diff options
Diffstat (limited to '_build/static/archives/extend/2014-January.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | _build/static/archives/extend/2014-January.txt | 99 |
1 files changed, 99 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/_build/static/archives/extend/2014-January.txt b/_build/static/archives/extend/2014-January.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1c01655c --- /dev/null +++ b/_build/static/archives/extend/2014-January.txt @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +From me at xiao-jia.com Wed Jan 15 06:42:46 2014 +From: me at xiao-jia.com (Xiao Jia) +Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:42:46 +0800 +Subject: [99s-extend] Parsing binary example in ranch guide +Message-ID: <CAO0g3iHXt7b4rwwUv7KShiCLno=y2htz6i+0Pn6OnVgF++NYmg@mail.gmail.com> + +Hi, + +I am learning how to use ranch and reading this page: + + http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/ranch/HEAD/guide/parsers + + +<< Size:32, _/bits >> = Buffer, +case Buffer of + << Frame:Size/binary, Rest/bits >> -> + handle_frame(Frame, Buffer); + _ -> + get_more_data(Buffer) +end. + + +Shouldn't it be + + handle_frame(Frame, Rest); + +instead? + +-- +Regards, +Xiao Jia + + +From essen at ninenines.eu Wed Jan 15 08:51:32 2014 +From: essen at ninenines.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgSG9ndWlu?=) +Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:51:32 +0100 +Subject: [99s-extend] Parsing binary example in ranch guide +In-Reply-To: <CAO0g3iHXt7b4rwwUv7KShiCLno=y2htz6i+0Pn6OnVgF++NYmg@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAO0g3iHXt7b4rwwUv7KShiCLno=y2htz6i+0Pn6OnVgF++NYmg@mail.gmail.com> +Message-ID: <[email protected]> + +Yes. + +Feel free to open a PR, thanks! + +On 01/15/2014 06:42 AM, Xiao Jia wrote: +> Hi, +> +> I am learning how to use ranch and reading this page: +> +> http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/ranch/HEAD/guide/parsers +> +> +> << Size:32, _/bits >> = Buffer, +> case Buffer of +> << Frame:Size/binary, Rest/bits >> -> +> handle_frame(Frame, Buffer); +> _ -> +> get_more_data(Buffer) +> end. +> +> +> Shouldn't it be +> +> handle_frame(Frame, Rest); +> +> instead? +> + +-- +Lo?c Hoguin +http://ninenines.eu + + +From me at xiao-jia.com Fri Jan 17 03:15:24 2014 +From: me at xiao-jia.com (Xiao Jia) +Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:15:24 +0800 +Subject: [99s-extend] Restart listeners if ranch_sup fails +Message-ID: <CAO0g3iGA7tKuBu+Wov6kcRQGUBH7EbJ-yTSxMhz5VCu2JLCAnA@mail.gmail.com> + +>From http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/ranch/HEAD/guide/embedded/ + + "It is recommended that your architecture makes sure that all +listeners are restarted if ranch_supfails." + +Does it imply that we should use rest_for_one instead of one_for_one +in the example code below? + + {ok, {{one_for_one, 10, 10}, [RanchSupSpec, ListenerSpec]}} + +=> + + {ok, {{rest_for_one, 10, 10}, [RanchSupSpec, ListenerSpec]}} + +-- +Regards, +Xiao Jia + + |