo.fr Mon Aug 4 19:50:36 2014
From: samset at wanadoo.fr (Samir Sow)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 19:50:36 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
I?m not sure i understand your question.
I?ve only started a cowboy https server with a handler.
The http version was working fine.
Sincerely
Samir
On 4 ao?t 2014, at 18:49, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
> Surely there's something else that you're not showing there. For some reason you got a list of segments in the error, and we haven't had that for a very long time. Do you have an onrequest hook or middleware that does weird things perhaps?
>
> On 08/04/2014 06:39 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I?ve moved a working http server to https.
>> SSL handshaking is ok but i got the following Ranch error :
>>
>> [error] Ranch listener https_mta had connection process started with cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.601.0> exit with reason: {badarg,[{binary,match,[[<<"com">>,<<"oockit">>,<<"www">>],<<".">>],[]},{cowboy_router,split_host,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,305}]},{cowboy_router,match,3,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,240}]},{cowboy_router,execute,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,169}]},{cowboy_protocol,execute,4,[{file,"src/cowboy_protocol.erl"},{line,435}]}]}
>>
>> call is
>>
>> curl --cacert priv/cert/root.crt "https://www.oockit.com:7171/mtagw?
>>
>>
>> dispatch is
>>
>> [{'_', [
>> {["/static/[...]"], cowboy_static, [{directory, {priv_dir, ?APP, [<<"static">>]}},
>> {mimetypes, {fun mimetypes:path_to_mimes/2, default}}]},
>> {"/mtagw", hck_mta, []}
>> ]}]).
>>
>>
>> Any clue ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> sincerely
>>
>> Samir
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extend mailing list
>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>
>
> --
> Lo?c Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
From essen at ninenines.eu Mon Aug 4 19:59:57 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:59:57 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
I'm saying it can't be the only difference.
On 08/04/2014 07:50 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
> I?m not sure i understand your question.
>
> I?ve only started a cowboy https server with a handler.
> The http version was working fine.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Samir
>
> On 4 ao?t 2014, at 18:49, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
>
>> Surely there's something else that you're not showing there. For some reason you got a list of segments in the error, and we haven't had that for a very long time. Do you have an onrequest hook or middleware that does weird things perhaps?
>>
>> On 08/04/2014 06:39 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I?ve moved a working http server to https.
>>> SSL handshaking is ok but i got the following Ranch error :
>>>
>>> [error] Ranch listener https_mta had connection process started with cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.601.0> exit with reason: {badarg,[{binary,match,[[<<"com">>,<<"oockit">>,<<"www">>],<<".">>],[]},{cowboy_router,split_host,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,305}]},{cowboy_router,match,3,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,240}]},{cowboy_router,execute,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,169}]},{cowboy_protocol,execute,4,[{file,"src/cowboy_protocol.erl"},{line,435}]}]}
>>>
>>> call is
>>>
>>> curl --cacert priv/cert/root.crt "https://www.oockit.com:7171/mtagw?
>>>
>>>
>>> dispatch is
>>>
>>> [{'_', [
>>> {["/static/[...]"], cowboy_static, [{directory, {priv_dir, ?APP, [<<"static">>]}},
>>> {mimetypes, {fun mimetypes:path_to_mimes/2, default}}]},
>>> {"/mtagw", hck_mta, []}
>>> ]}]).
>>>
>>>
>>> Any clue ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> sincerely
>>>
>>> Samir
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Extend mailing list
>>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Lo?c Hoguin
>> http://ninenines.eu
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From samset at wanadoo.fr Mon Aug 4 20:16:06 2014
From: samset at wanadoo.fr (Samir Sow)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:16:06 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
I can assure you it?s the only one :)
Samir
On 4 ao?t 2014, at 19:59, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
> I'm saying it can't be the only difference.
>
> On 08/04/2014 07:50 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>> I?m not sure i understand your question.
>>
>> I?ve only started a cowboy https server with a handler.
>> The http version was working fine.
>>
>> Sincerely
>>
>> Samir
>>
>> On 4 ao?t 2014, at 18:49, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
>>
>>> Surely there's something else that you're not showing there. For some reason you got a list of segments in the error, and we haven't had that for a very long time. Do you have an onrequest hook or middleware that does weird things perhaps?
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2014 06:39 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I?ve moved a working http server to https.
>>>> SSL handshaking is ok but i got the following Ranch error :
>>>>
>>>> [error] Ranch listener https_mta had connection process started with cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.601.0> exit with reason: {badarg,[{binary,match,[[<<"com">>,<<"oockit">>,<<"www">>],<<".">>],[]},{cowboy_router,split_host,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,305}]},{cowboy_router,match,3,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,240}]},{cowboy_router,execute,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,169}]},{cowboy_protocol,execute,4,[{file,"src/cowboy_protocol.erl"},{line,435}]}]}
>>>>
>>>> call is
>>>>
>>>> curl --cacert priv/cert/root.crt "https://www.oockit.com:7171/mtagw?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> dispatch is
>>>>
>>>> [{'_', [
>>>> {["/static/[...]"], cowboy_static, [{directory, {priv_dir, ?APP, [<<"static">>]}},
>>>> {mimetypes, {fun mimetypes:path_to_mimes/2, default}}]},
>>>> {"/mtagw", hck_mta, []}
>>>> ]}]).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any clue ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> sincerely
>>>>
>>>> Samir
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Extend mailing list
>>>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>>>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lo?c Hoguin
>>> http://ninenines.eu
>>
>
> --
> Lo?c Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
From essen at ninenines.eu Mon Aug 4 20:24:15 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 20:24:15 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Well I don't have any idea then. Cowboy is tested with http and https,
both with and without compression enabled. There's never been any
difference of the kind, the only difference is timing related.
On 08/04/2014 08:16 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
> I can assure you it?s the only one :)
>
> Samir
>
> On 4 ao?t 2014, at 19:59, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
>
>> I'm saying it can't be the only difference.
>>
>> On 08/04/2014 07:50 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>>> I?m not sure i understand your question.
>>>
>>> I?ve only started a cowboy https server with a handler.
>>> The http version was working fine.
>>>
>>> Sincerely
>>>
>>> Samir
>>>
>>> On 4 ao?t 2014, at 18:49, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Surely there's something else that you're not showing there. For some reason you got a list of segments in the error, and we haven't had that for a very long time. Do you have an onrequest hook or middleware that does weird things perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> On 08/04/2014 06:39 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I?ve moved a working http server to https.
>>>>> SSL handshaking is ok but i got the following Ranch error :
>>>>>
>>>>> [error] Ranch listener https_mta had connection process started with cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.601.0> exit with reason: {badarg,[{binary,match,[[<<"com">>,<<"oockit">>,<<"www">>],<<".">>],[]},{cowboy_router,split_host,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,305}]},{cowboy_router,match,3,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,240}]},{cowboy_router,execute,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,169}]},{cowboy_protocol,execute,4,[{file,"src/cowboy_protocol.erl"},{line,435}]}]}
>>>>>
>>>>> call is
>>>>>
>>>>> curl --cacert priv/cert/root.crt "https://www.oockit.com:7171/mtagw?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> dispatch is
>>>>>
>>>>> [{'_', [
>>>>> {["/static/[...]"], cowboy_static, [{directory, {priv_dir, ?APP, [<<"static">>]}},
>>>>> {mimetypes, {fun mimetypes:path_to_mimes/2, default}}]},
>>>>> {"/mtagw", hck_mta, []}
>>>>> ]}]).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any clue ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> sincerely
>>>>>
>>>>> Samir
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Extend mailing list
>>>>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>>>>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lo?c Hoguin
>>>> http://ninenines.eu
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Lo?c Hoguin
>> http://ninenines.eu
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From samset at wanadoo.fr Mon Aug 4 20:25:25 2014
From: samset at wanadoo.fr (Samir Sow)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:25:25 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] Fwd: ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
I found my mistake.
