aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/test_server/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Andersson <[email protected]>2015-03-06 12:13:55 +0100
committerPeter Andersson <[email protected]>2015-03-06 12:13:55 +0100
commite6d39e161f14f5d9a4dc9c44ee1f31b47343567a (patch)
tree48bb13703a3976f4b035981375a929b08ecbe5d8 /lib/test_server/src
parente725cd9385f269b501ebc3ca31999ac69706b535 (diff)
parenteb8b95db65b701ceed13d34350fe2f635d7d9eb5 (diff)
downloadotp-e6d39e161f14f5d9a4dc9c44ee1f31b47343567a.tar.gz
otp-e6d39e161f14f5d9a4dc9c44ee1f31b47343567a.tar.bz2
otp-e6d39e161f14f5d9a4dc9c44ee1f31b47343567a.zip
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/peppe/common_test/inconsistent_return_value' into maint
* origin/peppe/common_test/inconsistent_return_value: Add tests Make it possible to skip test case by returning skipped tag OTP-12359
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/test_server/src')
-rw-r--r--lib/test_server/src/test_server.erl90
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/lib/test_server/src/test_server.erl b/lib/test_server/src/test_server.erl
index 9192a76a17..f1592d9442 100644
--- a/lib/test_server/src/test_server.erl
+++ b/lib/test_server/src/test_server.erl
@@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ cover_compile(CoverInfo=#cover{app=App,excl=all,incl=Include,cross=Cross}) ->
io:fwrite("done\n\n",[]),
{ok,CoverInfo#cover{mods=Include}}
end;
-cover_compile(CoverInfo=#cover{app=App,excl=Exclude,incl=Include,cross=Cross}) ->
+cover_compile(CoverInfo=#cover{app=App,excl=Exclude,
+ incl=Include,cross=Cross}) ->
CrossMods = lists:flatmap(fun({_,M}) -> M end,Cross),
case code:lib_dir(App) of
{error,bad_name} ->
@@ -779,7 +780,9 @@ do_call_end_conf(Starter,Mod,Func,Data,Conf,TVal) ->
EndConfApply =
fun() ->
timetrap(TVal),
- case catch apply(Mod,end_per_testcase,[Func,Conf]) of
+ case catch apply(Mod,
+ end_per_testcase,
+ [Func,Conf]) of
{'EXIT',Why} ->
timer:sleep(1),
group_leader() ! {printout,12,
@@ -817,7 +820,9 @@ spawn_fw_call(Mod,{init_per_testcase,Func},CurrConf,Pid,
Skip = {skip,{failed,{Mod,init_per_testcase,Why}}},
%% if init_per_testcase fails, the test case
%% should be skipped
- case catch do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func, {Pid,Skip,[CurrConf]}, Why) of
+ case catch do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func,
+ {Pid,Skip,[CurrConf]},
+ Why) of
{'EXIT',FwEndTCErr} ->
exit({fw_notify_done,end_tc,FwEndTCErr});
_ ->
@@ -984,12 +989,15 @@ run_test_case_eval(Mod, Func, Args0, Name, Ref, RunInit,
NewResult = do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func, {{error,Reason},[Conf]},
{fail,Reason}),
{{0,NewResult},Where,[]};
- Skip = {skip,_Reason} ->
- NewResult = do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func, {Skip,Args0}, Skip),
+ Skip = {SkipType,_Reason} when SkipType == skip;
+ SkipType == skipped ->
+ NewResult = do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func,
+ {Skip,Args0}, Skip),
{{0,NewResult},Where,[]};
AutoSkip = {auto_skip,_Reason} ->
%% special case where a conf case "pretends" to be skipped
- NewResult = do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func, {AutoSkip,Args0}, AutoSkip),
+ NewResult =
+ do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func, {AutoSkip,Args0}, AutoSkip),
{{0,NewResult},Where,[]}
end,
exit({Ref,Time,Value,Loc,Opts}).
