aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/asn1/src/asn1ct_gen.erl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans Bolinder <[email protected]>2019-04-29 16:13:37 +0200
committerHans Bolinder <[email protected]>2019-05-03 12:17:02 +0200
commit60e47cba35ff565a33b25ecb01e96881ab7fe0da (patch)
tree511707cede18a65f93dd4d3d852de4da7b97c1e3 /lib/asn1/src/asn1ct_gen.erl
parente4c8e5a7997205ccc371415ae5c1caf544b025c6 (diff)
downloadotp-60e47cba35ff565a33b25ecb01e96881ab7fe0da.tar.gz
otp-60e47cba35ff565a33b25ecb01e96881ab7fe0da.tar.bz2
otp-60e47cba35ff565a33b25ecb01e96881ab7fe0da.zip
stdlib: Do not allow specs for functions in other modules
See also https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-845. [Kostis:] My suggestion is that the compiler refuses to compile modules that contain specs for functions that are not from this module. I do not remember when / why this `feature' was introduced, but thinking about it I see a lot of (ugly) semantics issues with it. For example, should one be allowed to declare in the foo module that lists:flatten/1 takes an integer() as an argument and returns a binary()? Should one be allowed to declare a spec in some module m1 for a function of m2 that is not defined in m2? There are all kinds of checks that will need to be added to dialyzer to protect itself from these semantics issues. The compiler already refuses to compile modules that contain specs for non-existing functions of the module. Similarly, it should refuse to compile modules that contain specs for functions of other modules - unless it can somehow check that these functions are indeed defined, but it is not how the compiler currently works.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/asn1/src/asn1ct_gen.erl')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions