Merge pull request #1891 from RaimoNiskanen/raimo/can_not-should-mostly-be-cannot

OTP-14282
'can not' should mostly be 'cannot'

3 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_icode2rtl.erl b/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_icode2rtl.erl
index 6da8a76d34..1ab41f4deb 100644
--- a/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_icode2rtl.erl
+++ b/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_icode2rtl.erl
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ gen_enter(I, VarMap, ConstTab) ->
   {Code1, ConstTab2} =
     case hipe_icode:enter_type(I) of
       primop ->
-	IsGuard = false, % enter can not happen in a guard
+	IsGuard = false, % enter cannot happen in a guard
 	hipe_rtl_primops:gen_enter_primop({Fun, Args}, IsGuard, ConstTab1);
       Type ->
 	Call = gen_enter_1(Fun, Args, Type),
diff --git a/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_arith.inc b/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_arith.inc
index c05b7aa160..575f10b542 100644
--- a/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_arith.inc
+++ b/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_arith.inc
@@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ eval_alu(Op, Arg1, Arg2) ->
 
 %% Björn & Bjarni:
 %% We need to be able to do evaluations based only on the bits, since
-%% there are cases where we can evaluate a subset of the bits, but can
-%% not do a full eval-alub call (eg. a + 0 gives no carry)
+%% there are cases where we can evaluate a subset of the bits, but
+%% cannot do a full eval-alub call (eg. a + 0 gives no carry)
 %%
 -spec eval_cond_bits(hipe_rtl:alub_cond(), boolean(),
 		     boolean(), boolean(), boolean()) -> boolean().
diff --git a/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_ssa_const_prop.erl b/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_ssa_const_prop.erl
index cad43e2df5..72373e536d 100644
--- a/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_ssa_const_prop.erl
+++ b/lib/hipe/rtl/hipe_rtl_ssa_const_prop.erl
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
 %%
 %% Some things to note:
 %%
-%% 1. All precoloured registers are assumed to contain bottom. We can not
+%% 1. All precoloured registers are assumed to contain bottom. We cannot
 %%    do anything with them since they are not in SSA-form. This might be
 %%    possible to resolve in some way, but we decided to not go there.
 %%
-%% 2. const_labels are assumed to be bottom, we can not find the address
+%% 2. const_labels are assumed to be bottom, we cannot find the address
 %%    in any nice way (that I know of, maybe someone can help ?). I
 %%    suppose they don't get a value until linking (or some step that
 %%    resembles it). They are only affecting bignums and floats (at least
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ visit_multimove(Inst, Env) ->
 %% Procedure : visit_call/2
 %% Purpose   : execute a call-instruction. All calls return bottom. We make 
 %%             this assumption since the icode-leel have taken care of BIF's
-%%             and we belive that we are left with the things that can not be
+%%             and we belive that we are left with the things that cannot be
 %%             done att compile time.
 %% Arguments : Inst - The instruction
 %%             Env  - The environment