@@ -1000,10 +1008,12 @@ run_test_case_eval1(Mod, Func, Args, Name, RunInit, TCCallback) ->
set_tc_state(init_per_testcase, hd(Args)),
ensure_timetrap(Args),
case init_per_testcase(Mod, Func, Args) of
- Skip = {skip,Reason} ->
+ Skip = {SkipType,Reason} when SkipType == skip;
+ SkipType == skipped ->
Line = get_loc(),
Conf = [{tc_status,{skipped,Reason}}|hd(Args)],
- NewRes = do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func, {Skip,[Conf]}, Skip),
+ NewRes = do_end_tc_call(Mod,Func,
+ {Skip,[Conf]}, Skip),
{{0,NewRes},Line,[]};
{skip_and_save,Reason,SaveCfg} ->
Line = get_loc(),
@@ -1021,11 +1031,12 @@ run_test_case_eval1(Mod, Func, Args, Name, RunInit, TCCallback) ->
{{0,NewRes},[{Mod,Func}],[]};
{ok,NewConf} ->
%% call user callback function if defined
- NewConf1 = user_callback(TCCallback, Mod, Func, init, NewConf),
+ NewConf1 =
+ user_callback(TCCallback, Mod, Func, init, NewConf),
%% save current state in controller loop
set_tc_state(tc, NewConf1),
%% execute the test case
- {{T,Return},Loc} = {ts_tc(Mod, Func, [NewConf1]),get_loc()},
+ {{T,Return},Loc} = {ts_tc(Mod,Func,[NewConf1]), get_loc()},
{EndConf,TSReturn,FWReturn} =
case Return of
{E,TCError} when E=='EXIT' ; E==failed ->
@@ -1041,30 +1052,39 @@ run_test_case_eval1(Mod, Func, Args, Name, RunInit, TCCallback) ->
{[{tc_status,{skipped,Why}},
{save_config,SaveCfg}|NewConf1],
Skip,Skip};
- {skip,Why} ->
- {[{tc_status,{skipped,Why}}|NewConf1],Return,Return};
+ {SkipType,Why} when SkipType == skip;
+ SkipType == skipped ->
+ {[{tc_status,{skipped,Why}}|NewConf1],Return,
+ Return};
_ ->
{[{tc_status,ok}|NewConf1],Return,ok}
end,
%% call user callback function if defined
- EndConf1 = user_callback(TCCallback, Mod, Func, 'end', EndConf),
+ EndConf1 =
+ user_callback(TCCallback, Mod, Func, 'end', EndConf),
%% update current state in controller loop
{FWReturn1,TSReturn1,EndConf2} =
case end_per_testcase(Mod, Func, EndConf1) of
SaveCfg1={save_config,_} ->
- {FWReturn,TSReturn,[SaveCfg1|lists:keydelete(save_config,1,
- EndConf1)]};
+ {FWReturn,TSReturn,
+ [SaveCfg1|lists:keydelete(save_config,1,
+ EndConf1)]};
{fail,ReasonToFail} ->
%% user has failed the testcase
- fw_error_notify(Mod, Func, EndConf1, ReasonToFail),
- {{error,ReasonToFail},{failed,ReasonToFail},EndConf1};
- {failed,{_,end_per_testcase,_}} = Failure when FWReturn == ok ->
+ fw_error_notify(Mod, Func, EndConf1,
+ ReasonToFail),
+ {{error,ReasonToFail},
+ {failed,ReasonToFail},
+ EndConf1};
+ {failed,{_,end_per_testcase,_}} = Failure when
+ FWReturn == ok ->
%% unexpected termination in end_per_testcase
%% report this as the result to the framework
{Failure,TSReturn,EndConf1};
_ ->
- %% test case result should be reported to framework
- %% no matter the status of end_per_testcase
+ %% test case result should be reported to
+ %% framework no matter the status of
+ %% end_per_testcase
{FWReturn,TSReturn,EndConf1}
end,
%% clear current state in controller loop
@@ -1131,7 +1151,8 @@ process_return_val([Return], M,F,A, Loc, Final) when is_list(Return) ->
