Merge branch 'aronisstav/dialyzer/dialyzer_tests/OTP-9116' into dev

* aronisstav/dialyzer/dialyzer_tests/OTP-9116:
  Increase timetrap of options1 suite
  Write output_plt even when plt_check is ok
  Create plt with erts, kernel and stdlib only
  Update test results as they currently appear in dev
  Major restructure of dialyzer's testsuite
  Add 'apps' option to the erlang interface
  Update spec file to work with new common test structure
  Test suites for Dialyzer

1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_tests_SUITE_data/src/trec.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_tests_SUITE_data/src/trec.erl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b36b0cafba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_tests_SUITE_data/src/trec.erl
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+%%
+%% The current treatment of typed records leaves much to be desired.
+%% These are not made up examples; I have cases like that the branch
+%% of the HiPE compiler with types in records. I get very confusing
+%% warnings which require a lot of effort to find their cause and why
+%% a function has no local return.
+%%
+-module(trec).
+-export([test/0, mk_foo_exp/2]).
+
+-record(foo, {a :: integer(), b :: [atom()]}).
+
+%%
+%% For these functions we currently get the following warnings:
+%%   1. Function test/0 has no local return
+%%   2. The call trec:mk_foo_loc(42,any()) will fail since it differs
+%%      in argument position 1 from the success typing arguments:
+%%      ('undefined',atom())
+%%   3. Function mk_foo_loc/2 has no local return
+%%
+%% Arguably, the second warning is not what most users have in mind
+%% when they wrote the type declarations in the 'foo' record, so no
+%% doubt they'll find it confusing. But note that it is also inconsistent!
+%% How come there is a success typing for a function that has no local return? 
+%%
+test() ->
+   mk_foo_loc(42, bar:f()).
+
+mk_foo_loc(A, B) ->
+    #foo{a = A, b = [A,B]}.
+
+%%
+%% For this function we currently get "has no local return" but we get
+%% no reason; I want us to get a reason.
+%%
+mk_foo_exp(A, B) when is_integer(A) ->
+    #foo{a = A, b = [A,B]}.