I?ve a typo error - used a token instead of a function call in the dispatch object.
I apologize for the disturbance.
Thank you.
Sincerely
Samir
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Samir Sow <samset at wanadoo.fr>
> Subject: Re: [99s-extend] ranch dispatch error ver 1.0.0
> Date: 4 ao?t 2014 20:16:06 UTC+2
> To: Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu>
> Cc: extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>
> I can assure you it?s the only one :)
>
> Samir
>
> On 4 ao?t 2014, at 19:59, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
>
>> I'm saying it can't be the only difference.
>>
>> On 08/04/2014 07:50 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>>> I?m not sure i understand your question.
>>>
>>> I?ve only started a cowboy https server with a handler.
>>> The http version was working fine.
>>>
>>> Sincerely
>>>
>>> Samir
>>>
>>> On 4 ao?t 2014, at 18:49, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Surely there's something else that you're not showing there. For some reason you got a list of segments in the error, and we haven't had that for a very long time. Do you have an onrequest hook or middleware that does weird things perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> On 08/04/2014 06:39 PM, Samir Sow wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I?ve moved a working http server to https.
>>>>> SSL handshaking is ok but i got the following Ranch error :
>>>>>
>>>>> [error] Ranch listener https_mta had connection process started with cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.601.0> exit with reason: {badarg,[{binary,match,[[<<"com">>,<<"oockit">>,<<"www">>],<<".">>],[]},{cowboy_router,split_host,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,305}]},{cowboy_router,match,3,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,240}]},{cowboy_router,execute,2,[{file,"src/cowboy_router.erl"},{line,169}]},{cowboy_protocol,execute,4,[{file,"src/cowboy_protocol.erl"},{line,435}]}]}
>>>>>
>>>>> call is
>>>>>
>>>>> curl --cacert priv/cert/root.crt "https://www.oockit.com:7171/mtagw?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> dispatch is
>>>>>
>>>>> [{'_', [
>>>>> {["/static/[...]"], cowboy_static, [{directory, {priv_dir, ?APP, [<<"static">>]}},
>>>>> {mimetypes, {fun mimetypes:path_to_mimes/2, default}}]},
>>>>> {"/mtagw", hck_mta, []}
>>>>> ]}]).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any clue ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> sincerely
>>>>>
>>>>> Samir
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Extend mailing list
>>>>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>>>>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lo?c Hoguin
>>>> http://ninenines.eu
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Lo?c Hoguin
>> http://ninenines.eu
>
From paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com Tue Aug 5 12:58:10 2014
From: paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com (Paulo F. Oliveira)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:58:10 +0100
Subject: [99s-extend] Broken links for REST flowcharts
Message-ID: <CA+dV7cSRzu0Mnz-JqzBnp2JqjVB=Cx5XswuBU-7BT7nZi9=1tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi.
The image links are broken for the REST flowcharts' guide, part of cowboy.
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/rest_flowcharts/rest_start.png
(for example)
should probably be
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/rest_start.png
according to the hierarchy here:
https://github.com/ninenines/ninenines.github.io/tree/master/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide
Thanks.
- Paulo F. Oliveira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140805/2c08b12c/attachment.html>
From essen at ninenines.eu Tue Aug 5 13:19:12 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:19:12 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] Broken links for REST flowcharts
In-Reply-To: <CA+dV7cSRzu0Mnz-JqzBnp2JqjVB=Cx5XswuBU-7BT7nZi9=1tQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+dV7cSRzu0Mnz-JqzBnp2JqjVB=Cx5XswuBU-7BT7nZi9=1tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Fixed, thanks.
On 08/05/2014 12:58 PM, Paulo F. Oliveira wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The image links are broken for the REST flowcharts' guide, part of cowboy.
>
> http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/rest_flowcharts/rest_start.png
> (for example)
> should probably be
> http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/rest_start.png
> according to the hierarchy here:
> https://github.com/ninenines/ninenines.github.io/tree/master/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Paulo F. Oliveira
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From essen at ninenines.eu Tue Aug 5 14:43:47 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:43:47 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hello!
Cowboy 1.0 has been released.
Cowboy is a small and fast HTTP server for Erlang with support for
Webmachine-like REST, Websocket and more.
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy
Cowboy is the work of more than 80 people. I would like to congratulate
everyone for the great work done so far. Thank you!
Please see the CHANGELOG for details on what's changed.
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
This release marks the beginning of the 1.0.x branch which will contain
backward compatible fixes. This branch will be maintained at least until
Cowboy 2.0 gets released (longer if sponsors request it). It is highly
recommended that you follow this branch if you were following master
before, as master will receive backward incompatible changes starting
tomorrow.
Cowboy is now fully documented. It has a user guide, a function
reference manual, and a wealth of examples. You can also install man
pages as explained in the README of the project.
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/manual/
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/tree/master/examples
Following a discussion on the Erlang mailing lists the Getting Started
chapter was reworked and greatly simplified, in parts due to the
improvements made to erlang.mk. Feedback is of course always welcome.
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/getting_started/
Starting tomorrow the master branch will receive backward incompatible
changes. Most of the planned changes are detailed in the ROADMAP. You
are welcome to suggest additional changes.
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/blob/master/ROADMAP.md
Cowboy 2.0 is planned to be released at around the same time Erlang/OTP
18.0 comes out. There are no plans for a Cowboy 1.1 at this time,
although that may change in the coming months if there is interest in
new features.
Ranch also got upgraded to 1.0, although there was no changes from the
previous release.
https://github.com/ninenines/ranch
Thanks to everyone who made this project what it is today!
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From max.lapshin at gmail.com Tue Aug 5 15:33:27 2014
From: max.lapshin at gmail.com (Max Lapshin)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:33:27 +0400
Subject: [99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CAMxVRxAwOt8y83P7wSxhDiOVJe7OZn5AFqowRACBqCSCbf7Qhw@mail.gmail.com>
Loic, it is very cool!
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140805/a3d520b7/attachment.html>
From gumm at sigma-star.com Tue Aug 5 17:56:25 2014
From: gumm at sigma-star.com (Jesse Gumm)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 10:56:25 -0500
Subject: [99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CAPTXyXcOJic72bbd8VCANqGoJNRZ44-HOQgm=mwa-=jcUDnt4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Congrats Loic!
--
Jesse Gumm
Owner, Sigma Star Systems
414.940.4866 || sigma-star.com || @jessegumm
On Aug 5, 2014 7:43 AM, "Lo?c Hoguin" <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Cowboy 1.0 has been released.
>
> Cowboy is a small and fast HTTP server for Erlang with support for
> Webmachine-like REST, Websocket and more.
>
> https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy
>
> Cowboy is the work of more than 80 people. I would like to congratulate
> everyone for the great work done so far. Thank you!
>
> Please see the CHANGELOG for details on what's changed.
>
> https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
>
> This release marks the beginning of the 1.0.x branch which will contain
> backward compatible fixes. This branch will be maintained at least until
> Cowboy 2.0 gets released (longer if sponsors request it). It is highly
> recommended that you follow this branch if you were following master
> before, as master will receive backward incompatible changes starting
> tomorrow.