ReturnTags = [skip,skip_and_save,save_config,comment,return_group_result],
%% check if all elements in the list are valid end conf return value tuples
case lists:all(fun(Val) when is_tuple(Val) ->
- lists:any(fun(T) -> T == element(1, Val) end, ReturnTags);
+ lists:any(fun(T) -> T == element(1, Val) end,
+ ReturnTags);
(ok) ->
true;
(_) ->
@@ -1165,14 +1186,19 @@ process_return_val1([Failed={E,TCError}|_], M,F,A=[Args], Loc, _, SaveOpts)
NewReturn ->
{NewReturn,SaveOpts}
end;
-process_return_val1([SaveCfg={save_config,_}|Opts], M,F,[Args], Loc, Final, SaveOpts) ->
+process_return_val1([SaveCfg={save_config,_}|Opts], M,F,[Args],
+ Loc, Final, SaveOpts) ->
process_return_val1(Opts, M,F,[[SaveCfg|Args]], Loc, Final, SaveOpts);
-process_return_val1([{skip_and_save,Why,SaveCfg}|Opts], M,F,[Args], Loc, _, SaveOpts) ->
- process_return_val1(Opts, M,F,[[{save_config,SaveCfg}|Args]], Loc, {skip,Why}, SaveOpts);
-process_return_val1([GR={return_group_result,_}|Opts], M,F,A, Loc, Final, SaveOpts) ->
+process_return_val1([{skip_and_save,Why,SaveCfg}|Opts], M,F,[Args],
+ Loc, _, SaveOpts) ->
+ process_return_val1(Opts, M,F,[[{save_config,SaveCfg}|Args]],
+ Loc, {skip,Why}, SaveOpts);
+process_return_val1([GR={return_group_result,_}|Opts], M,F,A,
+ Loc, Final, SaveOpts) ->
process_return_val1(Opts, M,F,A, Loc, Final, [GR|SaveOpts]);
-process_return_val1([RetVal={Tag,_}|Opts], M,F,A, Loc, _, SaveOpts) when Tag==skip;
- Tag==comment ->
+process_return_val1([RetVal={Tag,_}|Opts], M,F,A,
+ Loc, _, SaveOpts) when Tag==skip;
+ Tag==comment ->
process_return_val1(Opts, M,F,A, Loc, RetVal, SaveOpts);
process_return_val1([_|Opts], M,F,A, Loc, Final, SaveOpts) ->
process_return_val1(Opts, M,F,A, Loc, Final, SaveOpts);
@@ -1186,7 +1212,8 @@ process_return_val1([], M,F,A, _Loc, Final, SaveOpts) ->
user_callback(undefined, _, _, _, Args) ->
Args;
-user_callback({CBMod,CBFunc}, Mod, Func, InitOrEnd, [Args]) when is_list(Args) ->
+user_callback({CBMod,CBFunc}, Mod, Func, InitOrEnd,
+ [Args]) when is_list(Args) ->
case catch apply(CBMod, CBFunc, [InitOrEnd,Mod,Func,Args]) of
Args1 when is_list(Args1) ->
[Args1];
@@ -1778,7 +1805,8 @@ timetrap(Timeout0, TimeToReport0, TCPid, MultAndScale = {Multiplier,Scale}) ->
put(test_server_timetraps,[{Handle,TCPid,{TimeToReport,Scale}}]);
List ->
List1 = lists:delete({infinity,TCPid,{infinity,false}}, List),
- put(test_server_timetraps,[{Handle,TCPid,{TimeToReport,Scale}}|List1])
+ put(test_server_timetraps,[{Handle,TCPid,
+ {TimeToReport,Scale}}|List1])
end,
Handle.
@@ -1837,7 +1865,9 @@ time_ms(Ms, _, _) when is_integer(Ms) -> Ms;
time_ms(infinity, _, _) -> infinity;
time_ms(Fun, TCPid, MultAndScale) when is_function(Fun) ->
time_ms_apply(Fun, TCPid, MultAndScale);
-time_ms({M,F,A}=MFA, TCPid, MultAndScale) when is_atom(M), is_atom(F), is_list(A) ->
+time_ms({M,F,A}=MFA, TCPid, MultAndScale) when is_atom(M),
+ is_atom(F),
+ is_list(A) ->
time_ms_apply(MFA, TCPid, MultAndScale);
time_ms(Other, _, _) -> exit({invalid_time_format,Other}).