archives/extend/2013-August/000194.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [99s-extend] Riak in Farwest
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:extend%40lists.ninenines.eu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5B99s-extend%5D%20Riak%20in%20Farwest&In-Reply-To=%3CCAB9F1cco6H-t%3DL6FXu1aa6O5opNVoVqAZbm2a%3DeRxAp%2BGD%2BawA%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <style type="text/css">
       pre {
           white-space: pre-wrap;       /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */
           }
   </style>
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000192.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000195.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[99s-extend] Riak in Farwest</H1>
    <B>Florent Gallaire</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:extend%40lists.ninenines.eu?Subject=Re%3A%20%5B99s-extend%5D%20Riak%20in%20Farwest&In-Reply-To=%3CCAB9F1cco6H-t%3DL6FXu1aa6O5opNVoVqAZbm2a%3DeRxAp%2BGD%2BawA%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[99s-extend] Riak in Farwest">fgallaire at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Fri Aug  2 17:46:53 CEST 2013</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000192.html">[99s-extend] Riak in Farwest
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000195.html">[99s-extend] Riak in Farwest
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#194">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#194">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#194">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#194">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>&gt;<i> The only point I would differ with (and I may be wrong, as it was about 12 months ago that I researched this) is that I do feel, for clustering, that Riak does it better.  I'd much rather the dynamo model than a master-to-many slaves model.
</I>
Yes you're right, all clustering are far to be equal. Dynamo is really
great, and master-to-master is just an archaic way to do things you
don't really know to do.

Florent

-- 
FLOSS Engineer &amp; Lawyer

</PRE>

<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000192.html">[99s-extend] Riak in Farwest
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000195.html">[99s-extend] Riak in Farwest
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#194">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#194">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#194">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#194">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend">More information about the Extend
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>