>
> Cowboy is now fully documented. It has a user guide, a function reference
> manual, and a wealth of examples. You can also install man pages as
> explained in the README of the project.
>
> http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/
> http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/manual/
> https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/tree/master/examples
>
> Following a discussion on the Erlang mailing lists the Getting Started
> chapter was reworked and greatly simplified, in parts due to the
> improvements made to erlang.mk. Feedback is of course always welcome.
>
> http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/getting_started/
>
> Starting tomorrow the master branch will receive backward incompatible
> changes. Most of the planned changes are detailed in the ROADMAP. You are
> welcome to suggest additional changes.
>
> https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/blob/master/ROADMAP.md
>
> Cowboy 2.0 is planned to be released at around the same time Erlang/OTP
> 18.0 comes out. There are no plans for a Cowboy 1.1 at this time, although
> that may change in the coming months if there is interest in new features.
>
> Ranch also got upgraded to 1.0, although there was no changes from the
> previous release.
>
> https://github.com/ninenines/ranch
>
> Thanks to everyone who made this project what it is today!
>
> --
> Lo?c Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions at erlang.org
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140805/fb1bc75c/attachment.html>
From lloyd at writersglen.com Tue Aug 5 19:34:33 2014
From: lloyd at writersglen.com (lloyd at writersglen.com)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:34:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Tip of the hat, Lo?c et. al.
Outstanding and much appreciated work.
Best to all,
Lloyd
-----Original Message-----
From: "Lo?c Hoguin" <essen at ninenines.eu>
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 8:43am
To: "Erlang" <erlang-questions at erlang.org>, Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
Subject: [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
Hello!
Cowboy 1.0 has been released.
Cowboy is a small and fast HTTP server for Erlang with support for
Webmachine-like REST, Websocket and more.
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy
Cowboy is the work of more than 80 people. I would like to congratulate
everyone for the great work done so far. Thank you!
Please see the CHANGELOG for details on what's changed.
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
This release marks the beginning of the 1.0.x branch which will contain
backward compatible fixes. This branch will be maintained at least until
Cowboy 2.0 gets released (longer if sponsors request it). It is highly
recommended that you follow this branch if you were following master
before, as master will receive backward incompatible changes starting
tomorrow.
Cowboy is now fully documented. It has a user guide, a function
reference manual, and a wealth of examples. You can also install man
pages as explained in the README of the project.
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/manual/
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/tree/master/examples
Following a discussion on the Erlang mailing lists the Getting Started
chapter was reworked and greatly simplified, in parts due to the
improvements made to erlang.mk. Feedback is of course always welcome.
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/getting_started/
Starting tomorrow the master branch will receive backward incompatible
changes. Most of the planned changes are detailed in the ROADMAP. You
are welcome to suggest additional changes.
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/blob/master/ROADMAP.md
Cowboy 2.0 is planned to be released at around the same time Erlang/OTP
18.0 comes out. There are no plans for a Cowboy 1.1 at this time,
although that may change in the coming months if there is interest in
new features.
Ranch also got upgraded to 1.0, although there was no changes from the
previous release.
https://github.com/ninenines/ranch
Thanks to everyone who made this project what it is today!
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questions at erlang.org
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
From paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com Tue Aug 5 22:33:17 2014
From: paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com (Paulo F. Oliveira)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 21:33:17 +0100
Subject: [99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMuJbHgMSNLnCuf5x2+Nx1zUFhHy3=0rTGtLNbLJ=FfDU=tjfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAMxVRxAwOt8y83P7wSxhDiOVJe7OZn5AFqowRACBqCSCbf7Qhw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMuJbHgMSNLnCuf5x2+Nx1zUFhHy3=0rTGtLNbLJ=FfDU=tjfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+dV7cRYs3nfweJjUYLh-cCuuxmFbngoFUdDjoYgYwkky3LFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Federico.
Check this out for the "why" regarding your question:
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/issues/715
It's one of the reasons (I haven't detected others yet) stopping me from
moving to 1.0, unfortunately (I have some projects depending on these
status codes already), but as soon as I have some time and look at all the
_major_ differences between 0.9.0 and 1.0 I think I'll make the move. For
the time being, I have found no issues with the REST part of cowboy (the
one I use).
Thank you, Lo?c et all for the effort and for keeping it open source.
Regards.
- Paulo F. Oliveira
On 5 August 2014 15:18, Federico Carrone <federico.carrone at gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Loic. I really love cowboy.
>
> I got only one question: Why did you change the reply with 400 instead of
> 422 in cowboy_rest for unprocessable entities?
>
> Regards,
> Federico.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Loic, it is very cool!
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions at erlang.org
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://federicocarrone.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions at erlang.org
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140805/f3705f7b/attachment.html>
From essen at ninenines.eu Tue Aug 5 22:55:34 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:55:34 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+dV7cRYs3nfweJjUYLh-cCuuxmFbngoFUdDjoYgYwkky3LFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAMxVRxAwOt8y83P7wSxhDiOVJe7OZn5AFqowRACBqCSCbf7Qhw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMuJbHgMSNLnCuf5x2+Nx1zUFhHy3=0rTGtLNbLJ=FfDU=tjfQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+dV7cRYs3nfweJjUYLh-cCuuxmFbngoFUdDjoYgYwkky3LFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
You can easily send 422 and return halt instead of returning false if
you need to keep that, it'll just be 2 lines instead of 1. :)
On 08/05/2014 10:33 PM, Paulo F. Oliveira wrote:
> Hi, Federico.
>
> Check this out for the "why" regarding your question:
> https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/issues/715
>
> It's one of the reasons (I haven't detected others yet) stopping me from
> moving to 1.0, unfortunately (I have some projects depending on these
> status codes already), but as soon as I have some time and look at all
> the _major_ differences between 0.9.0 and 1.0 I think I'll make the
> move. For the time being, I have found no issues with the REST part of
> cowboy (the one I use).
>
> Thank you, Lo?c et all for the effort and for keeping it open source.
>
> Regards.
>
> - Paulo F. Oliveira
>
>
> On 5 August 2014 15:18, Federico Carrone <federico.carrone at gmail.com
> <mailto:federico.carrone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Congratulations Loic. I really love cowboy.
>
> I got only one question: Why did you change the reply with 400
> instead of 422 in cowboy_rest for unprocessable entities?
>
> Regards,
> Federico.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin at gmail.com
> <mailto:max.lapshin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Loic, it is very cool!
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions at erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://federicocarrone.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions at erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com Tue Aug 5 23:01:38 2014
From: paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com (Paulo F. Oliveira)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 22:01:38 +0100
Subject: [99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAMxVRxAwOt8y83P7wSxhDiOVJe7OZn5AFqowRACBqCSCbf7Qhw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMuJbHgMSNLnCuf5x2+Nx1zUFhHy3=0rTGtLNbLJ=FfDU=tjfQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+dV7cRYs3nfweJjUYLh-cCuuxmFbngoFUdDjoYgYwkky3LFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CA+dV7cRNHiuZcJzc+x3=eVuEsty3-8pE_2XqBOpVdg4MSch_AA@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, it should be _that_ easy for the 400 > 422 :D, but is that the only
important difference I should be aware of, then? I haven't written any real
tests, for the time being, to guarantee backward compatibility for
dependants...
In any case, I'm thinking about updating the dependencies in the future (I
own one of them and the other one is an internal project, for the time
being).
Thanks for the tip.
Cheers.
- Paulo F. Oliveira
On 5 August 2014 21:55, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
> You can easily send 422 and return halt instead of returning false if you
> need to keep that, it'll just be 2 lines instead of 1. :)
>
> On 08/05/2014 10:33 PM, Paulo F. Oliveira wrote:
>
>> Hi, Federico.
>>
>> Check this out for the "why" regarding your question:
>> https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/issues/715
>>
>> It's one of the reasons (I haven't detected others yet) stopping me from
>> moving to 1.0, unfortunately (I have some projects depending on these
>> status codes already), but as soon as I have some time and look at all
>> the _major_ differences between 0.9.0 and 1.0 I think I'll make the
>> move. For the time being, I have found no issues with the REST part of
>> cowboy (the one I use).
>>
>> Thank you, Lo?c et all for the effort and for keeping it open source.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> - Paulo F. Oliveira
>>
>>
>> On 5 August 2014 15:18, Federico Carrone <federico.carrone at gmail.com
>> <mailto:federico.carrone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Congratulations Loic. I really love cowboy.
>>
>> I got only one question: Why did you change the reply with 400
>> instead of 422 in cowboy_rest for unprocessable entities?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Federico.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin at gmail.com
>> <mailto:max.lapshin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Loic, it is very cool!
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions at erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://federicocarrone.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions at erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extend mailing list
>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>
>>
> --
> Lo?c Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140805/34528764/attachment.html>
From essen at ninenines.eu Tue Aug 5 23:06:19 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:06:19 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+dV7cRNHiuZcJzc+x3=eVuEsty3-8pE_2XqBOpVdg4MSch_AA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAMxVRxAwOt8y83P7wSxhDiOVJe7OZn5AFqowRACBqCSCbf7Qhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMuJbHgMSNLnCuf5x2+Nx1zUFhHy3=0rTGtLNbLJ=FfDU=tjfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+dV7cRYs3nfweJjUYLh-cCuuxmFbngoFUdDjoYgYwkky3LFNQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
<CA+dV7cRNHiuZcJzc+x3=eVuEsty3-8pE_2XqBOpVdg4MSch_AA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
If you were already at the previous version (0.10) then that plus a 400
instead of 500 when header parsing fails are pretty much the only changes.
There's some more if you were at 0.9, mostly the body reading interface
changed to prevent annoying timeout issues.
On 08/05/2014 11:01 PM, Paulo F. Oliveira wrote:
> Yes, it should be _that_ easy for the 400 > 422 :D, but is that the only
> important difference I should be aware of, then? I haven't written any
> real tests, for the time being, to guarantee backward compatibility for
> dependants...
>
> In any case, I'm thinking about updating the dependencies in the future
> (I own one of them and the other one is an internal project, for the
> time being).
>
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> Cheers.
>
> - Paulo F. Oliveira
>
>
> On 5 August 2014 21:55, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu
> <mailto:essen at ninenines.eu>> wrote:
>
> You can easily send 422 and return halt instead of returning false
> if you need to keep that, it'll just be 2 lines instead of 1. :)
>
> On 08/05/2014 10:33 PM, Paulo F. Oliveira wrote:
>
> Hi, Federico.
>
> Check this out for the "why" regarding your question:
> https://github.com/ninenines/__cowboy/issues/715
> <https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/issues/715>
>
> It's one of the reasons (I haven't detected others yet) stopping
> me from
> moving to 1.0, unfortunately (I have some projects depending on
> these
> status codes already), but as soon as I have some time and look
> at all
> the _major_ differences between 0.9.0 and 1.0 I think I'll make the
> move. For the time being, I have found no issues with the REST
> part of
> cowboy (the one I use).
>
> Thank you, Lo?c et all for the effort and for keeping it open
> source.
>
> Regards.
>
> - Paulo F. Oliveira
>
>
> On 5 August 2014 15:18, Federico Carrone
> <federico.carrone at gmail.com <mailto:federico.carrone at gmail.com>
> <mailto:federico.carrone at __gmail.com
> <mailto:federico.carrone at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> Congratulations Loic. I really love cowboy.
>
> I got only one question: Why did you change the reply with 400
> instead of 422 in cowboy_rest for unprocessable entities?
>
> Regards,
> Federico.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Max Lapshin
> <max.lapshin at gmail.com <mailto:max.lapshin at gmail.com>
> <mailto:max.lapshin at gmail.com
> <mailto:max.lapshin at gmail.com>>__> wrote:
>
> Loic, it is very cool!
>
> Thanks.
>
> _________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions at erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>
> <mailto:erlang-questions at __erlang.org
> <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>>
> http://erlang.org/mailman/__listinfo/erlang-questions
> <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://federicocarrone.com/
>
> _________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions at erlang.org <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>
> <mailto:erlang-questions at __erlang.org
> <mailto:erlang-questions at erlang.org>>
> http://erlang.org/mailman/__listinfo/erlang-questions
> <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu <mailto:Extend at lists.ninenines.eu>
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/__listinfo/extend
> <https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend>
>
>
> --
> Lo?c Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
>
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From michael.wittig at tullius-walden.com Wed Aug 13 11:17:51 2014
From: michael.wittig at tullius-walden.com (Michael Wittig)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:17:51 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] eunit suppoort in erlang.mk?
Message-ID: <CAAgJJDuQ4RLXMU7YB3CK6ZvE7RcOyGO1-Xwa4736r1HYyhDOmQ@mail.gmail.com>
hi,
is it possible to run eunit tests when executing make tests?
I have my tests directly in the modules (e.g. xyz_server)
Regards,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140813/7903a29a/attachment.html>
From chaehb at gmail.com Thu Aug 14 03:20:05 2014
From: chaehb at gmail.com (chaehb)
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:20:05 +0900
Subject: [99s-extend] couldn't quit in Erlang 17.1
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On 2014. 7. 27., at ?? 6:25, Lo?c Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu> wrote:
> Does it happen with ssl_hello_world?
>
> On 07/26/2014 09:06 AM, chaehb wrote:
>> Hi, everybody.
>>
>> After Erlang updated to 17.1,
>> when I run q(). command on erlang console, cowboy couldn't quitted but print series of messages..
>>
>> (after ok signal printed)
>>
>> ?...
>> =ERROR REPORT==== 26-Jul-2014::15:23:33 ===
>> Error in process <0.334.0> on node ?...my node name...' with exit value: {{case_clause,{error,closed}},[{ranch_acceptor,loop,3,[{file,"src/ranch_acceptor.erl"},{line,28}]}]}
>> ?.
>>
>> Before erlang updated (in 17.0), application could be normally quitted exactly same codes and environments.
>>
>> This is only appeared when I only use ssl(https).
>> But when use only http with same dispatch rules, cowboy normally quitted.
>>
I?ve try to do more tests with ssl_hello_world in cowboy(v1.0) and various Erlang/OTP versions.
If ErlangOTP < 17.0, http/https works fine.
If ErlangOTP >= 17.1(17.1.x,17.2 in github), http works fine but with https the same errors appeared.
*****
When I edited ranch_accepter.erl > line 40
{error, Reason} when Reason =/= closed ->
to
{error, Reason} ->
,
https work and app was normally quitted.
When I printed, Reason == closed.
From lists at tuli.pe Thu Aug 14 17:44:25 2014
From: lists at tuli.pe (Camille Troillard)
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:44:25 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] cowboy_rest and response headers
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hello,
I would like to set a Content-Range header in the response of a HEAD request.
Can I do that within the context of a cowboy_rest handler?
Ideally, I wish to let cowboy_rest reply and just specify this additional header.
Best,
Camille
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140814/64f862ef/attachment.html>
From essen at ninenines.eu Thu Aug 14 17:50:09 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:50:09 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] cowboy_rest and response headers
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Use cowboy_req:set_resp_header and return the Req this function gives you.
On 08/14/2014 05:44 PM, Camille Troillard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to set a Content-Range header in the response of a HEAD
> request.
> Can I do that within the context of a cowboy_rest handler?
> Ideally, I wish to let cowboy_rest reply and just specify this
> additional header.
>
>
> Best,
> Camille
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From stephane at wirtel.be Sun Aug 24 01:58:12 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 01:58:12 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] How to use the PUT verb with Cowboy_Rest ?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi all,
1. I would like to use the cowboy_rest protocol with cowboy 1.0 but I
have a small crash.
Here is my code:
https://www.friendpaste.com/7O3X4fG4u31gBg9MgW5xg4
Could you tell me if I correctly use cowboy_rest for the PUT verb? I
have seen is_conflict/2, but I don't know how to use it.
2. I would like to change the response code, but I get the error. Is it
possible?
Thank you.
Regards,
Stephane
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From daniel.goertzen at gmail.com Sun Aug 24 02:16:02 2014
From: daniel.goertzen at gmail.com (Daniel Goertzen)
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:16:02 -0500
Subject: [99s-extend] How to use the PUT verb with Cowboy_Rest ?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CAJCf5RxAZR2jx3Bf-XmYMPYs-i4rk8-Ba4xYqMWv=AjM3P33SQ@mail.gmail.com>
You should implement the resource_exists() callback; this will let the rest
module pick a 200 vs 201. If the db name was incorrect, I think you are
just supposed to return false from the put callback. I can't remember the
http code for that case.
Regards,
Dan.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:58 PM, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 1. I would like to use the cowboy_rest protocol with cowboy 1.0 but I have
> a small crash.
>
> Here is my code:
>
> https://www.friendpaste.com/7O3X4fG4u31gBg9MgW5xg4
>
> Could you tell me if I correctly use cowboy_rest for the PUT verb? I have
> seen is_conflict/2, but I don't know how to use it.
>
> 2. I would like to change the response code, but I get the error. Is it
> possible?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephane
>
> --
> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140823/51e1d345/attachment.html>
From stephane at wirtel.be Sun Aug 24 02:22:22 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 02:22:22 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] How to use the PUT verb with Cowboy_Rest ?
In-Reply-To: <CAJCf5RxAZR2jx3Bf-XmYMPYs-i4rk8-Ba4xYqMWv=AjM3P33SQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAJCf5RxAZR2jx3Bf-XmYMPYs-i4rk8-Ba4xYqMWv=AjM3P33SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
resource_exists is used by POST
is_conflict is used by PUT (from the code)
but in the case where my database already exists, I need to return 412
and not 409.
and I know I don't respect the default value returned by Cowboy_rest.
On 24 Aug 2014, at 2:16, Daniel Goertzen wrote:
> You should implement the resource_exists() callback; this will let the
> rest
> module pick a 200 vs 201. If the db name was incorrect, I think you
> are
> just supposed to return false from the put callback. I can't remember
> the
> http code for that case.
>
> Regards,
> Dan.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:58 PM, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> 1. I would like to use the cowboy_rest protocol with cowboy 1.0 but I
>> have
>> a small crash.
>>
>> Here is my code:
>>
>> https://www.friendpaste.com/7O3X4fG4u31gBg9MgW5xg4
>>
>> Could you tell me if I correctly use cowboy_rest for the PUT verb? I
>> have
>> seen is_conflict/2, but I don't know how to use it.
>>
>> 2. I would like to change the response code, but I get the error. Is
>> it
>> possible?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Stephane
>>
>> --
>> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extend mailing list
>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From edgurgel at gmail.com Sun Aug 24 02:25:54 2014
From: edgurgel at gmail.com (Eduardo Gurgel)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:25:54 +1200
Subject: [99s-extend] How to use the PUT verb with Cowboy_Rest ?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAJCf5RxAZR2jx3Bf-XmYMPYs-i4rk8-Ba4xYqMWv=AjM3P33SQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CAKAMJXhPm0vZdTrhW3Zg=zyowQzc0AczhptyTAVyX404pvc3XA@mail.gmail.com>
I think you can always halt the processing and do the reply by yourself:
{ok, Req2} = cowboy_req:reply(412, Req),
{halt, Req2, State}.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be>
wrote:
> resource_exists is used by POST
> is_conflict is used by PUT (from the code)
> but in the case where my database already exists, I need to return 412 and
> not 409.
>
> and I know I don't respect the default value returned by Cowboy_rest.
>
>
> On 24 Aug 2014, at 2:16, Daniel Goertzen wrote:
>
> You should implement the resource_exists() callback; this will let the
>> rest
>> module pick a 200 vs 201. If the db name was incorrect, I think you are
>> just supposed to return false from the put callback. I can't remember the
>> http code for that case.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dan.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:58 PM, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> 1. I would like to use the cowboy_rest protocol with cowboy 1.0 but I
>>> have
>>> a small crash.
>>>
>>> Here is my code:
>>>
>>> https://www.friendpaste.com/7O3X4fG4u31gBg9MgW5xg4
>>>
>>> Could you tell me if I correctly use cowboy_rest for the PUT verb? I have
>>> seen is_conflict/2, but I don't know how to use it.
>>>
>>> 2. I would like to change the response code, but I get the error. Is it
>>> possible?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Stephane
>>>
>>> --
>>> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Extend mailing list
>>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
--
Eduardo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140824/89d3a7f6/attachment.html>
From stephane at wirtel.be Sun Aug 24 02:52:58 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (Stephane Wirtel)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 02:52:58 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] How to use the PUT verb with Cowboy_Rest ?
In-Reply-To: <CAKAMJXhPm0vZdTrhW3Zg=zyowQzc0AczhptyTAVyX404pvc3XA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAJCf5RxAZR2jx3Bf-XmYMPYs-i4rk8-Ba4xYqMWv=AjM3P33SQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAKAMJXhPm0vZdTrhW3Zg=zyowQzc0AczhptyTAVyX404pvc3XA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Ok I will try asap, thanks
> On 24 ao?t 2014, at 02:25 AM, Eduardo Gurgel <edgurgel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think you can always halt the processing and do the reply by yourself:
>
> {ok, Req2} = cowboy_req:reply(412, Req),
> {halt, Req2, State}.
>
>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be> wrote:
>> resource_exists is used by POST
>> is_conflict is used by PUT (from the code)
>> but in the case where my database already exists, I need to return 412 and not 409.
>>
>> and I know I don't respect the default value returned by Cowboy_rest.
>>
>>
>> On 24 Aug 2014, at 2:16, Daniel Goertzen wrote:
>>
>>> You should implement the resource_exists() callback; this will let the rest
>>> module pick a 200 vs 201. If the db name was incorrect, I think you are
>>> just supposed to return false from the put callback. I can't remember the
>>> http code for that case.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dan.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:58 PM, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> 1. I would like to use the cowboy_rest protocol with cowboy 1.0 but I have
>>>> a small crash.
>>>>
>>>> Here is my code:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.friendpaste.com/7O3X4fG4u31gBg9MgW5xg4
>>>>
>>>> Could you tell me if I correctly use cowboy_rest for the PUT verb? I have
>>>> seen is_conflict/2, but I don't know how to use it.
>>>>
>>>> 2. I would like to change the response code, but I get the error. Is it
>>>> possible?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Stephane
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Extend mailing list
>>>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>>>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>
>>
>> --
>> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extend mailing list
>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
>
>
> --
> Eduardo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140824/f35e1e51/attachment.html>
From stephane at wirtel.be Sun Aug 24 11:54:58 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:54:58 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] Full example of cowboy_rest?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi all,
Do you have a concrete example of cowboy_rest ? with POST, GET, HEAD,
PUT and DELETE ?
POST will use resource_exists and allow_missing_post
PUT will use is_conflict
DELETE delete_resource, etc...
Currently, I started with the example with put_json and get_json and in
the functions, I fetch the Method and I use the pattern matching with
the Method, but I think it's not the right solution.
What are the best practices?
The examples in the repository of cowboy don't cover all the
possibilities of a simple rest api with these verbs.
Thanks in advance,
Stephane
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com Tue Aug 26 01:11:44 2014
From: paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com (Paulo F. Oliveira)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:11:44 +0100
Subject: [99s-extend] Full example of cowboy_rest?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CA+dV7cQXP3wEq5bn=3qWQ2EKuR39WZsRHCS+4Q1wgvLgDucjng@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, St?phane.
On 24 August 2014 10:54, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Do you have a concrete example of cowboy_rest ? with POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and DELETE ?
AFAIK, from the official examples, the correct answer is "no", there
is no "complete" example (does it even make sense to have one?).
On the other hand, I've been using Cowboy for a couple of months now,
and find these docs (REST flowcharts -
http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/1.0/guide/rest_flowcharts/) to be
very useful, and they might also help you. You should find the time to
read the complete REST guide/manual as a lot of useful information can
be found there and a very nice effort was put into not wasting words
and going straight to the point.
...
> What are the best practices?
For what specifically?
> The examples in the repository of cowboy don't cover all the possibilities of a simple rest api with these verbs.
That is a fact. I, for one, tend to have a _template_ source code file
from where I get the functions that I need (only not to have to write
2/3 lines of code every time), and that I "chain" looking at the
flowcharts. [I also have a lib for JSON parsing and validating, query
string validation, etc...] This might not always be very easy (to
"chain" it all together, but it shouldn't be that hard either"), but
my approach is usually "OK, so I want a route to have GET, PUT and
DELETE... what are the related methods that I'll most probably
require? resource_exists (serves all methods), is_conflict (serves
PUT), delete_resource (serves DELETE), delete_completed (serves
DELETE)" and then I think about replying with a body or not (in the
case of GET there will almost always be a body, in the case of PUT
your method call might result in a 204 and in the case of DELETE there
may or not be a body). I then code the methods, test the API, checking
that the codes I get make sense (404, 200, 409, 204, 202, ...
depending on the conditions I want set) and then slightly document
this for the users of the API (if the API is complicated and requires
a lot of documentation there might be something wrong with it). For
documentation purposes you can either go with a "[VERB] route
accepts...?..., serves...?..., and the result codes are...?..." simple
doc or something more elaborate like
https://helloreverb.com/developers/swagger.
Hope it helps.
- Paulo F. Oliveira
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Stephane
>
> --
> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
From stephane at wirtel.be Tue Aug 26 23:59:50 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:59:50 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] cowboy_rest and delete_completed and response
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi all,
I work with two content-types (json, msgpack).
In the DELETE verb, I need to return an object and in this case, I work
on delete_resource/2 and delete_completed/2.
The problem is, how can I return a body in function of the content-type?
because after delete_completed, there is a call to the
cowboy_rest:has_resp_body function and I need to set the body of the
response.
delete_completed(Req, State) ->
Body = Json or MsgPack ? <-- Which content ?
Req2 = cowboy_req:set_resp_body(Body, Req),
{true, Req2, State}.
Ok, but in this case, what's the reason of content_types_provided/2 and
content_types_accepted/2 ?
Thank you,
Stephane
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From essen at ninenines.eu Wed Aug 27 00:03:45 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:03:45 +0300
Subject: [99s-extend] cowboy_rest and delete_completed and response
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Call cowboy_req:meta(media_type, Req) to retrieve it.
On 08/27/2014 12:59 AM, St?phane Wirtel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I work with two content-types (json, msgpack).
>
> In the DELETE verb, I need to return an object and in this case, I work
> on delete_resource/2 and delete_completed/2.
> The problem is, how can I return a body in function of the content-type?
> because after delete_completed, there is a call to the
> cowboy_rest:has_resp_body function and I need to set the body of the
> response.
>
> delete_completed(Req, State) ->
> Body = Json or MsgPack ? <-- Which content ?
>
> Req2 = cowboy_req:set_resp_body(Body, Req),
> {true, Req2, State}.
>
> Ok, but in this case, what's the reason of content_types_provided/2 and
> content_types_accepted/2 ?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Stephane
>
>
> --
> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From stephane at wirtel.be Wed Aug 27 00:12:00 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:12:00 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] cowboy_rest and delete_completed and response
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
What's the purpose of the callbacks in content_types_accepted and
content_types_provided?
I prefer set the response in the State to the callbacks and they convert
it to the right format.
Example:
delete_completed(Req, State) ->
Response = [{<<"ok">>, <<"dbname">>}],
{true, Req, State#state{response=Response}}.
get_json(Req, #{response=Response}=State) ->
Body = jsx:encode(Response),
{Body, Req, State}.
get_msgpack(Req, #{response=Response}=State) ->
Body = msgpack:pack(Response, [{format, jsx}],
{Body, Req, State}.
On 27 Aug 2014, at 0:03, Lo?c Hoguin wrote:
> Call cowboy_req:meta(media_type, Req) to retrieve it.
>
> On 08/27/2014 12:59 AM, St?phane Wirtel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I work with two content-types (json, msgpack).
>>
>> In the DELETE verb, I need to return an object and in this case, I
>> work
>> on delete_resource/2 and delete_completed/2.
>> The problem is, how can I return a body in function of the
>> content-type?
>> because after delete_completed, there is a call to the
>> cowboy_rest:has_resp_body function and I need to set the body of the
>> response.
>>
>> delete_completed(Req, State) ->
>> Body = Json or MsgPack ? <-- Which content ?
>>
>> Req2 = cowboy_req:set_resp_body(Body, Req),
>> {true, Req2, State}.
>>
>> Ok, but in this case, what's the reason of content_types_provided/2
>> and
>> content_types_accepted/2 ?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Stephane
>>
>>
>> --
>> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extend mailing list
>> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
> --
> Lo?c Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From stephane at wirtel.be Wed Aug 27 11:29:46 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:29:46 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] I need your feedback about this cowboy_rest handler.
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi all,
This night, I wrote an example because I wanted to show you my work.
I have one handler for the concept of collections (in this case, tasks).
In this handler, I want these following methods:
POST /:collection
GET /:collection
DELETE /:collection
PUT /:collection
HEAD /:collection
:collection is a string, example: /tasks1
HEAD /:collection (/tasks1)
StatusCode:
* 200 ok
* 404 not found
GET /:collection (/tasks1)
Gets information about the collection
StatusCode:
* 200 ok
* 404 not found
PUT /:collection (/tasks1)
Create a new collection of tasks
Status_Code:
* 201 created
Response: an object, in msgpack or json and I need to had a location
header
* 412 precondition failed, the collection name already exists
Response: an object, in msgpack or json with the error (already exists)
POST /:collection (/tasks1)
Add a new item in the collection, a new task
StatusCode:
* 201 created
* 202 accepted
* 404 not found (error in the collection name)
Response: need to add a location header and return an object in msgpack
or json.
DELETE /:collection (/tasks1)
Delete all the tasks
Status_Code:
* 200 ok.
* 404 not found
In the case of 200, we need to return an object in msgpack or json.
I provided a code and If you can help me, because I think cowboy_rest is
a good solution, but I also think I will have some problems with my
service.
Examples:
* delete_completed, I need to write the serialisation in the
delete_completed function and not with the help of the defined callbacks
of content_types_provided.
* for PUT, I need to return a location header, should I add it in the
is_conflict
function?
* for PUT, how I have a 201? I have read the rest_flowchart and I need
to specify the location header ok, but where? in the is_conflict
function?
So, do you have time to help me, because with this example, I can
propose it to the cowboy repository.
https://github.com/matrixise/demo_rest/blob/master/src/collection_handler.erl
You can propose your PR, comments or remarks, but I would like to use
cowboy_rest.
Regards,
Stephane
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From essen at ninenines.eu Wed Aug 27 12:03:41 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:03:41 +0300
Subject: [99s-extend] I need your feedback about this cowboy_rest
handler.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hey,
On 08/27/2014 12:29 PM, St?phane Wirtel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This night, I wrote an example because I wanted to show you my work.
>
> I have one handler for the concept of collections (in this case, tasks).
>
> In this handler, I want these following methods:
>
> POST /:collection
> GET /:collection
> DELETE /:collection
> PUT /:collection
> HEAD /:collection
>
> :collection is a string, example: /tasks1
>
> HEAD /:collection (/tasks1)
> StatusCode:
> * 200 ok
> * 404 not found
>
> GET /:collection (/tasks1)
> Gets information about the collection
> StatusCode:
> * 200 ok
> * 404 not found
>
> PUT /:collection (/tasks1)
> Create a new collection of tasks
> Status_Code:
> * 201 created
> Response: an object, in msgpack or json and I need to had a
> location header
> * 412 precondition failed, the collection name already exists
> Response: an object, in msgpack or json with the error (already
> exists)
>
> POST /:collection (/tasks1)
> Add a new item in the collection, a new task
> StatusCode:
> * 201 created
> * 202 accepted
> * 404 not found (error in the collection name)
> Response: need to add a location header and return an object in msgpack
> or json.
>
> DELETE /:collection (/tasks1)
> Delete all the tasks
> Status_Code:
> * 200 ok.
> * 404 not found
> In the case of 200, we need to return an object in msgpack or json.
>
>
> I provided a code and If you can help me, because I think cowboy_rest is
> a good solution, but I also think I will have some problems with my
> service.
>
> Examples:
> * delete_completed, I need to write the serialisation in the
> delete_completed function and not with the help of the defined callbacks
> of content_types_provided.
What's the problem? The callbacks you set in content_types_provided are
there to provide the *resource*. If you set a body in response to the
DELETE method you are not sending the resource but information about the
result of the operation.
> * for PUT, I need to return a location header, should I add it in the
> is_conflict
> function?
I would say in the callback you set in content_types_accepted. But...
> * for PUT, how I have a 201? I have read the rest_flowchart and I need
> to specify the location header ok, but where? in the is_conflict function?
Why do you need a 201? If you PUT a collection to /:collection then this
is already the location of the collection. I am not sure what you are
trying to do there exactly?
> So, do you have time to help me, because with this example, I can
> propose it to the cowboy repository.
> https://github.com/matrixise/demo_rest/blob/master/src/collection_handler.erl
>
>
> You can propose your PR, comments or remarks, but I would like to use
> cowboy_rest.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephane
>
> --
> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From stephane at wirtel.be Wed Aug 27 12:35:33 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:35:33 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] I need your feedback about this cowboy_rest
handler.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On 27 Aug 2014, at 12:03, Lo?c Hoguin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 08/27/2014 12:29 PM, St?phane Wirtel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This night, I wrote an example because I wanted to show you my work.
>>
>> I have one handler for the concept of collections (in this case,
>> tasks).
>>
>> In this handler, I want these following methods:
>>
>> POST /:collection
>> GET /:collection
>> DELETE /:collection
>> PUT /:collection
>> HEAD /:collection
>>
>> :collection is a string, example: /tasks1
>>
>> HEAD /:collection (/tasks1)
>> StatusCode:
>> * 200 ok
>> * 404 not found
>>
>> GET /:collection (/tasks1)
>> Gets information about the collection
>> StatusCode:
>> * 200 ok
>> * 404 not found
>>
>> PUT /:collection (/tasks1)
>> Create a new collection of tasks
>> Status_Code:
>> * 201 created
>> Response: an object, in msgpack or json and I need to had a
>> location header
>> * 412 precondition failed, the collection name already exists
>> Response: an object, in msgpack or json with the error (already
>> exists)
>>
>> POST /:collection (/tasks1)
>> Add a new item in the collection, a new task
>> StatusCode:
>> * 201 created
>> * 202 accepted
>> * 404 not found (error in the collection name)
>> Response: need to add a location header and return an object in
>> msgpack
>> or json.
>>
>> DELETE /:collection (/tasks1)
>> Delete all the tasks
>> Status_Code:
>> * 200 ok.
>> * 404 not found
>> In the case of 200, we need to return an object in msgpack or json.
>>
>>
>> I provided a code and If you can help me, because I think cowboy_rest
>> is
>> a good solution, but I also think I will have some problems with my
>> service.
>>
>> Examples:
>> * delete_completed, I need to write the serialisation in the
>> delete_completed function and not with the help of the defined
>> callbacks
>> of content_types_provided.
>
> What's the problem? The callbacks you set in content_types_provided
> are there to provide the *resource*. If you set a body in response to
> the DELETE method you are not sending the resource but information
> about the result of the operation.
Ok, in this case, I understand. thanks
>
>> * for PUT, I need to return a location header, should I add it in the
>> is_conflict
>> function?
>
> I would say in the callback you set in content_types_accepted. But...
Works fine in the is_conflict function.
>
>> * for PUT, how I have a 201? I have read the rest_flowchart and I
>> need
>> to specify the location header ok, but where? in the is_conflict
>> function?
>
> Why do you need a 201? If you PUT a collection to /:collection then
> this is already the location of the collection. I am not sure what you
> are trying to do there exactly?
In this case, the PUT method is used for the creation of the resource
and not for the update. This is the reason of the 201 status code.
In the rest_flowchart graph for the PUT/POST methods, what is the node
"new resource" ? Is it just the {true, Req, State} from the callback
defined in the content_types_accepted?
PS: I retested and now, I have my 201 with PUT, just resource_exists has
to return false and not true ;-)
Thanks
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From essen at ninenines.eu Wed Aug 27 12:53:19 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:53:19 +0300
Subject: [99s-extend] I need your feedback about this cowboy_rest
handler.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> * for PUT, how I have a 201? I have read the rest_flowchart and I need
>>> to specify the location header ok, but where? in the is_conflict
>>> function?
>>
>> Why do you need a 201? If you PUT a collection to /:collection then
>> this is already the location of the collection. I am not sure what you
>> are trying to do there exactly?
> In this case, the PUT method is used for the creation of the resource
> and not for the update. This is the reason of the 201 status code.
>
> In the rest_flowchart graph for the PUT/POST methods, what is the node
> "new resource" ? Is it just the {true, Req, State} from the callback
> defined in the content_types_accepted?
>
> PS: I retested and now, I have my 201 with PUT, just resource_exists has
> to return false and not true ;-)
My bad I was a little confusing in my previous answer. You are right, if
the resource doesn't exist and PUT is used we get a 201 automatically.
The location header must only be provided if the resource was created
elsewhere.
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From stephane at wirtel.be Wed Aug 27 15:26:11 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:26:11 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] I need your feedback about this cowboy_rest
handler.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
On 27 Aug 2014, at 12:53, Lo?c Hoguin wrote:
>>>> * for PUT, how I have a 201? I have read the rest_flowchart and I
>>>> need
>>>> to specify the location header ok, but where? in the is_conflict
>>>> function?
>>>
>>> Why do you need a 201? If you PUT a collection to /:collection then
>>> this is already the location of the collection. I am not sure what
>>> you
>>> are trying to do there exactly?
>> In this case, the PUT method is used for the creation of the resource
>> and not for the update. This is the reason of the 201 status code.
>>
>> In the rest_flowchart graph for the PUT/POST methods, what is the
>> node
>> "new resource" ? Is it just the {true, Req, State} from the callback
>> defined in the content_types_accepted?
>>
>> PS: I retested and now, I have my 201 with PUT, just resource_exists
>> has
>> to return false and not true ;-)
>
> My bad I was a little confusing in my previous answer. You are right,
> if the resource doesn't exist and PUT is used we get a 201
> automatically. The location header must only be provided if the
> resource was created elsewhere.
Don't worry and thank you for your answers.
Stephane
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From a.brandon.clark at gmail.com Wed Aug 27 21:06:25 2014
From: a.brandon.clark at gmail.com (Brandon Clark)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:06:25 -0700
Subject: [99s-extend] Which erlang.mk?
Message-ID: <CA+_xk0k0LEftN+Lmn-BaYpmxYaSYuaOq1Et=8cX_R5u3O_Kkng@mail.gmail.com>
Greetings!
I'm trying to resurrect one of my neglected ranch applications. It uses
Common Test, erlang.mk, and relx all in the usual way. When I run make
tests with all fresh dependencies, I get this:
Doing /home/brandon/src/my_proj/deps/ranch...
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build-tests'. Stop.
make: *** [build-deps-tests] Error 2
A diff of my erlang.mk and deps/ranch/erlang.mk shows they are dramatically
different. Mine came from here just this morning:
https://raw.*github.com <http://github.com>*/extend/
erlang.mk/master/erlang.mk
Which one is the "right" one for creating new apps?
Thank you!
~BC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140827/91c1e017/attachment.html>
From essen at ninenines.eu Wed Aug 27 23:26:26 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:26:26 +0300
Subject: [99s-extend] Which erlang.mk?
In-Reply-To: <CA+_xk0k0LEftN+Lmn-BaYpmxYaSYuaOq1Et=8cX_R5u3O_Kkng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+_xk0k0LEftN+Lmn-BaYpmxYaSYuaOq1Et=8cX_R5u3O_Kkng@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
The one you downloaded from github is the correct one. It's a new
version compared to the older one. A few small things changed,
including, in this case, that build-tests was renamed to something like
ct-build-tests (please open it to make sure of the name).
The new version allows greater customization and has a better package
index feature and other things, but breaking compatibility with older
Makefiles. The new version is labeled 1 (beginning of erlang.mk file)
while the older one has no such label.
On 08/27/2014 10:06 PM, Brandon Clark wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm trying to resurrect one of my neglected ranch applications. It uses
> Common Test, erlang.mk <http://erlang.mk>, and relx all in the usual
> way. When I run make tests with all fresh dependencies, I get this:
>
> Doing /home/brandon/src/my_proj/deps/ranch...
>
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build-tests'. Stop.
>
> make: *** [build-deps-tests] Error 2
>
>
> A diff of my erlang.mk <http://erlang.mk> and deps/ranch/erlang.mk
> <http://erlang.mk> shows they are dramatically different. Mine came
> from here just this morning:
>
> https://raw._github.com
> <http://github.com>_/extend/erlang.mk/master/erlang.mk
> <http://erlang.mk/master/erlang.mk>
>
> Which one is the "right" one for creating new apps?
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> ~BC
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From stephane at wirtel.be Wed Aug 27 23:41:25 2014
From: stephane at wirtel.be (=?utf-8?q?St=C3=A9phane?= Wirtel)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:41:25 +0200
Subject: [99s-extend] cowboy_rest : PUT and resource_exists vs is_conflict ?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Hi all,
For the PUT method, the flow is
resource_exists
if method == PUT then go to the is_conflict function.
In each function, we need to check if the resource already exists or not.
I think we check twice, is it normal?
Thank you,
Stephane
--
St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
From essen at ninenines.eu Wed Aug 27 23:48:41 2014
From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:48:41 +0300
Subject: [99s-extend] cowboy_rest : PUT and resource_exists vs
is_conflict ?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
For some callbacks you may need to check but only if you need to perform
a different operation when it does/doesn't. For example if you write to
files a PUT is the same operation either way, but if you write to an SQL
DB you will want to do INSERT/UPDATE depending on that. Same goes for
is_conflict and others, it depends.
So sometimes you need to keep that info around in the state and
sometimes you don't.
On 08/28/2014 12:41 AM, St?phane Wirtel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the PUT method, the flow is
>
> resource_exists
> if method == PUT then go to the is_conflict function.
> In each function, we need to check if the resource already exists or not.
>
> I think we check twice, is it normal?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Stephane
>
> --
> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>
--
Lo?c Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
From paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com Sat Aug 30 00:15:56 2014
From: paulo.ferraz.oliveira at gmail.com (Paulo F. Oliveira)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 23:15:56 +0100
Subject: [99s-extend] I need your feedback about this cowboy_rest
handler.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CA+dV7cRD-UszqUz9gv5KH4rtmW+gC6a7tEJYQco66i891+Tqbg@mail.gmail.com>
PUT _should_ (there is no police here though) be used to either create
a resource or completely update it (it's refered to as "upsert" by
some; in Redis, for example, a similar concept would be "set").
Partial modifications should be made using PATCH. POST is what is
commonly used to create a resource. According to
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html 412 is used
when "[t]he precondition given in one or more of the request-header
fields evaluated to false when it was tested on the server." (also:
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.24).
- Paulo F. Oliveira
On 27 August 2014 14:26, St?phane Wirtel <stephane at wirtel.be> wrote:
> On 27 Aug 2014, at 12:53, Lo?c Hoguin wrote:
>
>>>>> * for PUT, how I have a 201? I have read the rest_flowchart and I need
>>>>> to specify the location header ok, but where? in the is_conflict
>>>>> function?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why do you need a 201? If you PUT a collection to /:collection then
>>>> this is already the location of the collection. I am not sure what you
>>>> are trying to do there exactly?
>>>
>>> In this case, the PUT method is used for the creation of the resource
>>> and not for the update. This is the reason of the 201 status code.
>>>
>>> In the rest_flowchart graph for the PUT/POST methods, what is the node
>>> "new resource" ? Is it just the {true, Req, State} from the callback
>>> defined in the content_types_accepted?
>>>
>>> PS: I retested and now, I have my 201 with PUT, just resource_exists has
>>> to return false and not true ;-)
>>
>>
>> My bad I was a little confusing in my previous answer. You are right, if
>> the resource doesn't exist and PUT is used we get a 201 automatically. The
>> location header must only be provided if the resource was created elsewhere.
>
>
> Don't worry and thank you for your answers.
>
> Stephane
>
>
> --
> St?phane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
> _______________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
